[01:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: oops [amd64] (disco-proposed/universe) [0.0.14-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[06:18] <cpaelzer> Laney: do you think the following might be related to the new autopkgtest?
[06:18] <cpaelzer> test on vagrant-libvirt (trigger libvirt upload in cosmic-proposed)
[06:18] <cpaelzer> new bad results, all skipped but evaluated as "fail"
[06:18] <cpaelzer> https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-cosmic/cosmic/armhf/v/vagrant-libvirt/20181210_130429_ecc9d@/log.gz
[06:18] <cpaelzer> https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-cosmic/cosmic/armhf/v/vagrant-libvirt/20181210_151616_e7572@/log.gz
[06:19] <cpaelzer> an example of an old good result looks exactly the same to me
[06:19] <cpaelzer> https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-cosmic/cosmic/armhf/v/vagrant-libvirt/20181129_142149_d4c77@/log.gz
[07:30] <ginggs> does anyone know what happened to python-pyftpdlib's autopkgtest results?
[08:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted deepin-music [amd64] (disco-proposed) [3.1.11+ds-1]
[08:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted deepin-music [armhf] (disco-proposed) [3.1.11+ds-1]
[08:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted deepin-music [ppc64el] (disco-proposed) [3.1.11+ds-1]
[08:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oops [amd64] (disco-proposed) [0.0.14-0ubuntu1]
[08:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted deepin-music [arm64] (disco-proposed) [3.1.11+ds-1]
[08:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted deepin-music [s390x] (disco-proposed) [3.1.11+ds-1]
[08:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted deepin-music [i386] (disco-proposed) [3.1.11+ds-1]
[08:28] <doko> LocutusOfBorg: you synced vtk7, now having unresolved dependencies on armhf and arm64
[08:38] <doko> Logan: second gudhi  ping. you dropped necessary Ubuntu changes
[09:34] <Laney> cpaelzer: we need to handle exit 8 as passed I think
[09:57] <cpaelzer> Laney: is that a new rc for this kind of skip now?
[09:57] <Laney> yes
[09:57] <Laney> 'all skipped'
[09:57] <Laney> in Debian they call it a 'neutral' result
[09:59] <Laney> I copied that a bit here: http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/vagrant-libvirt/cosmic/armhf
[09:59] <Laney> but britney should now see it as a pass
[10:01] <cpaelzer> so that made even my old results "neutral" as I see
[10:01] <cpaelzer> no need to rerun them
[10:01] <cpaelzer> great
[10:01] <cpaelzer> I'll wait for the next update to excuses (on cosmic actually) and let you know if it is no more red there
[10:18] <tkamppeter> Hi, cups-filters and poppler are stuck in disco-proposed for no obvious reason, they are both "Valid Candidate", what is happening here?
[10:18] <Laney> a transition, see update_output.txt
[10:19] <tkamppeter> Where do I find update_output.txt?
[10:20] <Laney> replace update_excuses.html with update_output.txt :-)
[10:20] <seb128> speaking of which, does anyone understand from update_output.txt what's the status
[10:20] <seb128> that's a long list, another transition got in between the poppler one clearing off?
[10:21] <Laney> hunspell did
[10:21] <Laney> dunno what the rest of this stuff is
[10:21] <Laney> looking forward to Till helping :>
[10:21] <seb128> :)
[10:23] <LocutusOfBorg> doko, I know, I'm already looking at it
[10:23] <LocutusOfBorg> hello, please update ubuntu-release hint: force-badtest ocfs2-tools/1.8.5-6ubuntu1/s390x and add force-badtest ocfs2-tools/1.8.5-7/s390x
[10:23] <LocutusOfBorg> also, please update force-badtest symfony/3.4.19+dfsg-1ubuntu1 to force-badtest symfony/3.4.20+dfsg-1ubuntu1 thanks
[10:23] <tkamppeter> What does this cryptic stuff in update_output.txt all mean?
[10:23] <LocutusOfBorg> thanks
[10:23] <Laney> tkamppeter: you n ever helped with a transition before?
[10:23] <Laney> LocutusOfBorg: send a merge proposal please
[10:23] <Laney> tkamppeter: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ProposedMigration/ might help you
[10:23] <tkamppeter> no, I never ran into such a situation?
