[04:44] https://twitter.com/kubuntu/status/1087208863147806720 [04:44] RT plz [05:17] ginggs, :-\ updating the hint for now then [05:17] rbalint: thanks [11:17] tjaalton: hi, 'morning [11:18] tjaalton: are dogtag-pki dep8 tests broken in disco? Should it be hinted? [11:24] ahasenack: dogtag itself is broken.. needs upstream to port it to tls1.3/java11 [11:26] it's one of the failures holding back openldap in disco-proposed [11:26] but only failed on amd64, weird [11:28] probably best to remove and blacklist for now [12:06] jdstrand: Still affected by https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1801338` [12:06] Launchpad bug 1801338 in apt (Ubuntu Cosmic) "apt fails to properly handle server-side connection closure" [Undecided,Triaged] [12:06] ? [12:08] i have not seen this, nor have i had any other reports, so it might be something unique to your situation [13:17] hi, what's the difference between the "platform" and "ubuntu" repositories here? [13:17] I've seen seed changes done to both [13:25] ahasenack: platform is common to ubuntu and other flavours [13:26] ahasenack, platform is sourced by all flavours; ubuntu is for the ubuntu flavours; kubuntu is for kubuntu flavours; xubuntu is for xubuntu flavours and so on. [13:26] hm [13:26] thanks [14:02] bdmurray, regarding that SRU it still hasn't released for testing, can you check? [14:02] the 1785165 one [14:12] cjwatson, xnox: how does that apply to supported-misc-servers in platform? [14:12] That's AIUI server "flavour" only? [14:13] Probably historical reasons [14:13] Whether server has had separate seeds has varied over time [14:13] And there may have been fiddly germinate issues which I understood ten years ago but have forgotten [14:15] I don't know of a fundamental reason why those couldn't be moved, but somebody would have to think moderately hard about the various STRUCTURE files [14:16] And whether moving them is actually worth it [14:16] Thanks [14:16] The background is that ahasenack is reviewing https://code.launchpad.net/~racb/ubuntu-seeds/+git/platform/+merge/361874 for me [14:16] Based on that I think the location of the change is acceptable? [14:19] I think so [15:24] why are there sometimes no build logs when the build failed? Like with https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ruby2.5/2.5.3-3ubuntu3/+build/16305257 [15:24] is that still fallout from the incident a while back when files were owned by the incorrect user in the build infrastructure? [15:30] rbasak, cjwatson - if i recall correctly edubuntu server was a server flavour. and like possibly mythbuntu was inheriting some of server things too. but both are now dead. [15:34] ahasenack: you've retried so I can't see when that build finished [15:34] ahasenack: do you know? [15:34] cjwatson: I haven't [15:34] somebody has === sgclark is now known as sgmoore [15:39] ahasenack: unexpected out-of-disk on buildd-manager, apparently. working on it [15:44] cjwatson: ah, cool, thanks for checking [15:44] cjwatson: is that the cause of the build error, or the cause of the missing build log? [15:46] ahasenack: dunno [15:46] k [16:11] cjwatson: can I retry the failed builds already? [16:12] ahasenack: you can do what you like; I have no idea if it'll work yet [16:12] ok [16:33] ahasenack: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/407262137/buildlog_ubuntu-disco-amd64.ruby2.5_2.5.3-3ubuntu3_BUILDING.txt.gz [16:33] this one has a build log [16:33] I'll check [16:34] it built fine in a ppa [17:05] did someone click retry? It's showing green now [17:05] just armhf isn't, which I just retried [17:05] * ahasenack haunted by armhf build or test failures [17:38] ahasenack: given buildd-manager restarting frequently it's possible that it retried itself [17:38] ok [17:39] I have a theory (it could be bunnies) [17:41] or gremlins [17:42] (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gISEekxuEgk) [17:47] yay, armhf built [17:47] doko: ruby2.5 built now [20:22] Is there a chance WiFi (iwlwifi) got a lot more laggy recently? [20:22] I'm experiencing ping times to my ap from 5 to 200ms [20:27] hmm early impression is that 4.19 improves things [20:27] hmm no [20:28] WiFi only gets 30 MB/s, wired gets 48/50 [20:28] * juliank is trying to figure out if the problem is laptop, router, or interference [21:34] cjwatson: <3 for the youtube link [22:00] juliank: we've been getting a lot of reports of problems with various iwlwifi devices recently, including possibly causing complete system lock-ups. It seems to depend on the age of the chipset and whether firmware updates are still being provided for it [22:05] TJ-: In my case, it's a 8265 / 8275 (rev 78), I don't think there's a lot newer stuff than that? [22:06] TJ-: I should try 4.15 again and see how WiFi performance is there [22:06] I was away over christmas, and when I came back new neighbours moved in; so it's either them causing interference, something else causing interference, a bug in the router, or a kernel bug [22:06] juliank: I was deep-diving into all this earlier today. I noticed there are some newer firmware files in the linux-firmware repo which might help you. https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/users/drivers/iwlwifi [22:08] juliank: one was "Add new versions of the firmwares for 8000C, 8265." on Dec 16th [22:09] juliank: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/firmware/linux-firmware.git [22:10] TJ-: hmm, those are in disco, and maybe they are the culprit, I should revert to the previous one [22:11] juliank: what channels/bandwidth is 'iw' reporting the device using? [22:11] I just hope 4.19 + older firmware is working [22:12] channel 36 (5180 MHz), width: 80 MHz, center1: 5210 MHz [22:13] hmm no difference [22:13] well, potentially worse [22:13] just down to 5 MB/s [22:13] juliank: can you poke the AP to move channel? [22:13] TJ-: I've been on channels 36,40,48,64,100, and 116, and all behaved the same [22:14] juliank: You're ahead of my thought process then :) [22:14] I shall try restarting the router again [22:14] see what that brings [22:14] Have you tried 2.4GHz too, in case there's a difference? [22:15] juliank: and as a very unlikely, but possible, scenario... could the u.fl connectors on the wifi device have been dislodged so you've lost use of an antenna? Before you shake your head... I had that happen over the last few months and only figured it out when I got real agitated and opened the device (in this case it was the AP not the PC)! [22:16] TJ-: no precise ping measurements, and throughput is about 25 Mbit/s [22:16] TJ-: I think the AP fell down once [22:16] juliank: same here! [22:16] juliank: do all devices see the same throughput, or just the PC? [22:17] Phone is generally slower, so can't really compare I think [22:17] Other laptop is slower too, so [22:18] Waiting for reboot [22:18] juliank: I found it only started to be noticable when the PC was some way away from the AP, particularly behind obstacles [22:18] I could adb to the TV and see what that does I guess [22:18] juliank: but sitting under the AP it seemed relatively fine but, as you've observed, felt slow [22:19] TJ-: they are like 4 meters away from each other, but even when I was right next to it, it had issues [22:20] TJ-: phone reports 420 Mbps on fast.com, laptop 220 Mbps [22:20] juliank: my 'noticable' was stuttering connections and long delays, sometimes losing and regaining the association [22:21] second run 340 Mbit/s [22:21] third run 290 [22:21] laptop starts of at 10 Mbit/s, then increases upto 180 [22:23] juliank: there's some trace-cmd debugging you can enable to capture firmware interactions. I've currently got it running in the background to try to capture clues if/when this PC hits the lock-up [22:24] that's with old firmware, with new firmware I get 270 Mbit/s [22:24] now I got 340 [22:25] juliank: in case it helps, "Tracing", "...more switches..." command, at https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/users/drivers/iwlwifi/debugging [22:25] juliank: that's logged ~1GB in the last 10 hours for this PC so it is quite busy [22:27] I sometimes think I should get a docking station [22:27] and use cables [22:28] generally what I see is WiFi topping out at 30 MB/s [22:29] which is not really bad [22:29] but it's still a long cry from the 50 I'm paying my ISP for [22:31] I need to test this somewhere outside without interference, and potentially get lenovo to check / replace parts [22:42] juliank: if it's using NetworkManager, what bitrate does 'nmcli dev wifi list' and 'iwlist bitrate' report maximum link rates ? [23:42] valorie: :-) accidentally earwormed myself of course ... [23:42] can't go wrong with Buffy earworms though!