| willcooke | morning all | 06:28 |
|---|---|---|
| jibel | Hi willcooke, how was your trip? | 06:57 |
| willcooke | morning jibel. Fine; boring, uncomfortable, tiring, etc :D | 06:57 |
| jibel | Great, enjoy your stay ;) | 06:58 |
| === pstolowski|afk is now known as pstolowski | ||
| didrocks | good morning | 08:18 |
| oSoMoN | good morning desktoppers | 08:44 |
| Trevinho | Good morning! | 08:46 |
| Trevinho | Hi oSoMoN | 08:46 |
| didrocks | salut oSoMoN, hey Trevinho | 08:46 |
| oSoMoN | hey Trevinho, didrocks | 08:47 |
| Trevinho | Salut à vous! | 08:47 |
| willcooke | morning didrocks | 09:01 |
| Laney | hi hi | 09:02 |
| didrocks | hey willcooke, Laney | 09:02 |
| didrocks | willcooke: how was your flight? | 09:02 |
| willcooke | didrocks, boring :) | 09:02 |
| Laney | hey didrocks, good weekend? | 09:03 |
| Laney | willcooke: shorts and sunglasses weather? | 09:03 |
| didrocks | willcooke: boring is good :) | 09:04 |
| didrocks | Laney: was good, but rainy. Yourself? | 09:04 |
| Laney | pretty good! | 09:04 |
| Laney | did a lot of digging to get some brambles out | 09:05 |
| didrocks | how are your arms? :) | 09:06 |
| Laney | it's mostly the back :( #oldman | 09:06 |
| Laney | but actually ok! | 09:06 |
| didrocks | heh | 09:07 |
| seb128 | Back, good morning desktopers | 09:07 |
| willcooke | Laney, it is! It's really nice outside. Inside it's about 4 degress :( Also I forgot my sunglasses | 09:08 |
| Laney | disaster | 09:08 |
| Laney | hey seb128 | 09:08 |
| oSoMoN | good morning willcooke, Laney, seb128 | 09:09 |
| seb128 | hey Laney oSoMoN | 09:11 |
| Laney | and oSoMoN! | 09:11 |
| Laney | #party #time | 09:11 |
| didrocks | hey seb128 | 09:12 |
| seb128 | lut didrocks | 09:13 |
| andyrock | morning all | 09:17 |
| seb128 | hey andyrock! had a good w.e? | 09:18 |
| andyrock | hey seb128! yeah a relaxing one! what about you? | 09:19 |
| seb128 | same, didn't do much but that was nice. | 09:20 |
| seb128 | we had friends over for a cheese fondue on friday evening and relaxed mostly during the rest of the W.E | 09:20 |
| jibel | didrocks, salut. Q on ubuntu-report: any idea how the CPU information can be empty, only the name is recorded? | 10:30 |
| * didrocks thinks… can you pastebin somewhere what this part of the json looks like? | 10:32 | |
| didrocks | hum, so it's definitively running with a recent ubuntu-report, so not that… | 10:36 |
| didrocks | maybe translated lscpu -J ? | 10:36 |
| didrocks | or patched version ? | 10:36 |
| didrocks | which is weird, but that's one plausible explanation why some fields are missing… (I do a string match) | 10:37 |
| didrocks | the only one present is: "name" corresponding to "Model name:" | 10:37 |
| didrocks | but yeah, the other are empty (and still present because I didn't "omitempty" on purpose for those, only the VM related ones) | 10:39 |
| didrocks | scratch the translation idea, I run the command with LANG=C ofc | 10:41 |
| didrocks | so apart from a patch lscpu, but it sounds weird… :/ | 10:41 |
| didrocks | do you have only one of those reports? | 10:44 |
| jibel | yes only one | 10:47 |
| didrocks | puzzled then… apart from local tweak, I don't really have any other idea off hand | 10:49 |
| jibel | k, I'll add an exception for this case | 10:49 |