[10:25] <Laney> k, well first step is to get perl to go to become a valid candidate
[10:25] <Laney> s/go to//
[10:30] <tkamppeter> I have read the doc now and so it seems that poppler and cups-filters a skipped as they cause problems on s390x.
[10:45] <Laney> darkxst: you fixing radare2? your libzip transition
[11:12] <LocutusOfBorg> Laney, https://code.launchpad.net/~costamagnagianfranco/britney/hints-ubuntu/+merge/360662
[11:12] <LocutusOfBorg> thanks!
[11:13] <LocutusOfBorg> question about mariadb, https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-disco/disco/ppc64el/m/mariadb-10.1/20181210_180330_7ad79@/log.gz
[11:13] <LocutusOfBorg> the testsuite is now mostly good, except for ppc64el where this test fails
[11:13] <LocutusOfBorg> they insert into a table this value: 0.6158
[11:13] <LocutusOfBorg> and this check fails:  where key1 <= 0.6158 and key2 >= 1.3762;
[11:14] <LocutusOfBorg> because the stored value is:
[11:14] <LocutusOfBorg> -0.6158000230789185
[11:14] <LocutusOfBorg> +0.6157999634742737
[11:14] <LocutusOfBorg> any clue? should I just don't care?
[11:14] <LocutusOfBorg> I'm asking here because we have glibc folks :)
[11:14] <Laney> suggest #ubuntu-devel
[11:36] <jbicha> could an AA remove radare2 3.1.2+dfsg-1 from disco-proposed and restore 3.0.1+dfsg-1build1 since the new version doesn't build on some arches?
[11:41] <LocutusOfBorg> jbicha, I don't think so
[11:41] <LocutusOfBorg> https://github.com/radare/radare2/commit/5549ad61608b90c65cdb6f5144ce137ce43da5e4
[11:41] <LocutusOfBorg> seems Laney did some good work there :D
[11:41] <jbicha> ok
[11:42] <apw> Laney, ^ can we assume you are on the case ?
[11:42] <apw> (rather than doing any kind of removal dance)
[11:42] <Laney> I've fixed it
[11:43] <LocutusOfBorg> <3
[11:43] <Laney> It was easier than requesting the removal once you actually looked at the problem
[11:50] <LocutusOfBorg> Laney, do you have a picture of what is missing for the big migration?
[11:50] <LocutusOfBorg> vtk is getting green in some hours
[11:51] <LocutusOfBorg> mia might need a tweak again...
[11:51] <ypwong> is there daily images for 18.04.2?
[11:51] <ypwong> need to test this on machines with new nvidia cards
[11:52] <Laney> ypwong: usual place http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/bionic/daily-live/
[11:54] <Laney> LocutusOfBorg: let's see again when vtk is good
[11:55] <ypwong> Laney, the page says 18.04.1.0 [sic]
[11:55] <Laney> it's dailies of what's in bionic atm
[11:56] <ypwong> and the manifest says it's using 4.15 linux-image
[11:57] <ypwong> when will daily images with 4.18 start to be built?
[11:57] <jbicha> LocutusOfBorg: update_output.txt suggests we may only need radare2 and vtk7 to finish the transition
[12:04] <LocutusOfBorg> jbicha, Laney I agree, I see only vtk* stuff entangled, but more eyes, better :D
[12:04] <LocutusOfBorg> at the end poppler got entangled anyway
[12:07] <LocutusOfBorg> just FYI, I plan to do haskell once this one migrates
[12:07] <LocutusOfBorg> and also hdf5
[12:07] <LocutusOfBorg> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/hdf5/1.10.4+repack-1
[12:07] <LocutusOfBorg> *please do not retry it yet*
[12:10] <jbicha> yeah, I intentionally cancelled hdf5 at the beginning in hopes it would make our transition easier
[13:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: ratchet-rfc6455 (disco-proposed/primary) [0.2.4-2]
[13:46] <LocutusOfBorg> this was lost ^^
[13:46] <LocutusOfBorg> useful to make some php migration
[13:47] <coreycb> RAOF: hello, if you have a moment for an SRU review today I'd like to get nova landed from the bionic unapproved queue.
