[04:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fwupd (bionic-proposed/main) [1.0.6-2 => 1.0.9-0ubuntu1] (desktop-core)
[04:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure-edge [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.18.0-1003.3~18.04.1] (no packageset)
[04:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure-edge [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.18.0-1003.3~18.04.1]
[07:12] <sil2100> Laney: hey! If anything, I'm looking into the spamming ADT cloud-worker-maintenance script
[08:04] <Laney> sil2100: didn't see that yet (been avoiding email), but merci!
[08:04] <Laney> good trip back?
[08:15] <sil2100> Laney: yeah, wasn't bad, Luton was just really really crowded
[08:16] <sil2100> Laney: how was the beer festival?
[08:16] <sil2100> ;)
[08:16] <sil2100> Trevinho: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-themes/+bug/1743373/comments/7 <- re: ubuntu-themes SRU
[08:17] <Laney> NO IDEA!
[08:17] <sil2100> Trevinho: (this concerns many of the bugs marked in the upload)
[08:18] <sil2100> Laney: oh? I thought you were supposed to a beer festival after release
[08:18] <sil2100> Did I mix it up?
[08:18] <Laney> sil2100: was joking about the beer :P
[08:18] <Laney> nah, I did go and it was good fun
[08:19] <sil2100> Phew
[08:19] <sil2100> coreycb: hey! Could you look at the verification of LP: #1751396 and LP: #1783654 as per Brian's request?
[08:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted friendly-recovery [source] (xenial-proposed) [0.2.31ubuntu2]
[10:09] <sil2100> juliank: hey! Regarding the networkd-dispatcher SRU: the contents itself look good, but one thing I'd need from the formal SRU POV is a bit more about the impact of the 'bug
[10:09] <sil2100> juliank: since basically this SRU introduces a new feature from what I see, as it's adding the feature of allowing overriding of /usr/lib/networkd-dispatcher scripts, right?
[10:10] <juliank> sil2100: yes, since we quickly hacked together /usr support before the release
[10:10] <juliank> it was /etc first, we quickly patched it to /usr to be able to release with hooks, now we're patching /etc back in
[10:10] <sil2100> juliank: so for things like this, we'd like to see a rationale why it's needed, what is 'busted' right now without it, you know, rationale why this feature is needed as an SRU
[10:11] <sil2100> juliank: oh, this is exactly the rationale I need
[10:11] <sil2100> Can you include the mention of this in the impact field?
[10:12] <juliank> sil2100: updated
[10:19] <sil2100> juliank: accepted, thanks o/
[10:20] <juliank> sil2100: thx
[10:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted networkd-dispatcher [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.7-0ubuntu3.3]
[10:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: magnum (bionic-proposed/universe) [6.1.0-0ubuntu1 => 6.1.1-0ubuntu0.18.04.1] (no packageset)
[10:21] <juliank> Oj, I just noticed the bug title had curly braces and brackets mixed {SRU]
[10:22] <juliank> silly title typo
[10:23]  * juliank goes verify
[10:26] <sil2100> It's fiiiine
[10:27] <Trevinho> sil2100: ouch, sorry for the verifications -_-
[10:29] <Trevinho> sil2100: I was using the bileto ppa version probably...
[11:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted glib2.0 [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.56.3-0ubuntu0.18.04.1]
[11:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python3-stdlib-extensions (cosmic-proposed/main) [3.6.6-1 => 3.6.7-1~18.10] (core)
[11:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python3-stdlib-extensions (bionic-proposed/main) [3.6.5-3 => 3.6.7-1~18.04] (core)
[11:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python3.7 (cosmic-proposed/main) [3.7.1~rc2-1 => 3.7.1-1~18.10] (ubuntu-desktop)
[11:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python3.7 (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.7.0-1~18.04 => 3.7.1-1~18.04] (no packageset)
[11:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python3.6 (cosmic-proposed/main) [3.6.7~rc1-1 => 3.6.7-1~18.10] (core)
[11:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected virtualbox-hwe [source] (bionic-proposed) [5.2.18-dfsg-3~ubuntu18.04.1]
[11:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python3.6 (bionic-proposed/main) [3.6.6-1~18.04 => 3.6.7-1~18.04] (core)
[11:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected virtualbox [source] (bionic-proposed) [5.2.18-dfsg-2~ubuntu18.04.1]
[11:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted virtualbox [source] (bionic-proposed) [5.2.18-dfsg-2~ubuntu18.04.1]
[11:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted virtualbox-hwe [source] (bionic-proposed) [5.2.18-dfsg-3~ubuntu18.04.1]
[11:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted virtualbox-ext-pack [source] (bionic-proposed) [5.2.18-1~ubuntu18.04.1]
[11:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted virtualbox-guest-additions-iso [source] (bionic-proposed) [5.2.18-1~ubuntu18.04.1]
[11:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: s390-tools (bionic-proposed/main) [2.3.0-0ubuntu3 => 2.3.0-0ubuntu3.1] (core)
[11:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: s390-tools (xenial-proposed/main) [1.34.0-0ubuntu8.7 => 1.34.0-0ubuntu8.8] (no packageset)
[12:15] <coreycb> sil2100: yes will do
[13:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: valgrind (bionic-proposed/main) [1:3.13.0-2ubuntu2 => 1:3.13.0-2ubuntu2.1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[14:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: yaru-theme (cosmic-proposed/main) [18.10.6 => 18.10.7] (ubuntu-desktop)
[14:13] <ddstreet> are all autopkgtests blocked by freeze right now?
