[07:03] <didrocks> good morning
[07:04] <duflu> Hi didrocks
[07:04] <didrocks> hey duflu
[07:06] <jibel> Hi duflu
[07:06] <duflu> Morning jibel
[07:13] <willcooke> hi gang
[07:14] <jibel> hi willcooke
[07:14] <didrocks> hey willcooke
[07:36] <duflu> Oops, morning willcooke
[07:51] <oSoMoN> good morning desktoppers, happy Friday!
[08:05] <duflu> Morning oSoMoN
[08:05] <oSoMoN> good afternoon duflu
[08:17] <seb128> good morning desktopers
[08:18] <oSoMoN> salut seb128
[08:18] <seb128> lut oSoMoN! c'est vendredi! en forme? ;)
[08:19] <oSoMoN> seb128, fatigué, mais c’est vendredi :) et toi?
[08:19] <seb128> un peu pareil
[09:05] <Laney> yo
[09:08] <seb128> hey Laney, how are you?
[09:08] <Trevinho> Bonjiur!
[09:08] <seb128> lut trevinho
[09:08] <Trevinho> hi Laney and seb128
[09:14] <Laney> hey seb128 Trevinho
[09:14] <Laney> seb128: good, looking forward to the weekend - got a friend coming to visit tonight
[09:14] <Laney> party time
[09:14] <Laney> you? how's france?
[09:15] <seb128> ah, nice!
[09:15] <seb128> grey today :p but good to be there for the w.e!
[09:20] <Laney> :>
[09:23] <seb128> lol, bug #1771109
[09:23] <seb128> emoji in domain names feels a weird thing to do :p
[09:27] <Trevinho> don't we live in weird times? www.😂.com to get more happiness!
[09:32] <Laney> :D
[09:32] <Laney> I registered downthe.pub the other day
[09:32] <Laney> 🍺.pub would go quite nicely with that
[09:36] <Laney> unavailable 😢
[10:19] <seb128> trevinho, does bug #1809788 ring any bell to you? (the reported states it's fixed in 18.10 but I'm not sure it's true either)
[10:39] <jibel> I've a problem with tracker-store that uses 100% cpu, how do I stop it?
[10:40] <jibel> if I just kill it it restarts automatically
[10:41] <Trevinho> jibel: wondering why you don't like such features in the winter... it's a warming system!
[10:42] <Trevinho> anyway I suppose is dbus activated so... remove the service file -_-
[10:42] <jibel> Trevinho, it's my contribution to climate change, reduce warming
[10:44] <Trevinho> seb128: can't remember any fix committed for that but I can give a look
[10:44] <seb128> trevinho, it's not a priority but if/when you have some slot that would be nice since oem asked about it
[10:44] <jibel> the log is full of failures like https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/nJm48fdCYw/
[10:45] <seb128> the error looks similar to https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/tracker/issues/40
[10:45] <gitbot> GNOME issue 40 in tracker "tracker-store restart loop" [Closed]
[10:49] <seb128> the commit was after 2.1.6 which is the most recent version/what we have in disco
[10:49] <seb128> so 'tracker reset --hard' for you?
[10:55] <jibel> seb128, yes, it seems to
[11:02] <Laney> seb128: that bolt thing, it happens for me in bionic, what about you?
[11:03] <Laney> you can just run 'boltctl enroll foo', no need for hw
[11:03] <jamesh> kenvandine: fyi: the inhibit portal support will probably work with GTK 3.24 in the container: there was some changes to the GTK side code there.
[11:04] <Laney> s/bionic/disco/ oops
[11:04] <seb128> Laney, ah, yes it happens on bionic. But when I tried on disco yesterday (but that was with another polkit dialog) it didn't seem fixed there
[11:04] <jamesh> It might be possible to backport just that change to 3.22, but I suspect we'll find more and more cases where we want a newer GTK for core18 based snaps
[11:04] <Laney> and cosmic
[11:04] <Laney> basically it doesn't seem fixed :P
[11:04] <seb128> thx, that confirms what I saw
[11:05] <seb128> Trevinho, ^
[11:05] <seb128> the bug submitter probably got confused or did test wrong
[11:05] <jamesh> while not wanting to do wholesale upgrades of bionic systems
[11:06] <seb128> Laney, thx for testing (and for the 'boltctl enroll foo' tip)
[11:07] <seb128> jamesh, don't even think about it, we are not going to SRU gtk 3.24 to bionic :p
[11:07] <Laney> np!
[11:09] <jamesh> seb128: I think it would be a bad idea too.  The problem is that snapcraft doesn't make it easy to e.g. build against a PPA, so for simple things pushing things to bionic-updates has been the path of least resistance
[11:09] <jamesh> seb128: I think we're probably going to end up needing a "bionic-overlay" PPA with corresponding snapcraft support
[11:10] <seb128> right, well first thing would be to try to backport the commits that look like portal fixes if that seems easy
[11:10] <Trevinho> ok I'll see to fix it
[11:10] <seb128> Trevinho, you can probably put it low on the priority list, you are busy enough and it's minor
[11:11] <seb128> willcooke, ^ do you know how much the oem team cares about bug #1809788? It looks cosmetic to me (and doesn't seem fixed in newer versions)
[11:11] <seb128> Trevinho, in any case that's bug fixing so for after feature freeze I would say
[11:12] <Laney> nominated for the rls directly, should get an assignee ;-)
[11:16] <Trevinho> I agree
[11:16] <Trevinho> I agree
[11:22] <seb128> tssss willcooke :)
[11:25] <kenvandine> jamesh: thanks
[17:01] <seb128> k, enough for this week, have a nice w.e desktopers!
[17:27] <oSoMoN> seb128, have a good week-end!
[17:52] <Laney> my friend just arrived, so I'll go entertain him
[17:52] <Laney> laters!
[18:11] <oSoMoN> have a good week-end everyone