[06:51] <willcooke> morning all
[06:51] <willcooke> afternoon duflu
[06:52] <duflu> Hi willcooke. Just back from physio. First time in 5 years :S
[06:53] <duflu> As you said, all down hill...
[06:53] <willcooke> duflu, how did it go?  Feeling stiff or not yet?
[06:53] <duflu> willcooke, yes and probably more later
[07:11] <oSoMoN> good morning desktoppers
[07:11] <willcooke> hi oSoMoN
[07:19] <duflu> Morning oSoMoN
[07:19] <duflu> and good morning seb128
[07:19] <seb128> hey duflu, how are you today?
[07:20] <duflu> seb128, relatively good. How are you?
[07:20] <oSoMoN> good afternoon duflu
[07:20] <oSoMoN> good morning willcooke, seb128
[07:20] <seb128> lut oSoMoN
[07:29] <didrocks> good morning
[07:32] <oSoMoN> salut didrocks
[07:35] <didrocks> salut oSoMoN
[08:26] <duflu> Morning didrocks
[08:27] <didrocks> hey duflu
[08:35] <willcooke> Hey seb128!  YC pinged about: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1809788
[08:35] <willcooke> They said that it's fixed in 18.10
[08:35] <willcooke> It's fairly minor from what I can see, the text overflows and gets clipped
[08:36] <willcooke> But maybe its something backportable
[08:45] <anikras>  /join #raspbian
[09:01] <Laney> hi there
[09:01] <duflu> Hi Laney
[09:02] <duflu> come here often?
[09:02]  * Laney starts a bar fight
[09:03] <duflu> There's a bar?!
[09:05] <seb128> hey Laney willcooke
[09:05] <seb128> willcooke, yeah, sounds like a fine one to have as a target of opportunity
[09:07] <Trevinho> goooood mooorniiing
[09:08] <seb128> hey Trevinho
[09:09] <Trevinho> seb128: hi!
[09:10] <duflu> Morning Trevinho
[09:13] <seb128> shrug, launchpad erroring out
[09:15] <duflu> Launchpad often does when western Europe is waking up
[09:15] <duflu> Moreso than other times
[09:18] <seb128> well I think there is a daily cron job or something around 9am utc
[09:19] <duflu> Also sometimes in my morning...
[09:19] <Laney> this time it's that the DC broke
[09:19] <seb128> they have been having load issues recently
[09:19] <Laney> VPN died for me too
[09:19] <seb128> Laney, where do you find those info?
[09:19] <seb128> ah
[09:20] <Laney> William also said in #launchpad
[09:20] <seb128> I should maybe autojoin that channel
[09:25] <andyrock> morning!
[09:25] <duflu> Hi hi andyrock
[09:28] <seb128> hey andyrock! how are you?
[09:30] <andyrock> seb128: enjoying london blue sky :D
[09:30] <andyrock> you?
[09:30] <seb128> andyrock, I'm good thanks!
[09:31] <seb128> andyrock, did you see my software-properties review yesterday?
[09:31] <andyrock> seb128: yeah I will update the branch today
[09:31] <andyrock> thanks for the review!
[09:33] <seb128> np!
[09:33] <seb128> I wonder what's going on with the signal
[09:34] <seb128> did the binding change or something?
[09:35] <andyrock> not sure tbh
[09:35] <andyrock> weird that I didn't notice it before
[09:37] <seb128> could be some gi issue in disco
[11:59] <tkamppeter> There is another bug which could be resolved for the Bionic update: bug 1763520
[12:00] <tkamppeter> Here I have attached SRU patches and a someone to sponsor the upload is needed, to kick off the verification process.
[12:01] <tkamppeter> I am not able to upload gtk+3.0 by myself.
