[03:34] <Trevinho> Laney: ah, I see it was rejected, why?
[03:35] <duflu> Morning Trevinho, go to bed :)
[03:35] <Trevinho> duflu: I'm in Mexico now... It's still evening here :)
[03:35] <Trevinho> duflu: good morning to you instead :)
[03:35] <duflu> Oh, how is Mexico?
[03:35] <Trevinho> always cool
[03:35] <Trevinho> I love mexico city
[03:36] <duflu> Apparently
[03:38] <duflu> 🌮
[03:41] <Trevinho> duflu: yeah, just another food compared to what you expect. And in the better way.
[07:04] <didrocks> good morning
[07:05] <jamesh> hi didrocks
[07:06] <jamesh> didrocks: Yaru's CI seems to be publishing broken gtk-common-themes snaps :(
[07:08] <didrocks> hey jamesh
[07:08] <didrocks> jamesh: how broken? did you dive into it?
[07:08] <jamesh> didrocks: I filed https://github.com/ubuntu/yaru/issues/953 about it
[07:08] <gitbot> ubuntu issue 953 in yaru "CI: travis build publishes busted gtk-common-themes snaps" [Open]
[07:09] <jamesh> didrocks: basically, the code in build-helpers/gtk-common-themes-parts.yaml has diverged sufficiently from how gtk-common-themes is actually built to cause problems
[07:09] <jamesh> how we're exposing GTK 2 theme data in particular
[07:09] <didrocks> jamesh: we don't only publish edge though
[07:10] <didrocks> jamesh: we publish any PR so that people can test them with snap integration as well
[07:10] <jamesh> didrocks: I'm less concerned about what you publish to those transient branches
[07:10] <didrocks> like have a PR, test existing snap with the built gtk-common-theme for that PR
[07:10] <didrocks> jamesh: yeah, but it should be the same content for both, shouldn't it?
[07:11] <didrocks> like same way of building it
[07:11] <didrocks> if you have an endpoint in gitlab CI so that it can take a parameter, like branch to rebuild, that would do it IMHO
[07:11] <didrocks> unsure if gitlab CI enables this
[07:12] <didrocks> (despite the fact that it may not be the exact commit, contrary to today, to be rebuilt, so could be racy)
[07:12] <didrocks> can someone with gitlab CI skills like Ken look at this?
[07:12] <jamesh> didrocks: https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/ci/triggers/#making-use-of-trigger-variables says we can pass variables with the manual trigger
[07:13] <didrocks> jamesh: yeah, so if Ken could set that up in his job and have the build script in gtk-common-build consuming that to retarget the source that would be awesome!
[07:13] <jamesh> so we could potentially have the gitlab side CI build a particular ref and publish to a particular branch
[07:13] <didrocks> yep!
[07:13] <didrocks> the only thing is the race, we aren't ship both yaru and gtk-common-themes will be built with the exact same commit
[07:13] <didrocks> but I guess that's ok
[07:14] <didrocks> jamesh: is there any way for us to have access to those gitlab CI build accesss?
[07:14] <didrocks> access*
[07:14] <jamesh> didrocks: well, we could have the CI  build a particular ref
[07:14] <didrocks> I won't be able to have a look this week, isntaller work is priority
[07:14] <duflu> Hi didrocks, jamesh
[07:14] <didrocks> but I should be able next week
[07:14] <didrocks> hey duflu
[07:15] <didrocks> jamesh: yeah, I need to look on how to get the correct refs from github hook
[07:15] <didrocks> and I don't think github has native gitlab CI build :p
[07:15] <jamesh> didrocks: I don't have sufficient access on gitlab.gnome.org's Ubuntu group to tweak it unfortunately (I needed Ken to enable CI on a repo last time)
[07:16] <didrocks> but doesn't sound too complicated when using the Travis CI build to trigger the gitlab one
[07:16] <jamesh> hi duflu
[07:16] <didrocks> jamesh: do you mind checking that I have all neeed access with Ken next time you talk to him? I'll put that on my next week list and won't have to chase the creds
[07:17] <jamesh> didrocks: I think you probably do: https://gitlab.gnome.org/groups/Community/Ubuntu/-/group_members
[07:17] <jamesh> you're listed as "Owner", while I'm "Developer"
[07:17] <didrocks> jamesh: unsure if CI access are the same than project one in gitlab world, but yeah
[07:18] <jamesh> IIRC, it is.
