/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2018/10/18/#ubuntu-release.txt

-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-1.10 [i386] (trusty-proposed/universe) [1.10.4-2ubuntu1~14.04.1] (no packageset)00:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu MATE Desktop amd64 [Cosmic Final] has been marked as ready00:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-1.10 [amd64] (trusty-proposed) [1.10.4-2ubuntu1~14.04.1]00:59
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-1.10 [armhf] (trusty-proposed) [1.10.4-2ubuntu1~14.04.1]00:59
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-1.10 [ppc64el] (trusty-proposed) [1.10.4-2ubuntu1~14.04.1]00:59
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-1.10 [arm64] (trusty-proposed) [1.10.4-2ubuntu1~14.04.1]00:59
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-1.10 [i386] (trusty-proposed) [1.10.4-2ubuntu1~14.04.1]01:00
jbichaevery 30 minutes, I'm getting an email telling me that brotli xenial-security 0.3.0+dfsg-2ubuntu1 is being rejected because it is older than 1.0.3-1ubuntu1~16.04.101:13
jbichamaybe the part about the 1.0.3 version being in main and the security update being in universe is part of the problem?01:13
jbichaI think we will ultimately need 1.0.3 in -security too so maybe I should ask security to rebuild it there; maybe it will fix this01:14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: brotli (xenial-security/main) [1.0.3-1ubuntu1~16.04.1 => 0.3.0+dfsg-2ubuntu1] (no packageset) (sync)01:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected brotli [sync] (xenial-security) [0.3.0+dfsg-2ubuntu1]01:44
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cargo (cosmic-proposed/universe) [0.29.0-1ubuntu1 => 0.30.0-1~exp1ubuntu1] (no packageset)02:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rustc (cosmic-proposed/universe) [1.28.0+dfsg1+llvm-0ubuntu2 => 1.29.2+dfsg1+llvm-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)02:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cargo [source] (cosmic-proposed) [0.30.0-1~exp1ubuntu1]02:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rustc [source] (cosmic-proposed) [1.29.2+dfsg1+llvm-0ubuntu1]02:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rustc (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.25.0+dfsg1+llvm-0ubuntu1 => 1.29.2+dfsg1+llvm-0ubuntu1~18.04.1] (no packageset)02:45
mwhudsonoops02:46
mwhudsonthat wasn't intended for the distro02:46
cyphermoxmwhudson: I don't know if there's anyone around just yet who can reject things02:57
mwhudsonwell the changelog doesn't mention a bug etc so i'm sure it will get rejected anyway :)02:58
* mwhudson off to collect kiddo, back online later02:58
erasurecodeodd question. What servers are involved in building Ubuntu ISOs? fedora has koji and atomic-reactor, arch has archiso, coreos-assembler for coreos, catalyst for gentoo... I hear it's somehow a cron job or within launchpad itself?04:03
cyphermoxmostly launchpad04:10
cyphermoxlike for the other distros, there are some other servers that do some assembly of the pieces later04:11
cyphermoxand then everything shows up for you on cdimage.ubuntu.com (or release.ubuntu.com when it will be released)04:12
cyphermoxerasurecode: right now I suggest you help testing the images (see iso.qa.ubuntu.com)04:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rustc [s390x] (cosmic-proposed/universe) [1.29.2+dfsg1+llvm-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)04:14
erasurecodeIts for a project, not really for helping out with QA / RelEng (this semester, anyway). I mostly just admire at a distance...04:31
cyphermoxok04:36
cyphermoxwell, the short answer is that launchpad does most of the heavy lifting, and you have this: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReleaseTeam/CDImageSetup04:38
cyphermoxit should get you some more idea how the servers are set up to do the rest of the assembly and publishing process.04:39
erasurecodeawesome! I knew it had something to do with it04:40
cyphermoxwhat kind of project?04:40
erasurecoderemastersys / ansible / drone-ci / distro releng - I could do it the relinux/remastersys way, but I figured it would be nice to know how all the distros build ISOs officially.04:46
cyphermoxok04:47
cyphermoxwell, the scripts in ubuntu-cdimage are kind of complicated04:47
cyphermoxit's not rocket surgery, but if you can avoid it... essentially it's a lot of different cases for various flavours, and what needs to be put on the image where.04:48
