/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2018/10/18/#ubuntu-server.txt

=== _delirium is now known as adamretter
lordievaderGood morning06:02
MrMojit0Morning06:07
=== coconut__ is now known as coconut_
=== coconut_ is now known as coconut__
rbasakcpaelzer: what exactly _is_ slof?10:53
cpaelzerrbasak: slim line open firmware10:55
cpaelzerrbasak: all but the bits that are for the s390x roms are in src:slof which builds bin:qemu-slof10:56
cpaelzerit is goging more than a year now for Debian to decide if/where to put the s390x bit10:57
cpaelzerso far we didn't need them, but the features in said SRU re-use pieces of that10:57
rbasakI see. So roms/SLOF in the SRU is exclusively s390x?10:57
cpaelzernormally qemu (as upstream delivers) is comprised of qmeu itself and many subprojets for bios10:57
cpaelzerdue to DFSG a lot is stripped and repackages in Debian/Ubuntu10:57
cpaelzerif you'd pick an upstream qemu tarball, then roms/SLOF would be for much more10:58
cpaelzerbut this much more is part of src:slof package10:58
cpaelzeras we use it in qemu until Debian has settled on s390x we use it only for s390x rom building10:58
cpaelzerand while we were waiting Debian started a movement to pull more back into src:qemu10:59
cpaelzerso over time we might end up building them out of src:qemu, but that is unconfirmed future-brabble10:59
xnoxwell, qemu targall ships pre-compiled binary, and sources to build it.10:59
cpaelzerxnox: yep, and historically both were removed11:00
xnoxthis avoids users to need all the cross-compilers, or access to native arch to build slof for e.g. power or e.g. s390x11:00
xnoxand sources are DFSG free, and used to be split into a separate package.11:00
cpaelzerexactly11:01
xnoxthere is no licensing issue; just debian not rebuilding the binary firmware, but we always have.11:01
cpaelzerrbasak: there is no need but if you want contect is debian bug 874347 832897 68490911:05
ubottuDebian bug 874347 in qemu "Feed back more Ubuntu and 2.10 changes" [Normal,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/87434711:05
cpaelzerthe latter being the most promising having xnox 's changes how he added qemu-system-s390x11:05
cpaelzerI did a ping last december, but nothing happened yet11:05
cpaelzerinterestingly point #1 of xnox list "It drops stripping roms/SLOF" is implemented, but unrelated to this bug11:06
cpaelzersince 2.12 it is no more stripped11:06
cpaelzerqmeu has 17 git submodules btw11:06
cpaelzerrbasak: anyway I guess xnox and I answered more than you needed - are you good for now?11:07
rbasakI'm trying to mostly understand from the code base rather than asking questions. I'll probably have more shortly, thanks.11:09
erle-I have a website with html files in a dir delivered by apache211:40
erle-I want to add a reverse proxy for a single path, redrecting to a different HTTP serve rin my local network11:41
erle-can I just add that to the same <VHost> block?11:41
erle-I did it, but it only gets 40411:41
erle-curl from the host works11:42
erle-it is a different message than a local folder that is not existing11:42
erle-apache restart etc works, the config file is correct, modules proxy and proxy_http are loaded11:42
plmHi all11:44
erle-tl;dr: / should just be local html root, but /x should be proxied11:45
ahasenackcyphermox: the ppc64el tests you have been doing with the server image, was that on real hardware or a vm?14:02
ahasenackI'm asking because of the multipath cases you hit14:03
ahasenackI did the tests in a simple vm on power814:03
ahasenackbut no multipath setup14:03
cyphermoxVM14:10
cyphermoxI don't have hardware to steal to do the testing on14:10
cyphermoxbut for most things, VMs are sufficient14:11
cyphermoxthat said, the bugs were more multipath related than because it's ppc64el14:11
ahasenackcyphermox: how did you enable multipath on a vm?14:13
cyphermoxit's something you can do in qemu, I have some scripts up, hold on14:17
cpaelzerahasenack: cyphermox: I have ran the multipath cases14:17
cpaelzerdid not re-trigger the bug that was seen14:17
cyphermoxahasenack: lp:~cyphermox/+junk/vm14:21
cyphermoxit works on ppc64el, probably works on amd64 too.14:21
ahasenackthx14:22
cyphermoxit's a collection of scripts I used to use to spin up VMs for some scenarios that were impractical to do in libvirt14:22
cyphermoxfor the most part, now I just use libvirt instead, there multipath is a bit painful but you can still do it14:23
ahasenackyeah, I wanted to check which devices were involved14:23
cyphermoxany device would do14:23
ahasenackI triaged a multipath bug many months ago and had no idea how to setup a vm with anything like it14:23
cyphermoxthe trick is to set serial on the drives14:23
ahasenackserial number?14:23
cyphermoxyup14:23
ahasenackah, I've been hit by that particularity before14:23
cyphermoxif two drives have the same serial, they are multipath.14:23
ahasenackno serial number messes up the /dev/disk/by-* links14:23
cyphermoxbah14:24
ahasenacksame serial, nice trick14:24
cyphermoxthat seems to work okay, I generally don't set serial at all14:24
ahasenackcyphermox: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/partman-auto/+bug/1798436 looks fixed in today's .2 image14:59
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1798436 in partman-auto (Ubuntu) "ppc64el lvm guided install: doesn't create /boot, and complains about it" [High,Triaged]14:59
ahasenackis that expected, or just a happy accident?14:59
=== admcleod is now known as admcleod_away
cyphermoxI don't know15:23
cyphermoxI noticed it was working too15:23
cyphermoxI went to look at partman-auto15:23
ahasenackcyphermox: I'll close it then15:26
cyphermoxta15:28
kinghatran update and upgrade on my server and now i get this when running update: http://paste.debian.net/hidden/22c3db9e/17:25
kinghatthis is the entirety of the update: http://paste.debian.net/hidden/8e933ba2/17:27
kinghatoh. looks like amd repo or something like that?17:29
kinghatim actually just going to run `do-release-upgrade` before i fix that.17:31
shubjerokinghat: yeah the key for that repo appears to be invalid/expired17:38
tomreynthe missing apt signing key is that of repo.radeon.com, not the local apt repo17:39
kinghatnot sure what happened to it. unless it changed or something? everything was running fine when i shut the server off a few months ago.17:40
shubjerokinghat: maybe try wget -qO - http://repo.radeon.com/rocm/apt/debian/rocm.gpg.key | sudo apt-key add -17:46
kinghatim still waiting for it to upgrade release to 18.04.117:47
tomreyninstalling an apt signing key acquired through an insecure transport without manual verification would be a bad idea.17:48
tomreynUnfortunately they failed to publish the gpg key fingerprint at https://rocm.github.io/ROCmInstall.html#ubuntu-support---installing-from-a-debian-repository - but at least a sha1sum is there. but then this is only provided via github.io's HTTPS either, no way to verify it through a trusted channel, so it's got to be trust on first use.17:51

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!