[07:18] <jamesh> It's a lot more integrated than gitlab+travis
[07:18] <didrocks> jamesh: ok, let's sync back on that next week, I'll copy this discussion on the bug for reference
[07:18] <didrocks> sounds good to you?
[07:18] <jamesh> sounds good!
[07:18] <didrocks> thanks ;)
[07:19] <jamesh> we should just be careful in the mean time that anything we promote from edge is a gitlab build
[07:26] <jamesh> didrocks: one other thing that you might want to look at: I want to change how we make the "communitheme" name available from gtk-common-themes - https://gitlab.gnome.org/Community/Ubuntu/gtk-common-themes/merge_requests/8
[07:26] <gitbot> Ubuntu issue (Merge request) 8 in gtk-common-themes "snap: point communitheme at Yaru via symlinks or theme inheritance" [Opened]
[07:27] <jibel> Good morning
[07:27] <jamesh> this effectively stops copying files from the communitheme snap and instead just uses Yaru.
[07:46] <didrocks> jamesh: well, I'll let Ken/OsoMoN reviewing it and then, work from that
[07:47] <jamesh> didrocks: it would make the trigger idea a lot more workable: it removes the need to wait for communitheme to publish before building gtk-common-themes
[07:47] <oSoMoN> good morning desktoppers
[07:47] <Trevinho> morning europe
[07:48] <didrocks> hey oSoMoN, Trevinho
[07:50] <didrocks> jamesh: got it!
[07:50] <didrocks> jamesh: quick review and +1, but I would like someone to test it on bionic
[08:33] <jibel> Laney, hi, I verified bug 1743216 with the test case in the description and perl still crashes
[08:42] <seb128> good morning desktopers
[09:01] <Laney> morning
[09:06] <seb128> hey Laney, how are you?
[09:10] <andyrock> morning!
[09:10] <willcooke> morning
[09:17] <duflu> Good morning andyrock, willcooke
[09:17] <duflu> and Laney
[09:18] <Laney> jibel: just checked and it looks ok for me https://people.canonical.com/~laney/weird-things/xdg-utils.webm
[09:19] <Laney> hey seb128 andyrock willcooke duflu jibel
[09:20] <Laney> I'm good, watched some fireworks last night
[09:23] <seb128> nice! what was the occasion for the fireworks?
[09:24] <Laney> some guy failed to overthrow the protestant king
[09:25] <Laney> by blowing parliament up
[09:25] <ginggs> some guy with a V for Vendetta mask :))-
[09:25] <Laney> so we celebrate by blowing other stuff up
[09:25] <Laney> and burning things
[09:25] <Laney> yep, he was an alan moore fan i heard
[09:30] <seb128> :)
[09:34] <willcooke> I saw a tweet the other day that said something along the lines of "I'm sure that history will forgive and forget the Brexiteers.  Anyway, I'm off to burn the effigy of a man who dies 412 years ago"
[09:40] <Laney> :D
[09:40] <jibel> Laney, hm, let me try again. Maybe I didn't update xdg-screensaver correctly
[09:44] <jibel> Laney, ah
[09:44] <jibel> Laney, I added the line after the decode lol
[09:44] <jibel> okay it's fine then
[09:44] <Laney> haha
[09:45] <Laney> my description could have been clearer to be fair
[09:45] <Laney> thx!
[09:45] <jibel> and with the verification of evince, pending desktop sru are done
[09:49] <Laney> was hoping somebody experiencing that bug "for real" was going to come along
[09:49] <Laney> ah well
[09:49] <Laney> cheers for doing it
[09:52] <seb128> thx jibel for the SRU verifications!
