=== cpaelzer__ is now known as cpaelzer [12:55] is it acceptable for an ubuntu main package to have a recommends on an universe package? [12:55] in this case, depending on the configuration of the main package, that universe package might or might not be required [12:55] it's a plugin that can only be built and used with the universe package installed [12:56] the main package has many plugins, it's just one of many. All the others link to something in main, but this particular one, if enabled, would need universe [12:56] no, it's not [12:56] it can be a suggests, but not a recommends [12:56] (IIRC) [12:56] debian has it as a recommends [12:56] it's samba-vfs-modules, and the universe package is glusterfs-common [12:57] you need to either move the plugin to a universe package, or stop building that particular plugin [12:57] https://salsa.debian.org/samba-team/samba/blob/master/debian/control#L304 [12:57] right now we don't build it [12:57] but I keep getting bugs asking to enable it [12:57] there is a mir, let me check [12:58] it was nacked [12:58] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1274247 [12:58] Launchpad bug 1274247 in glusterfs (Ubuntu) "[MIR] Glusterfs" [High,Won't fix] [13:00] and you can't make it a suggests instead of a recommends? [13:00] I suppose I could change our current delta, which is to not build it, to make it a suggests [13:00] ie: if you build the module, and glusterfs-common isn't installed, will samba still work? [13:00] ie: the module is disabled by default anyway, right? [13:00] mdeslaur: it will as long as you don't use the glusterfs module in smb.conf [13:01] yes, it's not loaded by default [13:01] right, so make it a suggests instead of a recommends [13:01] so our delta would change from "drop gluster support" to "add gluster support as a suggests" [13:01] right, or "move gluster recommends to suggests as it is in universe" [13:02] whoever wants to use it just needs to install the missing package, but at least the module is built and availabe [13:02] available [13:03] well, needs to know about it [13:03] there will be an error in the logs, smbd won't start, that kind of thing [13:03] better than not having it at all ;) [13:03] I can check these conditions, but would an error be acceptable, if the module is used and gluster isn't installed? [13:03] add something to the news file [13:04] I think it's reasonable since the module isn't enabled by default [13:04] or split it to a new binary which is going to be in universe and have that depends on glusterfs-common? [13:05] that's another possibility [13:06] yeah, something like samba-vfs-modules-glusterfs [13:06] would be a bigger delta from debian [13:07] thanks for the brainstorm [13:08] np [16:14] cjwatson: http://people.canonical.com/~cjwatson/ubuntu-policy/policy.html/ch-archive.html#s-universe doesn't have the build-depends against universe update. [16:14] Would you like a bug filed? :-P [16:17] Sure [16:17] Is there a LP project for it? [16:26] rbasak: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-policy [16:26] I'd be happy for somebody to take it over and merge it up [16:27] Should be gitified too [16:30] Thanks! === jdstrand_ is now known as jdstrand [17:47] tjaalton: hi, the landscape-client sru uploads you rejected, can the new upload with the fix use the same version? I think it can, bceause the package never made it to proposed [17:47] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/landscape-client/+bug/1699179 for an example [17:47] Launchpad bug 1699179 in landscape-client (Ubuntu Xenial) "PackageReporter kicks in during do-release-upgrade" [Medium,In progress] [18:48] Laney: that autopkgtest upgrade you mentioned in your email to ubuntu-devel@, does that apply to what bileto is using too? === ricab is now known as ricab|leaving [20:33] yes, there is but one place === Sir_Gallantmon is now known as Son_Goku === nOOb__ is now known as nOOb [21:43] ahasenack: yeah I think so