-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: raspi3-firmware (bionic-proposed/multiverse) [1.20171201-3 => 1.20180919-0ubuntu0.18.04.1] (no packageset) | 00:00 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted exempi [amd64] (disco-proposed) [2.5.0-2] | 06:40 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted exempi [armhf] (disco-proposed) [2.5.0-2] | 06:40 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted exempi [ppc64el] (disco-proposed) [2.5.0-2] | 06:40 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rdkit [amd64] (disco-proposed) [201809.1+dfsg-3] | 06:40 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rdkit [armhf] (disco-proposed) [201809.1+dfsg-3] | 06:40 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rdkit [ppc64el] (disco-proposed) [201809.1+dfsg-3] | 06:40 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted uglify-js [amd64] (disco-proposed) [3.4.9-1] | 06:40 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted exempi [arm64] (disco-proposed) [2.5.0-2] | 06:40 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted exempi [s390x] (disco-proposed) [2.5.0-2] | 06:40 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rdkit [i386] (disco-proposed) [201809.1+dfsg-3] | 06:40 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted uglify-js [amd64] (disco-proposed) [3.4.9-2] | 06:40 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted exempi [i386] (disco-proposed) [2.5.0-2] | 06:40 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rdkit [s390x] (disco-proposed) [201809.1+dfsg-3] | 06:40 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rdkit [arm64] (disco-proposed) [201809.1+dfsg-3] | 06:40 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: flash-kernel (bionic-proposed/main) [3.90ubuntu3 => 3.90ubuntu3.18.04.1] (core) | 09:22 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: flash-kernel (cosmic-proposed/main) [3.90ubuntu3 => 3.90ubuntu3.18.10.1] (core) | 09:22 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lighttpd [amd64] (disco-proposed/universe) [1.4.52-3ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 09:54 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lighttpd [s390x] (disco-proposed/universe) [1.4.52-3ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 09:54 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lighttpd [ppc64el] (disco-proposed/universe) [1.4.52-3ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 09:54 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lighttpd [i386] (disco-proposed/universe) [1.4.52-3ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 09:56 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lighttpd [arm64] (disco-proposed/universe) [1.4.52-3ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 09:57 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lighttpd [armhf] (disco-proposed/universe) [1.4.52-3ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 09:57 | |
oSoMoN | sil2100, good morning! When you have some time for it, could you please have a look at libreoffice{,-l10n} 1:6.1.4-0ubuntu0.18.10.1 in the cosmic queue and approve? | 10:11 |
---|---|---|
sil2100 | oSoMoN: hey! Ok, let me try picking that up | 10:19 |
oSoMoN | cheers! | 10:19 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: eglexternalplatform (disco-proposed/primary) [1.0+git20181101-1] | 10:19 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: egl-wayland (disco-proposed/primary) [1:1.1.1-2] | 10:20 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mesa (cosmic-proposed/main) [18.2.2-0ubuntu1 => 18.2.8-0ubuntu0~18.10.1] (core, xorg) | 11:21 | |
doko | Laney: I'll leave that to tdaitx | 11:33 |
doko | Laney, seb128: glib2.0's autopkg tests fail, and the the version in proposed ftbfs | 11:33 |
doko | blocking python packages ... | 11:33 |
doko | apw: please look at the linux autopkg test failures. blocks gcc-* for a month or so ... | 11:34 |
apw | doko, didn't sforshee already look those over ... | 11:34 |
Laney | known, being worked on | 11:35 |
doko | ta. apw: ENOCLUE, version mismatch for a hint? | 11:36 |
seb128 | doko, we have a nice report page that tell us about those issues, but thx for the ping anyway :) | 11:36 |
apw | doko, will find out | 11:37 |
doko | seb128: I'm not pinging every package. Just the stuff that blocks some core packages | 11:37 |
seb128 | doko, that doesn't change the fact that we have a report and that the ping is not necessary, especially for things that are recent (that glib sync is less than a week old, it's like it was stucked for ages) | 11:38 |
doko | Laney: what is the size limit for those articfacts? | 11:44 |
Laney | there isn't one atm | 11:44 |
Laney | wouldn't really expect more than a few megs though ideally | 11:45 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: graphite2 [amd64] (disco-proposed/main) [1.3.13-6] (core) | 12:29 | |
ahasenack | hi, could someone from the release team please review this to unblock ocfs2-tools? | 13:22 |
ahasenack | https://code.launchpad.net/~ahasenack/britney/ocfs2-s390x/+merge/361556 | 13:22 |
ahasenack | and question for the release team: I asked upstream if this means ocfs2-tools just doesn't work on s390x, and the answer is that yeah, it does not work: https://github.com/markfasheh/ocfs2-tools/issues/22#issuecomment-452931021 | 13:48 |