erasurecodeI figured all of it would be. I still need to check on how smaller distros build their stuff, but for the most part, I hope this works in all cases to just adapt the major releng pipelines.04:49
erasurecodeI think the problem is mostly about creating an ISO with software they were supposed to agree to a TOS for, like google-chrome or wifi drivers, or a non-free firefox extension. But, if the machine is running a build from scratch, I can have finer-grained control over ensuring no TOS-required software is allowed on a public image, and if they want Chrome pre-installed on an ISO, only they have access to it.04:51
erasurecodecyphermox: thank you for the help!04:54
cyphermoxI recall once seeing some software project that was making all this easy for you to build images very close to what we build, but I don't remember the name05:00
erasurecodeI'll research into it again in a month or two, after trying it a bit more in depth. Good luck on Cosmic! ttyl05:02
EickmeyerHey everyone! I'm zsyncing the latest Studio image, but alas, it's late, I'm tired, and a certain little boy has to be at the bus stop tomorrow morning, so I'll start running some test cases and ticking some checkboxes soon after I wake up and the coffee kicks-in. I should be awake around 7am US Pacific, and conscious sometime after that.05:15
valorierelease team, do you know anything about the Cosmic mascot?06:45
valorieI've seen no emails and it seems rather late06:45
valorieacheronuk said that it's usually in the ubuntu slideshow but missing from there as well?06:46
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: eclipselink (cosmic-proposed/universe) [2.6.5-3 => 2.6.5-4] (no packageset) (sync)06:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openjpa (cosmic-proposed/universe) [2.4.2-5 => 2.4.2-6] (no packageset) (sync)06:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libjdo-api-java (cosmic-proposed/universe) [3.1-2 => 3.1-3] (no packageset) (sync)06:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libquartz-java (cosmic-proposed/universe) [1:1.8.6-5 => 1:1.8.6-6] (no packageset) (sync)06:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted eclipselink [sync] (cosmic-proposed) [2.6.5-4]06:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libquartz-java [sync] (cosmic-proposed) [1:1.8.6-6]06:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: jaxrs-api (cosmic-proposed/universe) [2.1.2-1 => 2.1.2-2] (no packageset) (sync)06:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libjdo-api-java [sync] (cosmic-proposed) [3.1-3]06:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sitemesh (cosmic-proposed/universe) [2.4.1+dfsg-6 => 2.4.1+dfsg-7] (no packageset) (sync)06:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openjpa [sync] (cosmic-proposed) [2.4.2-6]06:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted jaxrs-api [sync] (cosmic-proposed) [2.1.2-2]06:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sitemesh [sync] (cosmic-proposed) [2.4.1+dfsg-7]06:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Budgie Desktop amd64 [Cosmic Final] has been marked as ready07:07
johnyfirehello07:20
johnyfiregot a question, what time UTC does 18.10 come online?07:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: vcr.py (cosmic-proposed/universe) [2.0.1-1ubuntu2 => 2.0.1-2] (no packageset) (sync)07:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted vcr.py [sync] (cosmic-proposed) [2.0.1-2]07:30
johnyfireanyone ?07:44
LocutusOfBorgjohnyfire, when its ready07:45
LocutusOfBorgjoin #ubuntu-release-party07:45
johnyfirethanks was just asking, because i got a Ryzen laptop and for the last month I can't use it at all , a friend of mine told me that only latest ubuntu will work with it, so iI just sit there and watch it powered off07:46
mwhudsonubuntu release party is exactly the right place for that sort of thing07:47
johnyfirethank you both and sorry for asking07:47
mwhudsonnp07:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dogtag-pki (cosmic-proposed/universe) [10.6.6-2 => 10.6.7-1] (no packageset) (sync)07:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: elfutils (cosmic-proposed/main) [0.170-0.5 => 0.170-0.5ubuntu1] (core)07:48
tjaaltonjohnyfire: why don't you just try the daily installer.. it'll hardly change if at all before the release07:48
