| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure [amd64] (trusty-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1028.29~14.04.1] (kernel) | 06:43 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure [amd64] (trusty-proposed) [4.15.0-1028.29~14.04.1] | 07:06 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubiquity (bionic-proposed/main) [18.04.14.8 => 18.04.14.9] (core) | 10:17 | |
| seb128 | soo, http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/pending-sru.html has a big stack of "old" SRUs for cosmic, what's going on there. Was it because proposed was cleaned out before release? (does that usually happens?) | 13:26 |
|---|---|---|
| apw | seb128, i assume you mean "was not cleaned out" | 13:29 |
| apw | seb128, and it is normal that we open DD and then copy everything up, and then prune the non-sru things | 13:29 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted s390-tools [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.34.0-0ubuntu8.8] | 13:29 | |
| seb128 | apw, indeed :/ | 13:29 |
| apw | seb128, which cannot happen without a DD to do it to | 13:30 |
| seb128 | ah ok | 13:30 |
| seb128 | so it's going to clear itself out | 13:30 |
| seb128 | good | 13:30 |
| seb128 | apw, thx | 13:30 |
| Laney | yeah | 13:30 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted s390-tools [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.3.0-0ubuntu3.1] | 13:31 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: oath-toolkit (cosmic-proposed/universe) [2.6.1-1.2 => 2.6.1-1.2ubuntu0.18.10.1] (no packageset) | 14:33 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-settings-daemon (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.1-0ubuntu1 => 3.28.1-0ubuntu1.1] (ubuntu-desktop) | 15:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-software (cosmic-proposed/main) [3.30.2-0ubuntu7 => 3.30.2-0ubuntu8] (ubuntu-desktop) | 15:18 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted secureboot-db [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.4~ubuntu0.18.04.1] | 15:22 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted secureboot-db [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.4~ubuntu0.16.04.1] | 15:30 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubiquity [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.21.63.9] | 15:31 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted secureboot-db [source] (trusty-proposed) [1.4~ubuntu0.14.04.1] | 15:36 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubiquity [source] (bionic-proposed) [18.04.14.9] | 15:38 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openvswitch [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.9.2-0ubuntu0.18.04.2] | 15:40 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted valgrind [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:3.13.0-2ubuntu2.1] | 15:47 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python3.7 [source] (cosmic-proposed) [3.7.1-1~18.10] | 16:19 | |
| superm1 | bdmurray, regarding the SRU bug 1791999 is there anything else missing to at least get this into proposed? I'm getting daily reports on the problems fixed by this release. | 16:20 |
| ubot5 | bug 1791999 in fwupd (Ubuntu) "Update to the 1.0.9 release" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1791999 | 16:20 |
| bdmurray | superm1: The bugs seem okay, I'll review it now. | 16:24 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: qtbase-opensource-src (cosmic-proposed/main) [5.11.1+dfsg-7ubuntu1 => 5.11.1+dfsg-7ubuntu2] (kubuntu, qt5, ubuntu-desktop) (sync) | 16:26 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python3.6 [source] (cosmic-proposed) [3.6.7-1~18.10] | 16:27 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwupd [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.0.9-0ubuntu1] | 16:28 | |
| superm1 | thanks | 16:28 |
| superm1 | blah. it's depwait on !x86 | 16:44 |
| superm1 | fix incoming | 16:44 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fwupd (bionic-proposed/main) [1.0.9-0ubuntu1 => 1.0.9-0ubuntu2] (desktop-core) | 16:45 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python3.7 [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.7.1-1~18.04] | 16:48 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python3.6 [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.6.7-1~18.04] | 16:54 | |
| superm1 | bdmurray, sorry it went to depwait on ppc64el, s390x arm64, armhf due to a mistake when debian/control was regenerated. I've just uploaded a fixed binary. I'll test it after that's accepted | 16:58 |
| bdmurray | superm1: for the sru tools / process to work you'll need the LaunchpadBugsFixed line in the .changes file | 17:04 |
