[06:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ulfius [amd64] (disco-proposed/universe) [2.5.1-2] (no packageset)
[06:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ulfius [ppc64el] (disco-proposed/universe) [2.5.1-2] (no packageset)
[06:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ulfius [i386] (disco-proposed/universe) [2.5.1-2] (no packageset)
[06:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ulfius [arm64] (disco-proposed/universe) [2.5.1-2] (no packageset)
[06:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ulfius [armhf] (disco-proposed/universe) [2.5.1-2] (no packageset)
[06:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ulfius [s390x] (disco-proposed/universe) [2.5.1-2] (no packageset)
[08:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-lunr [amd64] (disco-proposed) [2.3.5~dfsg-1]
[08:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ulfius [arm64] (disco-proposed) [2.5.1-2]
[08:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ulfius [i386] (disco-proposed) [2.5.1-2]
[08:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ulfius [s390x] (disco-proposed) [2.5.1-2]
[08:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ulfius [amd64] (disco-proposed) [2.5.1-2]
[08:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ulfius [ppc64el] (disco-proposed) [2.5.1-2]
[08:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ulfius [armhf] (disco-proposed) [2.5.1-2]
[09:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock (cosmic-proposed/main) [63ubuntu1 => 63ubuntu1.18.10.1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[09:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: alsa-lib (cosmic-proposed/main) [1.1.6-1ubuntu1.1 => 1.1.6-1ubuntu1.2] (core)
[09:53] <LocutusOfBorg> any AA please process https://bugs.launchpad.net/debian/+source/python-h5netcdf/+bug/1809094 ?
[09:53] <ubot5> Ubuntu bug 1809094 in python-h5netcdf (Ubuntu) "python-h5netcdf: kick out from release pocket in proposed" [Undecided,New]
[10:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: alsa-lib (bionic-proposed/main) [1.1.3-5ubuntu0.1 => 1.1.3-5ubuntu0.2] (core)
[15:22] <Laney> sil2100: hey, can you remind me if there's a place where you can see bileto's queue for running britney and if so where it is please?
[15:23]  * Laney has been seeing "Queued" for a while now
[15:47]  * Laney becomes impatient and takes the risk instead :>
[15:49] <LocutusOfBorg> Laney, https://bileto.ubuntu.com/excuses/$ID/$TARGET_SERIES.html
[15:50] <LocutusOfBorg> https://bileto.ubuntu.com/excuses/3571/disco.html
[15:50] <Laney> too slow
[15:51] <Laney> I wanted to see where it was in the queue for bileto to even start running britney
[15:51] <Laney> it took ages and ages for that to even start
[15:52] <LocutusOfBorg> autopkgtests are running... I presume britney runs once they finish? I don't remember...
[15:52] <Laney> I asked sil2100 for a reason
[15:52] <Laney> :-)
[15:53] <Laney> suspiciously similar timing to when I published isn't it 2018-12-19 15:47:58 / 2018.12.19 15:48:23
[16:01] <LocutusOfBorg> I was sure you were aware of that link, but I tried to help anyway :)
[16:04] <Laney> yes, thanks - just that in this case it was a different thing I was after ("why is it not running yet?")
[16:04] <Laney> by the time you looked it had already started running
[16:04] <Laney> which happened many tens of minutes after it went to Queued, and possibly even after or in response to me pressing publish
[16:05] <LocutusOfBorg> I remember having the same unexplained delay when I used bileto last time
[16:06] <LocutusOfBorg> I thought waiting an hour or two was the answer
[16:06] <Laney> I hope not, but I'll wait for the person who it most likely to know to show up :>
[16:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted alsa-lib [source] (cosmic-proposed) [1.1.6-1ubuntu1.2]
[16:19] <smoser> hey. i'm looking for some help before holiday
[16:20] <smoser> sil2100 or bdmurray i think are my options to release 1807978 from -proposed
[16:21] <smoser> i know its neither of your days... but that is currently a regression and would remain that way until 2019 if we didnt get that in today.
[16:21] <bdmurray> smoser: looking
[16:22] <bdmurray> smoser: Have you looked at the resource-agents autopkgtest failure in bionic?
[16:23] <smoser> i think i commented on that in the last sru. but i will look.
[16:24] <smoser> bdmurray: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/open-iscsi/+bug/1802354/comments/18
[16:24] <ubot5> Ubuntu bug 1802354 in open-iscsi (Ubuntu Cosmic) "iscsid does not run if there are only initramfs initiated targets" [High,Fix released]
[16:25] <smoser> commented on bug.