gitbot | markfasheh issue 22 in ocfs2-tools "o2image fails on s390x (big endian)" [Open] | 13:48 |
ahasenack | so should we skip that test in s390x entirely? Or perhaps change the version to 'all' in the mp above? | 13:48 |
LocutusOfBorg | ahasenack, https://code.launchpad.net/~costamagnagianfranco/britney/hints-ubuntu/+merge/360672 | 14:32 |
LocutusOfBorg | nobody cared so far... | 14:32 |
jbicha | please remove birdtray/s390x, it's intentionally not built there now because thunderbird is not available on s390x currently | 14:36 |
ahasenack | LocutusOfBorg: symfony is good on armhf now, right? | 15:23 |
ahasenack | oh, i see, they haven't *dropped* the hint | 15:23 |
ahasenack | vorlon: you once told me you could be pinged directly :) ^ LocutusOfBorg's and mine | 15:23 |
LocutusOfBorg | I stopped rebasing my hints, because I don't know how to do it with bzr... | 15:52 |
=== cpaelzer_ is now known as cpaelzer | ||
tdaitx | Laney: in about two weeks there will be a security update for openjdk-lts in cosmic, would it be ok to wait until then? | 16:51 |
tdaitx | (for the autopkgtest fix) | 16:51 |
Laney | tdaitx: I've blacklisted the tests so they're not running in any case | 16:51 |
tdaitx | I'm planning to upload the fix to disco meanwhile | 16:52 |
Laney | did you find the bug? | 16:52 |
tdaitx | Laney: yes, I did | 16:52 |
Laney | 🙌 | 16:52 |
roaksoax | win 2 | 16:53 |
tdaitx | Laney: does the blacklist affect all releases or are you able to just filter out cosmic? | 16:54 |
Laney | tdaitx: It's per release so I can drop disco | 16:54 |
Laney | If you want to upload to a PPA then we can do a manual run first to see if it works in production | 16:54 |
tdaitx | Laney: nice, I will upload it and let you know when the package is built (which means sometime tomorrow) | 16:55 |
Laney | nod | 16:56 |
tdaitx | thanks! | 16:56 |
Laney | doko: I fixed a bug in autopkgtest that should make those glib2.0 results for python3-stdlib-extensions go green | 16:58 |
vorlon | ahasenack: sorry, was that a pointer just to https://code.launchpad.net/~costamagnagianfranco/britney/hints-ubuntu/+merge/360672 or was there something else? | 16:59 |
ahasenack | vorlon: also to https://code.launchpad.net/~ahasenack/britney/ocfs2-s390x/+merge/361556 | 16:59 |
vorlon | ok | 17:00 |
ahasenack | vorlon: and the question if we shouldn't make that a "/all/s390x" one instead | 17:00 |
ahasenack | or change the test to exit 0 (fake success) if arch == s390x, given the response in the ticket | 17:00 |
vorlon | ahasenack: the existing convention is to use per-version hints for "previously skipped in lxc now fails in vm" when there's no fundamental reason for the package to be unavailable on that arch. ("hasn't been ported to big-endian" isn't fundamental to the nature of the software) | 17:05 |
ahasenack | ok | 17:06 |
Laney | You can use Restrictions: skippable and exit 77, to avoid running the test (almost) at all | 17:06 |
vorlon | yeah, but I don't think that's actually appropriate here | 17:06 |
vorlon | the test is right and returns the right result ("this package is broken on this arch") | 17:07 |
vorlon | and it's skippable only because it's not a regression, which is logic that belongs on the britney side | 17:07 |
Laney | I think "this package is broken on this arch [but never mind]" is OK for the package itself to decide | 17:08 |
Laney | YMMV | 17:08 |
LocutusOfBorg | vorlon, can you please look again at my merge request? thanks! | 20:32 |
vorlon | LocutusOfBorg: what has changed that invalidates my review comments? AFAICS the tests you're adding badtests for both now pass | 20:34 |
acheronuk | vorlon: hi. could you please skiptest konsole? again, only fail is apport | 20:37 |
LocutusOfBorg | vorlon, the "pass" is the ubuntu delta | 20:38 |
vorlon | acheronuk: done | 20:38 |
LocutusOfBorg | I prefer them to be hinted, and packages become in sync again | 20:38 |
acheronuk | ty | 20:38 |
LocutusOfBorg | so we don't have to carry a delta forever | 20:38 |
ahasenack | you prefer the combination no-delta+badtest rather than with-delta+tests-really-pass? | 20:40 |
vorlon | LocutusOfBorg: I would rather have a delta, such that whoever merges the package is forced to re-evaluate whether the delta is still needed or should be dropped, than to have a blanket badtest | 20:41 |
LocutusOfBorg | :( | 20:41 |
LocutusOfBorg | and instead trying to delete the "passes" on that archs so britney is forced to forget them? | 20:42 |
vorlon | (and I would prefer over either of these situations to have the work done in p-m to handle resetting of baselines) | 20:42 |
LocutusOfBorg | ^^ yes, exactly :) | 20:42 |
* acheronuk spies vagrind fix incoming | 20:44 | |
acheronuk | I hope! | 20:44 |
* LocutusOfBorg too | 20:45 | |
cyphermox | acheronuk: yes, uploaded already | 21:24 |
vorlon | cyphermox: fuse-zip autopkgtest failure w/ new valgrind which may need investigation. (did someone skiptest fuse-zip previously on account of valgrind and let a regression in?) https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-disco/disco/amd64/f/fuse-zip/20190110_220309_653b7@/log.gz | 22:23 |
vorlon | hmm no fuse-zip previously passed on its own | 22:23 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!