=== elsheepo is now known as beatzz
[11:35] <rbasak> kstenerud: how are you getting on?
[11:35] <kstenerud> rbasak trying to find the credentials files for the vpn
[11:35] <rbasak> kstenerud: OK. I'll leave you then. I'm going to disappear for a bit.
[13:08] <CrummyGummy_> Hi! I'm having an issue where udp traffic is getting to my server despite ufw not being set to allow the traffic. I had the same issue with shorewall. Am I doing something wrong?
[13:09] <CrummyGummy_> ufw looks like this https://paste.ee/p/opdRa
[13:10] <CrummyGummy_> and I can still do a dns lookup from that server and it is receiving sip invites
[14:18] <MJCD> hey all
[14:19] <MJCD> I installed the mail server as part of the install process
[14:19] <MJCD> but I dunno anything about administering such things
[14:19] <MJCD> is there some nice one with webmail and maybe a gui/web interface
[14:37] <Delvien> Is cockpit not available by default in ubuntu server 18.04.1 repos?
[14:41] <leftyfb> Delvien: https://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=cockpit
[14:43] <teward> Delvien: known bug in the system is that it doesn't enable universe and multiverse in the ISOs
[14:43] <teward> Delvien: go into your /etc/apt/sources.list and add 'universe multiverse' to the 'main restricted' lines.
[14:43] <Delvien> its weird.. new install cant find ANYTHING about cockpit with apt search
[14:43] <Delvien> ah, thats why then
[14:44] <teward> Delvien: https://askubuntu.com/questions/1082988/ubuntu-bionic-repo-list/1082990#1082990 and my answer here https://askubuntu.com/questions/1081243/why-do-i-need-to-enable-universe-repo-in-18-04-isnt-it-default-enabled/1081246#1081246 touch base on it
[14:44] <teward> Delvien: TL;DR the reason is a known bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/subiquity/+bug/1783129
[14:44] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 1783129 in subiquity "Only "main" component enabled after install" [High,Confirmed]
[14:44] <teward> but it wasn't fixed on 18.04.1 ISOs
[14:55] <Delvien> teward: thanks, got it fixed.
=== kallesbar_ is now known as kallesbar
[19:47] <shubjero> Anyone see this before? apt-cache thinks theres no installed kernel? haha https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/tbKZxvqTT7/
[19:48] <teward> shubjero: it might be a different kernel metapackage installed, but check if linux-image-generic is installed first with apt-cache
[19:48] <teward> IIRC there's a few different linux-* metapackages
[19:48] <leftyfb> apt-cache policy linux-image-4.4.0-137-generic
[19:48] <shubjero> teward: same output for linux-image-generic.
[19:49] <teward> wonder if you're not using the 'generic' kernels then
[19:49] <shubjero> I just noticed this when i was preparing to see what packages were going to be updated, and on one system a new kernel was being proposed but on another server it was not proposing a kernel update.. even tho these are both running 16.04 with the same outdated kernel
[19:50] <teward> you could always install the linux-generic package again, IIRC it's just a metapackage referring to the *actual* image files like leftyfb indicated
[19:50] <shubjero> yeah, i mean if i explictly ask for a new kernel it will update it.. so im not in a bind or anything.. just an observation really
[19:51] <teward> shubjero: I"ve seen it when I've removed a newer kernel due to an update causing major breakage
[19:51] <leftyfb> teward: why not install the hwe kernle?
[19:51] <leftyfb> kernel*
[19:51] <teward> it then removes linux-generic among other things, but those're rare
[19:51] <teward> leftyfb: you mean to ask shubjero.
[19:51] <teward> i always *do* but i also usually am on latest LTS anyways
[19:51] <leftyfb> sorry, shubjero ^
[19:52] <teward> leftyfb: or I'm on VMs so the HWE kernel stacks are irrelevant lol
[19:52] <shubjero> dont really feel a need to use the HWE kernel really
[19:52] <shubjero> never come across any blockers yet from the non hwe kernel
[19:53] <leftyfb> shubjero: support? security? features? wouldn't have run into your initial problem?
[19:53] <shubjero> i did run a hwe kernel when i still had a system on 14.04 and was trying to use a ceph feature that wasnt supported
[19:53] <shubjero> as long as ubuntu is packaging non hwe kernels for the distro and im not hitting any blockers, why bother?
[19:53] <shubjero> security is backported
[19:56] <shubjero> GA kernels are fully supported for the lifetime of the lts
[20:43] <caseyd> hello.. I'm having some trouble with a new ubuntu server installation. I'm needing to specify an ip with the following info: address: 136.228.96.75 gateway: 136.228.96.65 subnet mask: 255.255.255.240 ... ubuntu wants the subnet in cidr form, I entered 136.228.96.65/28, but it says "has host bits set".
[20:43] <caseyd> I'm not sure what that means.. any ideas?
[20:45] <teward> caseyd: you should probably read how subnetting works
[20:45] <caseyd> I know on windows I can just put in the mask and it works
[20:46] <teward> caseyd: http://jodies.de/ipcalc?host=+136.228.96.65&mask1=28&mask2=
[20:46] <teward> as I said
[20:46] <teward> you need to learn how subnetting works to better understand the "subnet" requested field in subiquity
[20:46] <teward> caseyd: in most cases it's GatewayIP minus 1
[20:46] <teward> see the output from that subnet calculator I linked to to see where I'm getting that from
[20:47] <teward> assuming, of coursee, the gateway IP address is at the beginning of the range :P
[20:47] <teward> (depending on the subnetting it might not be in weird setups)
[20:48] <caseyd> wow, thanks.. yeah I think that was it. I've been looking for a subnet calculator like this forever
[20:48] <caseyd> thanks for the link
[20:49] <teward> caseyd: yep.  I would suggest, however, that you read up on how subnetting works.
[20:49] <teward> for example, 10.0.0.1/8 the network IP is 10.0.0.0/8 - the first IP address in the subnet - typically the gateway is the next IP, and then the final IP is broadcast.
[20:51] <caseyd> cool, yeah that makes sense. I have a basic understanding for normal ranges, but I've never really messed with smaller ranges than the standard 10.10.10.0/24
[20:55] <teward> caseyd: I have a Python3 based library I use for network mask calculations, as well, I'd be happy to share what I've got, or even write up a simple Python equivalent of that web-based calculator for IPv4 :P
[20:55] <sdeziel> caseyd: there is ipcalc and sipcalc (ipv6) calculators on the CLI
[20:55] <teward> ^ that as well
[20:56] <teward> which does exactly what the other calculator does
[20:56] <teward> sdeziel: i should write a web frontend wrapper around this, give people a nice calculator to use...
[20:56] <teward> too bad I'm not a web developer lol
[20:57] <sdeziel> teward: duckduckgo has it covered for you: https://duckduckgo.com/?q=10.0.1.0%2F24&t=canonical&ia=answer
[20:57] <teward> ddg is evil
[20:58] <teward> nah just kidding :P
[20:58] <sdeziel> you got me wondering for a sec
[20:58] <teward> sdeziel: doesn't give me all the info i need
[20:58] <teward> like the number of usable IPs/hosts in the range, etc.
[20:58] <teward> :P
[20:58] <shubjero> ive always appreciated jodies.de/ipcalc as pasted above
[20:59] <caseyd> i like the jodies.de one a lot too
[21:00] <sdeziel> http://jodies.de/ipcalc seems to be a wrapper around the ipcalc package