[14:15] <LocutusOfBorg> vtk is finishing, publisher + britney...
[14:15]  * LocutusOfBorg modulo testsuites
[14:17] <oSoMoN> dear SRU team, could you please consider accepting libreoffice{,-l10n} 1:6.1.3-0ubuntu0.18.10.1 in cosmic-proposed? thanks!
[14:22] <seb128> bdmurray, ^
[14:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected ratchet-rfc6455 [sync] (disco-proposed) [0.2.4-2]
[14:27] <LocutusOfBorg> wtf^^^
[14:36] <Laney> someone please clean up nbs in proposed for radare2?
[14:40] <apw> Laney, looking
[14:41] <Laney> thx
[14:41] <apw> Laney, gone
[14:42] <Laney> 🤸
[14:42] <Laney> thanks!
[14:42] <LocutusOfBorg> oh, I was going to ask the same!
[14:42] <LocutusOfBorg> :'(
[14:46] <apw> ?
[14:48] <LocutusOfBorg> to nbs cleanup :)
[14:53] <apw> LocutusOfBorg, and the sad face ?
[14:53] <LocutusOfBorg> because somebody beat me to it :p
[14:53] <LocutusOfBorg> I wish I knew how to do that unicode stuff you all use :p
[14:54] <LocutusOfBorg> ☺
[14:54] <Laney> gnome-characters shell search provider
[14:54] <LocutusOfBorg> ohhhhhhhh
[14:54] <LocutusOfBorg> 💋
[14:54]  * LocutusOfBorg stops
[14:55] <apw> Laney, oh was there one of those on the the line before the thanks! ?  empty here
[14:55] <LocutusOfBorg> yes apw it was somebody doing a wheel or similar
[14:56] <Laney> tsk tsk apw
[14:56] <LocutusOfBorg> apw, would you agree to use your super AA power to remove all the unicode stuff from Ubuntu? thanks!
[14:56] <apw> i see most of your fun ones, i wonder why that one isn't there
[14:57] <LocutusOfBorg> by coming back to ascii, we would fix a lot of stuff
[14:58]  * LocutusOfBorg wonders why he did install gnome-characters
[15:01] <jbicha> LocutusOfBorg: make sure you have the apt version of gnome-characters since I believe the snap version doesn't support that feature yet
[15:01] <LocutusOfBorg> it works
[15:02] <jbicha> Characters works, but not the GNOME Shell search provider for it
[15:03] <Laney> k, far enough off topic now I think
[15:20] <LocutusOfBorg> we are waiting for the big migration, off topic is a must :D
[15:22] <cpaelzer> Laney: the armhf Skip on vagrant-libvirt is stll treded as Regression on https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/cosmic/update_excuses.html
[15:22] <cpaelzer> it is neutral on http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/v/vagrant-libvirt/cosmic/armhf thou
[15:22] <cpaelzer> can we do something to make it pick up the new result=
[15:22] <cpaelzer> or is netural sill a regression for that level of the tooling?
[15:22] <cpaelzer> +t
[15:23] <Laney> retry it, I guess britney has cached the failure
[15:24] <cpaelzer> ok, retry scheduled
[15:24] <Laney> sorry about that, shouldn't happen any more
[15:24] <cpaelzer> all fine, as long as we can sort it out that is ok
[15:25] <cpaelzer> you could not add a line if package=systemd|linux set flaky attribute no matter what?
[15:26]  * LocutusOfBorg tries to sync again ratchet-rfc6455
[15:28] <Laney> heh
[15:28] <Laney> I'd rather be more strict on those packages than less... given what they are ...
