/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2019/01/23/#ubuntu-devel.txt

=== mvo_ is now known as mvo
=== ricab is now known as ricab|brb
=== ricab|brb is now known as ricab
cpaelzerjuliank: will you take a look at multipath-tools again before FF of this cycle?11:38
juliankcpaelzer: I don't think so11:39
juliankI think worst case, we can keep it at the cosmic level for disco, and update it next cycle11:39
juliankI think with the amount of regressions that can come from a multipath-tools update it does not really make much sense to update it late in a cycle11:40
cpaelzeryes11:40
cpaelzerthat was what I was concerned about if it would come in very last11:41
cpaelzerand I didn't hear any of the usual multipath-heavy people cry for a new version, maybe the fixes are less important than usual11:41
cpaelzerI'd ack to doing it early in next cycle to be able to sort things out there11:41
cpaelzerthanks for the clarification juliank11:41
weaselhye.12:08
weaselhey.12:08
weaselany idea how to debootstrap a current ubuntu system using only https sources?12:08
weaselfor some reason you put apt-transport-https into universe12:09
weaselwhich makes debootstrap break12:09
weasel[ https://bugs.debian.org/920255 ]12:09
ubottuDebian bug 920255 in debootstrap "tries to install apt-transport-https even if doesn't exist" [Important,Open]12:09
cjwatsonthat was probably because apt has built-in https now12:09
weaselyeah, but it breaks debootstrapping12:09
cjwatsonI guess debootstrap hasn't been fixed for that?12:09
weaselnot yet, at least not in debian12:09
cpaelzerLocutusOfBorg: doko: I saw you retrying tests of "redmine" any idea what dependency is broken and why?12:09
cpaelzerI saw ruby-actionpack-xml-parser and that also makes redmine from proposed hard to install in a disco container12:10
weaselalso, cf Debian#87975512:10
weasel[ hm.  ubottu doesn't do that.  https://bugs.debian.org/879755 then ]12:10
ubottuDebian bug 879755 in debootstrap "debootstrap fails with current sid without apt-transport-https and https URLs" [Minor,Open]12:10
cpaelzerbut I didn#t check further, but seeing your retries with "assorted triggers" was wondering if you took a look already?12:10
weaselcjwatson: so, any advice on how to get any of the modern ubuntus bootstrapped?12:11
cpaelzerahasenack: ^^ FYI on current postgersql vs redmin in excuses12:11
cjwatsonin the short term maybe just sed apt-transport-https out of the relevant script?12:11
cjwatsonI'm sure somebody should fix it properly, but that somebody won't be me :)12:12
weaselthat's not a horrible idea.  let me try it :)12:12
weaselit didn't even occur to me12:13
cjwatsonmwhudson,sil2100,infinity: could any of you have a look at https://code.launchpad.net/~cjwatson/livecd-rootfs/+git/livecd-rootfs/+merge/361824 and https://code.launchpad.net/~cjwatson/livecd-rootfs/+git/livecd-rootfs/+merge/361825 ?  I'd like to make progress on getting those LXD images up12:43
cjwatson(I understand I may not be able to actually do the bionic SRU yet since there's other stuff in verification)12:43
sil2100cjwatson: I'll try having a look in some moments12:47
cjwatsonThanks12:47
=== ricab is now known as ricab|lunch
* Laney fist bumps mwhudson for the rustc backports13:41
jbichavorlon: would you subscribe foundation-bugs to pcre2 for LP: #1636666 ?14:37
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1636666 in pcre2 (Ubuntu) "[MIR] pcre2" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/163666614:37
LocutusOfBorgcpaelzer, I retried a lot of stuff, nothing intentional :)14:38
=== ricab|lunch is now known as ricab
=== alan_g_ is now known as alan_g
=== chiluk_ is now known as chiluk
dokocpaelzer: redmine is scheduled for removal in debian. I wouldn't mind if you prepare a removal bug ...17:08
ahasenackdoko: it looks like a similar case to schleuder wrt ruby-mail:18:23
ahasenackSetting up redmine (3.4.6-1) ...18:24
ahasenackCould not find gem 'mail (~> 2.6.4)' in any of the gem sources listed in your Gemfile.18:24
ahasenackwe have ruby-mail 2.7.x18:24
