| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ulfius [amd64] (disco-proposed/universe) [2.5.1-2] (no packageset) | 06:44 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ulfius [ppc64el] (disco-proposed/universe) [2.5.1-2] (no packageset) | 06:44 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ulfius [i386] (disco-proposed/universe) [2.5.1-2] (no packageset) | 06:45 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ulfius [arm64] (disco-proposed/universe) [2.5.1-2] (no packageset) | 06:45 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ulfius [armhf] (disco-proposed/universe) [2.5.1-2] (no packageset) | 06:45 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ulfius [s390x] (disco-proposed/universe) [2.5.1-2] (no packageset) | 06:57 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-lunr [amd64] (disco-proposed) [2.3.5~dfsg-1] | 08:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ulfius [arm64] (disco-proposed) [2.5.1-2] | 08:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ulfius [i386] (disco-proposed) [2.5.1-2] | 08:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ulfius [s390x] (disco-proposed) [2.5.1-2] | 08:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ulfius [amd64] (disco-proposed) [2.5.1-2] | 08:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ulfius [ppc64el] (disco-proposed) [2.5.1-2] | 08:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ulfius [armhf] (disco-proposed) [2.5.1-2] | 08:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock (cosmic-proposed/main) [63ubuntu1 => 63ubuntu1.18.10.1] (ubuntu-desktop) | 09:09 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: alsa-lib (cosmic-proposed/main) [1.1.6-1ubuntu1.1 => 1.1.6-1ubuntu1.2] (core) | 09:36 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | any AA please process https://bugs.launchpad.net/debian/+source/python-h5netcdf/+bug/1809094 ? | 09:53 |
|---|---|---|
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1809094 in python-h5netcdf (Ubuntu) "python-h5netcdf: kick out from release pocket in proposed" [Undecided,New] | 09:53 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: alsa-lib (bionic-proposed/main) [1.1.3-5ubuntu0.1 => 1.1.3-5ubuntu0.2] (core) | 10:09 | |
| Laney | sil2100: hey, can you remind me if there's a place where you can see bileto's queue for running britney and if so where it is please? | 15:22 |
| * Laney has been seeing "Queued" for a while now | 15:23 | |
| * Laney becomes impatient and takes the risk instead :> | 15:47 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | Laney, https://bileto.ubuntu.com/excuses/$ID/$TARGET_SERIES.html | 15:49 |
| LocutusOfBorg | https://bileto.ubuntu.com/excuses/3571/disco.html | 15:50 |
| Laney | too slow | 15:50 |
| Laney | I wanted to see where it was in the queue for bileto to even start running britney | 15:51 |
| Laney | it took ages and ages for that to even start | 15:51 |
| LocutusOfBorg | autopkgtests are running... I presume britney runs once they finish? I don't remember... | 15:52 |
| Laney | I asked sil2100 for a reason | 15:52 |
| Laney | :-) | 15:52 |
| Laney | suspiciously similar timing to when I published isn't it 2018-12-19 15:47:58 / 2018.12.19 15:48:23 | 15:53 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I was sure you were aware of that link, but I tried to help anyway :) | 16:01 |
| Laney | yes, thanks - just that in this case it was a different thing I was after ("why is it not running yet?") | 16:04 |
| Laney | by the time you looked it had already started running | 16:04 |
| Laney | which happened many tens of minutes after it went to Queued, and possibly even after or in response to me pressing publish | 16:04 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I remember having the same unexplained delay when I used bileto last time | 16:05 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I thought waiting an hour or two was the answer | 16:06 |
| Laney | I hope not, but I'll wait for the person who it most likely to know to show up :> | 16:06 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted alsa-lib [source] (cosmic-proposed) [1.1.6-1ubuntu1.2] | 16:13 | |
| smoser | hey. i'm looking for some help before holiday | 16:19 |
| smoser | sil2100 or bdmurray i think are my options to release 1807978 from -proposed | 16:20 |
| smoser | i know its neither of your days... but that is currently a regression and would remain that way until 2019 if we didnt get that in today. | 16:21 |
| bdmurray | smoser: looking | 16:21 |
| bdmurray | smoser: Have you looked at the resource-agents autopkgtest failure in bionic? | 16:22 |
| smoser | i think i commented on that in the last sru. but i will look. | 16:23 |
| smoser | bdmurray: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/open-iscsi/+bug/1802354/comments/18 | 16:24 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1802354 in open-iscsi (Ubuntu Cosmic) "iscsid does not run if there are only initramfs initiated targets" [High,Fix released] | 16:24 |