[15:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: ratchet-rfc6455 (disco-proposed/primary) [0.2.4-2build1]
[15:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: alsa-lib (cosmic-proposed/main) [1.1.6-1ubuntu1 => 1.1.6-1ubuntu1.1] (core)
[15:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-lts-xenial [amd64] (trusty-proposed/main) [4.4.0-141.167~14.04.1] (kernel)
[16:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-desktop3 (cosmic-proposed/main) [3.30.1-1ubuntu1 => 3.30.2-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[16:13] <LocutusOfBorg> Laney, question:
[16:13] <LocutusOfBorg> http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/v/vtk7/disco/armhf
[16:13] <LocutusOfBorg> doesn't show a run against 7.1.1+dfsg1-11ubuntu1
[16:14] <LocutusOfBorg> but updates_excuses reports it as green
[16:14] <Laney> wait
[16:14] <Laney> they both independently fetch their results, no synchronisation
[16:15] <LocutusOfBorg> mmm ok, strange that britney picked up them in advance then...
[16:15] <LocutusOfBorg> I remember you doing changes to make the autopkgtest result page "instantly updated" (for some values of instantly(
[16:19] <bdmurray> cyphermox: What's up with this autopkgtest failure for ubuntu-image w/ the grub2 in -proposed for Xenial?
[16:21] <Laney> it's not strange at all, that's a consequence of what I said
[16:21] <LocutusOfBorg> got it
[16:22]  * LocutusOfBorg hopes in the next run
[16:22] <LocutusOfBorg> the notest page is already good
[16:22] <LocutusOfBorg> please somebody unblacklist ghc, but allow manual syncs
[16:22] <LocutusOfBorg> not automatic please, so I can sync in order
[16:23] <jbicha> LocutusOfBorg: there is a cheat you can use to skip the blacklist…
[16:25] <cjwatson> Right, and that is the only way to achieve wheat you're asking for
[16:25] <cjwatson> *what
[16:27] <cjwatson> You can hack the client-side check out of a local copy of syncpackage, or use copy-package from lp:ubuntu-archive-tools
[16:27] <LocutusOfBorg> mmm last time I just used "syncpackage"
[16:27] <LocutusOfBorg> meh I might be wrong, thanks
[16:27] <LocutusOfBorg> I'll look once the stuff migrates
[16:27] <cjwatson> The only way we can "unblacklist ghc, but allow manual syncs" without also allowing automatic syncs would be to turn off autosyncs entirely
[16:28] <cjwatson> Perhaps last time you did it when autosyncs were disabled for some other reason
[16:28] <cjwatson> Easy enough to "cp /usr/bin/syncpackage ." and hack out the check though :)
[16:28] <LocutusOfBorg> oh yes, it was at the begin of the cycle, yes!
[16:28] <jbicha> I think there was also a much shorter haskell-related blacklist last time
[16:28] <LocutusOfBorg> sure, I'm already hacking the changes :D thanks
[16:28] <cyphermox> bdmurray: network error unrelated to grub.
[16:29] <jbicha> and wildcards are funny in that file, the wildcards prevent auto-syncing but not manually syncing
[16:29] <cjwatson> They do?  That's a syncpackage bug then
[16:29] <cjwatson> Possibly we never got round to updating syncpackage to handle the wildcard syntax
[16:30] <bdmurray> cyphermox: Can you add a comment in the SRU bug, after that I'll release it.
[16:31] <cyphermox> bdmurray: done
[16:37] <LocutusOfBorg> its in!
[16:41] <cjwatson> https://code.launchpad.net/~cjwatson/ubuntu-dev-tools/+git/ubuntu-dev-tools/+merge/360689 fixes this syncpackage behaviour, if anyone would like to review it
[16:45] <LocutusOfBorg> ghc started
[16:46]  * LocutusOfBorg does check it
[16:48] <jamespage> bdmurray, vorlon: can I get your view on https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1805355
[16:48] <LocutusOfBorg> cjwatson, good, I commented on the bug!
[16:48] <jamespage> I'd like to get cosmic and the UCA for OpenStack Rocky back in sync; ceph 13.2.1 slipped out of cosmic due to MIR lag
[16:50] <cjwatson> LocutusOfBorg: thanks
[16:55] <bdmurray> jamespage: I didn't feel great about reviewing it b/c of the size / length of the diff.
[17:01] <jamespage> bdmurray: yes it will be huge as its a stable release major version bump; my supporting fact is that we have tested extensively with the proposed version during cosmic development, and its what's in the Rocky UCA for Bionic.
