Hi-Angel | Hi! I'm reading a vacancy at Ubuntu desktop development team, and there is a mandatory field "Code hosting". Any ideas what would that mean? | 00:35 |
---|---|---|
wxl | e.g. github, gitlab, etc. | 00:36 |
wxl | examples of your code | 00:36 |
wxl | or that's how i'd read it | 00:36 |
Hi-Angel | Hmm, so, links to projects, I see. Thanks! | 00:37 |
wxl | np | 00:37 |
=== SuperKaramba is now known as BenderRodriguez | ||
LocutusOfBorg | teward, xnox_ I blame my node-acorn bootstrap | 09:11 |
doko | xnox_: what is https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-legacy-390xx/390.87-4 ? | 10:13 |
tjaalton | yeah remove that | 10:21 |
doko | ok, and blacklisting | 10:23 |
tjaalton | thanks | 10:25 |
seb128 | juliank, hey. Bug #1812174 might be interesting to you? It looks fine to me so I was going to sponsor it but I look at the state of things in Debian and saw your have a git with the sftp changes, so I'm pinging in case you want to review/maybe merge that in your version? Or is that ok if I just upload to disco? | 10:33 |
ubottu | bug 1812174 in dput (Ubuntu) "sftp method should support alternate port" [Wishlist,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1812174 | 10:33 |
juliank | seb128: ack | 10:34 |
LocutusOfBorg | we need to understand e.g. why node-buble is not building | 12:00 |
LocutusOfBorg | same issue | 12:00 |
=== realitix_ is now known as realitix | ||
doko | infinity: fyi: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/406733858/buildlog_ubuntu-bionic-amd64.debian-installer_20101020ubuntu543.4_BUILDING.txt.gz (pure reference test rebuild) | 14:17 |
teward | LocutusOfBorg: so node-acorn is the reason of those REPL errors? | 14:53 |
teward | LocutusOfBorg: or the source of all the problems observed thus far? | 14:53 |
LocutusOfBorg | teward, | 14:56 |
LocutusOfBorg | rollup was badly bootstrapped | 14:56 |
LocutusOfBorg | and rollup injects code on lots of places | 14:56 |
LocutusOfBorg | rollup bootstrap itself in stage profiles | 14:56 |
LocutusOfBorg | but the first bootstrapped version was badly done, so it was badly propagating the exception issues | 14:57 |
LocutusOfBorg | and everything built with rollup was bad as consequence | 14:57 |
LocutusOfBorg | ginggs, ^^ | 14:57 |
teward | aha! makes sense. | 14:57 |
LocutusOfBorg | I did create two chroots, and melded usr/lib/nodejs | 14:57 |
LocutusOfBorg | once debian and one ubunut | 14:57 |
LocutusOfBorg | now the two directories are looking the same | 14:57 |
LocutusOfBorg | in fact a lot of stuff in -proposed right now was failing for exactly the same reason | 14:57 |
LocutusOfBorg | stuff that before didn't have any issue | 14:58 |
LocutusOfBorg | because the "bootstrap" was partial | 14:58 |
teward | that makes sense, and explains why things had been failing on a 'grander' scale. | 14:58 |
LocutusOfBorg | I copied the node_modules from debian chroot for rollup and used it :) | 14:58 |
LocutusOfBorg | debian folks uploaded a binary for the bootstrap | 14:58 |
LocutusOfBorg | now node-buble works, acorn too, rollup is correctly bootstrapped | 14:59 |
LocutusOfBorg | so I presume nodejs will be the next one to build correctly | 14:59 |
LocutusOfBorg | I didn't test it, but I'm pretty sure of what I'm saying :) | 14:59 |
LocutusOfBorg | we might need some publisher runs but meh | 15:00 |
LocutusOfBorg | now the only failed package is node-nan, requiring new nodejs and lots of dep-wait stuff | 15:03 |
LocutusOfBorg | also node-srs | 15:03 |
=== zul is now known as Guest8708 | ||
teward | LocutusOfBorg: let me know if you need me to test it. v6 datagram stuff will still most likely fail on my end and v6 related ones will fail likely because E:NOIPv6 but | 15:31 |
teward | still willing to help out :) | 15:31 |
infinity | doko: There are already newer versions of d-i in bionic-proposed that clearly build, so not too concerned about looking at that log. :P | 15:35 |
LocutusOfBorg | teward, just upgrade your chroot and try! | 15:38 |
teward | LocutusOfBorg: running my massibe sbuild-update calls now | 15:39 |
LocutusOfBorg | the archive might be still outdated | 15:39 |
teward | possibly but my chroots are all rebuilt for each run, i don't keep the chroots with each time. we'll see what happens. | 15:41 |
teward | i still have to pull things regularly anyways so :p | 15:41 |
LocutusOfBorg | ahasenack, thanks for helping Ryan wrt openldap! | 17:09 |
LocutusOfBorg | I'm happy to give it to him | 17:09 |
LocutusOfBorg | I also want him to become DD or ubuntu PPU :) | 17:09 |
ahasenack | yeah, hopefully he can apply for ppu | 17:09 |
ahasenack | yep | 17:09 |
LocutusOfBorg | I really stopped double checking his openldap stuff a long while ago | 17:09 |
LocutusOfBorg | I just build&sign&upload :) | 17:09 |
ahasenack | it's good stuff | 17:09 |
LocutusOfBorg | I would be happy to advocate him for PPU if you want :) | 17:10 |
ahasenack | sure | 17:10 |
LocutusOfBorg | btw I have some nitpicks on his ubuntu upload | 17:10 |
LocutusOfBorg | now apparmor is a thing in debian too | 17:11 |
LocutusOfBorg | also ufw support is a thing | 17:11 |
LocutusOfBorg | so maybe he can upstream part of the delta to his debian packaging? | 17:11 |
* LocutusOfBorg didn't check the above | 17:11 | |
ahasenack | that would be cool | 17:13 |
ahasenack | reduce the delta | 17:13 |
dckusr | is there any change to make python-opencv not install X windows ? tons of people use opencv to run some CV algorithms without GUI | 20:25 |
dckusr | maybe a python-opencv-gui package can be made for doing that... | 20:25 |
dckusr | I have dockers which apt install this package, and they are so bloated... | 20:26 |
sarnold | dckusr: you can use the equivs package to make fake debian packages to satisfy dependencies | 20:34 |
sarnold | dckusr: apt-rdepends python-opencv output can help you determine which packages to fake | 20:34 |
sarnold | dckusr: I'm guessing that making a fake libopencv-highgui3.2 package would help, but that's probably not the only one you would need to fake | 20:34 |
dckusr | sarnold: why resort tofaking ? | 20:39 |
dckusr | most opencv uses are for non gui uses | 20:40 |
dckusr | so why not cater to the sane option first ? | 20:40 |
sarnold | dckusr: that might be a good idea too, but it will probably also take a while for any possible changes in debian packaging to filter back to ubuntu | 20:41 |
sparr | are questions about building debs on topic here? | 22:22 |
rlaager | Am I doing something wrong, or is packages.ubuntu.com missing a bunch of information? It seems to have no packages for Bionic, or possibly anything newer than Trusty. | 22:46 |
Faux | Heh, no, it seems broken here too. | 22:49 |
sparr | I saw the same | 23:57 |
TJ- | Is that broke again? | 23:59 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!