| === Class7_ is now known as Class7 | ||
| === jamesh_ is now known as jamesh | ||
| jibel | Good morning | 06:00 |
|---|---|---|
| didrocks | good morning | 06:58 |
| duflu | Morning didrocks | 07:01 |
| didrocks | hey duflu | 07:02 |
| seb128 | hey didrocks, duflu | 07:08 |
| seb128 | good morning desktopers | 07:08 |
| didrocks | hey seb128 | 07:08 |
| duflu | Hi seb128 | 07:08 |
| === pstolowski|afk is now known as pstolowski | ||
| clobrano | hi all 0/ | 08:33 |
| Laney | moin | 09:02 |
| Laney | WOH | 09:02 |
| Laney | ok that's better | 09:05 |
| Laney | got some new and exciting graphics corruption then | 09:05 |
| seb128 | hey Laney, how are you? | 09:08 |
| didrocks | hey Laney | 09:08 |
| didrocks | Laney: seb128: do you know how ubuntu-session and others have been removed from ubuntu-meta from s390x by Ken? http://launchpadlibrarian.net/391700885/ubuntu-meta_1.424_1.425.diff.gz ubuntu-session is arch:all, so I don't see how ubuntu-meta didn't pick it up in 1.425 for that arch | 09:09 |
| Laney | hey seb128 didrocks | 09:09 |
| Laney | yes it depends on gnome-shell so you can't install it there | 09:10 |
| didrocks | do you think this was hacked by hand? | 09:10 |
| Laney | doubt it | 09:10 |
| Laney | what's the problem? | 09:10 |
| didrocks | ubuntu-session has been readded automatically for s390x in 1.426 | 09:11 |
| didrocks | which is normal, it's in the archive and arch: all (was already arch: all in cosmic) | 09:11 |
| seb128 | hum, I've no idea about those changes, sorry | 09:11 |
| didrocks | I wonder thus how it was removed in last ubuntu-meta upload | 09:11 |
| didrocks | (apart from "by hand hacking") | 09:11 |
| didrocks | seb128: yeah, doesn't make sense, right? | 09:12 |
| seb128 | its weird indeed | 09:12 |
| didrocks | (this is what holds 1.426 in proposed) | 09:12 |
| Laney | it probably wasn't arch: all when that upload happened | 09:13 |
| seb128 | that was changed in https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-session/3.30.0-0ubuntu4 | 09:14 |
| didrocks | ah, it was hold in proposed at that time | 09:14 |
| didrocks | uploaded before, but stuck there | 09:14 |
| didrocks | so yeah, not present in the release pocket | 09:15 |
| didrocks | I guess we need to make it arch-specific again | 09:15 |
| Laney | just exclude it in the seed | 09:16 |
| didrocks | yeah, good idea as well | 09:16 |
| didrocks | does [!s390x] works? (I don't see any negative syntax in the seed) | 09:17 |
| didrocks | work* | 09:17 |
| didrocks | or you need to list all arch "in"? (which doesn't seem a big advantage compared to have ubuntu-session mentioning the arches itself) | 09:18 |
| Laney | yes it works | 09:19 |
| Laney | try something like "git log -p -S !s390x" | 09:19 |
| didrocks | with a \, indeed, there are some examples | 09:20 |
| Laney | :3 | 09:21 |
| didrocks | Thx! | 09:22 |
| oSoMoN | good morning desktoppers | 09:25 |
| didrocks | Added ubuntu-session to desktop [s390x] | 09:26 |
| didrocks | grrrr | 09:26 |
| didrocks | I blacklisted it in desktop-minimal | 09:26 |
| duflu | Hi oSoMoN, Laney, world | 09:26 |
| didrocks | but as there desktop -> desktop-minimal | 09:26 |
| didrocks | it includes it without blacklisting it seems | 09:26 |
| didrocks | do we really want ubuntu-session to be arch:all ? | 09:26 |
| didrocks | it's not installable on s390x anyway, so why making it available for it? | 09:27 |
| Laney | that's normal for arch:all packages | 09:27 |
| Laney | it doesn't mean installable on all architectures, it means a build on one architecture can be installed on all of them | 09:28 |