| superm1 | bdmurray, Ah wasn't aware, OK i'll redo it again. sorry for the trouble | 17:05 |
| infinity | bdmurray: Speaking of, I fixed ubuntu-sru queue permissions for cosmic. | 17:07 |
| infinity | bdmurray: (Had to get my own permissions fixed first so I could use edit-acl...) | 17:07 |
| bdmurray | infinity: great, thanks! | 17:08 |
| * infinity goes back to not being here today. | 17:08 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fwupd (bionic-proposed/main) [1.0.9-0ubuntu1 => 1.0.9-0ubuntu2] (desktop-core) | 17:09 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected fwupd [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.0.9-0ubuntu2] | 17:10 | |
| === msalvatore_ is now known as msalvatore | ||
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwupd [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.0.9-0ubuntu2] | 17:57 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted parted [source] (cosmic-proposed) [3.2-21ubuntu2] | 19:14 | |
| superm1_ | bdmurray, one of the bug reports has two uploads that contribute to fixing the bug (gnome-software and fwupd). I marked verification-done since I tested the fwupd half of it, but it will require releasing the gnome-software half to fully validate, let me know if you want me to switch it back as a result | 19:28 |
| === superm1_ is now known as superm1 | ||
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted elfutils [source] (cosmic-proposed) [0.170-0.5.0ubuntu1] | 20:42 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted octavia [source] (cosmic-proposed) [3.0.0-0ubuntu3] | 20:47 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted breeze [source] (cosmic-proposed) [4:5.13.5-0ubuntu2.1] | 20:53 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mokutil [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.3.0+1538710437.fb6250f-0ubuntu2~18.04.1] | 21:55 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted netplan.io [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.40.1~18.04.2] | 22:00 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted qtwebkit-opensource-src [source] (cosmic-proposed) [5.212.0~alpha2-12ubuntu1.1] | 22:08 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted netplan.io [source] (cosmic-proposed) [0.40.2.1] | 22:19 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted oath-toolkit [source] (cosmic-proposed) [2.6.1-1.2ubuntu0.18.10.1] | 22:25 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-software [source] (cosmic-proposed) [3.30.2-0ubuntu8] | 22:29 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted parted [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.2-20ubuntu0.1] | 22:35 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted virt-manager [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:1.5.1-0ubuntu1.1] | 22:42 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-initial-setup [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.0-2ubuntu6.16.04.3] | 22:48 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted postfix [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.3.0-1ubuntu0.2] | 22:51 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected samba [source] (bionic-proposed) [2:4.7.6+dfsg~ubuntu-0ubuntu2.3] | 22:53 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted apache2 [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.29-1ubuntu4.5] | 22:55 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-flashback [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.0-1ubuntu1.3] | 23:00 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted exim4 [source] (bionic-proposed) [4.90.1-1ubuntu1.1] | 23:02 | |
| RAOF | Hah. I guess the cosmic-proposed report is not very useful for the moment :) | 23:04 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fuse-umfuse-ext2 [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.4-1.1ubuntu0.18.04.1] | 23:06 | |
| xnox | RAOF, well, use your senses ;-) | 23:17 |
| RAOF | :P | 23:18 |
| valorie | so when do we start speculating on DD name? | 23:40 |
| valorie | hard to top "cosmic" | 23:40 |
| xnox | valorie, my bets are on Devout Doplhin or a Dirty Dog | 23:43 |
| xnox | valorie, my bets are on Devout Dolphin or a Dirty Dog | 23:43 |
| valorie | hmm | 23:43 |
| valorie | dirty dingo is more exotic | 23:43 |
| Bashing-om | Guess Dusty Dingbat is not even considered :P | 23:52 |
| valorie | ha! | 23:55 |
| valorie | does it have to be an animal? because Dirigible would be cool | 23:55 |
| RAOF | Dirty Dauphin! | 23:57 |
| RAOF | Hm. Is today the day that I process KDE out of the bionic-proposed queue… | 23:58 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!