/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2019/01/30/#ubuntu-release.txt

RAOFddstreet: Hm, that systemd upload appears to drop a bunch of changes from the existing cosmic-proposed package?01:11
RAOFddstreet: Specifically, the fixes for bug #1799364, LP: #1804584, LP: #1804603, LP: #1804864, LP: #180535801:17
ubot5bug 1799364 in systemd (Ubuntu Bionic) "The wlan/bt hotkey doesn't work for all Dell Latitude and Precision computers" [Medium,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/179936401:17
ubot5Launchpad bug 1804584 in systemd (Ubuntu Bionic) "LG screen reported as being a Goldstar one" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/180458401:17
ubot5Launchpad bug 1804603 in systemd (Ubuntu Disco) "systemd-tmpfiles-setup.service fails on btrfs" [Undecided,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/180460301:17
ubot5Launchpad bug 1804864 in systemd (Ubuntu Cosmic) "autopkgtest regression TEST-22-TMPFILES are not executable" [Undecided,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/180486401:17
ubot5Launchpad bug 1805358 in systemd (Ubuntu Bionic) "autopkgtest boot-and-services fails on many architectures very often since systemd/239-7ubuntu12" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/180535801:17
RAOFddstreet: Likewise, the bionic upload appears to drop a bunch of changes?01:20
LocutusOfBorgapw, yes I need an hint too :/ force-badtest virtualbox-ext-pack/all/i386 #relies on non-existing virtualbox binary on i38608:39
LocutusOfBorggood morning btw :)08:39
ypwonginfinity, will 18.04.2 use hwe package? The daily image is still using 4.15 kernel08:47
ypwongI mean the desktop one08:47
apwypwong, the 18.04.2 point release desktop images would be expected to be using the hwe kernel09:13
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-45.48] (core, kernel)09:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-45.48] (core, kernel)09:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-45.48]09:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-45.48]09:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (xenial-proposed/main) [2.37 => 2.37.1] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)09:56
Laneythere's a lot of /unknown results atm, I think one of the cloud regions is woeful so I've disabled it09:59
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (bionic-proposed/main) [2.37+18.04 => 2.37.1+18.04] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)10:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (cosmic-proposed/main) [2.37+18.10 => 2.37.1+18.10] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)10:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (trusty-proposed/universe) [2.37~14.04 => 2.37.1~14.04] (no packageset)10:02
Laneyand I'm too lazy to click all those buttons so I'll just retry all failed arm64 :>10:03
* apw looks at snapd ^10:18
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd [source] (cosmic-proposed) [2.37.1+18.10]10:30
ddstreetRAOF you're comparing against the last pre-security systemd release; I didn't drop the changes, the last (security) systemd release did10:31
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.37.1+18.04]10:31
ddstreetif you compare against the current systemd in -updates you should see the correct diff, with just my changes added10:31
ddstreetRAOF that is not unusual when security releases supercede something in -proposed10:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.37.1]10:32
ddstreetRAOF let me know if you have any other q about the uploads10:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd [source] (trusty-proposed) [2.37.1~14.04]10:34
ddstreetrbasak if you're sru approver today, can you approve the b/c systemd uploads, please, when you get a chance10:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-45.48~16.04.1] (kernel)10:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-45.48~16.04.1] (kernel)10:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-45.48~16.04.1]11:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: erlang-erlware-commons [amd64] (disco-proposed/universe) [1.3.1+dfsg-2] (no packageset)11:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: erlang-erlware-commons [ppc64el] (disco-proposed/universe) [1.3.1+dfsg-2] (no packageset)11:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-45.48~16.04.1]11:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: erlang-erlware-commons [s390x] (disco-proposed/universe) [1.3.1+dfsg-2] (no packageset)11:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: erlang-erlware-commons [i386] (disco-proposed/universe) [1.3.1+dfsg-2] (no packageset)11:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: progress-linux [amd64] (disco-proposed/universe) [20181201-3] (no packageset)11:13
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: erlang-erlware-commons [arm64] (disco-proposed/universe) [1.3.1+dfsg-2] (no packageset)11:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: erlang-erlware-commons [armhf] (disco-proposed/universe) [1.3.1+dfsg-2] (no packageset)11:26
