=== _delirium is now known as adamretter | ||
lordievader | Good morning | 06:02 |
---|---|---|
MrMojit0 | Morning | 06:07 |
=== coconut__ is now known as coconut_ | ||
=== coconut_ is now known as coconut__ | ||
rbasak | cpaelzer: what exactly _is_ slof? | 10:53 |
cpaelzer | rbasak: slim line open firmware | 10:55 |
cpaelzer | rbasak: all but the bits that are for the s390x roms are in src:slof which builds bin:qemu-slof | 10:56 |
cpaelzer | it is goging more than a year now for Debian to decide if/where to put the s390x bit | 10:57 |
cpaelzer | so far we didn't need them, but the features in said SRU re-use pieces of that | 10:57 |
rbasak | I see. So roms/SLOF in the SRU is exclusively s390x? | 10:57 |
cpaelzer | normally qemu (as upstream delivers) is comprised of qmeu itself and many subprojets for bios | 10:57 |
cpaelzer | due to DFSG a lot is stripped and repackages in Debian/Ubuntu | 10:57 |
cpaelzer | if you'd pick an upstream qemu tarball, then roms/SLOF would be for much more | 10:58 |
cpaelzer | but this much more is part of src:slof package | 10:58 |
cpaelzer | as we use it in qemu until Debian has settled on s390x we use it only for s390x rom building | 10:58 |
cpaelzer | and while we were waiting Debian started a movement to pull more back into src:qemu | 10:59 |
cpaelzer | so over time we might end up building them out of src:qemu, but that is unconfirmed future-brabble | 10:59 |
xnox | well, qemu targall ships pre-compiled binary, and sources to build it. | 10:59 |
cpaelzer | xnox: yep, and historically both were removed | 11:00 |
xnox | this avoids users to need all the cross-compilers, or access to native arch to build slof for e.g. power or e.g. s390x | 11:00 |
xnox | and sources are DFSG free, and used to be split into a separate package. | 11:00 |
cpaelzer | exactly | 11:01 |
xnox | there is no licensing issue; just debian not rebuilding the binary firmware, but we always have. | 11:01 |
cpaelzer | rbasak: there is no need but if you want contect is debian bug 874347 832897 684909 | 11:05 |
ubottu | Debian bug 874347 in qemu "Feed back more Ubuntu and 2.10 changes" [Normal,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/874347 | 11:05 |
cpaelzer | the latter being the most promising having xnox 's changes how he added qemu-system-s390x | 11:05 |
cpaelzer | I did a ping last december, but nothing happened yet | 11:05 |
cpaelzer | interestingly point #1 of xnox list "It drops stripping roms/SLOF" is implemented, but unrelated to this bug | 11:06 |
cpaelzer | since 2.12 it is no more stripped | 11:06 |
cpaelzer | qmeu has 17 git submodules btw | 11:06 |
cpaelzer | rbasak: anyway I guess xnox and I answered more than you needed - are you good for now? | 11:07 |
rbasak | I'm trying to mostly understand from the code base rather than asking questions. I'll probably have more shortly, thanks. | 11:09 |
erle- | I have a website with html files in a dir delivered by apache2 | 11:40 |
erle- | I want to add a reverse proxy for a single path, redrecting to a different HTTP serve rin my local network | 11:41 |
erle- | can I just add that to the same <VHost> block? | 11:41 |
erle- | I did it, but it only gets 404 | 11:41 |
erle- | curl from the host works | 11:42 |
erle- | it is a different message than a local folder that is not existing | 11:42 |
erle- | apache restart etc works, the config file is correct, modules proxy and proxy_http are loaded | 11:42 |
plm | Hi all | 11:44 |
erle- | tl;dr: / should just be local html root, but /x should be proxied | 11:45 |
ahasenack | cyphermox: the ppc64el tests you have been doing with the server image, was that on real hardware or a vm? | 14:02 |
ahasenack | I'm asking because of the multipath cases you hit | 14:03 |
ahasenack | I did the tests in a simple vm on power8 | 14:03 |
ahasenack | but no multipath setup | 14:03 |