[17:02] <jamespage> the diff between what we tested on cosmic and the version in the queue is a fix to my 32-bit support patch for the radosgw component which is covered under bug 1805145
[17:04] <jamespage> bdmurray: reviewing the full diff is probably not practical for this one
[17:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libreoffice [source] (cosmic-proposed) [1:6.1.3-0ubuntu0.18.10.1]
[17:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: hdf5 [s390x] (disco-proposed/universe) [1.10.4+repack-1] (kubuntu)
[17:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libreoffice-l10n [source] (cosmic-proposed) [1:6.1.3-0ubuntu0.18.10.1]
[17:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: hdf5 [ppc64el] (disco-proposed/universe) [1.10.4+repack-1] (kubuntu)
[17:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: zimlib [ppc64el] (disco-proposed/universe) [4.0.4-4] (no packageset)
[17:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: zimlib [amd64] (disco-proposed/universe) [4.0.4-4] (no packageset)
[17:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: zimlib [i386] (disco-proposed/universe) [4.0.4-4] (no packageset)
[17:21] <bdmurray> jamespage: okay, I'll look at it now
[17:21] <jamespage> bdmurray: thanks
[17:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ceph [source] (cosmic-proposed) [13.2.1+dfsg1-0ubuntu2.18.10.1]
[17:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: hdf5 [amd64] (disco-proposed/universe) [1.10.4+repack-1] (kubuntu)
[17:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: zimlib [s390x] (disco-proposed/universe) [4.0.4-4] (no packageset)
[17:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: zimlib [arm64] (disco-proposed/universe) [4.0.4-4] (no packageset)
[17:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: zimlib [armhf] (disco-proposed/universe) [4.0.4-4] (no packageset)
[17:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ratchet-rfc6455 [source] (disco-proposed) [0.2.4-2build1]
[17:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted zimlib [arm64] (disco-proposed) [4.0.4-4]
[17:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted zimlib [i386] (disco-proposed) [4.0.4-4]
[17:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted zimlib [s390x] (disco-proposed) [4.0.4-4]
[17:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted zimlib [amd64] (disco-proposed) [4.0.4-4]
[17:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted zimlib [ppc64el] (disco-proposed) [4.0.4-4]
[17:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted zimlib [armhf] (disco-proposed) [4.0.4-4]
[17:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted hdf5 [amd64] (disco-proposed) [1.10.4+repack-1]
[17:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted hdf5 [s390x] (disco-proposed) [1.10.4+repack-1]
[17:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted hdf5 [ppc64el] (disco-proposed) [1.10.4+repack-1]
[17:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ratchet-rfc6455 [amd64] (disco-proposed/none) [0.2.4-2build1] (no packageset)
[18:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rdma-core [source] (cosmic-proposed) [19.0-1ubuntu0.1]
[18:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected cups [source] (cosmic-proposed) [2.2.8-5ubuntu2]
[18:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted e2fsprogs [source] (cosmic-proposed) [1.44.4-2ubuntu0.1]
[18:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libtorrent-rasterbar [source] (cosmic-proposed) [1.1.9-1ubuntu0.1]
[18:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-tweaks [source] (cosmic-proposed) [3.30.2-0ubuntu1]
[18:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted open-iscsi [source] (cosmic-proposed) [2.0.874-5ubuntu9.2]
[18:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: e2fsprogs (bionic-proposed/main) [1.44.1-1 => 1.44.1-1ubuntu1] (core)
[18:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted network-manager [source] (cosmic-proposed) [1.12.4-1ubuntu1.2]
[18:47] <vorlon> bdmurray: ^^ sorry, I uploaded e2fsprogs for bionic only after you accepted the one for cosmic
[18:57] <bdmurray> vorlon: alright, I should be able to remember what its about
[18:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted open-iscsi [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.0.874-5ubuntu2.5]
[19:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted e2fsprogs [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.44.1-1ubuntu1]
[19:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected cups [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.2.7-1ubuntu2.2]
[19:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lxd [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.0.3-0ubuntu1~18.04.1]
[19:21] <coreycb> bdmurray: hello, when you have a moment would you be able to review nova from the bionic unapproved queue?
