=== TheHonorableKitt is now known as ThKitten
[05:58] <cpaelzer> good morning
[07:14] <lordievader> Good morning
=== Bodenhaltung_ is now known as Bodenhaltung
[10:31] <ahasenack> good morning
[14:39] <baffle> Hi, I am trying to get frr to start on boot on 18.04, and the unit-file has Wants/Before=network-online.target .. But network-online.target is never reached, status says "inactive (dead)".. network-online.target has depends on systemd-networkd-wait-online.service (I use netplan for interface config), but that is also "inactive (dead)".  It again depends on systemd-networkd.service, wich is "active
[14:39] <baffle> (running)" and has no errors, and have configured interfaces.. Any tips? I'm getting really frustrated. If I do "systemctl --type=target" network-online.target is not listed..
[14:41] <baffle> If I switch back to using /etc/network/interfaces, network-online.target has other dependencies, but still doesn't trigger.
[14:59] <TJ-> baffle: if you've got a Wants= surely you need an After= not a Before=
[15:17] <baffle> TJ-: Sorry. /lib/systemd/system/frr.service has [Unit] After=networking.service, [Install] WantedBy=network-online.target.
[15:19] <baffle> TJ-: If I do systemctl show frr.service it says "Before=shutdown.target network-online.target" and "After=basic.target system.slice networking.service systemd-journald.socket sysinit.target".
[15:34] <TJ-> baffle: ahhh... maybe I've got confused again over 'Wants=' - I seem to recall someone in #systemd telling me it is like an inverse dependency, as in this unit becomes Want-ed by the named unit
[15:56] <theGoat> so i would like to centrally manage the authentication of my linux VMs, without using AD.  was wondering what my options were?
[16:04] <cyphermox> LDAP
[16:05] <cyphermox> also NIS, and probably something I forgot, too
[17:41] <leftyfb> Anyone know of some documentation on deploying a disk image (from dd maybe) using PXE? (Not the fog project)
[17:46] <lordcirth> leftyfb, you probably want clonezilla
[17:47] <leftyfb> nope
[17:47] <leftyfb> clonezilla won't use a dd image
[17:47] <leftyfb> we want to create images in a CI system and then deploy them using PXE
[17:48] <lordcirth> That's surprising.  Have you considered not using dd, then?  It is pretty inefficient
[17:49] <leftyfb> possibly
[17:50] <lordcirth> Also, the clonezilla page says you can use dd images
[17:50] <lordcirth> "Based on Partclone (default), Partimage (optional), ntfsclone (optional), or dd to image or clone a partition."
[17:52] <teward> leftyfb: you can use advanced clonezilla server / client modes
[17:53] <teward> and make it use dd
[17:53] <teward> it's slow (and I mean SLOW) but
[17:53] <leftyfb> define slow
[17:53] <leftyfb> slower than a d-i install via pxe?
[17:53] <teward> no i mean the dd process :P
[17:53] <lordcirth> probably depends on bandwidth vs cpu
[17:53] <teward> ^ this
[17:54] <lordcirth> d-i is bottlenecked by dpkg unzip, I think
[17:54] <TJ-> leftyfb: what have you tried? are you using syslinux?
[17:54] <leftyfb> I must say, I was VERY impressed with FOG. It pull a 10G image from a 120G drive and compressed it down to about 600M, all within a minute or 2. Takes the same amount of time to deploy it back to the same drive
[17:54] <lordcirth> leftyfb, that's pretty cool
[17:54] <leftyfb> TJ-: yes, I'm using syslinux
[17:55] <lordcirth> So, why aren't you using fog, then?
[17:56] <TJ-> leftyfb: so you can do "LINUX memdisk" "INTRD disk.img" "APPEND raw" ?