mwhudson^ that elfutils upload might be better as an early SRU but well it's there07:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dogtag-pki [sync] (cosmic-proposed) [10.6.7-1]07:49
johnyfiretjaalton: so I will use the daily installer and it wont need wipe to get the final release ?07:49
tjaaltonno07:50
LocutusOfBorgor wait 12h, but I know it is an hard thing to do when ubuntu is getting released :)07:51
johnyfireI will wait then, it'll take some time to remove the dust for the laptop, either way. Hope it will work... thanks again you are very kind people07:52
LocutusOfBorgdamn, java is broken :/07:56
LocutusOfBorgnice way to break cosmic07:57
LocutusOfBorg(wsimport tool has disappeared, sigh)07:58
LocutusOfBorgwhy did we switch to openjdk11 one week before release, breaking stuff?08:58
seb128can we get the gnome-software uploads from the queue in as 0 day SRU?08:58
seb128the one in the release pocket is screwed on i386, that has low number of users nowadays but would still be nice to have fixed in a SRU this week09:01
dokobecause 10 won't be supported anymore09:03
LocutusOfBorgdoko, and breaking a ton of packages one week ahead is supported?09:05
LocutusOfBorgvbox is no way buildable09:05
LocutusOfBorgand lots of more java tools09:05
LocutusOfBorgI'm already in touch with oracle, not sure if they will give some help or have hints09:05
LocutusOfBorgthe idea was to package corba and other tools separately, and *after* switch to 1109:06
LocutusOfBorgI don't even see an FFE for it :/09:06
dokothere is, see the ubuntu-release ML09:06
didrocksgoing to try bug #1798554 on bionic if I can reproduce. I still marked the test as passing as cosmic isn't a big OEM target and OEM don't really use ubiquity step 2 but their own tool for creating users09:20
ubot5bug 1798554 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "OEM setup: user language selection not taken into account" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/179855409:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: guice (cosmic-proposed/universe) [4.2-3 => 4.2.1-1] (no packageset) (sync)09:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: jcodings (cosmic-proposed/universe) [1.0.40-3 => 1.0.41-1] (no packageset) (sync)09:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: jgit (cosmic-proposed/universe) [3.7.1-5 => 3.7.1-6] (no packageset) (sync)09:23
LocutusOfBorgI don't see virtualbox on the list of the "affected packages", so probably who did craft the list did a mistake?09:26
didrocks(reproduced the OEM issue on bionic as well)09:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-software [source] (cosmic-proposed) [3.30.2-0ubuntu6]09:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-software [source] (cosmic-proposed) [3.30.2-0ubuntu7]09:29
infinitydidrocks: Please do point out in the bug if it's not a regression from bionic.09:31
infinitydidrocks: Also, was that bionic.1 or bionic.0 you tested?09:31
didrocksinfinity: currently updating it once launchpad doesn't timeout for me09:31
didrocksinfinity: .109:31
didrockshum, someone modified the title…09:32
infinitydidrocks: A bionic.0 (without network, so nothing upgrades under you) might be an interesting data point too.09:32
didrocksinfinity: ah, good idea, could try09:32
infinitydidrocks: Literally that user's only action in launchpad ever is to change your bug title to the single word "german".  WHAT DOES IT MEAN.09:33
didrocksinfinity: interesting behavior, indeed :p09:33
xnoxooooh cyphermox new upload is nice, my laptop got mok for the first time ever.09:48
didrocksinfinity: confirmed, .0 without network -> still the same (unsure it even worked one day TBH)10:02
jibelsil2100, Laney bug 179856210:04
ubot5bug 1798562 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "After a side by side installation, resized filesystem is corrupted" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/179856210:04
Laneyo m g10:04
jibelinfinity, ^10:07
LaneyOct 18 05:43:29 u kernel: EXT4-fs error (device sda4): ext4_find_extent:909: inode #27: comm Xorg: pblk 9727 bad header/extent: extent tree corrupted - magic f30a, entries 34, max 340(340), depth 0(0)10:10
Laney& Oct 18 05:43:20 u systemd-fsck[475]: /dev/sda4: clean, 260/5857280 files, 644812/23400762 blocks10:11
acheronukeek10:32
guivercLaney, lp #1798236 - leafpad, gedit, xscorch installed all worked, but it didn't return me to prompt as expected  (running from term; i eventually ^C to get prompt)10:56