[19:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xorg-server-hwe-18.04 [source] (bionic-proposed) [2:1.20.1-3ubuntu2.1~18.04.1]
[19:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xorg-server-hwe-18.04 [s390x] (bionic-proposed/none) [2:1.20.1-3ubuntu2.1~18.04.1] (no packageset)
[19:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: xf86-input-wacom-hwe-18.04 (bionic-proposed/primary) [1:0.36.1-0ubuntu1~18.04.1]
[19:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: xserver-xorg-input-evdev-hwe-18.04 (bionic-proposed/primary) [1:2.10.6-1~18.04.1]
[19:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: xserver-xorg-input-joystick-hwe-18.04 (bionic-proposed/primary) [1:1.6.3-1build1~18.04.1]
[19:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: xserver-xorg-input-libinput-hwe-18.04 (bionic-proposed/primary) [0.28.1-1~18.04.1]
[19:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: xserver-xorg-input-synaptics-hwe-18.04 (bionic-proposed/primary) [1.9.1-1ubuntu1~18.04.1]
[19:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: xserver-xorg-video-amdgpu-hwe-18.04 (bionic-proposed/primary) [18.1.0-1~18.04.1]
[19:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xorg-server-hwe-18.04 [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [2:1.20.1-3ubuntu2.1~18.04.1] (no packageset)
[19:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: xserver-xorg-video-ati-hwe-18.04 (bionic-proposed/primary) [1:18.1.0-1~18.04.1]
[19:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xorg-server-hwe-18.04 [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [2:1.20.1-3ubuntu2.1~18.04.1] (no packageset)
[19:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau-hwe-18.04 (bionic-proposed/primary) [1:1.0.15-3~18.04.1]
[19:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: xserver-xorg-video-fbdev-hwe-18.04 (bionic-proposed/primary) [1:0.5.0-1ubuntu1~18.04.1]
[19:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: xserver-xorg-video-qxl-hwe-18.04 (bionic-proposed/primary) [0.1.5-2build2~18.04.1]
[19:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: xserver-xorg-video-vmware-hwe-18.04 (bionic-proposed/primary) [1:13.3.0-2build1~18.04.1]
[19:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: xserver-xorg-video-vesa-hwe-18.04 (bionic-proposed/primary) [1:2.4.0-1~18.04.1]
[19:53] <bdmurray> coreycb: there are 2 uploads, I assume you want the newer one?
[19:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: xorg-hwe-18.04 (bionic-proposed/primary) [1:7.7+19ubuntu8~18.04.1]
[19:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xorg-server-hwe-18.04 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [2:1.20.1-3ubuntu2.1~18.04.1] (no packageset)
[19:53] <coreycb> bdmurray: yes sir
[19:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected nova [source] (bionic-proposed) [2:17.0.7-0ubuntu1]
[19:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xorg-server-hwe-18.04 [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [2:1.20.1-3ubuntu2.1~18.04.1] (no packageset)
[19:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nova [source] (bionic-proposed) [2:17.0.7-0ubuntu1]
[20:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: xorg-server-hwe-18.04 [armhf] (bionic-proposed/main) [2:1.20.1-3ubuntu2.1~18.04.1] (no packageset)
[20:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pytango [source] (xenial-proposed) [8.1.8-1ubuntu0.1]
[20:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected cups [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.1.3-4ubuntu0.6]
[20:06] <coreycb> bdmurray: thanks as always
[20:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted open-iscsi [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.0.873+git0.3b4b4500-14ubuntu3.7]
[20:12] <cpaelzer> Laney: the re-test did unblock the "neutral" test from Britneys POV as well
[20:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mountall [source] (trusty-proposed) [2.53ubuntu1]
[20:13] <cpaelzer> bdmurray: hi, I saw you accepting libvirt on 1787405
[20:13] <cpaelzer> bdmurray:  I wonder what we should do about qemu and the systemd tests
[20:13] <cpaelzer> the test breakage is in no way related to the uploads
[20:14] <cpaelzer> I had suggested solutions in bug 1806347 - but there was no response at all on my MPs to add overrides so I removed them, nor were there a response on the bug itself
[20:14] <cpaelzer> I'm not sure what to do to unblock this SRU - I can easily re-open the britney MPs if you'd be willing to review and accept them
[20:15] <cpaelzer> The branches still existhttps://code.launchpad.net/~paelzer/britney/hints-ubuntu-cosmic-sru-systemd https://code.launchpad.net/~paelzer/britney/hints-ubuntu-bionic-sru-systemd
[20:18] <bdmurray> cpaelzer: I think the hints changes make sense although the comment seems like wishful thinking
[20:18] <cpaelzer> since I'm actually off - I added new MPs back to bug 1806347 in case you agree to mask them for now
[20:18] <cpaelzer> bdmurray: hope dies last
[20:18] <cpaelzer> I'd also leave the bug open for xnox to consider masking just the few subtests that are flaky
[20:19] <cpaelzer> as that would make the dep8 tests overall more meaningful
[20:19] <cpaelzer> currently nobody gives a penny about them as the assumption always is "ah flaky again"
[20:19] <cpaelzer> just the rate of success recently is so bad ...
