[07:06] <didrocks> good morning
[07:22] <duflu> Oops, hi didrocks
[07:22] <duflu> And with that, afk
[07:25] <didrocks> hey duflu
[08:00] <seb128> good morning desktopers
[08:03] <duflu> Hi seb128
[08:03] <seb128> hey duflu, how are you? ready for the w.e?
[08:04] <duflu> seb128, I sense summer will start properly soon despite wearing a hoodie most of the day. Yeah, preparing for gardening and Xmas. You?
[08:05] <seb128> I'm ok, slept a bit longer which is nice, let's see if that helps to kick the butt of that cold which is still annoying me
[08:05] <duflu> Maybe sleep some more
[08:05] <duflu> As with most treatments, keep going past when you think you're better
[08:27] <seb128> k, I'm dropping offline for a bit, going to a coworking place with some GNOME guys today
[08:47] <seb128> (stop on the way to get coffee ;)
[08:47] <duflu> I forget what linux.org used to link to, but it looks hijacked
[08:48] <duflu> Maybe they own it. Don't know
[08:49] <duflu> Just a thinko when I meant to go to kernel.org
[09:02] <Laney> hey, happy friday!
[09:03] <duflu> Hi hi Laney
[09:03] <duflu> Laney
[09:03] <Laney> Laney
[09:04] <Laney> what's up duflu duflu
[09:05] <Laney> just cycled to the shops in a storm
[09:05] <Laney> moist sox
[09:05] <duflu> Laney, going round in circles with prexisting upstream MRs, but I am determined to not work into Friday night this time
[09:06] <Laney> rebasing fun?
[09:06] <Laney> review fun?
[09:06] <duflu> Rebasing, fixing, rewording
[09:08] <Laney> 😓
[09:08] <Laney> fearnon seems to be a bit more active lately
[09:22] <andyrock> good morning!
[09:22] <duflu> Morning Laney
[09:22] <duflu> Argh
[09:22] <duflu> Morning andyrock
[09:23] <duflu> Laney, can we backport the fix for bug 1774957 to bionic?
[09:26] <Laney> duflu: I should think so - are you up for submitting it?
[09:26] <Laney> ideally a cherry-pick MR
[09:27] <duflu> Laney, I was speaking hypothetically. It doesn't affect me and I am finishing up for the week. Just accepting the nomination would be good thanks
[09:28] <Laney> then it'll need an assignee
[09:28] <Laney> Actually this is in 3.28 so what we really want is a release
[09:40] <seb128> hey again desktop, from the co-working space
[09:44] <Laney> hey seb128
[09:44] <Laney> who's with you this time?
[09:46] <seb128> Laney, hey! Hans, Carlos and Mark/Patrick from rh who I don't know/I don't think do GNOME
[09:48] <Laney> ahhh outnumbered
[09:48] <seb128> :)
[09:48] <Laney> is carlos in .nl?
[09:48] <seb128> yeah, he's living in Leiden for a few years
[09:49] <seb128> apparently Spain is too hot in summer or something :)
[09:50] <Laney> heheh
[10:47] <andyrock> seb128: have you asked Carlos about osk on xorg?
[10:48] <seb128> andyrock, hey, not yet, I wanted to check with your first what issues we still had on our list and their status
[10:48] <seb128> like waiting for code reviews, input, other
[10:48] <seb128> can you make a summary for me? ;)
[10:48] <andyrock> yep I'll send you an email :)
[10:49] <seb128> thx
[11:07] <andyrock> seb128: done!
[11:08] <seb128> andyrock, thx
[11:39]  * Laney stares at libreoffice
[11:59] <seb128> the build issue?
[11:59] <Laney> ye
[11:59] <seb128> that one doesn't make any sense to me (at least from the log, I didn't do any poking)
[12:01] <Laney> checking for explicit CFLAGS... -g1 -O3 -O2 -fdebug-prefix-map=/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>=. -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security
[12:02] <Laney> https://git.launchpad.net/~libreoffice/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/tree/patches/debian-opt.diff?h=ubuntu-disco-6.1
[12:03] <Laney> echo laney@nightingecho '-g1 -O3 -O2 -fdebug-prefix-map=/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>=. -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security' | grep -E -o '\-O[0-3]'                                                                      ~
[12:03] <Laney> -O3
[12:03] <Laney> -O2
[12:03] <Laney> that patch doesn't handle multiple -O in CFLAGS
[12:03] <seb128> did the toolchain changed recently?
[12:03] <Laney> dunno
[12:03] <seb128> it built a few days ago
[12:03] <Laney> just analysed the actual bug
[12:03] <seb128> k
[12:04] <Laney> previous build didn't have -O3 -O2 there but I don't know where that comes from yet
[12:05] <Laney> ah yeah from dpkg
[12:05] <Laney> this seems wrong
[12:07] <Laney> (dpkg-buildflags)
[12:11] <Laney> new dpkg broke this
[12:17] <Laney> https://git.dpkg.org/cgit/dpkg/dpkg.git/commit/?id=d5374bc618310917557daa9c9ac2f4930515a0b2
[16:03] <seb128> kenvandine, hey, I failed the fontconfig SRU over https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fontconfig/+bug/1803534/comments/12
[16:03] <kenvandine> seb128: ok, thanks
[16:03] <kenvandine> i'm actually looking at that right now
[16:05] <kenvandine> seb128: i think that issue in the SRU occurs in cosmic
[16:05] <kenvandine> so we backported some bug... i think
[16:05] <kenvandine> firefox has been causing me lots of grief for a while now, and it looks like the same thing as reported in the SRU verification
[16:05] <kenvandine> i think it's been going on since i upgraded to cosmic
[16:05] <seb128> kenvandine, it's possible, my comment was the missing symbol/invalid depends though
[16:06] <kenvandine> ah... well there was a potential regression reported
[16:06] <seb128> I know, I hit the depends issue while trying to reproduce the cpu one :p
[16:06] <kenvandine> missing symbol... that's surprising
[16:07] <kenvandine> i don't recall lintian complainging
[16:07] <seb128> well, it went away when I installed libfontconfig1 from proposed
[16:07] <seb128> but fontconfig should depends on the new version if it needs it
[16:07] <kenvandine> yeah, that makes sense
[16:07] <seb128> e.g "sudo apt install fontconfig" should have pulled in the lib
[16:07] <seb128> rather than failing in postinst and letting my dpkg angry
[16:08] <kenvandine> the cpu one doesn't happen right away, in my experience
[16:08] <kenvandine> but it seems every couple days i have to kill firefox
[16:08] <seb128> I can trigger it directly with what the user described
[16:08] <seb128> log in
[16:08] <seb128> start firefox
[16:08] <seb128> sudo synaptic
[16:08] <seb128> I've 2 Web Content process fighting for cpu
[16:09] <kenvandine> firefox snap or deb?
