[00:35] Hi! I'm reading a vacancy at Ubuntu desktop development team, and there is a mandatory field "Code hosting". Any ideas what would that mean? [00:36] e.g. github, gitlab, etc. [00:36] examples of your code [00:36] or that's how i'd read it [00:37] Hmm, so, links to projects, I see. Thanks! [00:37] np === SuperKaramba is now known as BenderRodriguez [09:11] teward, xnox_ I blame my node-acorn bootstrap [10:13] xnox_: what is https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-legacy-390xx/390.87-4 ? [10:21] yeah remove that [10:23] ok, and blacklisting [10:25] thanks [10:33] juliank, hey. Bug #1812174 might be interesting to you? It looks fine to me so I was going to sponsor it but I look at the state of things in Debian and saw your have a git with the sftp changes, so I'm pinging in case you want to review/maybe merge that in your version? Or is that ok if I just upload to disco? [10:33] bug 1812174 in dput (Ubuntu) "sftp method should support alternate port" [Wishlist,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1812174 [10:34] seb128: ack [12:00] we need to understand e.g. why node-buble is not building [12:00] same issue === realitix_ is now known as realitix [14:17] infinity: fyi: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/406733858/buildlog_ubuntu-bionic-amd64.debian-installer_20101020ubuntu543.4_BUILDING.txt.gz (pure reference test rebuild) [14:53] LocutusOfBorg: so node-acorn is the reason of those REPL errors? [14:53] LocutusOfBorg: or the source of all the problems observed thus far? [14:56] teward, [14:56] rollup was badly bootstrapped [14:56] and rollup injects code on lots of places [14:56] rollup bootstrap itself in stage profiles [14:57] but the first bootstrapped version was badly done, so it was badly propagating the exception issues [14:57] and everything built with rollup was bad as consequence [14:57] ginggs, ^^ [14:57] aha! makes sense. [14:57] I did create two chroots, and melded usr/lib/nodejs [14:57] once debian and one ubunut [14:57] now the two directories are looking the same [14:57] in fact a lot of stuff in -proposed right now was failing for exactly the same reason [14:58] stuff that before didn't have any issue [14:58] because the "bootstrap" was partial [14:58] that makes sense, and explains why things had been failing on a 'grander' scale. [14:58] I copied the node_modules from debian chroot for rollup and used it :) [14:58] debian folks uploaded a binary for the bootstrap [14:59] now node-buble works, acorn too, rollup is correctly bootstrapped [14:59] so I presume nodejs will be the next one to build correctly [14:59] I didn't test it, but I'm pretty sure of what I'm saying :) [15:00] we might need some publisher runs but meh [15:03] now the only failed package is node-nan, requiring new nodejs and lots of dep-wait stuff [15:03] also node-srs === zul is now known as Guest8708 [15:31] LocutusOfBorg: let me know if you need me to test it. v6 datagram stuff will still most likely fail on my end and v6 related ones will fail likely because E:NOIPv6 but [15:31] still willing to help out :) [15:35] doko: There are already newer versions of d-i in bionic-proposed that clearly build, so not too concerned about looking at that log. :P [15:38] teward, just upgrade your chroot and try! [15:39] LocutusOfBorg: running my massibe sbuild-update calls now [15:39] the archive might be still outdated [15:41] possibly but my chroots are all rebuilt for each run, i don't keep the chroots with each time. we'll see what happens. [15:41] i still have to pull things regularly anyways so :p [17:09] ahasenack, thanks for helping Ryan wrt openldap! [17:09] I'm happy to give it to him [17:09] I also want him to become DD or ubuntu PPU :) [17:09] yeah, hopefully he can apply for ppu [17:09] yep [17:09] I really stopped double checking his openldap stuff a long while ago [17:09] I just build&sign&upload :) [17:09] it's good stuff [17:10] I would be happy to advocate him for PPU if you want :) [17:10] sure [17:10] btw I have some nitpicks on his ubuntu upload [17:11] now apparmor is a thing in debian too [17:11] also ufw support is a thing [17:11] so maybe he can upstream part of the delta to his debian packaging? [17:11] * LocutusOfBorg didn't check the above [17:13] that would be cool [17:13] reduce the delta [20:25] is there any change to make python-opencv not install X windows ? tons of people use opencv to run some CV algorithms without GUI [20:25] maybe a python-opencv-gui package can be made for doing that... [20:26] I have dockers which apt install this package, and they are so bloated... [20:34] dckusr: you can use the equivs package to make fake debian packages to satisfy dependencies [20:34] dckusr: apt-rdepends python-opencv output can help you determine which packages to fake [20:34] dckusr: I'm guessing that making a fake libopencv-highgui3.2 package would help, but that's probably not the only one you would need to fake [20:39] sarnold: why resort tofaking ? [20:40] most opencv uses are for non gui uses [20:40] so why not cater to the sane option first ? [20:41] dckusr: that might be a good idea too, but it will probably also take a while for any possible changes in debian packaging to filter back to ubuntu [22:22] are questions about building debs on topic here? [22:46] Am I doing something wrong, or is packages.ubuntu.com missing a bunch of information? It seems to have no packages for Bionic, or possibly anything newer than Trusty. [22:49] Heh, no, it seems broken here too. [23:57] I saw the same [23:59] Is that broke again?