[03:21] <windowsrefund> does anyone know wtf this 'c930e,0,0-in' thing is? I want to kill it 20 times. https://i.imgur.com/8LxqsJX.png
[03:24] <Glorfindel> windowsrefund: looks like an input
[03:24] <Glorfindel> I'm not familiar with that program though
[03:29] <windowsrefund> yea, there's no app or program that I'm aware of
[03:29] <windowsrefund> and it wasn't here last week
[03:30] <Glorfindel> can you remove it? or is that the problem
[03:30] <windowsrefund> oh
[03:30] <windowsrefund> hahahaha
[03:30] <windowsrefund> it was the webcam
[03:30] <windowsrefund> little f'r
[03:32] <Glorfindel> that would do it, lol
[04:17] <OvenWerks> windowsrefund: so yu can just ignore it. if you don't use any USB devices you can also unclick "Bridge USB devices to jack when plugged in"
[04:17] <OvenWerks>  (in -controls)
[04:19] <studio-user387> Hi, I've just downloaded ubuntustudio-18.10-dvd-amd64.iso and I found that all MD5, SHA1 and SHA256 SUMS were different...
[04:19] <OvenWerks> I guess a feature request to "blacklist" certain devices could be another option
[04:20] <studio-user387> I used iDM for windows 10 with 16 threads, is that affecting the hash result?
[04:21] <OvenWerks> That I can't say.iDM is some thing for printing an ISO to a DVD or usb stick?
[04:22] <Glorfindel> studio-user387: the hashes were different from *each other*? or from the listed hashes on the ubuntu studio website?
[04:23] <studio-user387> iDM used for downloading from the direct link
[04:24] <studio-user387> The hashes were different from the listed hashes on the ubuntu studio website
[04:24] <OvenWerks> that sounds like a bad download
[04:24] <Glorfindel> download managers shouldn't change the hash, excepting corruption
[04:24] <studio-user387> I used CertUtil in CMD to check the hashes
[04:24] <Glorfindel> redownload it
[04:25] <OvenWerks> if you can use zsync to download that would be faster
[04:25] <OvenWerks> zsync will keep any parts of the already downloaded file that are correct and just download the rest
[04:25] <studio-user387> is zsync open source?
[04:26] <OvenWerks> zsync will then check the whole file against the checksum
[04:26] <OvenWerks> zsync is open source yes
[04:28] <studio-user387> okay thank you, I'll try it again tonight with zsync... I almost spent all of my data plan hahaha
[04:28] <OvenWerks> yikes!
[04:31] <studio-user387> Can I fix the iso file with zsync or should I start download it from the beginning?
[04:32] <OvenWerks> zsync can start with the file you have
[04:34] <studio-user387> even if I did't use zsync to download it at the first place?
[04:34] <OvenWerks> what zsync does is download a relatively small *.zsync file that has lots of checksums for xmall parts of the file. It keeps the omes that match and just DL parts that do not match
[04:35] <OvenWerks> (or are missing which is more likely in your case)
[04:35] <studio-user387> Wow that's cool, I hope that wont take more data plan
[04:35] <studio-user387> "zsync.moria.org.uk" <<< this is the link, right?
[04:36] <OvenWerks> everything takes more of your data plan... that may be your problem, you ran out before you finished DL.
[04:37] <studio-user387> is "Pausing and resuming download" several times also cause the corrupted parts?
[04:38] <OvenWerks> That depends on the DL process.
[04:39] <OvenWerks> zsync can restart as can torrents
[04:40] <OvenWerks> torrents also do auto self checking and you might already have sw for that, but it is harder to point torrent at a file you have already DL with another app
[04:41] <OvenWerks> zsync doesn't care. I have taken a similar iso and renamed it to the one I want and used zsync to just DL the parts that are different.
[04:41] <studio-user387> If zsync is so useful like that, why it's free?
[04:42] <OvenWerks> if windows is so bad why does it cost money?
[04:42] <studio-user387> Thank you @OvenWerks Hashes things are new to me, where can I learn more about it?
[04:42] <OvenWerks> I don't know the best place for that
[04:43] <studio-user387> I don't know, maybe business?
[04:43] <OvenWerks> That sort of gives business a black eye I think
[04:46] <studio-user387> Yes, maybe you're right. I can't wait for my first experience in Ubuntu