[16:09] <seb128> I can't even use the machine
[16:09] <seb128> deb
[16:09] <seb128> standard install, it's a test machine pretty much stock install
[16:09] <kenvandine> the Web Content process pegging the cpu is what i see and i suspect it's related to some apt update happening
[16:09] <seb128> well in my case it's not apt
[16:09] <seb128> I started a new session
[16:10] <seb128> sudo synaptic is enough
[16:10] <seb128> firefox is looping in futex and opening fonts
[16:11] <kenvandine> i installed synapitc a bit ago, will test that scenario as soon as a build i have going finishes :)
[16:11] <seb128> it stops when I close synaptic
[16:11] <kenvandine> interesting
[16:12] <kenvandine> i thought it might be something triggering a cache refresh
[16:12] <seb128> could be
[16:13]  * kenvandine decides not to wait
[16:13] <kenvandine> oh sigh... can't run sudo synaptic on wayland :(
[16:13] <kenvandine> (synaptic:10712): Gtk-WARNING **: 11:11:09.968: cannot open display: :0
[16:14] <seb128> kenvandine, it looks like https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=909818
[16:14] <seb128> which is https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/fontconfig/fontconfig/commit/5f12f564
[16:15] <seb128> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=909818#90 has details
[16:25] <kenvandine> seb128: i had the SRU version built and installed on cosmic and can reproduce the problem
[16:26] <kenvandine> but downgrading to cosmic version it's fine
[16:26] <kenvandine> so yeah, we backported that bug :)
[16:26] <kenvandine> i wonder what synaptic is doing to trigger that
[16:32] <seb128> kenvandine, it's not synaptic, sudo gedit does the same, I guess it's gtk under sudo
[16:32] <kenvandine> weird
[16:38] <kenvandine> seb128: i'll add the depends and patch to fix that issue
[16:39] <seb128> great
[16:40] <Laney> bumping the shlibs version in d/control is probably the correct way to do that
[16:40] <Laney> rules*
[16:41] <kenvandine> Laney: yeah
[16:41] <kenvandine> that makes more sense :)
[16:48] <seb128> Laney, didrocks, do you know if hw-detect is using in ubiquity? wondering if https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/hw-detect/merge_requests/2/diffs would work for ubiquity as well or only d-i
[16:48] <gitbot> Debian Installer issue (Merge request) 2 in hw-detect "hw-detect.sh: install open-vm-tools when running under VMware Virtual Platform" [Opened]
[16:48] <didrocks> there is something with probert, but not the same one used in subiquity
[16:49] <seb128> well that's a Debian PR, so d-i, not subiquity
[16:49] <seb128> I just wonder if that would give us the package install working for free on ubiquity as from today as well
[16:49] <didrocks> yep, ubiquity uses hd-detect
[16:49] <seb128> thx
[16:49] <didrocks> to load firmwares and such
[16:49] <didrocks> unsure if this uses package install though
[16:50] <seb128> right, I saw it was writting the modprobe etc but I'm unsure if the package install would apply
[16:50] <seb128> thx for replying didrocks :)
[16:51] <didrocks> yw! I wonder how much this is interesting for this installer though, as the new one won't use d-i as per spec
[16:56] <Laney> I'm not sure without testing, sorry
[16:58] <Laney> xnox or cyphermox might though
[16:58] <Laney> open-vm-tools would need to be seeded of course
[17:05] <seb128> right
[17:05] <seb128> thx didrocks Laney
[17:05] <seb128> k, enough co-working, time to 'commute' back :) have a nice w.e desktopers!
[17:05] <willcooke> see you seb128
[17:05] <Laney> bye!!!
[17:06] <cyphermox> moo?
[17:06] <cyphermox> good weekend seb128
[17:06] <seb128> thx, you too guys!
[17:06] <Laney> cyphermox: that merge proposal seb128 linked, would it work on ubiquity if opem-vm-tools was seeded or do we not run that bit of hw-detect there?
[17:07] <cyphermox> we don't run hw-detect I think
[17:07] <cyphermox> but if it's seeded, it should just work
[17:08] <Laney> it'd be in the pool or something I guess
[17:08] <cyphermox> yeah
[17:08] <cyphermox> well, seeded it will be on the rootfs
[17:08] <cyphermox> actually installed, as opposed to being on the pool on the CD
[17:09] <cyphermox> unless you want to seed it in live-share or something, but why
[17:10] <Laney> so it can be conditionally installed
[17:10] <Laney> like that MR does
[17:11] <Laney> live seed probably
[17:11] <Laney> so indeed not pool
[18:04] <willcooke> night all