[12:41] <seb128> tkamppeter, right, I was sort of waiting on an upstream review to sponsor that one but they didn't pick it up yet :-/
[12:43] <Laney> maybe try pinging ebassi
[12:43] <Laney> that bug affects upgraders, right? so not .2 critical imho
[12:53] <seb128> correct for upgraders
[14:47] <k_alam> jbicha: Hi,
[14:48] <jbicha> good evening
[14:48] <seb128> hey k_alam jbicha
[14:48] <k_alam> Good evening
[14:49] <k_alam> seb128: hi
[14:50] <k_alam> jbicha: Regarding the gnote-scope package you uploaded why does it not show in the repo?
[14:51] <jbicha> it needs to be manually approved by a member of ~ubuntu-archive https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/disco/+queue?queue_state=0
[14:52] <k_alam> Can we ping someone for that ?
[14:57] <k_alam> seb128: Can you review the gsd-common transition bug ?
[14:58] <seb128> k_alam, bug?
[14:58] <k_alam> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/1811118
[15:00] <seb128> k_alam, done
[15:00] <k_alam> Thanks.
[15:01] <jbicha> k_alam: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-archive/+members :)
[15:03] <k_alam> seb128:  Can you also sponsor this? The bzr repo is out of sync....so I added a patch....
[15:03] <k_alam> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/indicator-application-gtk2/+bug/1810742
[15:04] <seb128> k_alam, I can have a look a bit later
[15:05] <k_alam> seb128: Alright, no prob
[15:05] <k_alam> jbicha: Thanks
[15:10] <seb128> k_alam, you change description doesn't match the change
[15:11] <seb128> Subject: Don't treat -Wdeprecated-declarations as errors
[15:11] <seb128> I would expect the corresponding change to the use of '-Wno-deprecated-declarations'
[15:11] <seb128> or such
[15:11] <seb128> but you just plaining drop Werror, not only for deprecated-declarations
[15:15] <k_alam> seb128: So "Don't use Werror..." would be ok ?
[15:16] <seb128> yes
[15:16] <seb128> k_alam, also, do we still need indicator-application-gtk2? it was added for xubuntu/lubuntu at the time because they didn't use gtk3
[15:16] <seb128> but xfce is gtk3 now no?
[15:17] <seb128> ah, bug #1811489
[15:18] <seb128> jbicha, ^ usually you are interested by those craft cleaning :)
[15:18] <seb128> cruft
[15:18] <k_alam> yes, mostly....but there are other gtk2 apps and xfce gtk3 port is ongoing
[15:20] <jbicha> k_alam: are you aware that *nothing* in Ubuntu depends or recommends indicator-application-gtk2?
[15:20] <jbicha> maybe we can talk Seb into removing it :)
[15:22] <k_alam> the doesn't list the reverse depends....But if nothing recommends it then I have no prob removing it....unity get rid of it long time ago
[15:22] <k_alam> *got
[15:22] <jbicha> k_alam: I believe libappindicator1 is what gtk2 apps need but there aren't any gtk2 Panels any more
[15:24] <k_alam> yes gtk2 apps only needs libappindicator1
[15:25] <seb128> right, the indicator was only for desktop panels that could load a gtk3 applet
[15:25] <seb128> I'm fine removing it, let me do it
[15:25] <k_alam> lxpanel-indicator-applet-plugin is still using it though ?
[15:26] <k_alam> but that's lubuntu thing
[15:28] <jbicha> k_alam: you could ask Lubuntu to remove that Ubuntu-specific package since LXDE is no longer supported
[15:30] <seb128> they don't suggest/recommends it though?
[15:31] <seb128> I was ready to press Y to delete it but I'm going to wait for that to be sorted out
[15:32] <k_alam> it only suggests gtk2 panel indicators......
[17:45] <tsimonq2> I can file the removal bug for that, sure.
[17:45] <tsimonq2> I assume this is part of the GTK 2 removefest? ;)
[18:12] <k_alam> tsimonq2: Once it drops from suggests (lxpanel-indicator-applet-plugin), it can be removed...I think
[18:39] <tsimonq2> k_alam: Reverse-suggests does not dictate removal or non-removal.
[18:41] <k_alam> tsimonq2: Ok, then I guess it can be removed