| willcooke | andyrock, I was talking to apw last night about the dock over the lockscreen issue. He said he suffers from it, and I was trying to work out what he's doing differently to most other people. Something which /might/ be relevent was that he has his monitors arranged vertically rather than horizontally. | 11:25 |
| willcooke | Dunno if that's of any use, but I thought I'd pass it along in case it helps | 11:26 |
| andyrock | mmm you're saying that this does not happen on a single monitor setup? | 11:27 |
| andyrock | willcooke: I saw it on single monitor setups too | 11:28 |
| willcooke | ha | 11:28 |
| andyrock | maybe it is easier to trigger/reproduce on a multi-head setup | 11:28 |
| willcooke | andyrock, no saying it doesn't happen on a single monitor, rather perhaps the positions of the monitors matter. but sounds likenot | 11:28 |
| andyrock | willcooke: let me finish the ppa than I'll take another look to the lockscreen problem | 11:29 |
| andyrock | waiting for the package to be published | 11:29 |
| willcooke | andyrock, np, thx | 11:31 |
| apw | andyrock, and my external is above ie at 0 | 11:37 |
| === cpaelzer__ is now known as cpaelzer | ||
| Laney | bloomin resolved | 14:42 |
| Laney | it's got this clever thing where it doesn't return AAAA records if it thinks you don't have ipv6 connectivity | 14:44 |
| Laney | well it's getting that decision wrong | 14:44 |
| Laney | :< | 14:44 |
| seb128 | what issue was that? | 14:46 |
| Laney | it's probably https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/5782 | 14:47 |
| gitbot | systemd issue 5782 in systemd "resolved does not honor v6 and v4 gateways on different interfaces" [Needs-Reporter-Feedback ❓, Resolve, Open] | 14:47 |
| * Laney is just complaining | 14:47 | |
| seb128 | ah | 14:49 |
| andyrock | Trevinho: was I supposed to review one of yours branches? | 15:18 |
| andyrock | I forgot which one | 15:18 |
| seb128 | andyrock, https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libnotify/merge_requests/5 | 15:18 |
| gitbot | GNOME issue (Merge request) 5 in libnotify "notification: use snap namespace and prefix whent launched inside snap" [Opened] | 15:18 |
| Trevinho | andyrock: yes.. | 15:19 |
| Trevinho | the one seb posted | 15:19 |
| andyrock | thx seb128 | 15:19 |
| seb128 | np :) | 15:19 |
| andyrock | i'll take a look right now | 15:19 |
| Trevinho | maybe also having one with git push bit would be nice | 15:19 |
| seb128 | thx | 15:19 |
| seb128 | you mean? | 15:21 |
| Trevinho | like if Ken or Robert have time... | 15:22 |
| Trevinho | so they can also merge | 15:22 |
| seb128 | ah ok | 15:23 |
| seb128 | well, feel free to drop them an email | 15:24 |
| seb128 | or ping Robert at night | 15:24 |
| k_alam | Trevinho: Hi, you told me to ping you...to review those bugs | 15:36 |
| k_alam | Trevinho: Also please check ftbfs for hud, some sort of gtk-doc error on amd64, i386 compiles fine.....not sure how to fix that.... | 15:41 |
| k_alam | https://launchpadlibrarian.net/405435798/buildlog_ubuntu-disco-amd64.hud_14.10+17.10.20170619-0ubuntu2_BUILDING.txt.gz | 15:41 |
| seb128 | k_alam, where is that ftbfs? | 15:46 |
| k_alam | seb128: I haven't filed a bug.....jbicha said it could be a bug in gtk-doc.....but it gives errors like dh_install: Cannot find (any matches for) "usr/share/gtk-doc/* | 15:49 |
| seb128 | k_alam, well, on what serie/machine/ppa do you try to build? | 15:50 |
| marcustomlinson | That's a bug in gobject-introspection-1.58.1 (btw) | 15:52 |
