[06:26] <vorlon> tsimonq2: what's the deal with the remaining qtbase-opensource-src autopkgtest regressions?  this is making it difficult to track progress towards migrating these transitions (and was it really necessary to reupload qtbase before the transition completed? some communication around this would've been nice)
[06:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kdevelop [amd64] (disco-proposed) [4:5.3.0-1]
[06:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kdevelop [armhf] (disco-proposed) [4:5.3.0-1]
[06:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kdevelop [ppc64el] (disco-proposed) [4:5.3.0-1]
[06:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kdevelop [arm64] (disco-proposed) [4:5.3.0-1]
[06:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kdevelop [s390x] (disco-proposed) [4:5.3.0-1]
[06:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kdevelop [i386] (disco-proposed) [4:5.3.0-1]
[06:58] <acheronuk> vorlon: can okteta be ignored against qtbase this time? tests were moved to run at build time via debian/rules and there is a lib bump. I forgot this would make those tests go south where britney has already scheduled a test against the one in -release
[06:59] <vorlon> acheronuk: what lib is bumped, that wasn't already bumped at the time the tests were run against qtbase-opensource-src 5.11.2+dfsg-6ubuntu1?
[07:00] <vorlon> acheronuk: anyway, I've just rescheduled the tests with --all-proposed which I suspect is enough to get them to pass, but I will also skiptest for now
[07:01] <acheronuk> libkasten3okteta1controllers1 -> libkasten3okteta1controllers1abi1
[07:01] <vorlon> ah
[07:05] <acheronuk> vorlon: thanks. hopefully marble go pass on retry
[07:38] <acheronuk> vorlon: 'SKIP no tests in this package' with okteta with --all-proposed. that is what I seemed to recall happens in these cases
[07:38] <acheronuk> I mean that = fail
[07:50] <acheronuk> a hole in britney logic that could maybe be patched, but probably not hit enough to be worth the bother
[08:56] <doko> vorlon, acheronuk: recheduling okteta doesn't help. the tests were removed by tsimonq2, so the autopkg test base line has to be reset
[09:00] <acheronuk> doko: agreed. though to be fair to tsimonq2, it was not he who did the merge removing them
[09:00]  * acheronuk looks shiftily around
[09:02] <doko> LocutusOfBorg, rbalint: kodi ftbfs
[10:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rally [amd64] (disco-proposed/universe) [1.2.1+dfsg1-1] (no packageset)
[10:15] <doko> please mark the postgresql-hll/2.12-1 tests as failing on armhf i386 and s390x. removed the other binaries. see Debian #914189
[10:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rally [amd64] (disco-proposed) [1.2.1+dfsg1-1]
[10:29] <rbalint> doko, will queue the patch for next upload in Debian, i should fix autopkgtest anyway
[10:59] <doko> tkamppeter: https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-disco/disco/amd64/c/cups/20181120_021438_982bb@/log.gz
[12:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted systemd [source] (bionic-proposed) [237-3ubuntu10.10]
[12:42] <rbalint> doko, kodi uploaded to Debian, waiting for the sync
[12:43] <rbalint> RAOF, bdmurray: please accept u-u cosmic and bionic -proposed, it fixes a serious issue
[12:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pango1.0 [ppc64el] (disco-proposed/main) [1.42.4-4] (core)
[12:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pango1.0 [s390x] (disco-proposed/main) [1.42.4-4] (core)
[13:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pango1.0 [arm64] (disco-proposed/main) [1.42.4-4] (core)
[13:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pango1.0 [armhf] (disco-proposed/main) [1.42.4-4] (core)
[13:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected sosreport [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.6-1ubuntu0.18.04.2]
[13:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected sosreport [source] (cosmic-proposed) [3.6-1ubuntu0.18.10.2]
[13:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected sosreport [source] (xenial-proposed) [3.6-1ubuntu0.16.04.2]
[13:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sosreport (xenial-proposed/main) [3.6-1ubuntu0.16.04.1 => 3.6-1ubuntu0.16.04.2] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[13:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sosreport (bionic-proposed/main) [3.6-1ubuntu0.18.04.1 => 3.6-1ubuntu0.18.04.2] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[13:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sosreport (cosmic-proposed/main) [3.6-1ubuntu0.18.10.1 => 3.6-1ubuntu0.18.10.2] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[13:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pango1.0 [amd64] (disco-proposed/main) [1.42.4-4] (core)