[14:15] <Laney> no
[14:15] <Laney> but there is no non-frozen release atm
[14:15] <Laney> (for uploads)
[14:15] <ddstreet> all releases are frozen?
[14:15] <apw> all stable releases are always frozen, and we have no development release
[14:16] <ddstreet> what i meant is that all release autopkgtest excuses are showing "Not touching package due to block request by freeze (contact #ubuntu-release if update is needed)"
[14:16] <Laney> that is better plain english, thanks
[14:16] <ddstreet> which i'm surprised to see
[14:17] <apw> ddstreet, which is normal for a status in a stable release
[14:17] <Laney> that means there is a block in the hint file, not related to testing
[14:17] <apw> ddstreet, it is saying it won't consider releaseing it, nothing more
[14:17] <Laney> it doesn't actually matter since SRUs aren't released with proposed-migration anyway
[14:17] <ddstreet> ok guess i never noticed that before
[14:18] <Laney> actually, even if they were you'd still see that message and there would be a corresponding unblock
[14:18] <apw> that indeed
[14:18] <Laney> usually you don't see it because https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html points to the development release and that is rarely frozen at this level
[14:20] <ddstreet> yep, i'll stick to using the pending sru summary :)
[14:39] <oSoMoN> hello release team, https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/70.0.3538.67-0ubuntu1 went into cosmic-proposed after final freeze but before release, is it going to migrate to cosmic-updates once it's open, or should it be re-uploaded by the security team to -security as is normally done for chromium updates?
[15:21] <teward> so I have a basic question, is i386 essentially dead now after 18.04?  I.E. 18.10 and such won't have upgrade paths for it?
[15:24] <mdeslaur> teward: you can dist-upgrade to it
[15:24] <mdeslaur> and you can still install from the mini iso
[15:26] <teward> mdeslaur: hmm, that's what i thought
[15:26] <teward> (I'm tracking Lubuntu stuff since I"m sorta helping with their infra, so some things i saw there made me head-scratch :P)
[15:26] <teward> thanks
[15:51] <bdmurray> mdeslaur: You can't dist upgrade to 18.10 if you are on i386 with ubuntu-release-upgrader.
[15:51] <bdmurray> teward: ^^
[15:51] <bdmurray> infinity: I don't have SRU queue powers for cosmic yet.
[15:52] <mdeslaur> bdmurray: that's good to know, thanks
[17:38] <teward> bdmurray: that's what i thought.
[17:39] <teward> bdmurray: so the upgrade path then from 18.04 -> 18.10 for i386 was disabled then, and that includes d-r-u?
[17:39] <teward> which then begs the question: have we killed off i386 yet :p
[17:40] <wxl> for everyone except xubuntu and lubuntu
[17:40] <wxl> but if we keep making decisions like that without telling anyone, then probably yes for them too :/
[17:41] <bdmurray> teward: We haven't decided about killing off i386 yet but if we do decide to we didn't want to leave these users on a short term release like 18.10. Its in the release notes.
[17:43] <acheronuk> ^ that makes sense, and I think was discussed in here at some point
[18:35] <teward> anyone know if snapd is now part of all the images?
[18:35] <teward> not just Ubuntu but everything?
[18:39] <jbicha> teward: it's in all *desktop* images: https://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-dev/ubuntu-seeds/+git/platform/tree/desktop-common#n120
[18:40] <teward> jbicha: 'all' Desktop images for all flavors?
[18:40] <teward> or just Ubuntu desktop images?
[18:40] <jbicha> it wasn't in Lubuntu 18.04 LTS because Lubuntu was special and didn't install recommends
[18:40] <teward> what about 18.10?
[18:40] <jbicha> in the seed at least
[18:41] <jbicha> snapd is in Lubuntu 18.10
[18:41] <teward> wxl: ^
[18:41] <teward> you can go tell simon to start whining while you're at it wxl
[18:41] <teward> ... but in here :P
[18:41] <teward> (not really but still)
[18:42] <jbicha> Lubuntu has shifted its focus a bit so maybe snapd being pre-installed isn't as worrying for the devs as it was a few months ago
[18:42] <teward> yeah... given the info I have about their latest discovery of it on the ISOs... not as 'worrying' as you'd think
[18:42] <teward> not as 'not worrying'
[18:42] <teward> but I'll let wxl explain that one :P
[18:43] <teward> i have enoug hwork to do hardening their infra >.>
[18:44] <jbicha> there was an attempt to blacklist it but that was pre-cosmic: https://git.launchpad.net/~lubuntu-dev/ubuntu-seeds/+git/lubuntu/commit/?id=28a4a97461
[18:47] <wxl> it's still there https://git.launchpad.net/~lubuntu-dev/ubuntu-seeds/+git/lubuntu/tree/blacklist
[18:47] <wxl> did that not work?
[18:47] <wxl> i mean
[18:47] <wxl> it obviously didn't XD
[18:48] <wxl> but we should probably get rid of that if it's not actually possible
[18:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ibm-java80 [source] (xenial-proposed) [8.0.5.22-0ubuntu1]
[19:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: netplan.io (bionic-proposed/main) [0.40.1~18.04.1 => 0.40.1~18.04.2] (core)
[19:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: netplan.io (cosmic-proposed/main) [0.40.2 => 0.40.2.1] (core)
[21:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openvswitch (bionic-proposed/main) [2.9.2-0ubuntu0.18.04.1 => 2.9.2-0ubuntu0.18.04.2] (ubuntu-server)