[00:33] <sarnold> hmm, I'm surprised to find php7.1 still on the archives http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/p/php7.1/
[00:35] <tsimonq2> sarnold: That's because Artful still seems to be on there.
[00:36] <tsimonq2> http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/
[00:36] <sarnold> tsimonq2: ah!
[00:36] <sarnold> so, I guess that slightly changes the question :) hehe
[00:36] <tsimonq2> Look at the publishing history, it's still on Artful: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/php7.1/+publishinghistory
[00:36] <tsimonq2> sarnold: So maybe poke an AA about that instead. ;)
[00:37] <sarnold> "hey can you please remove this release from our archives I wanna free up some disk space locally"  :)
[00:37] <JackFrost> I was a bit surprised that artful was there as well, noticed a bit ago but kinda was useful.  Reminds me I should update my ISO..
[00:38] <rbasak> I use a squid cache rather than a full mirror. Works well for me. I assume Artful-only stuff is no longer present :)
[00:39] <tsimonq2> Vivid round two?
[00:39]  * tsimonq2 runs
[00:41] <sarnold> rbasak: I'm just doing the cve triage and answering the question "which PHPs do we support?" is imho easier with ls -ld pool/*/p/php* than a web browser, hehe
[00:47] <rbasak> That makes sense. Even if it does feel wrong. The best alternative I can suggest would be some more complicated chdist setup and wrapper so I can't argue with you that it would be better :-/
[00:47] <rbasak> It looks like rmadision takes regexes but that is likely to be disabled server-side.
[00:47] <rbasak> rmadison
[06:49] <md_5> is there a channel for ubuntu kernel devel?
[06:58] <md_5> #ubuntu-kernel ofc
[10:45] <cpaelzer> rbalint: bug 1813730 now also got snapd and python-defaults to the already long list we had
[10:46] <cpaelzer> rbalint: what do you think about a test override for livecd-rootfs 2.558 for now ?
[10:46] <cpaelzer> if you are ok with that I'd propose a branch, you could ack as "working on it, really not related to the uploaded packages, and it needs some more time"
[10:46] <cpaelzer> then I could merge it and we would unblock quite some stuff
[10:55] <cpaelzer> rbalint: I opened an MP for you to approve/deny accordingly - you should have it in your inbox by now
[10:56] <Zta77> Is Gnome written in js?
[11:00] <cjwatson> Parts of it are, such as a fair chunk of gnome-shell
[11:01] <cjwatson> Large parts of it are in C, some in Vala (which is a domain-specific language based on C that makes it easier to use the GNOME object system), some in Python, probably others I've missed
[12:21] <rbalint> cpaelzer, i'm fixing util-linux, but if i don't finish in a few hours then i will support the hint
[13:31] <Zta77> cjwatson: Thanks. I means Gnome Shell, so my assumptions make sense =)
[13:34] <Zta77> I've installed Debian in QEmu and I'm trying to make it look like Ubuntu. But I'm having trouble matching the orange window decoration buttons; the once I've got are too fat -- see screenshot. What package are those images in? https://imgur.com/a/YgUqgz4
[13:41] <Zta77> Ah, 'light-themes' found though /usr/share/themes/Radiance/unity/close_focused_pressed.svg
[13:53] <ricotz> kenvandine, hi
[13:55] <ricotz> kenvandine, please pick up the vala upstream updates for the gnome backport PPAs
[14:49] <seb128> bdmurray, hey, do you have any idea why the bionic SRU for bug #1804744 is not going to -updates despite being verified? Is that because SRU team blocks bionic SRUs on having their cosmic counterpart verified as well first?
[15:04] <zyga> who should I work with about core18 bugs?
[15:47] <rbalint> cpaelzer, please go for the hint, while libmount1 broke the test i think livecd-rootfs is at fault but the test cycle is long and i could not verify the fix yet
[18:07] <jdstrand> Wimpress: hey, this is not a big deal at all, but fyi, the yaru theme in mate on disco uses the gnome foot as the icon for the (brisk?) menu
[18:08] <jdstrand> Wimpress: in other news, hidpi with mate/compton and multimonitor is so far quite good :)
[18:09]  * jdstrand had some trouble with compiz and multimonitor
[18:27] <bdmurray> ahasenack: Is the verification for bug 1807246 or can more be done / the test case followed?
[18:27] <ahasenack> bdmurray: he is the original reporter, but that is indeed a poor verification
[18:28] <ahasenack> bdmurray: if you give me 20min, I can do the proper one, following the test section from the sru
[18:28] <ahasenack> probably less
[18:29] <bdmurray> ahasenack: I'm in no hurry but would appreciate a better verification
[18:30] <ahasenack> bdmurray: ok, I'll ping back shortly
[18:39] <ahasenack> bdmurray: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sssd/+bug/1807246/comments/17