[13:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pango1.0 [i386] (disco-proposed/main) [1.42.4-4] (core)
[13:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sosreport [source] (cosmic-proposed) [3.6-1ubuntu0.18.10.2]
[13:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sosreport [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.6-1ubuntu0.18.04.2]
[13:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sosreport [source] (xenial-proposed) [3.6-1ubuntu0.16.04.2]
[13:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: adobe-flashplugin (bionic-proposed/partner) [1:20181113.1-0ubuntu0.18.04.1 => 1:20181120.1-0ubuntu0.18.04.1] (no packageset)
[13:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: adobe-flashplugin (trusty-proposed/partner) [1:20181113.1-0ubuntu0.14.04.1 => 1:20181120.1-0ubuntu0.14.04.1] (no packageset)
[13:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: adobe-flashplugin (cosmic-proposed/partner) [1:20181113.1-0ubuntu0.18.10.1 => 1:20181120.1-0ubuntu0.18.10.1] (no packageset)
[13:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: adobe-flashplugin (xenial-proposed/partner) [1:20181113.1-0ubuntu0.16.04.1 => 1:20181120.1-0ubuntu0.16.04.1] (no packageset)
[14:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted adobe-flashplugin [source] (cosmic-proposed) [1:20181120.1-0ubuntu0.18.10.1]
[14:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted adobe-flashplugin [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:20181120.1-0ubuntu0.18.04.1]
[14:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted adobe-flashplugin [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:20181120.1-0ubuntu0.16.04.1]
[14:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted adobe-flashplugin [source] (trusty-proposed) [1:20181120.1-0ubuntu0.14.04.1]
[14:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: networking-arista [amd64] (disco-proposed/universe) [2018.2.0~b1~git2018112011.53edc6a-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[14:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (xenial-proposed/main) [2.35.5 => 2.36.1] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[14:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (bionic-proposed/main) [2.35.5+18.04 => 2.36.1+18.04] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[14:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (cosmic-proposed/main) [2.35.5+18.10 => 2.36.1+18.10] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[14:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted networking-arista [amd64] (disco-proposed) [2018.2.0~b1~git2018112011.53edc6a-0ubuntu1]
[14:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pango1.0 [arm64] (disco-proposed) [1.42.4-4]
[14:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pango1.0 [i386] (disco-proposed) [1.42.4-4]
[14:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pango1.0 [s390x] (disco-proposed) [1.42.4-4]
[14:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pango1.0 [amd64] (disco-proposed) [1.42.4-4]
[14:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pango1.0 [ppc64el] (disco-proposed) [1.42.4-4]
[14:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pango1.0 [armhf] (disco-proposed) [1.42.4-4]
[14:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (trusty-proposed/universe) [2.35.5~14.04 => 2.36.1~14.04] (no packageset)
[15:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fontconfig (bionic-proposed/main) [2.12.6-0ubuntu2 => 2.12.6-0ubuntu2.1] (core)
[15:28] <Laney> bdmurray: how often do the rls reports run? (I think not very often: could it be made more frequent?)
[15:28] <Laney> the rls bug ones I mean
[15:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: unity-settings-daemon (bionic-proposed/universe) [15.04.1+18.04.20180413-0ubuntu1.1 => 15.04.1+18.04.20180413-0ubuntu1.2] (mythbuntu)
[15:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: unity-settings-daemon (cosmic-proposed/universe) [15.04.1+18.04.20180413-0ubuntu2 => 15.04.1+18.04.20180413-0ubuntu3] (mythbuntu)
[15:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected unity-settings-daemon [source] (bionic-proposed) [15.04.1+18.04.20180413-0ubuntu1.2]
[15:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: unity-settings-daemon (bionic-proposed/universe) [15.04.1+18.04.20180413-0ubuntu1.1 => 15.04.1+18.04.20180413-0ubuntu1.2] (mythbuntu)
[15:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: unity-settings-daemon (xenial-proposed/main) [15.04.1+16.04.20160701-0ubuntu2 => 15.04.1+16.04.20160701-0ubuntu3] (ubuntu-desktop)
[15:52] <bdmurray> Laney: the devel release one runs more frequently than the stable release ones
[15:55] <Laney> bdmurray: in desktop we're using it for stable releases too, but the reports are often behind by the time we get to the meeting
[15:56] <bdmurray> Laney: okay I'll have a look.
