| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mate-screensaver (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.20.0-1 => 1.20.2-1~ubuntu18.04.1] (ubuntu-mate) (sync) | 03:43 | |
| tsimonq2 | infinity: That's my (kind of belated) copy-package with binaries: ^ | 03:49 |
|---|---|---|
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pushover [amd64] (disco-proposed) [0.0.5+git20180909-3] | 08:22 | |
| bluesabre | Release team, what steps need to be taken to discontinue 32-bit ISOs for Xubuntu? I've prepared a mail to the release mailing list, but not sure if that's the way to go. | 13:17 |
| bluesabre | (related: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/xubuntu-devel/2018-December/011755.html) | 13:19 |
| infinity | bluesabre: The mail is enough, we'll twiddle the right bits. | 13:22 |
| bluesabre | infinity: great, thanks | 13:22 |
| bluesabre | And sent. | 13:23 |
| infinity | I think that leaves lubuntu as the only i386 image still produced (not counting base and netboot). | 13:24 |
| infinity | tsimonq2: ^ | 13:24 |
| infinity | bluesabre: Note that "inability to upgrade" probably shouldn't have been a factor, but it certainly hints at future plans. :P | 13:25 |
| infinity | (we disabled automagic upgrades specifically because if we *do* drop i386 before 20.04, we'd rather leave users with a 5-year-supported 18.04 than stranded on a 9m release after) | 13:26 |
| bluesabre | Sure | 13:26 |
| infinity | But if we do 20.04 i386, we'll enable that upgrade. | 13:26 |
| bluesabre | It was one of several contributing factors :) | 13:26 |
| infinity | I hope we don't do it. | 13:26 |
| infinity | bluesabre: It's gone, and scrubbed from your daily-live dirs as well. | 13:52 |
| bluesabre | infinity: great, thanks for the help! | 13:53 |
| infinity | bluesabre: Thanks for making lubuntu the last oddball with an i386 image so they can stop using you as precedent. ;) | 13:54 |
| bluesabre | ha :D | 13:54 |
| bluesabre | sorry tsimonq2, we've made it a bit harder for you to say no | 13:54 |
| infinity | I mean, lubuntu can keep producing i386 images right up until we flat-out refuse to build i386 debs anymore, but I'm trying to recommend against it. | 13:55 |
| infinity | Since ISOs encourage installs and that sets future user expectations. | 13:56 |
| infinity | So better to wean them off. | 13:56 |
| mwhudson | they can pay for ISOs by debugging every time x87 goes weird | 20:49 |
| * acheronuk votes to kill i386 and armhf now.... | 21:53 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pdftk [ppc64el] (disco-proposed/universe) [2.02-5] (no packageset) | 23:19 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pdftk [s390x] (disco-proposed/universe) [2.02-5] (no packageset) | 23:19 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pdftk [amd64] (disco-proposed/universe) [2.02-5] (no packageset) | 23:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pdftk [i386] (disco-proposed/universe) [2.02-5] (no packageset) | 23:21 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: movim [amd64] (disco-proposed/universe) [0.14-1] (no packageset) | 23:23 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pdftk [arm64] (disco-proposed/universe) [2.02-5] (no packageset) | 23:26 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pdftk [armhf] (disco-proposed/universe) [2.02-5] (no packageset) | 23:28 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!