ubot5Launchpad bug 1798236 in gnome-software (Ubuntu Cosmic) "gnome-software crashes with assertion failure Gs:ERROR:../lib/gs-plugin-loader.c:1698:gs_plugin_loader_pending_apps_add: assertion failed: (gs_app_list_length (list) > 0)" [High,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/179823610:56
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: figtree (cosmic-proposed/universe) [1.4.3+dfsg-5 => 1.4.3+dfsg-6ubuntu1] (no packageset)11:09
acheronukConfirmed LP: #1798562 at least in virtualbox11:33
ubot5Launchpad bug 1798562 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "After a side by side installation, resized filesystem is corrupted" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/179856211:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: freeipa (cosmic-proposed/universe) [4.7.1-1 => 4.7.1-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)11:34
sil2100grrrr11:41
apwLaney: is that an offline resize?11:53
Laneyapw: the install alongside option from the installer11:53
Laneyso... yes, I assume so11:53
apwso then and e2resize bug?11:53
apwwith newer roots?11:54
LaneyI tried with e2fsprogs from bionic and it still happened11:54
Laneyin both the first & second installs11:54
Laneythat's a valid test right?11:54
apwis there any obvious options differences for root?11:54
Laneyxnox is giving me a cosmic with bionic kernel11:55
Laneysoon™11:55
apwnot if the bug is a newer ext4 feature in cosmic not supported by e2resize11:55
apwwe could do with like a superblock dump from a root from a bionic install and from a cosmic install11:56
apwto see if anything new is on11:56
Laneylike dumpe2fs?11:57
apwLaney: yes that sort of thing12:01
apwLaney: particularly the Filsystem features12:02
apwbut it would be good to confirm 100% is offline, as that narrows search to tools12:04
Laneyapw: think jibel's got that available12:04
Laney12:07
jibelapw, how do you confirm it's ofline?12:09
jibeloffline12:09
TJ-jibel: not mounted12:10
jibelk12:11
apwjibel, oh i am saying that someone who knows how casper does it confirm its an offline resize12:11
apwcaper/ubiquity/thign that does it12:13
sforsheeapw: it looks like ext4 does not support online shrinking so it would have to be offline12:23
apwsforshee, then that is something12:24
apwsforshee, i see we have a lot of work on detecting corruption post v4.1512:24
* apw muses whether checksums are enabled12:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: backuppc (xenial-proposed/main) [3.3.1-2ubuntu3.3 => 3.3.1-2ubuntu3.4] (core)12:39
juliankum, Does any file system support online shrinking?12:49
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted figtree [source] (cosmic-proposed) [1.4.3+dfsg-6ubuntu1]12:49
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted guice [sync] (cosmic-proposed) [4.2.1-1]12:49
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted jgit [sync] (cosmic-proposed) [3.7.1-6]12:49
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted freeipa [source] (cosmic-proposed) [4.7.1-2ubuntu1]12:49
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted jcodings [sync] (cosmic-proposed) [1.0.41-1]12:49
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected elfutils [source] (cosmic-proposed) [0.170-0.5ubuntu1]12:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [s390x] (cosmic-proposed) [1.29.2+dfsg1+llvm-0ubuntu1]12:51
ahasenackhi, can someone please reject my backuppc upload to xenial-proposed? I want to enhance the dep8 test a bit, make it more resilient13:03
apwjibel, i think you were getting the filesystem info dumps from the filesystems ?13:08
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected backuppc [source] (xenial-proposed) [3.3.1-2ubuntu3.4]14:05
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Studio DVD amd64 [Cosmic Final] has been marked as ready14:08
ahasenackthanks!14:19
bdmurrayahasenack: no problem, those are easy!14:20
ahasenackbdmurray: can I keep the same version/release numbers?14:20
jibelapw, yes sorry bionic http://paste.ubuntu.com/p/4G5GpwzbBy/  cosmic http://paste.ubuntu.com/p/zSCz23Y4n3/14:22
bdmurrayahasenack: yes, as they didn't make it into -proposed14:23
ahasenackthanks14:24
apwxnox, do we have logs for the bionic kernel in cosmic kernel test ?15:23
apw... in cosmic userspace ...15:24
xnoxapw, hey15:35
xnoxapw, i have something.... do you want installer logs or runtime/boot stuff?15:35
* xnox ponders what's the old bug number15:35