[17:56] <TJ-> s/INTRD/INITRD/
[17:56] <leftyfb> lordcirth: because it's way overkill for what we need, not sure about the importing of dd images from a separate CI system and there would be a ton of custom work to get it to use the system serial# from DMI to determine a hostname as opposed to MAC address. At the moment I can't even get it to change the hostname after deployment like it's supposed to
[17:57] <TJ-> leftyfb: oh, you wouldn't even need the APPEND for a HDD/partitioned image file > 4GB
[17:57] <leftyfb> TJ-: At the moment I'm only using syslinux to run a d-i install. Are you saying syslinux is capable of deploying a dd image on it's own? I'm not looking to run it live, I need it to dd the image back to the drive
[17:57] <TJ-> leftyfb: using memdisk, yes
[17:58] <TJ-> leftyfb: maybe this'll help: https://www.syslinux.org/wiki/index.php?title=MEMDISK#Hard_disk_images
[17:59] <leftyfb> TJ-: you sure this will dd the disk image to the physical drive and not just try to run it live in memory?
[17:59] <TJ-> leftyfb: if you want to write the image, you'd need to boot a minimal initrd.img that fetches the disk/img and writes it to the device
[17:59] <leftyfb> ah, see, right
[17:59] <leftyfb> That's what I'm looking to do, write the image
[18:00] <TJ-> leftyfb: it'd have to be 2 stage, you've got to have something that can do the fetching and writing
[18:00] <leftyfb> TJ-: is there documentation on writing such an initrd.img? Can it run a python script as well?
[18:01] <leftyfb> TJ-: what do you mean by 2 stage? As in chain loading initrd's or something?
[18:04] <TJ-> leftyfb: 2 stage as in 1) PXE boot a kernel and initrd 2) initrd fetches disk.img and writes it to disk, then sets things up to pivot to its rootfs and start its /sbin/init
[18:04] <leftyfb> ah right, for any post-install(HOSTNAME) right?
[18:05] <TJ-> leftyfb: casper is designed to do that but with an ISO image; you may be able to adapt those casper initialramfs scripts/config/directives to do it
[18:05] <TJ-> casper loads/fetches the ./casper/filesystemd.squashfs for example
[18:05] <leftyfb> The only thing I need to do post-image is change the hostname. I could do that just by mounting the partition and sed'ing the /etc/hostname
[18:06] <leftyfb> So maybe all I need is a custom initrd
[18:07] <TJ-> yes, it sounds like it
[18:08] <leftyfb> Can dd use an image it's getting live over wget or the like? It'll be in the 10's of GB's, not enough to stick in memory
[18:08] <lordcirth> leftyfb, dd will accept from a pipe.  Get it there how you please
[18:08] <lordcirth> honestly you could probably netcat it
[18:09] <leftyfb> ok, that's what I figured. I've done it from tar/zip
[18:09] <lordcirth> netcat may not be a wise idea, though
[18:09] <leftyfb> looks like I have a ton of stuff to look into/learn
[18:09] <lordcirth> Don't we all
[18:10] <leftyfb> it's too bad FOG wasn't easier to play with. The imaging/deploying was so efficient
[18:10] <lordcirth> I've added FOG to my tech todo list
[18:10] <leftyfb> The install was a bit of a mess
[18:11] <lordcirth> I want to install OpenNebula on my home server, and put FOG in a VM on it
[18:11] <leftyfb> It's a well-meaning project and it's got the imaging stuff down nicely, but the UX is pretty bad
[18:11] <lordcirth> It's not a homelab if it's not needlessly complex for home use
[20:35] <leftyfb> lordcirth: https://photos.app.goo.gl/LmdPoSS9wP4VtCDt8
[20:36] <leftyfb> my "home lab"
[20:36] <lordcirth> neat
[20:43] <leftyfb> lordcirth: have you seen my little pi rack?
[20:43] <lordcirth> no
[20:47] <leftyfb> https://photos.app.goo.gl/UBtwQK2mumzh4w7F9
[20:48] <mybalzitch> oh shit, that's nicely organized and everything!
[20:48] <leftyfb> :)
[20:48] <mybalzitch> that 2nd photo is real pleasing to look at
[20:48] <leftyfb> all custom
[20:50] <lordcirth> Shiny
[21:57] <bjonnh> running docker in LXD : https://support.plesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/360012448554-Docker-updated-leads-to-the-failed-docker-service-Dependency-failed-for-Docker-Application-Container-Engine
[21:57] <bjonnh> I had to follow (some how, they have a lot of mistakes) that