[10:02] <Laney> Trevinho: I added you to the u-c-c team now :-)
[10:18] <didrocks> how lucky Trevinho is :)
[10:19] <seb128> jamesh, weekly status update? ;)
[10:20] <jamesh> seb128: gar.  I started writing it but hadn't saved it.  I'll finish it off now
[10:21] <seb128> jamesh, thx
[10:21] <seb128> the website usually save your edit even if you close the page I think
[10:28] <duflu> seb128, I think the ball is rolling on all bb-things of mine. But that email thread is too complex and I don't want to make it worse. Will check again tomorrow
[10:29] <seb128> duflu, k, but feel free to reply with your bit if you want, I think it's fine for that email discussion to be active
[11:48] <ahasenack> hi, do you (desktop) own ubuntu-wallpapers? There is this MP out there: https://code.launchpad.net/~illia-v/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-wallpapers/+git/ubuntu-wallpapers/+merge/356434
[11:49] <ahasenack> I'll remove the server team from it, but would like to add an appropriate team
[11:50] <ahasenack> hm, I can't remove the server team (my team)
[11:51] <Laney> ahasenack: suggest pinging jbicha, the previous reviewer
[11:52] <ahasenack> but he was tagged as "community", which happens when the person is not a member of the existing review slots. I'm thinking generally who should review ubuntu-wallpapers
[11:54] <jbicha> ahasenack: the authoritative VCS for ubuntu-wallpapers is https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-art-pkg/ubuntu-wallpapers/ubuntu
[11:54] <jbicha> good morning
[11:54] <ahasenack> hi jbicha
[11:56] <ahasenack> jbicha: ok, I'm adding that team to a review slot
[11:56] <ahasenack> sounds appropriate
[13:00] <andyrock> lunch time \o/
[14:15] <Wimpress> kenvandine: Yo
[14:16] <Wimpress> kenvandine: When using the desktop-qt5 desktop helper, xdg-user-dirs are not mapped in the home directory?
[14:16] <Wimpress> Is this expected?
[14:30] <kenvandine> Wimpress: it's not expected...
[14:30] <seb128> Alright
[14:30] <seb128> it's meeting time!
[14:31] <kenvandine> Wimpress: that was broken for a bit but Trevinho fixed it last week
[14:31] <kenvandine> Wimpress: is it a snap that was recently rebuilt?
[14:31] <seb128> #startmeeting Desktop Team Weekly Meeting - 2018-11-06
[14:31] <meetingology> Meeting started Tue Nov  6 14:31:33 2018 UTC.  The chair is seb128. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology.
[14:31] <meetingology> Available commands: action commands idea info link nick
[14:31] <andyrock> o/
[14:31] <oSoMoN> \o
[14:32] <didrocks> hey o/
[14:32] <tseliot> o/
[14:32] <Trevinho>  /o
[14:32] <jibel> hi
[14:32] <seb128> Roll call: andyrock, dgadomski, didrocks, duflu (out), jbicha, jamesh (out), jibel, heber, kenvandine, laney, oSoMoN, seb128, tkamppeter, trevinho, robert_ancell (out), tjaalton, tseliot
[14:32] <heber> o/
[14:32] <Trevinho> 💤
[14:32] <kenvandine> o/
[14:32] <kenvandine> Wimpress: not merged yet, https://github.com/ubuntu/snapcraft-desktop-helpers/pull/164
[14:32] <gitbot> ubuntu issue (Pull request) 164 in snapcraft-desktop-helpers "desktop-exports: Fixes and improvements for XDG dirs generations" [Open]
[14:33] <kenvandine> sorry, back to the meeting :)
[14:33] <seb128> Happy first D-has-a-name-now-disco meeting :)
[14:33] <seb128> so let's get started
[14:34] <seb128> new format still feels a bit weird to me :p
[14:34] <seb128> #topic rls bugs review
[14:34] <seb128> http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-cc-incoming-bug-tasks.html
[14:34] <seb128> one bug, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager/+bug/1778946
[14:34] <tjaalton> o/
[14:35] <willcooke> That's on me to provide more logs.  There is a temporary work around, which is not a fix, but unsticks people who need it
[14:35] <willcooke> I will try and get those logs today
[14:35] <seb128> it's an issue with -pptp only which we don't install by default
[14:35] <seb128> on a non LTS cycle
[14:35] <seb128> I would vote for -notfixing
[14:36] <seb128> we can still fix it, but no need to target imho
[14:36] <seb128> opinions?
