=== Class7_ is now known as Class7 [07:15] good morning [07:15] Salut didrocks [07:18] salut jibel, bon week-end? [07:19] didrocks, w-e calme, matchs basket et hand samedi (en tant que spectateur :)) et repos hier [07:19] didrocks, et j'ai fixé mon réseau [07:19] didrocks, et doi? [07:19] toi [07:23] jibel: week-end passé chez des amis, c'était sympa aussi :) [07:23] Hi didrocks, jibel [07:24] hey duflu [07:25] Hi duflu [08:44] good morning desktopers [08:44] good morning desktoppers [08:45] Hi seb128 and oSoMoN [08:45] lut oSoMoN [08:45] en forme ? bon w.e ? [08:45] hey duflu! how are you today? [08:45] seb128, sore from lifting many things. You? [08:46] I'm good, happy to be sitting at my desk today, w.e are exhausting :) [08:46] heh [08:47] I was away 4 days and I don't remember what this whole software engineering thing is about [08:47] so yeah, week-end was good :) [08:53] :) [08:55] good morning! [09:01] hi [09:01] happy monday to you [09:01] and your kin [09:06] We wish you a merry Monday, Laney [09:17] and a happy new week [09:18] HO HO HO [09:23] hey hey Laney, how are you today? good w.e? [09:35] hey seb128 [09:35] I'm good thanks, looks like a nice day :> [09:35] lucky you, it's grey and rainy here [09:35] weekend was nice, we went to cambridge to hang out [09:35] there was a big storm on saturday though /o\ [09:36] what about you? [09:40] I'm good, w.e was nice, we have lunch/spent the affternoon with friends on saturday and when to visit a mini-farm for kids yesterday/had lunch there. It was a bit exhausting though, the baby had a very active w.e and wouldn't play alone nor want to sleep :-/ [09:44] andyrock, hey, had a good w.e? It looks like you didn't push the update-notifier error check tweak you did on thursday, can you do that? Then I can finally upload that one [09:44] :/ [09:44] seb128: I forgot I was on holiday on Friday [09:44] :/ [09:45] I'm doing that now [09:45] andyrock, hey :) no worry, there was no hurry, but we had enough review rounds, now is time to get that uploaded :p [09:45] thx [09:47] there's never enough review! [09:47] :) [09:48] speaking of reviews, my systemd/hwdb PR for that airplane mode issue just got merged :) [09:51] win [09:53] seb128: done! [09:53] andyrock, thx! [09:53] Laney: https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~azzar1/update-notifier/fix-lp-1800862/revision/945 [09:53] that should be readable enough [09:54] yep [09:59] didrocks: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock/+bug/1769383/comments/19 [09:59] Ubuntu bug 1769383 in gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock (Ubuntu) "Ubuntu dock/launcher is shown on the lock screen" [High,Confirmed] [09:59] I think you linked the wrong MR here [10:03] corrected [10:04] Laney, https://code.launchpad.net/~azzar1/update-notifier/fix-lp-1800862/+merge/358309 is +1 from you now? [10:04] sure [10:04] andyrock: that's the same link? [10:04] thx [10:04] Laney: :( [10:04] damn [10:51] yea, it's mr1 [10:53] didrocks, andyrock, so we are confident that this issue is hitting people who tweak the extensions? [10:54] seb128: no, I wonder if this comment was pasted on the wrong bug report or if title/description change (which doesn't seem so) [10:55] so clearly not the lockscreen issue [10:55] however, I saw this morning some movement on the screenlock issue upstream [10:55] one sec [10:57] ah, this was just a duplication to https://github.com/micheleg/dash-to-dock/issues/762 [10:57] micheleg issue 762 in dash-to-dock "Dock persists on lock screen" [Open] [10:58] some people commented "thanks, it works fine", but no solution was given in duplicates :p [11:44] seb128: didrocks I'm working on it [11:45] it's somehow related to the 'transparency" feature of dash-to-dock [11:45] it loses track of the tracked window [11:45] *windows [11:46] not sure because gnome-shell fails to send an 'actor-removed' signal [11:46] trying to find a reliable way to reproduce it [11:49] hi. would you say it is generally useful for users to report the (often many) stack traces logged by 'journalctl --user' on a fully patched 18.04? are those better ignored for now unless they seem to be results / side effects of major malfunctions? [12:04] andyrock, k, good, thx [12:05] tomreyn, hey, that would probably be annoying to users and prompt them to report issues when not strictly needed, we already got negative feedback from the quantify of error nagging without that [12:08] seb128: i didn't mean whether these stacktraces should be reported to users via (G)UI, but whether users, such as myself, should spend time on reposrting those stacktraces to the bug trackers. [12:09] seb128: i ssupect your answer also suggests there is no use in such reports at this time, would you agree there? [12:11] tomreyn, reporting to the bug tracker is always useful, it might be that people are too busy and those just sit there though [12:15] ok, maybe i'll do a few and see what happens (if anything), thanks seb [17:05] Morning === caravena_ is now known as caravena