=== andrewc is now known as Guest46625 [10:27] * cjwatson gets spam email: "Subject: Cdimage, No more struggle to increase your website traffic" [10:27] ... I really don't think that's our problem [10:54] cjwatson, ;) [11:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: okteta [s390x] (disco-proposed/universe) [5:0.25.4-1ubuntu1] (kubuntu) [11:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: okteta [ppc64el] (disco-proposed/universe) [5:0.25.4-1ubuntu1] (kubuntu) [11:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: okteta [i386] (disco-proposed/universe) [5:0.25.4-1ubuntu1] (kubuntu) [11:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: okteta [amd64] (disco-proposed/universe) [5:0.25.4-1ubuntu1] (kubuntu) [11:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: okteta [armhf] (disco-proposed/universe) [5:0.25.4-1ubuntu1] (kubuntu) [11:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: okteta [arm64] (disco-proposed/universe) [5:0.25.4-1ubuntu1] (kubuntu) === cpaelzer__ is now known as cpaelzer [13:21] o/ sil2100, could you please approve the upload for sosreport in C/B/X upload queue if you have some time today (LP: #1803735) ? [13:21] Launchpad bug 1803735 in sosreport (Ubuntu Cosmic) "[kernel] dont collect some tracing instance files" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1803735 === jdstrand_ is now known as jdstrand [13:31] slashd: hey! I'll try! I have a pretty big backlog of things, but hopefully I'll get to it ;) [13:33] sil2100, ok thanks ;) [14:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted systemd [source] (bionic-proposed) [237-3ubuntu10.8] [14:42] apw, sil2100 - please RM systemd 237-3ubuntu10.8 from bionic-proposed [14:42] to be trumped by a security upload. [14:42] and thus will need a rebase. [14:42] chrisccoulson, ^^^ [14:44] xnox, doesn't that come out in the wash when teh security update hits -security ? [14:45] apw, but, there also is no point to verify that one. [14:46] xnox, ok gone [14:49] ... [14:49] So I just wasted time? [14:49] Or will we re-upload the same package after the security upload is done? [14:50] sil2100, i heard it will be rebased and re-uploaded [14:58] sigh [14:58] xnox: so why did you have me review systemd in that case ;p ? [15:20] sil2100: infinity: please can you take a look at promoting neutron to bionic-updates? [15:20] sil2100, i did not know that #part_2 security update was in progress. [15:21] sil2100, cause i was under the impression that all security updates were done last monday; then i got more complaints re-readability of the SRU changes break-down, which I hopefully improved on.....; and then it was like "yeah, but no, we are trumping you again dimitir" [15:22] coreycb: looking [15:22] sil2100, the previous SRU attemp was sitting there since early october...... and got trump by security uploads part_1 [15:22] xnox: eeek [15:22] xnox: can you give me a sign once the security update is out and the rebased systemd is in the queue? [15:23] sil2100, yeah, i shall smoke-signal you [15:24] coreycb: hm, I see 2 of the bugs not marked as verification-done for neutron - what's the story with those? [15:26] sil2100: i see bug 1795424 and bug 1790598 marked as verification-done-bionic [15:26] bug 1795424 in neutron (Ubuntu Bionic) "[SRU] queens stable releases" [High,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1795424 [15:26] bug 1790598 in neutron (Ubuntu Xenial) "metadata service calls to nova-api-metadata with IP based SAN's fails" [Low,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1790598 [15:30] coreycb: the pending-sru page lists also: LP: #1751396 and LP: #1783654 [15:30] Launchpad bug 1751396 in neutron (Ubuntu Bionic) "DVR: Inter Tenant Traffic between two networks and connected through a shared network not reachable with DVR routers" [Critical,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1751396 [15:30] Launchpad bug 1783654 in neutron (Ubuntu Bionic) "DVR process flow not installed on physical bridge for shared tenant network" [Critical,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1783654 [15:33] sil2100: ok. what happened is the previous version in -proposed fixed those 2 bugs via patches cherry-picked into the package. in 12.0.5 the patches are included in the upstream release so the cherry-picked patches have been dropped. [15:34] the previous version never made it out of proposed [15:36] coreycb: but the fixes are in there, right? [15:36] coreycb: doesn't that mean a verification of those bugs is needed? [15:37] sil2100: i think they're all covered under 1795424 at this point [15:38] sil2100: at least i think they can be covered under the general tempest testing at this point [15:39] coreycb: could you mention what related testing has been performed as part of 1795424 and mark those verfication-done-bionic, if applicable? [15:40] sil2100: sure will do [15:40] Since any new changes in comparison to what's in -updates need to be validated one way or another [15:51] sil2100: ok that should be all set now. i didn't realize those bugs would still show up as needing verification since they'd been dropped from the latest changelog. [15:53] coreycb: I must say that in this case I also would expect them not to show up, as the .changes file of the latest upload only had the latest version listed [15:53] I guess the sru-report tooling is smarter than I thought [15:53] coreycb: thanks! [16:10] thanks sil2100 ! [17:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dm-writeboost (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.2.8-1ubuntu2 => 2.2.8-1ubuntu3~18.04.1] (no packageset) [18:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: systemd (bionic-proposed/main) [237-3ubuntu10.9 => 237-3ubuntu10.10] (core) [19:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted boost-defaults [amd64] (disco-proposed) [1.67.0.1] [19:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted boost-defaults [armhf] (disco-proposed) [1.67.0.1] [19:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted boost-defaults [ppc64el] (disco-proposed) [1.67.0.1] [19:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted octavia-dashboard [amd64] (disco-proposed) [2.0.0-2.1ubuntu1] [19:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted okteta [arm64] (disco-proposed) [5:0.25.4-1ubuntu1] [19:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted okteta [i386] (disco-proposed) [5:0.25.4-1ubuntu1] [19:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted okteta [s390x] (disco-proposed) [5:0.25.4-1ubuntu1] [19:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted boost-defaults [arm64] (disco-proposed) [1.67.0.1] [19:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted boost-defaults [s390x] (disco-proposed) [1.67.0.1] [19:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted okteta [armhf] (disco-proposed) [5:0.25.4-1ubuntu1] [19:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted reportbug [amd64] (disco-proposed) [7.5.0ubuntu1] [19:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted boost-defaults [i386] (disco-proposed) [1.67.0.1] [19:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted okteta [ppc64el] (disco-proposed) [5:0.25.4-1ubuntu1] [19:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted okteta [amd64] (disco-proposed) [5:0.25.4-1ubuntu1] [22:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kdevelop [s390x] (disco-proposed/universe) [4:5.3.0-1] (kubuntu) [22:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kdevelop [ppc64el] (disco-proposed/universe) [4:5.3.0-1] (kubuntu) [22:59] infinity, if you have some time in your sru round u-u would be warmly welcome in cosmic and bionic [23:05] rbalint: That's... Some changelog. [23:06] rbalint: I'm not sure I have the brainpower for that review this afternoon. [23:08] infinity, you are not the first one thinking about passing on this :-) [23:09] infinity, however the fix would be badly needed in every release because upgrades are hanging [23:10] infinity, also please note that i did not ask for xenial;-) [23:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kdevelop [armhf] (disco-proposed/universe) [4:5.3.0-1] (kubuntu) [23:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kdevelop [arm64] (disco-proposed/universe) [4:5.3.0-1] (kubuntu) [23:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kdevelop [i386] (disco-proposed/universe) [4:5.3.0-1] (kubuntu) [23:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kdevelop [amd64] (disco-proposed/universe) [4:5.3.0-1] (kubuntu)