| Laney | hey duflu | 09:28 |
| didrocks | so, I have to duplicate in 2 seeds, just this one package, which doesn't sound right to me | 09:28 |
| seb128 | lut oSoMoN, en forme? | 09:31 |
| oSoMoN | seb128, bien, et toi? | 09:32 |
| seb128 | nickel! | 09:32 |
| seb128 | oSoMoN, do you know how to flag bugs like https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ibus-unikey/+bug/1803270 so we have them on our backlog to triage? (unsure if it's a real issue or not, I guess maybe we need to bundle more ibus-* to solve it?) | 09:36 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1803270 in ibus-unikey (Ubuntu) "Support for Snap Apps" [Undecided,New] | 09:36 |
| Laney | didrocks: I get | 09:38 |
| Laney | Removed ubuntu-session from desktop [s390x], desktop-minimal [s390x] | 09:38 |
| Laney | isn't that right? | 09:38 |
| didrocks | Laney: this is because of my last commit | 09:39 |
| didrocks | where I doubled the removal in desktop seed | 09:39 |
| didrocks | try without it, you will see | 09:39 |
| Laney | I pointed it at my local branch | 09:39 |
| didrocks | you specified the arch blacklist yourself? | 09:40 |
| didrocks | only in desktop-minimal? | 09:40 |
| Laney | top commit is 1aa52ff97feb1d1a2b8cc6db0c7baa74318a7666 | 09:40 |
| * Laney reads the log | 09:40 | |
| Laney | maybe it cloned it anyway | 09:40 |
| didrocks | weird, I'm on cosmic and this wasn't what I got… are you sure it didn't pull from the server? | 09:42 |
| Laney | * Cloning branch disco of file:///home/laney/dev/canonical/release/seeds/ubuntu/ | 09:42 |
| didrocks | hum… | 09:42 |
| didrocks | I clearly had Removed ubuntu-session from desktop-minimal [s390x] | 09:43 |
| didrocks | + Add on desktop | 09:43 |
| didrocks | before the commit in HEAD | 09:43 |
| oSoMoN | seb128, not sure how to ensure this kind of bug doesn't slip through, a "snap" tag maybe? | 09:43 |
| didrocks | Laney: cosmic as well, I guess? | 09:43 |
| Laney | yeah | 09:43 |
| * didrocks puzzled | 09:43 | |
| seb128 | oSoMoN, k, let's do that, I was asking in case there was a process for triaging those already | 09:44 |
| didrocks | Laney: at worst, we can try reverting the last commit, see this is a no-op | 09:44 |
| didrocks | (doesn't impact ubuntu-meta) | 09:44 |
| oSoMoN | seb128, not a formal one, no | 09:44 |
| didrocks | but I pasted the exact output above :( | 09:44 |
| Laney | :< | 09:44 |
| oSoMoN | seb128, I asked the reported for more info | 09:44 |
| seb128 | oSoMoN, thx | 09:44 |
| didrocks | well, if the hack isn't needed in the end, would be for the better… | 09:44 |
| Laney | it would be really weird, probably a germinate bug, if that was needed | 09:45 |
| didrocks | yeah | 09:45 |
| didrocks | Laney: not related, but all those removals are listed because there is only one deep dep taken by germinate (so all desktop-common packages are unlisted) | 09:46 |
| didrocks | then, we have the dep between ubuntu-desktop -> ubuntu-desktop-minimal which fullfills the deps | 09:46 |
| Laney | I probably would have expected -minimal packages to have Task: ubuntu-desktop too | 09:48 |
| Laney | but dunno if that's a legitimate expectation | 09:48 |
| didrocks | we want to install the minimal tasks independently though, no? | 09:48 |
| Laney | like apt install ubuntu-desktop^ to select every desktop package directly | 09:49 |
| didrocks | this would still work, no? as we have the metapackage dep… | 09:49 |
| didrocks | (but I might be wrong, feel free to do the changes you feel are necessary) | 09:50 |
| Laney | I know it *works* because of the dependency, I'm saying that I would have probably expected them to still also be in the full ubuntu-desktop task | 09:51 |
