[03:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mate-screensaver (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.20.0-1 => 1.20.2-1~ubuntu18.04.1] (ubuntu-mate) (sync)
[03:49] <tsimonq2> infinity: That's my (kind of belated) copy-package with binaries: ^
[08:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pushover [amd64] (disco-proposed) [0.0.5+git20180909-3]
[13:17] <bluesabre> Release team, what steps need to be taken to discontinue 32-bit ISOs for Xubuntu? I've prepared a mail to the release mailing list, but not sure if that's the way to go.
[13:19] <bluesabre> (related: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/xubuntu-devel/2018-December/011755.html)
[13:22] <infinity> bluesabre: The mail is enough, we'll twiddle the right bits.
[13:22] <bluesabre> infinity: great, thanks
[13:23] <bluesabre> And sent.
[13:24] <infinity> I think that leaves lubuntu as the only i386 image still produced (not counting base and netboot).
[13:24] <infinity> tsimonq2: ^
[13:25] <infinity> bluesabre: Note that "inability to upgrade" probably shouldn't have been a factor, but it certainly hints at future plans. :P
[13:26] <infinity> (we disabled automagic upgrades specifically because if we *do* drop i386 before 20.04, we'd rather leave users with a 5-year-supported 18.04 than stranded on a 9m release after)
[13:26] <bluesabre> Sure
[13:26] <infinity> But if we do 20.04 i386, we'll enable that upgrade.
[13:26] <bluesabre> It was one of several contributing factors :)
[13:26] <infinity> I hope we don't do it.
[13:52] <infinity> bluesabre: It's gone, and scrubbed from your daily-live dirs as well.
[13:53] <bluesabre> infinity: great, thanks for the help!
[13:54] <infinity> bluesabre: Thanks for making lubuntu the last oddball with an i386 image so they can stop using you as precedent. ;)
[13:54] <bluesabre> ha :D
[13:54] <bluesabre> sorry tsimonq2, we've made it a bit harder for you to say no
[13:55] <infinity> I mean, lubuntu can keep producing i386 images right up until we flat-out refuse to build i386 debs anymore, but I'm trying to recommend against it.
[13:56] <infinity> Since ISOs encourage installs and that sets future user expectations.
[13:56] <infinity> So better to wean them off.
[20:49] <mwhudson> they can pay for ISOs by debugging every time x87 goes weird
[21:53]  * acheronuk votes to kill i386 and armhf now....
[23:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pdftk [ppc64el] (disco-proposed/universe) [2.02-5] (no packageset)
[23:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pdftk [s390x] (disco-proposed/universe) [2.02-5] (no packageset)
[23:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pdftk [amd64] (disco-proposed/universe) [2.02-5] (no packageset)
[23:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pdftk [i386] (disco-proposed/universe) [2.02-5] (no packageset)
[23:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: movim [amd64] (disco-proposed/universe) [0.14-1] (no packageset)
[23:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pdftk [arm64] (disco-proposed/universe) [2.02-5] (no packageset)
[23:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pdftk [armhf] (disco-proposed/universe) [2.02-5] (no packageset)