[14:36] <willcooke> I agree that we dont need to target it
[14:36] <willcooke> and there is a sort-of-workaround for now
[14:36] <seb128> good, let's -notfixing then
[14:37] <seb128> http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-cc-tracking-bug-tasks.html
[14:38] <seb128> the bugs on that list are assigned and being worked on
[14:38] <seb128> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1799614 was missing the assignee, done that now
[14:38] <seb128> http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-bb-incoming-bug-tasks.html
[14:38] <seb128> no desktop entries there
[14:38] <seb128> http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-bb-tracking-bug-tasks.html
[14:39] <seb128> I reviewed the list yesterday and we are getting things sorted out, a few items to review here
[14:39] <seb128> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/desktop-file-utils/+bug/1768271
[14:40] <seb128> it's only a warning, I'm going to have a look at fixing it but I don't think it needs to be targetted
[14:40] <seb128> so I vote -notfixing
[14:40] <seb128> opinions?
[14:40] <didrocks> The Error is scary, but if it's only a warning…
[14:40] <Trevinho> agree
[14:40] <seb128> oh, well, in fact it's targetted so I can as well deal with it... taking it :)
[14:40] <Laney> it is targeted
[14:41] <Laney> maybe jbicha did that for a reason
[14:41] <seb128> right, I'm just going to backport the commit so let's consider it handled
[14:41] <seb128> next
[14:41] <seb128> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1795169
[14:42] <seb128> oSoMoN, you nominated it but it has no assignee ... do you plan to work on that?
[14:42] <oSoMoN> yes
[14:42] <seb128> k, so I do assign it
[14:43] <Trevinho> mh I added one to bb-incoming yesterday, but didn't show up apparently.... well can wait one more week :) [problem is now I can't find the # -_-]
[14:43] <seb128> I listed https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libdrm/+bug/1798597
[14:43] <seb128> but I think that's just an understood item and needs to be assigned to tjaalton
[14:43] <seb128> I'm doing that
[14:44] <tjaalton> seb128: I'm already assigned
[14:44] <seb128> tjaalton, to one component only :)
[14:44] <tjaalton> not enough?
[14:44] <seb128> the reporting tools are not clever
[14:44] <tjaalton> k
[14:45] <seb128> Trevinho, did you find it back?
[14:45] <seb128> otherwise next week
[14:45] <Trevinho> nope, still looking... but yeag
[14:45] <seb128> #topic AOB
[14:45] <seb128> any other topic?
[14:46] <dgadomski> yeah, I have something
[14:46] <dgadomski> I'd appreciate anybody reviewing the merge proposal for bug #1755490
[14:46] <Trevinho> wondering what typo I did...
[14:47] <andyrock> Trevinho: check your email
[14:47] <seb128> Trevinho, on what component was it?
[14:47] <seb128> dgadomski, I can have a look this week, adding to my backlog
[14:47] <Trevinho> mutter, but no worries I will add for next week
[14:48] <dgadomski> thanks seb128
[14:48] <Trevinho> didrocks: I can also look that
[14:48] <seb128> np!
[14:48] <seb128> any other topic?
[14:49] <didrocks> nothing for me
[14:49] <andyrock> nope
[14:49] <seb128> k, seems like it's a wrap then
[14:49] <seb128> thanks everyone
[14:49] <Trevinho> yep
[14:49] <seb128> #endmeeting
[14:49] <meetingology> Meeting ended Tue Nov  6 14:49:42 2018 UTC.
[14:49] <meetingology> Minutes:        http://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-desktop/2018/ubuntu-desktop.2018-11-06-14.31.moin.txt
[14:49] <Trevinho> thanks
[14:49] <oSoMoN> thanks
[14:49]  * Trevinho back to bed xD 
[14:50] <Trevinho> this timezone isn't the nicest for the meeting :D
[14:50] <seb128> Trevinho, night
[14:50] <seb128> Trevinho, oh, don't feel like you need to get up if it doesn't work with your tz
[14:51] <Trevinho> well, it's at 8.30, I can try to make it for few weeks
[14:52] <seb128> :)
[14:55] <jbicha> seb128: I applied the desktop-file-utils font fix in Debian so you can merge it if you like
[14:55] <seb128> jbicha, thx
[14:56] <jbicha> the warning annoyed me for a while but I hadn't tracked down how to fix it earlier
[15:14] <seb128> didrocks, your changes from https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/desktop-file-utils/0.23-3ubuntu2 did you just forgot to bzr push and still have them? or should Ijust import the upload for you while I'm doing my merge with Debian?
