[10:27]  * cjwatson gets spam email: "Subject: Cdimage, No more struggle to increase your website traffic"
[10:27] <cjwatson> ... I really don't think that's our problem
[10:54] <apw> cjwatson, ;)
[11:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: okteta [s390x] (disco-proposed/universe) [5:0.25.4-1ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[11:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: okteta [ppc64el] (disco-proposed/universe) [5:0.25.4-1ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[11:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: okteta [i386] (disco-proposed/universe) [5:0.25.4-1ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[11:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: okteta [amd64] (disco-proposed/universe) [5:0.25.4-1ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[11:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: okteta [armhf] (disco-proposed/universe) [5:0.25.4-1ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[11:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: okteta [arm64] (disco-proposed/universe) [5:0.25.4-1ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[13:21] <slashd> o/ sil2100, could you please approve the upload for sosreport in C/B/X upload queue if you have some time today (LP: #1803735) ?
[13:31] <sil2100> slashd: hey! I'll try! I have a pretty big backlog of things, but hopefully I'll get to it ;)
[13:33] <slashd> sil2100, ok thanks ;)
[14:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted systemd [source] (bionic-proposed) [237-3ubuntu10.8]
[14:42] <xnox> apw, sil2100 - please RM systemd 237-3ubuntu10.8 from bionic-proposed
[14:42] <xnox> to be trumped by a security upload.
[14:42] <xnox> and thus will need a rebase.
[14:42] <xnox> chrisccoulson, ^^^
[14:44] <apw> xnox, doesn't that come out in the wash when teh security update hits -security ?
[14:45] <xnox> apw, but, there also is no point to verify that one.
[14:46] <apw> xnox, ok gone
[14:49] <sil2100> ...
[14:49] <sil2100> So I just wasted time?
[14:49] <sil2100> Or will we re-upload the same package after the security upload is done?
[14:50] <apw> sil2100, i heard it will be rebased and re-uploaded
[14:58] <sil2100> sigh
[14:58] <sil2100> xnox: so why did you have me review systemd in that case ;p ?
[15:20] <coreycb> sil2100: infinity: please can you take a look at promoting neutron to bionic-updates?
[15:20] <xnox> sil2100, i did not know that #part_2 security update was in progress.
[15:21] <xnox> sil2100, cause i was under the impression that all security updates were done last monday; then i got more complaints re-readability of the SRU changes break-down, which I hopefully improved on.....; and then it was like "yeah, but no, we are trumping you again dimitir"
[15:22] <sil2100> coreycb: looking
[15:22] <xnox> sil2100, the previous SRU attemp was sitting there since early october...... and got trump by security uploads part_1
[15:22] <sil2100> xnox: eeek
[15:22] <sil2100> xnox: can you give me a sign once the security update is out and the rebased systemd is in the queue?
[15:23] <xnox> sil2100, yeah, i shall smoke-signal you
[15:24] <sil2100> coreycb: hm, I see 2 of the bugs not marked as verification-done for neutron - what's the story with those?
[15:26] <coreycb> sil2100: i see bug 1795424 and bug 1790598 marked as verification-done-bionic
[15:30] <sil2100> coreycb: the pending-sru page lists also: LP: #1751396 and LP: #1783654
[15:33] <coreycb> sil2100: ok. what happened is the previous version in -proposed fixed those 2 bugs via patches cherry-picked into the package. in 12.0.5 the patches are included in the upstream release so the cherry-picked patches have been dropped.
[15:34] <coreycb> the previous version never made it out of proposed
[15:36] <sil2100> coreycb: but the fixes are in there, right?
[15:36] <sil2100> coreycb: doesn't that mean a verification of those bugs is needed?
[15:37] <coreycb> sil2100: i think they're all covered under 1795424 at this point
[15:38] <coreycb> sil2100: at least i think they can be covered under the general tempest testing at this point
[15:39] <sil2100> coreycb: could you mention what related testing has been performed as part of 1795424 and mark those verfication-done-bionic, if applicable?
[15:40] <coreycb> sil2100: sure will do
[15:40] <sil2100> Since any new changes in comparison to what's in -updates need to be validated one way or another
[15:51] <coreycb> sil2100: ok that should be all set now. i didn't realize those bugs would still show up as needing verification since they'd been dropped from the latest changelog.
[15:53] <sil2100> coreycb: I must say that in this case I also would expect them not to show up, as the .changes file of the latest upload only had the latest version listed
[15:53] <sil2100> I guess the sru-report tooling is smarter than I thought
[15:53] <sil2100> coreycb: thanks!
[16:10] <coreycb> thanks sil2100 !
[17:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dm-writeboost (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.2.8-1ubuntu2 => 2.2.8-1ubuntu3~18.04.1] (no packageset)
[18:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: systemd (bionic-proposed/main) [237-3ubuntu10.9 => 237-3ubuntu10.10] (core)
[19:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted boost-defaults [amd64] (disco-proposed) [1.67.0.1]
[19:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted boost-defaults [armhf] (disco-proposed) [1.67.0.1]
[19:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted boost-defaults [ppc64el] (disco-proposed) [1.67.0.1]
[19:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted octavia-dashboard [amd64] (disco-proposed) [2.0.0-2.1ubuntu1]
[19:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted okteta [arm64] (disco-proposed) [5:0.25.4-1ubuntu1]
[19:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted okteta [i386] (disco-proposed) [5:0.25.4-1ubuntu1]
[19:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted okteta [s390x] (disco-proposed) [5:0.25.4-1ubuntu1]
[19:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted boost-defaults [arm64] (disco-proposed) [1.67.0.1]
[19:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted boost-defaults [s390x] (disco-proposed) [1.67.0.1]
[19:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted okteta [armhf] (disco-proposed) [5:0.25.4-1ubuntu1]
[19:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted reportbug [amd64] (disco-proposed) [7.5.0ubuntu1]
[19:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted boost-defaults [i386] (disco-proposed) [1.67.0.1]
[19:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted okteta [ppc64el] (disco-proposed) [5:0.25.4-1ubuntu1]
[19:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted okteta [amd64] (disco-proposed) [5:0.25.4-1ubuntu1]
[22:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kdevelop [s390x] (disco-proposed/universe) [4:5.3.0-1] (kubuntu)
[22:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kdevelop [ppc64el] (disco-proposed/universe) [4:5.3.0-1] (kubuntu)
[22:59] <rbalint> infinity, if you have some time in your sru round u-u would be warmly welcome in cosmic and bionic
[23:05] <infinity> rbalint: That's... Some changelog.
[23:06] <infinity> rbalint: I'm not sure I have the brainpower for that review this afternoon.
[23:08] <rbalint> infinity, you are not the first one thinking about passing on this :-)
[23:09] <rbalint> infinity, however the fix would be badly needed in every release because upgrades are hanging
[23:10] <rbalint> infinity, also please note that i did not ask for xenial;-)
[23:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kdevelop [armhf] (disco-proposed/universe) [4:5.3.0-1] (kubuntu)
[23:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kdevelop [arm64] (disco-proposed/universe) [4:5.3.0-1] (kubuntu)
[23:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kdevelop [i386] (disco-proposed/universe) [4:5.3.0-1] (kubuntu)
[23:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kdevelop [amd64] (disco-proposed/universe) [4:5.3.0-1] (kubuntu)