[15:57] <bdmurray> Laney: its every 8 hours now, how about every 4?
[15:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: hwdata (xenial-proposed/main) [0.267-1 => 0.267-1ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[16:01] <Laney> sure, that'll help, thanks
[16:16] <bdmurray> sil2100: Are you about?
[16:32] <teward> does anyone here know where the releases.ubuntu.com subpages for the individual releases' header/footers that surround the file list for ISOs is generated?
[16:32] <xnox> teward, lp:ubuntu-cdimage
[16:32] <teward> xnox, git or bzr?
[16:34] <teward> xnox, this generates the HEADER/FOOTER.html files that get referrenced on the mirrors?
[16:35] <xnox> teward, it generates _all_ of the contents seen on cdimage.ubuntu.com/ full stop.
[16:35] <teward> ok
[16:35] <teward> i'll have to dig into this, because the mirrors/web team made a change to the CSS structure for imports to be mirror-root-relative instead of including the CSS from releases.u.c for those running https:// enabled mirrors to not have CSS import problems
[16:36] <teward> not sure if that was updated in the generation scripts or not (I'll have to dig)
[16:41] <sil2100> bdmurray: what's up?
[16:43] <bdmurray> sil2100: I'd like to get nautilus for bionic fully phased, I keep overwriting all the "regressions" and I think its a losing battle.
[16:44] <xnox> teward, we do not republish releases.u.c automatically, if changes are needed there a manual push will need to happen.
[16:44] <bdmurray> sil2100: I just think the phased-updater is going to keep finding false positives and that we should get the update out to every one.
[16:45] <teward> xnox, it's two-part, there'll need to probably be a manual push for a change, but i want to make sure the script is adjusted for future as well
[16:45] <teward> let me dig in once I am home in front of my Linux and I'll go hunting
[16:46] <teward> (at work now)
[16:49] <sil2100> bdmurray: ok, how can I help with that? You want me to override the phased percentage?
[16:49] <bdmurray> sil2100: yeah, let me find the magic command
[16:51] <seb128> Trevinho, ^ interest bit for you
[16:51] <bdmurray> sil2100: change-override with -z 100 is all I know right now
[16:51] <sil2100> bdmurray: ok, proceeding with that then!
[16:51] <seb128> bdmurray, thanks, I was going to ask if there was some way to tell the system to let users have the SRU update and stop nagging daily about weird one time reports
[16:52] <bdmurray> seb128: I was tired of your emails! as I'm sure you were tired of mine. ;-)
[16:52] <seb128> :)
[16:52] <seb128> as a wishlist it would be nice to be able to tell it to go back to "n version" when doing the checking
[16:53] <seb128> because if you end up in a case where a SRU replace one that was not out long, the system keeps thinking those are new when it's obvious they are not
[16:54] <sil2100> bdmurray, seb128: done o/
[16:54] <bdmurray> sil2100: thanks
[16:54] <seb128> thx
[16:54] <sil2100> yw
[17:02] <Trevinho> seb128, bdmurray: good thanks
[17:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pysimplesoap [source] (cosmic-proposed) [1.16-2ubuntu0.1]
[17:10] <teward> xnox, ahhh, I think I found the bits that'd have to change, I'll double check later at home when I have the better capacity to test rather than doing everything from just the web browser.
[17:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openssh [source] (cosmic-proposed) [1:7.7p1-4ubuntu0.1]
[17:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted open-iscsi [source] (cosmic-proposed) [2.0.874-5ubuntu9.1]
[17:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted open-iscsi [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.0.874-5ubuntu2.4]
[17:19] <vorlon> doko, seb128: what's the word on LP: #1803230?  I see it marked as 'wishlist', which certainly doesn't affect its actual impact on the archive for disco
[17:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gvfs [source] (cosmic-proposed) [1.38.1-0ubuntu1]
[17:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted unity-settings-daemon [source] (cosmic-proposed) [15.04.1+18.04.20180413-0ubuntu3]
[17:39] <bdmurray> seb128: Could you update the bugs for the g-s-d and geoclue-2.0 cosmic SRUs?