[15:17] <didrocks> oh, I maybe forgot them, let me have a look
[15:18] <didrocks> seb128: no, I don't have the bzr changes anymore, should have been in tmp dir
[15:18] <didrocks> feel free to just reimport the upload
[15:18] <seb128> k, thx
[15:33] <willcooke> kenvandine, oSoMoN: https://meet.google.com/uxr-ygvj-mkc?authuser=0
[15:40] <oSoMoN> willcooke, kenvandine: https://git.launchpad.net/~chromium-team/chromium-browser/+git/snap-from-source/tree/snapcraft.yaml?h=dev#n208
[15:48] <willcooke> thanks oSoMoN
[17:52] <tsimonq2> oSoMoN: Heya, just making sure you're aware that I'm doing a LibreOffice SRU for Cosmic.
[17:53] <tsimonq2> If you want me to push my changes anywhere in Launchpad (VCS) just let me know.
[17:58] <Laney> Trevinho: what is the plan for gnome-shell ubuntu/master do you know?
[17:58] <Laney> there's some yaru stuff, the bugs are updated for sru but it's not uploaded
[18:01] <Laney> Can't really do that SRU until bug #1745888 is fixed in disco at least
[18:02] <Laney> got to go, will look back tomorrow
[18:35] <Trevinho> Laney: mh I thought I proposed for both.. Let me check
[20:02] <seb128> tsimonq2, would be best to sync up with the maintainer before doing a SRU, not after
[20:10] <oSoMoN> tsimonq2, yeah, like seb128 said
[20:11] <oSoMoN> tsimonq2, the timing is not great as I’ve pushed 6.1.3 to disco and will prepare a SRU for cosmic, but I'll make sure to retain your patch
[21:26] <tsimonq2> ...does nobody have an IRC bouncer? ;)
[21:27] <tsimonq2> Anyway, if oSoMoN and/or seb128 are reading the logs, I did coordinate the patch beforehand with oSoMoN when it was being handled upstream, and I did express my plans to SRU it to Cosmic...
[21:29] <tsimonq2> Either way though, bug 1799001.
[21:30] <tsimonq2> I'd rather get this verified and out the door before starting it over with a new version, though.
[22:42] <Trevinho> Laney: ah, ok as per gnome-shell, branches have been merged, but no one did  a release yet... So, I think you can just finalize it and sponsor, and then proceed with the SRU too.
[22:43] <Trevinho> that was my expectation though :)
[22:43] <Trevinho> Laney: also as per glib, this is hitting quite hard nautilus... Do you think is worth waiting for a next glib point release or just include this to our packaging https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/issues/1588 ?
[22:43] <gitbot> GNOME issue 1588 in glib "Moving a bookmark item to the same URI causes a crash" [1. Crash, Gbookmarkfile, Closed]
[23:28] <Trevinho> kenvandine: hey can you please publish https://bileto.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/3448 ?
[23:29] <kenvandine> Trevinho: i'll look
[23:29] <Trevinho> kenvandine: thanks :)
[23:31] <kenvandine> Trevinho: this doesn't look right
[23:31] <kenvandine> -               libgnome-desktop-3-dev (>= 3.27.3),
[23:31] <kenvandine> +               libgnome-desktop-3-dev (>= 3.5.91),
[23:31] <Trevinho> oh...
[23:31] <Trevinho> right
[23:31] <kenvandine> or is 3.5.91 what it actually cares about?
[23:31] <kenvandine> seems unlikely
[23:31] <Trevinho> let me see the mp
[23:31] <Trevinho> probably some merge issue
[23:33] <kenvandine> -GNOME_DESKTOP_REQUIRED_VERSION=3.27.3
[23:33] <kenvandine> +GNOME_DESKTOP_REQUIRED_VERSION=3.5.91
[23:33] <kenvandine> Trevinho: also seems odd
[23:34] <Trevinho> kenvandine: thanks for spotting, i've asked here https://code.launchpad.net/~khurshid-alam/unity-control-center/sharing-panel/+merge/341306