cyphermox | VM | 14:10 |
cyphermox | I don't have hardware to steal to do the testing on | 14:10 |
cyphermox | but for most things, VMs are sufficient | 14:11 |
cyphermox | that said, the bugs were more multipath related than because it's ppc64el | 14:11 |
ahasenack | cyphermox: how did you enable multipath on a vm? | 14:13 |
cyphermox | it's something you can do in qemu, I have some scripts up, hold on | 14:17 |
cpaelzer | ahasenack: cyphermox: I have ran the multipath cases | 14:17 |
cpaelzer | did not re-trigger the bug that was seen | 14:17 |
cyphermox | ahasenack: lp:~cyphermox/+junk/vm | 14:21 |
cyphermox | it works on ppc64el, probably works on amd64 too. | 14:21 |
ahasenack | thx | 14:22 |
cyphermox | it's a collection of scripts I used to use to spin up VMs for some scenarios that were impractical to do in libvirt | 14:22 |
cyphermox | for the most part, now I just use libvirt instead, there multipath is a bit painful but you can still do it | 14:23 |
ahasenack | yeah, I wanted to check which devices were involved | 14:23 |
cyphermox | any device would do | 14:23 |
ahasenack | I triaged a multipath bug many months ago and had no idea how to setup a vm with anything like it | 14:23 |
cyphermox | the trick is to set serial on the drives | 14:23 |
ahasenack | serial number? | 14:23 |
cyphermox | yup | 14:23 |
ahasenack | ah, I've been hit by that particularity before | 14:23 |
cyphermox | if two drives have the same serial, they are multipath. | 14:23 |
ahasenack | no serial number messes up the /dev/disk/by-* links | 14:23 |
cyphermox | bah | 14:24 |
ahasenack | same serial, nice trick | 14:24 |
cyphermox | that seems to work okay, I generally don't set serial at all | 14:24 |
ahasenack | cyphermox: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/partman-auto/+bug/1798436 looks fixed in today's .2 image | 14:59 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 1798436 in partman-auto (Ubuntu) "ppc64el lvm guided install: doesn't create /boot, and complains about it" [High,Triaged] | 14:59 |
ahasenack | is that expected, or just a happy accident? | 14:59 |
=== admcleod is now known as admcleod_away | ||
cyphermox | I don't know | 15:23 |
cyphermox | I noticed it was working too | 15:23 |
cyphermox | I went to look at partman-auto | 15:23 |
ahasenack | cyphermox: I'll close it then | 15:26 |
cyphermox | ta | 15:28 |
kinghat | ran update and upgrade on my server and now i get this when running update: http://paste.debian.net/hidden/22c3db9e/ | 17:25 |
kinghat | this is the entirety of the update: http://paste.debian.net/hidden/8e933ba2/ | 17:27 |
kinghat | oh. looks like amd repo or something like that? | 17:29 |
kinghat | im actually just going to run `do-release-upgrade` before i fix that. | 17:31 |
shubjero | kinghat: yeah the key for that repo appears to be invalid/expired | 17:38 |
tomreyn | the missing apt signing key is that of repo.radeon.com, not the local apt repo | 17:39 |
kinghat | not sure what happened to it. unless it changed or something? everything was running fine when i shut the server off a few months ago. | 17:40 |
shubjero | kinghat: maybe try wget -qO - http://repo.radeon.com/rocm/apt/debian/rocm.gpg.key | sudo apt-key add - | 17:46 |
kinghat | im still waiting for it to upgrade release to 18.04.1 | 17:47 |
tomreyn | installing an apt signing key acquired through an insecure transport without manual verification would be a bad idea. | 17:48 |
tomreyn | Unfortunately they failed to publish the gpg key fingerprint at https://rocm.github.io/ROCmInstall.html#ubuntu-support---installing-from-a-debian-repository - but at least a sha1sum is there. but then this is only provided via github.io's HTTPS either, no way to verify it through a trusted channel, so it's got to be trust on first use. | 17:51 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!