cascardoext4 failures on the kernel15:35
xnoxack15:35
vorlonbdmurray: do you know if there's a bug open about the u-r-u message being confusing when you are in Prompt=lts mode and you run do-release-upgrade -d? ("Upgrades to the development release are only available from the latest supported release")15:39
xnoxcascardo, apw - no i don't have those logs =/ should have booted qemu with dumping kernel/console to a log file15:40
bdmurrayvorlon: I think there is15:40
bdmurrayvorlon: I'm not finding it though15:42
vorlonbdmurray: I see LP: #1795024, but that's complaining about the effect of the prompt, whereas I'm just complaining about the inaccurate message15:42
ubot5Launchpad bug 1795024 in ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) "release-upgrades Prompt to anything other than normal prevents beta upgrades" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/179502415:42
cyphermoxsil2100: jibel: apw: need help with the fs corruption bug?15:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop amd64 [Cosmic Final] has been marked as ready15:46
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot amd64 [Cosmic Final] has been marked as ready15:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot i386 [Cosmic Final] has been marked as ready15:47
apwxnox, ok15:47
sil2100cyphermox: we're trying to find a reliable reproducer, also trying to figure out what could be causing this15:48
sil2100But we're not getting reliable results15:48
vorlonbdmurray: LP: #1798618 filed15:49
ubot5Launchpad bug 1798618 in ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) "confusing error message with 'do-release-upgrade -d' and Prompt=lts" [Medium,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/179861815:49
cyphermoxsil2100: ok, we'll I'll do a setup here15:51
cyphermoxsil2100: where is your core18 build running? I don't have any indication of its status?15:51
didrocksvorlon: I think bdmurray is confusing this with the exact same conversation we had ~1 month ago (I was puzzled as well by the error message). I don't think there was a plan to change it though and so, didn't open a bug IIRC15:51
bdmurraydidrocks: I knew it sounded familiar!15:52
sil2100cyphermox: https://code.launchpad.net/~mvo/+snap/core18/+build/356205 <- here's the snap building, it's ekhm, waiting for now ;/15:52
cyphermoxoh, ok15:52
cyphermoxcrap, I had forgotten to replug the laptop :/15:53
didrocksbdmurray: glad to not be the only one who finded that weird, it's not only my French ;)15:54
acheronukhmmm. queuebot died16:01
acheronukKubuntu marked as ready :)16:01
vorlondidrocks: ok well, the message is incorrect and confusing, so bug filed :)16:03
TJ-sil2100: cyphermox could Bug #1783757 or Bug #1796788 be related to the ext shrink corruption?16:08
ubot5bug 1783757 in e2fsprogs (Ubuntu) "shrinking previous file systems makes them corrupted " [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/178375716:08
ubot5bug 1796788 in e2fsprogs (Ubuntu) "resize2fs: Illegal indirect block found while trying to resize" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/179678816:08
sil2100Laney: 🦒16:08
LaneyxAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH16:09
tsimonq2Who knows where to find stgraber?16:10
tsimonq2I think queuebot is MIA.16:10
tsimonq2It's too quiet. :P16:10
TJ-sil2100: also, with some interesting debug/reproducer methods from only FS metadata courtesy of Ted Tso: Bug #177814016:11
ubot5bug 1778140 in e2fsprogs (Ubuntu) "resize2fs hoses a filesystem on lvm after resizing" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/177814016:11
tsimonq2Laney: 🦒 ❤16:11
Laney😱16:12
vorloninfinity, sil2100: did you have eyes on the linux-oem in cosmic unapproved? bionic-updates currently has a higher version number than cosmic release, looks like this is a sync to get it up-to-date17:40
vorlonby apw17:40
vorlonmethinks I should just accept it17:40
infinityvorlon: apw said he'd be handling it post-release and was just parking it in the queue so he didn't forget.17:43
willcookecongrats all17:43
Eickmeyerinfinity: Just saw the announcement, you called it an LTS.17:43
=== infinity changed the topic of #ubuntu-release to: Released: Bionic 18.04.1, Cosmic 18.10 | Archive: Closed | Cosmic Release Coordination | Please don't upload things during freezes where you shouldn't, or be prepared to apologise to the release team | We accept payment in cash, check or beer | melius malum quod cognoscis.
