[07:03] good morning desktoppers [07:24] good morning desktopers [07:25] good morning [07:26] oSoMoN, hi, looks like firefox 65 requires gcc 7 for armX builds (more precisely webrtc aka chromium) [07:26] didrocks, hey [07:26] hey ricotz [07:32] Morning oSoMoN, ricotz, didrocks [07:32] hey duflu === pstolowski|afk is now known as pstolowski [08:56] morning [08:56] Morning willcooke [09:01] ahoy [09:02] Morning Laney [09:02] I assume [09:04] morning all o/ [09:05] Hi clobrano [09:05] hi duflu :) [09:09] hey willcooke, duflu, Laney, clobrano! [09:09] morning didrocks [09:46] * Laney meows === hggdh_ is now known as hggdh === pstolowski is now known as pstolowski|afk [17:21] andyrock, kenvandine just mentioned that he can recreate the d-2-d lock sreen bug [17:21] or at least, he could, until he installed your fix [17:21] :) [17:21] andyrock: yeah, i did a clean install of 18.10 the week of release [17:21] and didn't see the bug for more than a week [17:21] and it's been consistent ever since [17:21] and i never installed dash-to-dock [17:22] yesterday i installed the deb of ubuntu-dock from disco and haven't seen it since [17:22] so i think the fix is good [17:22] kenvandine: any steps to reproduce it? [17:22] kenvandine: there are people still reporting the issue [17:22] just let my laptop sleep [17:22] it would happen 100% of the time [17:23] willcooke witnessed this daily back in SLC :) [17:24] kenvandine: the main issue is a reference count mismatch in one or more MetaWindows between the c code and the gjs one [17:24] but one it happens I'm not sure [17:24] yeah, i'm pretty sure you have actually fixed it [17:24] my laptop has gone to sleep quite a few times since installing the fix [17:24] and it hasn't happened [17:24] but it did happen 100% of the time [17:25] mmm it's not a true fix, it's a workaround that allows use to buy some time [17:25] :D [17:26] lol [17:26] ok [17:26] well i do appreciate it :) [17:26] andyrock: and once it would happen the shell was all out of whack [17:27] the appindicators didn't show any more [17:27] and the dock wouldn't show running apps [17:27] yeah that's because gnome-shell expects an extension to unload correctly [17:27] there is no mechanism of protection in case this is not true [17:28] once it happens your shell is in an undefined state [17:29] Should we sru that fix to B? [17:29] willcooke: it's on my list [17:29] cool, thanks andyrock [17:29] and 18.10 please :) [17:29] I proposed a C branch will ping the right people to get in C before and then we can backport to B [17:30] andyrock: thanks [17:30] kenvandine: try not to change your configuration too much so we can debug it in Malta if you're going to be there [17:30] :D [17:30] andyrock: sure [17:31] it's not easy to fix those reference issues without being able to interactively debug them [18:07] laters, see you monday [18:07] #christmasshopping [18:07] Hello! I've been sent here to ask for help to report a bug with the snap version of gnome-system-monitor... which made me worry it might be an actually hard process, so here I am [19:40] ovrh, hi! Can you report it against this: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-system-monitor/+filebug [19:40] and mention that it's the snap [19:40] and let me know the bug number [19:42] willcooke, Thank you, will do! I was not sure if I should have reported it on launchpad, gnome, or somewhere else. I'll send you the bug # when I've prepared it [19:42] I think "the" solution for bug reports isto email whoever is listed as the snap owner [19:43] sarnold, there was talk of adding something to the description of the snap, or to the contact field, can't remember which. kenvandine do you remember? ^ [19:44] sarnold, this might be a bit special since they're kinda "main" snaps [19:45] sarnold, That would be Canonical, I doubt I can email them directly [19:46] yeah [19:46] we need to add a URL [19:46] url would be much appreciated :) this is far from the first time someone's had trouble reporting a bug against a snap :( [19:46] to the contact field [19:46] yeah [19:46] also, it would be really cool of ubuntu-bug could report a bug against a snap [19:47] yes [19:47] but if snaps are going to live elsewhere too, at minimum an url would be nice, since not all publishers are going to want to put up an email address :) [19:47] yeah, email doesn't make sense [19:48] we want real bug tracking [20:47] night asll [20:47] all [21:06] willcooke, Here's the bug report for when you'll be online again: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-system-monitor/+bug/1808420 thanks again for the help. [21:06] Ubuntu bug 1808420 in gnome-system-monitor (Ubuntu) "gnome-system-monitor from Snap does not hide /dev/loop* mounts" [Undecided,New] [21:08] ovrh: nice; I suggest adding the pastes and image to the bug report directly, so it's not dependant upon external sites [21:08] ovrh: thanks for filing the bug [21:10] sarnold, Will do. Is there any formatting supported? I see markdown didn't exactly work [21:11] ovrh: no :( attachments are best if th formatting really matters, but probabyl just a standard comment is sufficient to convey "there's a lot of mounts on this thing"