[00:45] <JonOomph> Hi! I was curious if a LaunchPad recipe can invoke cargo (or commands which utilize git and GitHub). For example, in the Debian packaging rules, it runs the `cargo` command, but gets the following error: "spurious network error (2 tries remaining): curl error: Could not resolve host: github." Thx!
[01:03] <cjwatson> JonOomph: It can't talk to the internet.  I answered your question on answers.launchpad.net
[01:04] <cjwatson> But there are very many existing Rust packages in Ubuntu, so it can definitely be done with a bit more effort
[01:04] <JonOomph> Okay, thanks for the answer! I appreciate it!
[01:04] <cjwatson> (Not talking to the internet, that is, but getting cargo to use local registries etc.)
[01:26] <JonOomph> I was hoping for a quick win trying to package an unpackaged dependency... But it has 50+ cargo dependencies, and this is no longer what I would call a "quick" fix, haha
[01:27] <JonOomph> I'll make this an optional dependency, and then hope some folks will help package it up for Debian/Ubuntu and all the other distros out there.
[03:58] <veebers> ]j31
[03:58] <veebers> sigh
[15:17] <seb128> hey there! is launchpad/librarian having issues again?
[15:18] <juliank> same question here
[15:18] <juliank> getting 502s
[15:19] <cjwatson> there does seem to have been a spike
[15:20] <cjwatson> #is-outage internal
[15:21] <seb128> thx
[16:06] <cjwatson> seb128,juliank: better now?
[16:06] <seb128> cjwatson, yes!
[16:06] <seb128> thx
[16:06] <cjwatson> Restarting the librarian eventually helped but makes no sense
[16:07] <seb128> :/
[17:05] <tomreyn> hi, i just into a 503 while uploading a chromium crash log. https://i.imgur.com/bPJA59y.png
[17:06] <tomreyn> is errors.u.c. managed by you at all? if not, whom to talk to?
[17:10] <cjwatson> tomreyn: It's not.  #canonical-sysadmin
[17:10] <tomreyn> ty
[17:10] <tomreyn> + a nice weekend to you
[17:10] <cjwatson> (I think it's actually the Ubuntu foundations team, but IS should be able to either handle it or redirect you)
[17:10] <cjwatson> likewise
[18:23] <acheronuk> cjwatson: hi. would it be possible to get size bumped on this to 15GB? https://launchpad.net/~kubuntu-ppa/+archive/ubuntu/beta
[18:24] <acheronuk> I would like to get testers on 2 releases, but can only fit one in there currently
[18:24] <cjwatson> acheronuk: you just caught me before I ran away for the weekend.  done
[18:24] <acheronuk> cjwatson: thank you :)
[18:24] <cjwatson> np
[18:24] <acheronuk> have a good weekend
[18:25] <cjwatson> had enough of working on the git.l.n redeployment for one week :)
[18:25] <acheronuk> ooooh. I bet, but having that perform better will be great.
[18:26] <cjwatson> some of it's ceph limitations that we can't improve without a better cloud
[18:26] <cjwatson> but the redeployment will remove at least some horizontal scaling barriers
[18:26] <cjwatson> and hopefully not introduce too many weird NFS bugs :)
[18:28] <acheronuk> fair enough. can cope its not super fast.
[18:28] <cjwatson> we were able to double its RAM recently, so that's helped
[18:29] <cjwatson> it isn't really going into deathspirals any more
[18:31] <acheronuk> timeout on our CI fetching packaging, causing build 'fails' was one annoying thing. and slow initial clone of repos
[18:32] <acheronuk> sometime I'm doing dozens or hundereds as a set, so slow gets multiplied
[18:32] <cjwatson> Have you seen any of that since 2019-01-11?
[18:33] <cjwatson> I mean, timeouts rather than mild sluggishness
[18:35] <acheronuk> some timeouts I think on the CI, but much much rarer. I now mostly just notice the sluggishness compared to what things were like a couple of years ago.
[18:36] <acheronuk> oh, I misread that date!
[18:36] <acheronuk> yes, it has been much better the last week
[18:37] <cjwatson> Right, that's when we doubled its RAM
[18:37] <acheronuk> some times before I'd do a git clone, and wonder if anything would ever happen....
[18:38] <cjwatson> The initial plan for the redeployment is to have about the same amount of total RAM, but spread across a couple of compute nodes and sharing storage via NFS
[18:38] <acheronuk> now there may be a slight delay, but it gets that quite quickly
[18:38] <acheronuk> sounds reasonable
[18:38] <cjwatson> If we need to scale up it'll basically be juju add-unit rather than needing to scrape around for bigger instance sizes
[18:39] <acheronuk> you are starting to lose me on the 'server speak' ;)
[18:39] <cjwatson> Took most of a month to get all the new deployment machinery put together though - I just finished the first end-to-end draft of that this afternoon
[18:39] <acheronuk> but it sounds cool
[18:40] <acheronuk> it is appreciated
[21:02] <jrwren> I'm trying to file an ubuntu bug, but when I click submit, I get an error.
[21:02] <jrwren> Timeout error
[21:03] <jrwren> Sorry, something just went wrong in Launchpad.
[21:03] <jrwren> Error ID: OOPS-9c464f76c8c3ba2369cc40720a6ed347
[21:30] <jrwren> oh, i tried a 4th time and this time it worked!
[21:30] <jrwren> the LP gods have smiled upon me.