[00:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted morse-simulator [arm64] (disco-proposed) [1.4-4]
[00:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted morse-simulator [armhf] (disco-proposed) [1.4-4]
[00:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted morse-simulator [amd64] (disco-proposed) [1.4-4]
[00:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted morse-simulator [ppc64el] (disco-proposed) [1.4-4]
[00:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted musescore-general-soundfont-small [amd64] (disco-proposed) [0.1.3-1]
[00:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pyphen [amd64] (disco-proposed) [0.9.5-2]
[00:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted morse-simulator [i386] (disco-proposed) [1.4-4]
[00:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted musescore-general-soundfont [amd64] (disco-proposed) [0.1.3-2]
[00:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted morse-simulator [s390x] (disco-proposed) [1.4-4]
[05:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kamailio [s390x] (disco-proposed/universe) [5.2.0-2] (no packageset)
[05:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kamailio [amd64] (disco-proposed/universe) [5.2.0-2] (no packageset)
[05:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kamailio [i386] (disco-proposed/universe) [5.2.0-2] (no packageset)
[05:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kamailio [arm64] (disco-proposed/universe) [5.2.0-2] (no packageset)
[05:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kamailio [armhf] (disco-proposed/universe) [5.2.0-2] (no packageset)
[05:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kamailio [ppc64el] (disco-proposed/universe) [5.2.0-2] (no packageset)
[06:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kamailio [amd64] (disco-proposed) [5.2.0-2]
[06:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kamailio [armhf] (disco-proposed) [5.2.0-2]
[06:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kamailio [ppc64el] (disco-proposed) [5.2.0-2]
[06:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kamailio [arm64] (disco-proposed) [5.2.0-2]
[06:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kamailio [i386] (disco-proposed) [5.2.0-2]
[06:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kamailio [s390x] (disco-proposed) [5.2.0-2]
[06:21] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: reverse-depends src:llvm-toolchain-4.0 -b shows firefox and thunderbird also have build-dependencies on this version, and those are not false positives
[06:30] <vorlon> acheronuk: it appears that all of your retries of the uim/ppc64el test were done with all-proposed=1, which seems sure to run into the problem with uim-el uninstallability within -proposed, but it's unclear to me that they should have been.  I'm retrying the test with only qt from -proposed, which is better than skiptest
[08:31] <acheronuk> vorlon: I tried uim normally as well, but IIRC the test decided test decided....
[08:31] <acheronuk> "autopkgtest: WARNING: Test dependencies are unsatisfiable with using apt pinning. Retrying with using all packages from disco-proposed"
[08:32] <acheronuk> like your try did
[08:36] <acheronuk> this is why I asked for skiptest
[12:15] <LocutusOfBorg> chrisccoulson, can I switch from llvm-4.0-dev to llvm-dev for firefox and thunderbird? I can switch and upload
[12:15] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, ^^ I see debian is using llvm-dev not the 4.0 version, so it should be safe to swtich
[14:31] <jbicha> LocutusOfBorg: I think osomon is the current Firefox maintainer for Ubuntu
[17:15] <acheronuk> vorlon: if you are willing I would quite like to skiptest konsole as well, as that is just blocaked by apport test regression which is entirely valgrind brokeness. However, I will be uploading a new bugfix release of konsole end of next week, so if you do not skiptest the current one it's not the end of the world
[17:17] <acheronuk> mostly the pink test fail here offends my 'fix it' instinct :D  http://people.ubuntu.com/~rikmills/ka-iron-hand_reports/applications_archive/18.12.0_disco_proposed_migration.pdf
[23:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pdfminer [amd64] (disco-proposed/universe) [20181108+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[23:22] <vorlon> acheronuk: ack, now that I can see this I'll follow through on a skiptest.  Why is uim-qt5-immodule uninstallable, though?  it didn't look like this should've been a library transition
[23:23] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: "should be safe" - but hasn't been done yet; until it is, not a candidate for removal
[23:31] <acheronuk> vorlon: depends emacs24, which  s built for all arches on amd64, but depends on emacs-gtk, which depends on the arch dependant builds of emacs-bin-common = source version. hence in proposed emacs24 -> emacs-gtk requires 1:26.1+1-3 emacs-bin-common on all arches, which doesn't exist on ppc64el due to the FTBFS
[23:31] <acheronuk> vorlon: thank you
[23:31] <vorlon> acheronuk: my question is why is the version in the release pocket not installable
[23:34] <acheronuk> oh. well for Qt at least, uim in release depends qtbase-abi-5-11-2 so will be uninstallable in any test against Qt 5.11.3