[20:20] <cpaelzer> actually let me check if the version of systemd is still correct
[20:20] <cpaelzer> as IIRC xnox did backport some of the fixes we did in Disco
[20:20] <cpaelzer> yeah there are newer version now, let me bump my MPs versions
[20:22] <cpaelzer> B-proposed has 237-3ubuntu10.10 and my bionic MP has old&new
[20:23] <cpaelzer> C-propsoed has the newer 239-7ubuntu10.5 which didn't exist when I created the overrides - let me check the results of this ...
[20:24] <cpaelzer> those seem only too bad on x86 and I need the new version
[20:26] <cpaelzer> ok the Bionic MP is still good and I updated the Cosmic MP now
[20:27] <cpaelzer> bdmurray: consider merging those for the current versions of systemd
[20:27] <cpaelzer> I could then retry Cosmic-nonx86 with triggers on the newer version which should hopefully work more often than not
[20:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ca-certificates (trusty-proposed/main) [20170717~14.04.1 => 20170717~14.04.2] (core)
[20:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ca-certificates (xenial-proposed/main) [20170717~16.04.1 => 20170717~16.04.2] (core)
[20:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: debian-installer (xenial-proposed/main) [20101020ubuntu451.26 => 20101020ubuntu451.27] (core)
[20:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shim-signed (xenial-proposed/main) [1.33.1~16.04.2 => 1.33.1~16.04.3] (core)
[20:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: debian-installer (trusty-proposed/main) [20101020ubuntu318.44 => 20101020ubuntu318.45] (core)
[20:54] <ddstreet> bdmurray btw the trusty/xenial uploads for ca-certificates and debian-installer are linked, ca-certificates needs to go into the archive and build first before debian-installer builds
[22:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted shim-signed [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.33.1~16.04.3]
[22:58] <vorlon> Laney: thanks for 0ff44d90e7b9b3f44e80cc0b41af548a37242dfd , retrying http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/l/livecd-rootfs/disco/armhf
[22:58] <vorlon> (and some others)
[23:38] <doko> LocutusOfBorg: why are you starting a haskell transition with the current state of the archive?
[23:40] <doko> vorlon, Laney, infinity, whoever from the release team: what's your plan to get the pending transitions done?
[23:41] <vorlon> doko: I don't know what transitions are pending, and it's not the responsibility of the release team to finish them?
[23:43] <doko> I disagree. Maybe not the responsibility of finishing them, but the responsibility of not adding new stuff. I can't be the only one to ask for stop of autosyncs
[23:43] <vorlon> exactly zero people have asked me to stop autosyncs
[23:43] <doko> so who watches and who cares if things are still managable?
[23:45] <vorlon> can we not talk in generalities? what transitions are you concerned about here?
[23:46] <doko> poppler and now ghc
[23:47] <vorlon> it looks to me like poppler has finished
[23:48] <doko> ohh, I didn't notice
[23:48] <vorlon> ghc: universe-only language which is not entangled with other software stacks and which I do not speak
[23:49] <doko> anyway, now ghc and it looks like a no-go for php and mysql
[23:49] <vorlon> no-go?
[23:49] <doko> but poppler finished is good news
[23:50] <doko> wait until ghc is finished
[23:52] <vorlon> ok