| marcustomlinson | /usr/include/glib-2.0/gobject/gobject.h:725: syntax error, unexpected ')' in ' ((__typeof__(new_object)) (g_object_ref) (new_object));' at ')' | 15:52 |
| k_alam | seb128: disco/lcy01-amd64-026/ | 15:52 |
| seb128 | marcustomlinson, is that the hud/gtk-doc issue? | 15:53 |
| marcustomlinson | seb128: I'm just referring to what I see in the log: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/405435798/buildlog_ubuntu-disco-amd64.hud_14.10+17.10.20170619-0ubuntu2_BUILDING.txt.gz | 15:53 |
| seb128 | jbicha, ricotz, ^ is that a known problem? | 15:54 |
| seb128 | marcustomlinson, right | 15:54 |
| seb128 | k_alam, I would say that the documentation issue is that gtkdoc-mktmpl got removed in 1.26 and hud still try to use that command | 15:54 |
| marcustomlinson | right, but the build is not failing from that right | 15:56 |
| k_alam | seb128: For gtkdoc-mktmpl, it should give errors like gtkdoc-mktmpl: command not found, but it doesn't....also i386 should also fail | 15:58 |
| seb128 | k_alam, the documentation is only built on the arch all arch which is amd64? | 16:00 |
| seb128 | k_alam, and the log has | 16:00 |
| seb128 | '-- gtkdoc-mktmpl not found | 16:00 |
| seb128 | -- gtkdoc was not found. | 16:00 |
| seb128 | -- Configuring done' | 16:00 |
| seb128 | it just doesn't error out on it | 16:00 |
| marcustomlinson | That gobject-introspection issue is fixed in 1.58.2 btw. Alternatively hud should link against 1.58.0 | 16:02 |
| k_alam | seb128: Yes, hud-doc on amd64......any idea how to fix that? | 16:06 |
| k_alam | marcustomlinson: So build-depend on gobject-introspection >= 1.58.0 will do the trick ? | 16:10 |
| marcustomlinson | I'd say gobject-introspection >= 1.58.2 | 16:10 |
| k_alam | Ok, thanks | 16:12 |
| seb128 | k_alam, marcustomlinson, we have now 1.58.3 in disco so a retry should fix that without having to change anything | 16:12 |
| seb128 | k_alam, well, someone needs to find the cmake/gtk-doc integration to stop using those not available commands | 16:12 |
| seb128 | or workaround would be to stop building the documentation until it's resolved | 16:12 |
| k_alam | right, I will try fixing cmake/gtk-doc first | 16:20 |
| seb128 | thx | 16:20 |
| seb128 | maybe open a bug for discussing/tracking the work? | 16:21 |
| k_alam | Yes, I am filing one now | 16:21 |
| seb128 | Trevinho, I was looking at https://code.launchpad.net/~3v1n0/dbus-test-runner/new-priv-gobject-abi/+merge/361260 and was tempted to try to sync with Debian, seems they included a similar fix in https://packages.qa.debian.org/d/dbus-test-runner/news/20181102T220415Z.html and that our delta is not big so maybe we don't need to maintain Ubuntu changes there anymore, wdyt? | 16:22 |
| seb128 | Trevinho, https://salsa.debian.org/debian/dbus-test-runner/blob/master/debian/patches/1002_new-gobject-private-api.patch | 16:23 |
| * jbicha grumbles at autotools | 16:23 | |
| * Laney autos at grumbletools | 16:25 | |
| Trevinho | seb128: my fix was based on what in debian | 16:25 |
| Trevinho | plus the control change IIRC | 16:26 |
| Trevinho | so wanted to upstream it and then release a new upstream version | 16:26 |
| === muktupavels_ is now known as muktupavels | ||
| === pstolowski is now known as pstolowski|afk | ||
| === daker_ is now known as daker | ||
| === popey_ is now known as popey | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!