| smoser | commented on bug. | 16:25 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: network-manager (bionic-proposed/main) [1.10.6-2ubuntu1.1 => 1.10.14-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop) | 16:30 | |
| oSoMoN | SRU team: can someone please accept network-manager 1.10.14-0ubuntu1 in bionic-proposed? The intention is to allow for an extended period of testing in -proposed over the holidays | 16:42 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: puppet-module-heini-wait-for [amd64] (disco-proposed/universe) [2.0.1-1] (no packageset) | 17:14 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: puppet-module-octavia [amd64] (disco-proposed/universe) [13.1.0-1] (no packageset) | 17:14 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dask-sphinx-theme [amd64] (disco-proposed/universe) [1.1.0-1] (no packageset) | 17:16 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: puppet-module-voxpupuli-ssh-keygen [amd64] (disco-proposed/universe) [2.0.1-1] (no packageset) | 17:16 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pcl [amd64] (disco-proposed/universe) [1.9.1+dfsg1-2] (no packageset) | 18:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pcl [i386] (disco-proposed/universe) [1.9.1+dfsg1-2] (no packageset) | 18:36 | |
| rbalint | rbasak, (maybe sil2100 ): could you please release unattended-upgrades srus to cosmic and bionic? | 18:48 |
| rbalint | i know it is one day early but the fix is simple and it would be better to have two days before everyone goes on holiday | 18:49 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pcl [s390x] (disco-proposed/universe) [1.9.1+dfsg1-2] (no packageset) | 18:50 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pcl [ppc64el] (disco-proposed/universe) [1.9.1+dfsg1-2] (no packageset) | 19:43 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pcl [armhf] (disco-proposed/universe) [1.9.1+dfsg1-2] (no packageset) | 20:56 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lm-sensors [amd64] (disco-proposed/main) [1:3.5.0-3] (core) | 23:13 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lm-sensors [armhf] (disco-proposed/main) [1:3.5.0-3] (core) | 23:13 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lm-sensors [arm64] (disco-proposed/main) [1:3.5.0-3] (core) | 23:13 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lm-sensors [ppc64el] (disco-proposed/main) [1:3.5.0-3] (core) | 23:13 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lm-sensors [i386] (disco-proposed/main) [1:3.5.0-3] (core) | 23:13 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pcl [amd64] (disco-proposed/universe) [1.9.1+dfsg1-2ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 23:14 | |
| Eickmeyer | infinity, or anyone for that matter: There is a package that was synced from Debian for 18.04 (csladspa 6.10) that, apparently, was synced at just the wrong time and is riddled with bugs , and is right now Ardour's #1 bug report. Right now, the workaround is to uninstall csladspa, but the version in 18.10 (6.11) and Disco (6.12) has the bug fixed. I need help getting it backported to 18.04. | 23:34 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pcl [s390x] (disco-proposed/universe) [1.9.1+dfsg1-2ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 23:36 | |
| Eickmeyer | I checked the wiki, but SRU or Sync Request don't exactly fit the mold here. | 23:36 |
| Eickmeyer | tsimonq2: If you're around, you might be able to guide me through this as well. | 23:38 |
| wxl | that seems like an SRU to me Eickmeyer | 23:39 |
| Eickmeyer | wxl: I agree, but should I attach the debdiff if it's basically a debian import? | 23:40 |
| wxl | Eickmeyer: i'm not the SRU expert but that's my general feeling | 23:43 |
| Eickmeyer | wxl: Understood. I'm preparing an SRU in a related bug report with links to the Ardour bug reports in question given to me by the Ardour team. | 23:44 |
| wxl | Eickmeyer: the one thing i *THINK* i'm right about is that sync requests ONLY apply to development releases, while SRUs ONLY apply to stable releases. that said, if you wanted a sync request on a stable release, you'd do an SRU. | 23:44 |
| Eickmeyer | wxl: That's what I figured. | 23:45 |
| wxl | Eickmeyer: worst case scenario you might have to edit the bug report a bit if i'm a little bit off, but i think you're on the right track | 23:45 |
| mwhudson | Eickmeyer: if you want to fix the bug by uploading an entirely new version, i don't think there's much to be gained by attaching a debdiff | 23:49 |
| mwhudson | Eickmeyer: in your bug report you should justify why you are doing that rather than just fixing the bugs though | 23:49 |
| Eickmeyer | mwhudson: Agreed. Ardour is a major application with audio production in Ubuntu Studio with a large user base, so I want to make sure the bridge to that community is a good one. | 23:51 |
| wxl | but this is a new version of csladspa not ardour right? and it's know to work with that older version of ardour? | 23:52 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!