| === lubot-tg is now known as lubot | ||
| === lubot-tg is now known as lubot | ||
| === lubot-tg is now known as lubot | ||
| === lubot-tg is now known as lubot | ||
| lubot | readlnh was added by: readlnh | 03:07 |
|---|---|---|
| lubot | <SamuelBanya> The only issue I've been having is to add the .qrc resource file to the project since it's cmake. I did however modify the cmakelists.txt file to include it. Artem made temporary assets which I've included it in the welcome center's images folder | 16:04 |
| lubot | <SamuelBanya> I only wish we didn't have to do cmake tbh cause it makes the process of working with qt creator that much harder since it's overlap of two documentation resources | 16:05 |
| lubot | <SamuelBanya> Just want to clarify: we can't just use QMake instead? It would make this 10x easier. | 16:38 |
| lubot | <tsimonq2> @SamuelBanya [I only wish we didn't have to do cmake tbh cause it makes the process of working …], There is documentation available for doing it with CMake | 16:43 |
| lubot | <tsimonq2> @SamuelBanya [Just want to clarify: we can't just use QMake instead? It would make this 10x ea …], Nope, I very much disagree after using both extensively :) | 16:43 |
| lubot | <SamuelBanya> Can you point me in the right direction cause #qt only helped so much last night and it's been a pain in qt creator itself. If it's qmake it automatically does everything for you | 16:47 |
| lubot | <SamuelBanya> I don't do terminal based edits because qt + c++ is pretty complex already and I rely on qt creator to at least make sense of most of it | 16:48 |
| lubot | <SamuelBanya> :) | 16:48 |
| lubot | <tsimonq2> @SamuelBanya [I don't do terminal based edits because qt + c++ is pretty complex already and I …], Then maybe we should sit down at one point and help you make sense of it | 16:53 |
| lubot | <SamuelBanya> Alright thats a better approach because I would even more so prefer to just do away with qt creator anyway I'm just a bit scared because there are so many moving parts in that single project. Otherwise I'm used to just running one file scripts in Python or adjusting JavaScript scripts. | 16:56 |
| lubot | <SamuelBanya> I tried looking even in the CMake side of things but mostly their docs point you to their book which I don't want to buy just for a single module | 16:56 |
| lubot | <SamuelBanya> Unless there are better docs on it with qt | 16:56 |
| lynorian | bot seems dead | 19:54 |
| lynorian | although not sure I can contribute much more for today | 19:55 |
| lubot | <HMollerCl> @SamuelBanya [Alright thats a better approach because I would even more so prefer to just do a …], Why are you using c++qt instead of pyqt? | 20:03 |
| lubot | <SamuelBanya> Because Simon wants cmake | 20:04 |
| lubot | <SamuelBanya> Cause it's upstream | 20:04 |
| lubot | <SamuelBanya> I would definitely want to use python instead though | 20:05 |
| lubot | <SamuelBanya> But I've been learning c++ to compensate though it's still damn hard as a newbie. | 20:06 |
| lubot | <SamuelBanya> If we would agree to use that instead would you want to help me develop it? | 20:06 |
| lubot | <teward001> *stabs @tsimonq2* | 20:06 |
| lubot | <teward001> *points up* Why, Simon, why. | 20:07 |
| lubot | <teward001> well now i know why | 20:28 |
| lubot | <teward001> Fwd from tsimonq2: PyQt is slow | 20:28 |
| lubot | <teward001> Fwd from tsimonq2: CMake > QMake | 20:28 |
| lubot | <HMollerCl> I agree that c++ is more efficient than python, but is that needed for a welcome center? @tsimonq2 | 20:31 |
| lubot | <HMollerCl> Software-properties Is done in pygtk and pyqt | 20:32 |
| lubot | <HMollerCl> The WC (welcome center, bad acronym) supposed to be run only once. It could also be an offline webpage | 20:34 |
| lubot | <SamuelBanya> So it's not a program to be run more than once? | 20:48 |
| lubot | <SamuelBanya> Artems vision for it is like a one stop hub | 20:48 |
| lubot | <SamuelBanya> I kind of like that a lot so we don't have to have deep dives into menus | 20:48 |
| lubot | <SamuelBanya> Though I do know keyboard shortcuts exist through and they ARE handy. It might be nice for a newbie to just rely on the gui first | 20:49 |
| lubot | <SamuelBanya> I want as much people to feel comfortable to come over to our distro and I really feel we should be pushing for that, especially with new beginners. | 20:49 |
| lubot | <HMollerCl> Maybe my understanding of what the WC is is wrong. I thought that it was like the "tour" windows has | 21:03 |
| lubot | <SamuelBanya> True | 21:06 |
| lubot | <SamuelBanya> (Photo, 1280x762) https://i.imgur.com/myj3hqf.jpg | 21:07 |
| lubot | <SamuelBanya> This is what Artem was thinking | 21:07 |
| lubot | <SamuelBanya> I do like your idea for an offline webpage though the functionality is needed to open up actual programs within the OS | 21:09 |
| lubot | <SamuelBanya> Which doesn't sound like an offline webpage could do | 21:09 |
| lubot | <SamuelBanya> Though honestly if we do another collab program let's shoot for python so I can get Hans to help me out consistently. | 21:16 |
| lubot | <SamuelBanya> Or rather past the April release, Hans, are there any Python related scripts we could both work on for ease of use for our users? | 22:47 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!