[16:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: network-manager (bionic-proposed/main) [1.10.6-2ubuntu1.1 => 1.10.14-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)
[16:42] <oSoMoN> SRU team: can someone please accept network-manager 1.10.14-0ubuntu1 in bionic-proposed? The intention is to allow for an extended period of testing in -proposed over the holidays
[17:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: puppet-module-heini-wait-for [amd64] (disco-proposed/universe) [2.0.1-1] (no packageset)
[17:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: puppet-module-octavia [amd64] (disco-proposed/universe) [13.1.0-1] (no packageset)
[17:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dask-sphinx-theme [amd64] (disco-proposed/universe) [1.1.0-1] (no packageset)
[17:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: puppet-module-voxpupuli-ssh-keygen [amd64] (disco-proposed/universe) [2.0.1-1] (no packageset)
[18:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pcl [amd64] (disco-proposed/universe) [1.9.1+dfsg1-2] (no packageset)
[18:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pcl [i386] (disco-proposed/universe) [1.9.1+dfsg1-2] (no packageset)
[18:48] <rbalint> rbasak, (maybe sil2100 ): could you please release unattended-upgrades srus to cosmic and bionic?
[18:49] <rbalint> i know it is one day early but the fix is simple and it would be better to have two days before everyone goes on holiday
[18:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pcl [s390x] (disco-proposed/universe) [1.9.1+dfsg1-2] (no packageset)
[19:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pcl [ppc64el] (disco-proposed/universe) [1.9.1+dfsg1-2] (no packageset)
[20:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pcl [armhf] (disco-proposed/universe) [1.9.1+dfsg1-2] (no packageset)
[23:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lm-sensors [amd64] (disco-proposed/main) [1:3.5.0-3] (core)
[23:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lm-sensors [armhf] (disco-proposed/main) [1:3.5.0-3] (core)
[23:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lm-sensors [arm64] (disco-proposed/main) [1:3.5.0-3] (core)
[23:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lm-sensors [ppc64el] (disco-proposed/main) [1:3.5.0-3] (core)
[23:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lm-sensors [i386] (disco-proposed/main) [1:3.5.0-3] (core)
[23:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pcl [amd64] (disco-proposed/universe) [1.9.1+dfsg1-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[23:34] <Eickmeyer> infinity, or anyone for that matter: There is a package that was synced from Debian for 18.04 (csladspa 6.10) that, apparently, was synced at just the wrong time and is riddled with bugs , and is right now Ardour's #1 bug report. Right now, the workaround is to uninstall csladspa, but the version in 18.10 (6.11) and Disco (6.12) has the bug fixed. I need help getting it backported to 18.04.
[23:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pcl [s390x] (disco-proposed/universe) [1.9.1+dfsg1-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[23:36] <Eickmeyer> I checked the wiki, but SRU or Sync Request don't exactly fit the mold here.
[23:38] <Eickmeyer> tsimonq2: If you're around, you might be able to guide me through this as well.
[23:39] <wxl> that seems like an SRU to me Eickmeyer
[23:40] <Eickmeyer> wxl: I agree, but should I attach the debdiff if it's basically a debian import?
[23:43] <wxl> Eickmeyer: i'm not the SRU expert but that's my general feeling
[23:44] <Eickmeyer> wxl: Understood. I'm preparing an SRU in a related bug report with links to the Ardour bug reports in question given to me by the Ardour team.
[23:44] <wxl> Eickmeyer: the one thing i *THINK* i'm right about is that sync requests ONLY apply to development releases, while SRUs ONLY apply to stable releases. that said, if you wanted a sync request on a stable release, you'd do an SRU.
[23:45] <Eickmeyer> wxl: That's what I figured.
[23:45] <wxl> Eickmeyer: worst case scenario you might have to edit the bug report a bit if i'm a little bit off, but i think you're on the right track
[23:49] <mwhudson> Eickmeyer: if you want to fix the bug by uploading an entirely new version, i don't think there's much to be gained by attaching a debdiff
[23:49] <mwhudson> Eickmeyer: in your bug report you should justify why you are doing that rather than just fixing the bugs though
[23:51] <Eickmeyer> mwhudson: Agreed. Ardour is a major application with audio production in Ubuntu Studio with a large user base, so I want to make sure the bridge to that community is a good one.
[23:52] <wxl> but this is a new version of csladspa not ardour right? and it's know to work with that older version of ardour?