ahasenackhttps://github.com/redmine/redmine/blob/master/Gemfile seems to support 2.7.118:26
tewardahasenack: is that *latest* upstream or the version of redmine 3.4.6?18:27
ahasenackI'm checking18:27
tewardbecause 'master' seems ahead of 3.4.618:27
ahasenacklatest 3.4.x is 3.4.8 (tarball, just downloaded)18:28
teward'cause if I look at releases, I see us at 4.0 which I am assuming Master is at18:28
teward4.0.x *18:28
ahasenack3.4.8 still wants ruby-mail 2.6.4:18:28
ahasenackgem "mail", "~> 2.6.4"18:28
ahasenackit's the 4.0.x release that can use ruby-mail 2.7.118:29
tewardahasenack: right, 4.0.1 supports 2.7.1 - gem "mail", "~> 2.7.1"18:29
tewardyep18:29
tewardso it probably needs upgraded in Debian and Ubuntu then18:29
ahasenackright, debian stopped at 3.4.618:29
teward(sorry I was just perusing channels and landed here and noticed your last message with the 'master' upstream link)18:29
ahasenackI can file an ubuntu bug explaining this, and then someone can decide to either go ahead of debian, or drop it18:29
ahasenackdoko: cpaelzer: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/redmine/+bug/181305118:32
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1813051 in redmine (Ubuntu) "Not installable on disco due to ruby-mail" [Undecided,New]18:32
tewardahasenack: might want to link to https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=919805 while you're in there18:33
ubottuDebian bug 919805 in src:redmine "redmine: FTBFS (Could not find gem mail)" [Serious,Open]18:33
tewardsame problem18:33
teward(and I made a note of what we found there just now)18:33
ahasenackthx18:33
tewardi wonder how hard it would be to update that package... *is merely curious, and might try to as a thought experiment*18:34
ahasenackit's ruby18:35
ahasenackoutside my comfort zone18:35
ahasenackwaaaay outside18:35
tewardyeah outside mine too but I've had to learn some ruby, just curiousity making me wonder :P18:35
teward*is bored at work so tests things*18:35
tewardahasenack: wonder if patching the gemfile to use the newer would work, or if it just breaks.18:36
tewardwhich'd be a simple bugfix patch if all we have to do is alter the gemfile.18:36
mwhudsoncjwatson: is there something i can do to get email about new livecd-rootfs MPs?18:53
mwhudsoncjwatson: approved both18:54
ahasenackteward: I've seen it break in another ruby package, ruby-mail 2.7.x seems to have introduced some significant changes18:59
ahasenackI hacked the gem file (schleuder was the pkg) and the tests failed19:00
tewardmakes sense.19:00
tewardahasenack: then it's safe to say we have to jump to 4.0.1 if we intend to keep it :P19:00
tewardwonder what Debian's going to do :P19:00
ahasenackdoko said debian was going to remove it19:00
tewardahasenack: i didn't see a removal bug, I saw the FTBFS bug.19:16
tewardahasenack: though Debian QA shows it as bieng removed from testing19:17
jbichadoko: I'm having problems with dpkg shlibs on armhf now, here's an example: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xfce4-terminal/0.8.7.4-2/+build/1631395419:30
mdeslaurjbicha, doko: I'm getting that with ghostscript too19:42
=== ricab is now known as ricab|EOD
dokojbicha, mdeslaur: removed from -proposed. but I'm afk now21:26
jbichathank you21:27
mdeslaurthanks!21:30
mwhudsonLaney: gotta keep the DC warm21:52
mwhudsonspeaking of which, time to upload them all again21:53
cjwatsonmwhudson: thanks; https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-dev/livecd-rootfs/+git/livecd-rootfs -> subscribe yourself, and "code review level" is the relevant one, you can turn off the rest if you want22:28
mwhudsoncjwatson: i'd swear that wasn't there last time i looked for it22:29
mwhudsonoh well22:29
mwhudsonmaybe i was looking at branch vs repo22:30
cjwatsonCould be22:30
mwhudsonanyway, thanks :)22:31
jbichadoko: ha, our pcre3-in-main count went up by one yesterday :( LP: #145969223:48
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1459692 in anope (Ubuntu) "[MIR] anope" [Undecided,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/145969223:48

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!