| didrocks | so you mean: ubuntu-desktop: ubuntu-desktop-minimal desktop-common | 09:51 |
| didrocks | correct? | 09:51 |
| didrocks | (but we could argue the same for minimal and standard, no?) | 09:51 |
| didrocks | as desktop-common deps on those | 09:52 |
| didrocks | and were never included on ubuntu-desktop | 09:52 |
| Laney | those get Priority fields to match, so seem a bit different to me | 09:56 |
| Laney | I think ubuntustudio did a 'core' split or something in the way I'm talking about | 09:56 |
| didrocks | I'm not opposed to readding desktop-common as well | 09:57 |
| didrocks | noting it down | 09:58 |
| Laney | probably not a very big deal | 09:58 |
| didrocks | I have no clear opinion TBH, the benefit is that the diff between ubuntu-desktop and ubuntu-desktop-minimal would only show what's in addition for ubuntu-desktop | 09:58 |
| Laney | you'd still be able to look for packages that have Task: ubuntu-desktop and *not* Task: ubuntu-desktop-minimal | 09:59 |
| didrocks | yeah | 09:59 |
| Laney | grep-aptavail -sPackage -FTask ubuntustudio-desktop --and --not -FTask ubuntustudio-desktop-core | 10:00 |
| didrocks | yeah, just not as trivial than pure apt :p so ok, we can add the dep (probably later, once the image thingy would be more advance, keeping a note) | 10:00 |
| didrocks | reverted HEAD here, let's see | 10:01 |
| * didrocks puzzled, no change found as well now… It's not even like it took a commit in between as I had Add/Remove | 10:08 | |
| didrocks | anyway, let's revert this, and see if someone else triggers it, net benefit: one less hack :p | 10:08 |
| didrocks | adding desktop-common while I'm at it | 10:08 |
| doko | mozjs60 ftbfs with test failures on s390x. would you terribly mind if I remove the binaries? or do you want to have a look at fixing that? | 10:50 |
| Laney | neither of those, why not leave it? | 10:52 |
| Laney | (what binaries?) | 10:52 |
| * Laney cries at nautilus | 12:23 | |
| seb128 | Laney, what's the issue? | 12:44 |
| Laney | patch rebasing is a pain | 12:45 |
| doko | Laney: blocking icu, so if you're ok with the removal ... | 12:56 |
| Laney | doko: it failed to build everywhere? | 12:57 |
| doko | no, just s390x | 12:58 |
| Laney | https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mozjs60/60.2.3-1build1 | 12:58 |
| doko | and there's also texlive-bin uninstallability which would require two MIRs | 12:58 |
| jbicha | doko: I think the texlive problem for transitions is just Debian bug 913542 | 12:59 |
| ubot5 | Debian bug 913542 in src:teckit "teckit: Fails to build on Ubuntu's ppc64el (symbols)" [Important,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/913542 | 12:59 |
| doko | mozjs looks like a rounding error | 13:00 |
| doko | jbicha: I fixed that already | 13:00 |
| jbicha | oh, are you going to NMU it then? | 13:01 |
| Laney | I should make a card for this nautilus stuff | 13:02 |
| doko | no, you could do these NMUs the same as I can do | 13:03 |
| Laney | a bit more civility would be nice | 13:05 |
| === chrisccoulson_ is now known as chrisccoulson | ||
| dgadomski | seb128: hey, re: bug #1755490 - sorry, my filters ate the notification about your reply and I noticed it today, provided the information you requested | 15:31 |
| ubot5 | bug 1755490 in unity-settings-daemon (Ubuntu) "Incorrect information about display shown in unity-control-center" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1755490 | 15:31 |
| seb128 | dgadomski, hey, thx | 17:16 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!