=== lubot-tg is now known as lubot
=== lubot-tg is now known as lubot
=== lubot-tg is now known as lubot
=== lubot-tg is now known as lubot
[03:07] <lubot> readlnh was added by: readlnh
[16:04] <lubot> <SamuelBanya> The only issue I've been having is to add the .qrc resource file to the project since it's cmake. I did however modify the cmakelists.txt file to include it. Artem made temporary assets which I've included it in the welcome center's images folder
[16:05] <lubot> <SamuelBanya> I only wish we didn't have to do cmake tbh cause it makes the process of working with qt creator that much harder since it's overlap of two documentation resources
[16:38] <lubot> <SamuelBanya> Just want to clarify: we can't just use QMake instead? It would make this 10x easier.
[16:43] <lubot> <tsimonq2> @SamuelBanya [I only wish we didn't have to do cmake tbh cause it makes the process of working …], There is documentation available for doing it with CMake
[16:43] <lubot> <tsimonq2> @SamuelBanya [Just want to clarify: we can't just use QMake instead? It would make this 10x ea …], Nope, I very much disagree after using both extensively :)
[16:47] <lubot> <SamuelBanya> Can you point me in the right direction cause #qt only helped so much last night and it's been a pain in qt creator itself. If it's qmake it automatically does everything for you
[16:48] <lubot> <SamuelBanya> I don't do terminal based edits because qt + c++ is pretty complex already and I rely on qt creator to at least make sense of most of it
[16:48] <lubot> <SamuelBanya> :)
[16:53] <lubot> <tsimonq2> @SamuelBanya [I don't do terminal based edits because qt + c++ is pretty complex already and I …], Then maybe we should sit down at one point and help you make sense of it
[16:56] <lubot> <SamuelBanya> Alright thats a better approach because I would even more so prefer to just do away with qt creator anyway I'm just a bit scared because there are so many moving parts in that single project. Otherwise I'm used to just running one file scripts in Python or adjusting JavaScript scripts.
[16:56] <lubot> <SamuelBanya> I tried looking even in the CMake side of things but mostly their docs point you to their book which I don't want to buy just for a single module
[16:56] <lubot> <SamuelBanya> Unless there are better docs on it with qt
[19:54] <lynorian> bot seems dead
[19:55] <lynorian> although not sure I can contribute much more for today
[20:03] <lubot> <HMollerCl> @SamuelBanya [Alright thats a better approach because I would even more so prefer to just do a …], Why are you using c++qt instead of pyqt?
[20:04] <lubot> <SamuelBanya> Because Simon wants cmake
[20:04] <lubot> <SamuelBanya> Cause it's upstream
[20:05] <lubot> <SamuelBanya> I would definitely want to use python instead though
[20:06] <lubot> <SamuelBanya> But I've been learning c++ to compensate though it's still damn hard as a newbie.
[20:06] <lubot> <SamuelBanya> If we would agree to use that instead would you want to help me develop it?
[20:06] <lubot> <teward001> *stabs @tsimonq2*
[20:07] <lubot> <teward001> *points up* Why, Simon, why.
[20:28] <lubot> <teward001> well now i know why
[20:28] <lubot> <teward001> Fwd from tsimonq2: PyQt is slow
[20:28] <lubot> <teward001> Fwd from tsimonq2: CMake > QMake
[20:31] <lubot> <HMollerCl> I agree that c++ is more efficient than python, but is that needed for a welcome center? @tsimonq2
[20:32] <lubot> <HMollerCl> Software-properties Is done in pygtk and pyqt
[20:34] <lubot> <HMollerCl> The WC (welcome center, bad acronym) supposed to be run only once. It could also be an offline webpage
[20:48] <lubot> <SamuelBanya> So it's not a program to be run more than once?
[20:48] <lubot> <SamuelBanya> Artems vision for it is like a one stop hub
[20:48] <lubot> <SamuelBanya> I kind of like that a lot so we don't have to have deep dives into menus
[20:49] <lubot> <SamuelBanya> Though I do know keyboard shortcuts exist through and they ARE handy. It might be nice for a newbie to just rely on the gui first
[20:49] <lubot> <SamuelBanya> I want as much people to feel comfortable to come over to our distro and I really feel we should be pushing for that, especially with new beginners.
[21:03] <lubot> <HMollerCl> Maybe my understanding of what the WC is is wrong. I thought that it was like the "tour" windows has
[21:06] <lubot> <SamuelBanya> True
[21:07] <lubot> <SamuelBanya> (Photo, 1280x762) https://i.imgur.com/myj3hqf.jpg
[21:07] <lubot> <SamuelBanya> This is what Artem was thinking
[21:09] <lubot> <SamuelBanya> I do like your idea for an offline webpage though the functionality is needed to open up actual programs within the OS
[21:09] <lubot> <SamuelBanya> Which doesn't sound like an offline webpage could do
[21:16] <lubot> <SamuelBanya> Though honestly if we do another collab program let's shoot for python so I can get Hans to help me out consistently.
[22:47] <lubot> <SamuelBanya> Or rather past the April release, Hans, are there any Python related scripts we could both work on for ease of use for our users?