[00:17] Crostini booted, but then when I clicked terminal it would launch the icon, spin for a bit, then stop and go away. 😕 [00:20] Disabled and reenabled. It's working fine! [00:21] Whoohoo! Chrome is now the OS that runs more apps than any other in history. [00:27] My first install was "sl". [00:30] @AdamOutler, It has been true for some time. Technically you can do the same with Windows/Linux or MacOS but ChromeOS is the only that has official support for all of the OSs without needing to install any third party software [00:30] Nope. Not on mine. Just got the update @KMyers 😀 [00:30] i should have just waited for it to come out on the acer, lol [00:31] @AdamOutler, What device did you get? [00:32] It's a last year Acer c610? It has a dual core Intel. [00:32] I don't know the model [00:32] Ok. Not bad at all [00:33] It's bad. I wouldn't use it but it does my kids homework and web games. [00:33] Ssh in a pinch [00:33] Celeron and slow storage. [00:33] I am hoping they make a Pixelbook V2 [00:34] My pixel 2 just got the call screening feature. [00:34] I don't need a pixel 3 now. [04:05] Did you guys see this Meetup? … Pre Turkey Rooftop Yoga - With LuluLemon & Ironhack (Free!) … Ironhack Miami: Learn to Code + Design … Tuesday, 6:30 PM Nov 20 [04:06] There are 5 programming related meetups this week. [04:06] Nice but I am currently 1200 miles away [16:46] What is the benefit of using redhat over Ubuntu? [16:47] Dnf maybe is my immediate thought [17:11] Dnf? Did not finish? [17:12] My work wants me to use redhat for a server. Redhat has licensing fees and then also fees for virtualization, then more fees for the redhat VMs license. I'm just trying to figure out what RedHat provided that is not provided by canonical. [17:14] CentOS gives the best RedHat experience without the license [17:19] I'm trying to figure out what the advantage is of RedHat. It appears that nobody has ever challenged the paradigm. Is there a reason for red hat? [17:21] There are a few things it used to do better when it came to servers but that gap has been closed for years [17:22] It's so expensive. [17:24] I don't think the industry has evolved. They see Red Hat as the only "Enterprise" option and the rest is just a toy for neck beards and hackers [17:47] @AdamOutler, The historical/transactional reverses etc that can be tied easily into playbooks or some such. I'm sure other distros have an equivalent. Guess for Enterprise it just boils down to support contacts [17:47] Iirc, yum also has that feature [17:48] I can also imagine the resistant to change thing [17:49] Years of a shop running distro X, and distro Y breaks legacy scripts nobody knows how to support [17:49] That's more a corporate thing than a distro viability thing though [17:50] The same reason nobody runs ipv6 I'd wager. [20:33] I definitely think it has to do with market penetration and familiarity. Familiarity with a technology drives a lot of IT decisions over the best product for the problem. [20:33] I think companies that are younger and have a younger group of employees are more likely to implement Debian based distros. [20:34] The licensing simplicity of Ubuntu is a huge advantage over Redhat, IMHO. [20:34] I can run Ubuntu and spin up instances all night and day with ease, and then finally deploy to my production Ubuntu box that looks identical to all of my other Ubuntu instances across the board.