| === elsheepo is now known as beatzz | ||
| rbasak | kstenerud: how are you getting on? | 11:35 |
|---|---|---|
| kstenerud | rbasak trying to find the credentials files for the vpn | 11:35 |
| rbasak | kstenerud: OK. I'll leave you then. I'm going to disappear for a bit. | 11:35 |
| CrummyGummy_ | Hi! I'm having an issue where udp traffic is getting to my server despite ufw not being set to allow the traffic. I had the same issue with shorewall. Am I doing something wrong? | 13:08 |
| CrummyGummy_ | ufw looks like this https://paste.ee/p/opdRa | 13:09 |
| CrummyGummy_ | and I can still do a dns lookup from that server and it is receiving sip invites | 13:10 |
| MJCD | hey all | 14:18 |
| MJCD | I installed the mail server as part of the install process | 14:19 |
| MJCD | but I dunno anything about administering such things | 14:19 |
| MJCD | is there some nice one with webmail and maybe a gui/web interface | 14:19 |
| Delvien | Is cockpit not available by default in ubuntu server 18.04.1 repos? | 14:37 |
| leftyfb | Delvien: https://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=cockpit | 14:41 |
| teward | Delvien: known bug in the system is that it doesn't enable universe and multiverse in the ISOs | 14:43 |
| teward | Delvien: go into your /etc/apt/sources.list and add 'universe multiverse' to the 'main restricted' lines. | 14:43 |
| Delvien | its weird.. new install cant find ANYTHING about cockpit with apt search | 14:43 |
| Delvien | ah, thats why then | 14:43 |
| teward | Delvien: https://askubuntu.com/questions/1082988/ubuntu-bionic-repo-list/1082990#1082990 and my answer here https://askubuntu.com/questions/1081243/why-do-i-need-to-enable-universe-repo-in-18-04-isnt-it-default-enabled/1081246#1081246 touch base on it | 14:44 |
| teward | Delvien: TL;DR the reason is a known bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/subiquity/+bug/1783129 | 14:44 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1783129 in subiquity "Only "main" component enabled after install" [High,Confirmed] | 14:44 |
| teward | but it wasn't fixed on 18.04.1 ISOs | 14:44 |
| Delvien | teward: thanks, got it fixed. | 14:55 |
| === kallesbar_ is now known as kallesbar | ||
| shubjero | Anyone see this before? apt-cache thinks theres no installed kernel? haha https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/tbKZxvqTT7/ | 19:47 |
| teward | shubjero: it might be a different kernel metapackage installed, but check if linux-image-generic is installed first with apt-cache | 19:48 |
| teward | IIRC there's a few different linux-* metapackages | 19:48 |
| leftyfb | apt-cache policy linux-image-4.4.0-137-generic | 19:48 |
| shubjero | teward: same output for linux-image-generic. | 19:48 |
| teward | wonder if you're not using the 'generic' kernels then | 19:49 |
| shubjero | I just noticed this when i was preparing to see what packages were going to be updated, and on one system a new kernel was being proposed but on another server it was not proposing a kernel update.. even tho these are both running 16.04 with the same outdated kernel | 19:49 |
| teward | you could always install the linux-generic package again, IIRC it's just a metapackage referring to the *actual* image files like leftyfb indicated | 19:50 |
| shubjero | yeah, i mean if i explictly ask for a new kernel it will update it.. so im not in a bind or anything.. just an observation really | 19:50 |
| teward | shubjero: I"ve seen it when I've removed a newer kernel due to an update causing major breakage | 19:51 |
| leftyfb | teward: why not install the hwe kernle? | 19:51 |
| leftyfb | kernel* | 19:51 |
| teward | it then removes linux-generic among other things, but those're rare | 19:51 |
| teward | leftyfb: you mean to ask shubjero. | 19:51 |
| teward | i always *do* but i also usually am on latest LTS anyways | 19:51 |