[17:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted unity-settings-daemon [source] (bionic-proposed) [15.04.1+18.04.20180413-0ubuntu1.2]
[17:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gvfs [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.36.1-0ubuntu1.2]
[18:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fontconfig [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.12.6-0ubuntu2.1]
[18:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dm-writeboost [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.2.8-1ubuntu3~18.04.1]
[18:10] <kenvandine> can someone please reject fontconfig from bionic-proposed?  I need to reupload
[18:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted update-notifier [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.192.1.4]
[19:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dh-golang [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.34.2]
[19:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-mechanicalsoup [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.10.0-1.1]
[19:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libreoffice [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:6.0.7-0ubuntu0.18.04.1]
[19:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libreoffice-l10n [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:6.0.7-0ubuntu0.18.04.1]
[19:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-image (bionic-proposed/main) [1.4+18.04ubuntu2 => 1.5+18.04ubuntu1] (desktop-core)
[19:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-image (xenial-proposed/main) [1.4+16.04ubuntu2 => 1.5+16.04ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[19:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-image (cosmic-proposed/main) [1.4+18.10ubuntu4 => 1.5+18.10ubuntu1] (desktop-core)
[20:11] <seb128> bdmurray, what do you mean?
[20:12] <seb128> vorlon, no idea, that bug was filed by doko and set as "incomplete", the description also has no context nor any word on the "impact on the archive for disco"
[20:13] <seb128> vorlon, doko, also we have standard processes for raising bugs to team and flagging them importants for series (maybe it should be tagged rls-dd-incoming?)
[20:22] <seb128> bdmurray, ah, I see that Steve was no happy with the testcase on the geoclue one
[20:35] <seb128> bdmurray, updated, g-s-d as well
[20:41] <infinity> kenvandine: It can
[20:41] <infinity> Erm.
[20:41] <infinity> kenvandine: It can't be "rejected" after it's accepted.  You just get to upload with a higher version number.
[20:56] <kenvandine> infinity: thanks, I'll do that
[21:18] <doko> vorlon, seb128: wishlist is a severe understatement. it's on your list for http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses_by_team.html for more than a week, ping on #ubuntu-desktop. no idea why you think it's wishlist, and blocking icu
[21:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fontconfig (bionic-proposed/main) [2.12.6-0ubuntu2.1 => 2.12.6-0ubuntu2.2] (core)
[22:01] <seb128> doko, it's listed on that page as a stack of other sources, I don't see why it's so important. and if you are blocked by it you can still delete the new version from proposed meanwhile
[22:02] <seb128> well, anyway, as said earlier we have standard processes to assign to teams or target bugs to series
[22:02] <seb128> but that's for another day
[22:05] <bdmurray> infinity: Could you review https://code.launchpad.net/~brian-murray/ubuntu-archive-tools/sru-report-incomplete/+merge/358673?
[22:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-settings-daemon [source] (cosmic-proposed) [3.30.1.2-1ubuntu3]
[22:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted geoclue-2.0 [source] (cosmic-proposed) [2.4.12-2ubuntu2]
[22:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-6 [source] (cosmic-proposed) [6.5.0-2ubuntu1~18.10]
[22:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-6-cross [source] (cosmic-proposed) [30ubuntu4.1]
[22:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-6-cross-ports [source] (cosmic-proposed) [28ubuntu5.1]
[22:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-6 [source] (bionic-proposed) [6.5.0-2ubuntu1~18.04]
[22:39] <RAOF> rbalint: Did you deliberately not close the relevant bugs from the changelog?
[22:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-6-cross [source] (bionic-proposed) [30ubuntu3.1]
[22:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-6-cross-ports [source] (bionic-proposed) [28ubuntu3.1]
[22:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: installation-guide (bionic-proposed/main) [20160121ubuntu4.2 => 20160121ubuntu4.3] (core)
[22:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: installation-guide (cosmic-proposed/main) [20160121ubuntu7 => 20160121ubuntu7.1] (core)
[23:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-release-upgrader [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:16.04.26]
[23:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-software (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.1-0ubuntu4.18.04.7 => 3.28.1-0ubuntu4.18.04.8] (ubuntu-desktop)
[23:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-software [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.1-0ubuntu4.18.04.8]