infinityEickmeyer: Erm.  Where?17:43
Eickmeyerinfinity: Very beginning of the email.17:44
infinityEickmeyer: Hah.  Oops.  Well, that's just the copy on ubuntu-release, I'll re-do it. :P17:44
Eickmeyerinfinity: :D17:44
infinityRight, let's try that again.17:48
tewardinfinity: do you want me to indicate the typo you did on ubuntu-announce too?18:22
teward'cause 18.04 LTS is indicated in the 18.10 announce message that went there too18:23
tewardjust saying.18:23
wordlessinfinity, Oh, so you were the one who has always written the announcement mail!18:32
wordlessI've always wondered who he was :)18:32
vorloncjwatson: do you happen to know if LP: #1798656 is a regression?19:05
ubot5Launchpad bug 1798656 in debconf (Ubuntu) "gnome frontend gives no widget for answering a boolean prompt" [Critical,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/179865619:05
infinityteward: Son of a.  And three of us read that paragraph too.  Well, can't take back the email now.19:44
tsimonq2infinity: Speaking of broken things, RIP queuebot. stgraber seems to have disappeared, wat do?20:06
vorlonsnap refresh --channel=stable stgraber20:10
* tsimonq2 throws a tomato at vorlon 20:10
tsimonq2;)20:10
TJ-tsimonq2: "2018-10-15 15:52:20     stgraber        free: yeah, off Wed, Thu and Fri this week, then in SLC next week"20:16
tsimonq2ack20:18
cjwatsonvorlon: certainly could be, since I rewrote that frontend a fair bit.  would it be possible to get an isolated reproducer?20:37
vorlonsure20:37
cjwatsonthought I'd tested all the question types but maybe I missed something20:39
vorloncjwatson: https://launchpad.net/~vorlon/+archive/ubuntu/debconf-tests/+packages noisy-fake-driver has a boolean and it does not show the bug.  DEBIAN_FRONTEND=Gnome dpkg-reconfigure docker.io also does not reproduce the original bug.  So... hmm.20:41
vorloncould be the bug was only present in the bionic versions of the packages and not in cosmic?  or it could be that a debconf frontend that has been started mid-upgrade was broken?20:42
mwhudsoncongrats all20:44
cjwatsonvorlon: /proc/N/maps of the debconf process might reveal whether it thinks it's gtk2 or gtk320:48
cjwatsonif the bindings weren't there then surely it wouldn't be able to display a window at all ... so probably more subtle than that20:49
vorlonyeah, have to reproduce it again first20:50
vorlonthe window did look like the gtk3 experience as I last recall it20:50
tewardinfinity: just going to say, I have about 50 cups of caffeine in me, it helps me spot stuff.  That, and the 'This is no longer offtopic" announcement on Ask Ubuntu helped me catch it too :P20:50
tewardsince attentionToDetail() is a thing :P20:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nodejs [source] (bionic-proposed) [8.10.0~dfsg-2ubuntu0.4]20:56
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: breeze-gtk (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.12.4-0ubuntu1 => 5.12.7-0ubuntu0.1] (kubuntu)20:56
tsimonq2cat /dev/null > teward21:00
tsimonq2dd if=/dev/null of=/dev/teward21:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nautilus [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:3.26.4-0~ubuntu18.04.2]21:01
valorieteward: doesn't caffeine start leaking from your pores onto the keyboard with ~50 cups in?21:02
cyphermoxvalorie: he can't type, the shakes make it too hard21:13
valorie:-)21:13
cjwatsoneven I draw the line somewhere south of 50 ...21:41
tsimonq2^21:42
vorlonvery small cups21:43
cjwatson(turns out that when you drink coffee at more or less line rate from a pint mug your heart starts thumping really hard)21:44
tsimonq2I could probably line up like 50 shot glasses of coffee and be fine enough with that :)21:44
cjwatsonuh dude21:45
cjwatsonthat's like 2.5 pints at minimum21:45
cjwatson(stupid units.  sorry.)21:45
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oem [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1024.29]21:45
* tsimonq2 converts to American21:45
tsimonq2pfft yeah that's doable21:46
cjwatsonI mean maybe over like four hours21:47
tsimonq2Yeah.21:48
tsimonq2I said it was doable, I didn't say it was *sane* ;)21:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: parted (cosmic-proposed/main) [3.2-21ubuntu1 => 3.2-21ubuntu2] (core)21:54
valoriewhen I can feel the caffeine in my teeth, I know it's time to stop21:56
valoriebecause my teeth def. do not need any revving up21:56
xnoxi used to take pro-plus (caffeine tablets) it was fun, but eventually one does crash.21:57
tsimonq2I stay away from the caffeine tablets, but I guess ymmv :)21:59
=== lyorian is now known as lynorian
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: parted (bionic-proposed/main) [3.2-20 => 3.2-20ubuntu0.1] (core)22:25
xnoxvorlon, infinity - can i start uploading things into dd-series unapproved queue? or no?23:39

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!