[07:15] <didrocks> good morning
[07:15] <jibel> Salut didrocks
[07:18] <didrocks> salut jibel, bon week-end?
[07:19] <jibel> didrocks, w-e calme, matchs basket et hand samedi (en tant que spectateur :)) et repos hier
[07:19] <jibel> didrocks, et j'ai fixé mon réseau
[07:19] <jibel> didrocks, et doi?
[07:19] <jibel> toi
[07:23] <didrocks> jibel: week-end passé chez des amis, c'était sympa aussi :)
[07:23] <duflu> Hi didrocks, jibel
[07:24] <didrocks> hey duflu
[07:25] <jibel> Hi duflu
[08:44] <seb128> good morning desktopers
[08:44] <oSoMoN> good morning desktoppers
[08:45] <duflu> Hi seb128 and oSoMoN
[08:45] <seb128> lut oSoMoN
[08:45] <seb128> en forme ? bon w.e ?
[08:45] <seb128> hey duflu! how are you today?
[08:45] <duflu> seb128, sore from lifting many things. You?
[08:46] <seb128> I'm good, happy to be sitting at my desk today, w.e are exhausting :)
[08:46] <oSoMoN> heh
[08:47] <oSoMoN> I was away 4 days and I don't remember what this whole software engineering thing is about
[08:47] <oSoMoN> so yeah, week-end was good :)
[08:53] <seb128> :)
[08:55] <andyrock> good morning!
[09:01] <Laney> hi
[09:01] <Laney> happy monday to you
[09:01] <Laney> and your kin
[09:06] <duflu> We wish you a merry Monday, Laney
[09:17] <oSoMoN> and a happy new week
[09:18] <Laney> HO HO HO
[09:23] <seb128> hey hey Laney, how are you today? good w.e?
[09:35] <Laney> hey seb128
[09:35] <Laney> I'm good thanks, looks like a nice day :>
[09:35] <seb128> lucky you, it's grey and rainy here
[09:35] <Laney> weekend was nice, we went to cambridge to hang out
[09:35] <Laney> there was a big storm on saturday though /o\
[09:36] <Laney> what about you?
[09:40] <seb128> I'm good, w.e was nice, we have lunch/spent the affternoon with friends on saturday and when to visit a mini-farm for kids yesterday/had lunch there. It was a bit exhausting though, the baby had a very active w.e and wouldn't play alone nor want to sleep :-/
[09:44] <seb128> andyrock, hey, had a good w.e? It looks like you didn't push the update-notifier error check tweak you did on thursday, can you do that? Then I can finally upload that one
[09:44] <Laney> :/
[09:44] <andyrock> seb128: I forgot I was on holiday on Friday
[09:44] <andyrock> :/
[09:45] <andyrock> I'm doing that now
[09:45] <seb128> andyrock, hey :) no worry, there was no hurry, but we had enough review rounds, now is time to get that uploaded :p
[09:45] <seb128> thx
[09:47] <Laney> there's never enough review!
[09:47] <seb128> :)
[09:48] <seb128> speaking of reviews, my systemd/hwdb PR for that airplane mode issue just got merged :)
[09:51] <Laney> win
[09:53] <andyrock> seb128: done!
[09:53] <seb128> andyrock, thx!
[09:53] <andyrock> Laney: https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~azzar1/update-notifier/fix-lp-1800862/revision/945
[09:53] <andyrock> that should be readable enough
[09:54] <Laney> yep
[09:59] <andyrock> didrocks: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock/+bug/1769383/comments/19
[09:59] <andyrock> I think you linked the wrong MR here
[10:03] <andyrock> corrected
[10:04] <seb128> Laney, https://code.launchpad.net/~azzar1/update-notifier/fix-lp-1800862/+merge/358309 is +1 from you now?
[10:04] <Laney> sure
[10:04] <Laney> andyrock: that's the same link?
[10:04] <seb128> thx
[10:04] <andyrock> Laney: :(
[10:04] <andyrock> damn
[10:51] <didrocks> yea, it's mr1
[10:53] <seb128> didrocks, andyrock, so we are confident that this issue is hitting people who tweak the extensions?
[10:54] <didrocks> seb128: no, I wonder if this comment was pasted on the wrong bug report or if title/description change (which doesn't seem so)
[10:55] <didrocks> so clearly not the lockscreen issue
[10:55] <didrocks> however, I saw this morning some movement on the screenlock issue upstream
[10:55] <didrocks> one sec
[10:57] <didrocks> ah, this was just a duplication to https://github.com/micheleg/dash-to-dock/issues/762
[10:57] <gitbot> micheleg issue 762 in dash-to-dock "Dock persists on lock screen" [Open]
[10:58] <didrocks> some people commented "thanks, it works fine", but no solution was given in duplicates :p
[11:44] <andyrock> seb128: didrocks I'm working on it
[11:45] <andyrock> it's somehow related to the 'transparency" feature of dash-to-dock
[11:45] <andyrock> it loses track of the tracked window
[11:45] <andyrock> *windows
[11:46] <andyrock> not sure because gnome-shell fails to send an 'actor-removed' signal
[11:46] <andyrock> trying to find a reliable way to reproduce it
[11:49] <tomreyn> hi. would you say it is generally useful for users to report the (often many) stack traces logged by 'journalctl --user' on a fully patched 18.04? are those better ignored for now unless they seem to be results / side effects of major malfunctions?
[12:04] <seb128> andyrock, k, good, thx
[12:05] <seb128> tomreyn, hey, that would probably be annoying to users and prompt them to report issues when not strictly needed, we already got negative feedback from the quantify of error nagging without that
[12:08] <tomreyn> seb128: i didn't mean whether these stacktraces should be reported to users via (G)UI, but whether users, such as myself, should spend time on reposrting those stacktraces to the bug trackers.
[12:09] <tomreyn> seb128: i ssupect your answer also suggests there is no use in such reports at this time, would you agree there?
[12:11] <seb128> tomreyn, reporting to the bug tracker is always useful, it might be that people are too busy and those just sit there though
[12:15] <tomreyn> ok, maybe i'll do a few and see what happens (if anything), thanks seb
[17:05] <Trevinho> Morning