| leftyfb | sorry, shubjero ^ | 19:51 |
| teward | leftyfb: or I'm on VMs so the HWE kernel stacks are irrelevant lol | 19:52 |
| shubjero | dont really feel a need to use the HWE kernel really | 19:52 |
| shubjero | never come across any blockers yet from the non hwe kernel | 19:52 |
| leftyfb | shubjero: support? security? features? wouldn't have run into your initial problem? | 19:53 |
| shubjero | i did run a hwe kernel when i still had a system on 14.04 and was trying to use a ceph feature that wasnt supported | 19:53 |
| shubjero | as long as ubuntu is packaging non hwe kernels for the distro and im not hitting any blockers, why bother? | 19:53 |
| shubjero | security is backported | 19:53 |
| shubjero | GA kernels are fully supported for the lifetime of the lts | 19:56 |
| caseyd | hello.. I'm having some trouble with a new ubuntu server installation. I'm needing to specify an ip with the following info: address: 136.228.96.75 gateway: 136.228.96.65 subnet mask: 255.255.255.240 ... ubuntu wants the subnet in cidr form, I entered 136.228.96.65/28, but it says "has host bits set". | 20:43 |
| caseyd | I'm not sure what that means.. any ideas? | 20:43 |
| teward | caseyd: you should probably read how subnetting works | 20:45 |
| caseyd | I know on windows I can just put in the mask and it works | 20:45 |
| teward | caseyd: http://jodies.de/ipcalc?host=+136.228.96.65&mask1=28&mask2= | 20:46 |
| teward | as I said | 20:46 |
| teward | you need to learn how subnetting works to better understand the "subnet" requested field in subiquity | 20:46 |
| teward | caseyd: in most cases it's GatewayIP minus 1 | 20:46 |
| teward | see the output from that subnet calculator I linked to to see where I'm getting that from | 20:46 |
| teward | assuming, of coursee, the gateway IP address is at the beginning of the range :P | 20:47 |
| teward | (depending on the subnetting it might not be in weird setups) | 20:47 |
| caseyd | wow, thanks.. yeah I think that was it. I've been looking for a subnet calculator like this forever | 20:48 |
| caseyd | thanks for the link | 20:48 |
| teward | caseyd: yep. I would suggest, however, that you read up on how subnetting works. | 20:49 |
| teward | for example, 10.0.0.1/8 the network IP is 10.0.0.0/8 - the first IP address in the subnet - typically the gateway is the next IP, and then the final IP is broadcast. | 20:49 |
| caseyd | cool, yeah that makes sense. I have a basic understanding for normal ranges, but I've never really messed with smaller ranges than the standard 10.10.10.0/24 | 20:51 |
| teward | caseyd: I have a Python3 based library I use for network mask calculations, as well, I'd be happy to share what I've got, or even write up a simple Python equivalent of that web-based calculator for IPv4 :P | 20:55 |
| sdeziel | caseyd: there is ipcalc and sipcalc (ipv6) calculators on the CLI | 20:55 |
| teward | ^ that as well | 20:55 |
| teward | which does exactly what the other calculator does | 20:56 |
| teward | sdeziel: i should write a web frontend wrapper around this, give people a nice calculator to use... | 20:56 |
| teward | too bad I'm not a web developer lol | 20:56 |
| sdeziel | teward: duckduckgo has it covered for you: https://duckduckgo.com/?q=10.0.1.0%2F24&t=canonical&ia=answer | 20:57 |
| teward | ddg is evil | 20:57 |
| teward | nah just kidding :P | 20:58 |
| sdeziel | you got me wondering for a sec | 20:58 |
| teward | sdeziel: doesn't give me all the info i need | 20:58 |
| teward | like the number of usable IPs/hosts in the range, etc. | 20:58 |
| teward | :P | 20:58 |
| shubjero | ive always appreciated jodies.de/ipcalc as pasted above | 20:58 |
| caseyd | i like the jodies.de one a lot too | 20:59 |
| sdeziel | http://jodies.de/ipcalc seems to be a wrapper around the ipcalc package | 21:00 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!