joalifrbasak, if you're sru approver today, could you please approve the upload of libmemcached for C/B/X/T (LP: #1573594)12:03
ubot5Launchpad bug 1573594 in libmemcached (Ubuntu Cosmic) "Missing null termination in PROTOCOL_BINARY_CMD_SASL_LIST_MECHS response handling" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/157359412:03
rbasakddstreet, joalif: added to my list. I'll see how far I get today.12:06
joalifrbasak, thanks!12:06
=== philroche_ is now known as philroche
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libidn (bionic-proposed/main) [1.33-2.1ubuntu1 => 1.33-2.1ubuntu1.1] (core)13:52
=== chrisccoulson_ is now known as chrisccoulson
ginggssil2100: thanks! (xtensor hint)14:10
LocutusOfBorghello AA I need an hint too :/ force-badtest virtualbox-ext-pack/all/i386 #relies on non-existing virtualbox binary on i38614:17
LocutusOfBorgplllllllllllllllllease ^^14:18
=== jdstrand_ is now known as jdstrand
sil2100ginggs: yw!14:32
sil2100LocutusOfBorg: looking o/14:32
LocutusOfBorgta14:33
LocutusOfBorgsil2100, basically, there is no vbox anymore on i386, so the testsuite needs a permanent hint14:33
LocutusOfBorgupstream stopped supporting it with 6.0 release14:33
juliankgood for them14:34
sil2100ugh14:34
LocutusOfBorgwait, I don't mean guest14:35
LocutusOfBorgI mean vbox as *host*14:35
LocutusOfBorgin fact, the ext-pack regression was the reason for me discovering that :D14:36
LocutusOfBorgso, for the first time a regression has been useful :)14:36
jamespagewould a member of the sru team be able to look at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/bionic/+source/ceph/+bug/1813582 please - that bug is impacting on bionic openstack deploys (for a subset of services)14:36
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1813582 in ceph (Ubuntu Bionic) "Update to 12.2.8 leads to SIGSEGV Segmentation fault in python3-rados" [High,In progress]14:36
Trevinhohey rbasak, do you have some time to review the stuff we have as desktop-team in SRU queue, mostly shell relateded stuff though (mutter, g-s, g-c-c, g-s-d and related upower)14:50
tjaaltonanyone know why bionic dailies still don't use HWE packages (kernel + xorg stack)?14:51
rbasakTrevinho: adding to my list, but it seems unlikely I'll get to it, sorry.14:52
seb128could someone binNEW review the bionic/fwupdate SRU, it's going to miss .2 otherwise (https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/bionic/+queue?queue_state=0&queue_text=)14:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted erlang-erlware-commons [amd64] (disco-proposed) [1.3.1+dfsg-2]14:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted erlang-erlware-commons [armhf] (disco-proposed) [1.3.1+dfsg-2]14:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted erlang-erlware-commons [ppc64el] (disco-proposed) [1.3.1+dfsg-2]14:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted progress-linux [amd64] (disco-proposed) [20181201-3]14:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted erlang-erlware-commons [arm64] (disco-proposed) [1.3.1+dfsg-2]14:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted erlang-erlware-commons [s390x] (disco-proposed) [1.3.1+dfsg-2]14:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted erlang-erlware-commons [i386] (disco-proposed) [1.3.1+dfsg-2]14:54
Trevinhorbasak: ok, that's fine... In case please pass the wort to others in the SRU team please14:56
rbasakTrevinho: sure but that happens automatically...there's a queue :-)14:56
rbasak(though unfortunately lately every item in the queue seems to be a mega-feature-review)14:56
Trevinhoyeah, indeed, I see the point our stuff isn't the smallest either :-P14:59
Laneybos01's supposed to be fixed15:49
Laneywill start up 1× instance to see if it works15:49
Laneyit's aliiiivvvveeeee15:52
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fwupdate [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [12-3bionic1]16:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fwupdate [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [12-3bionic1]16:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fwupdate [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [12-3bionic1]16:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fwupdate [i386] (bionic-proposed) [12-3bionic1]16:41
blackboxswHi sil2100, looks like it's that time again, we sorted the cloud-init disco intermittent build failure per ftbs and have queued cloud-init 18.5-21-g8ee294d5 for Xenial Bionic and Cosmic per SRU process bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/1813346.16:42
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1813346 in cloud-init (Ubuntu) "sru cloud-init (18.4.0 update to 18.5-21-g8ee294d5) Xenial, Bionic, Cosmic" [Undecided,New]16:42
blackboxswif there is time today, we'd like to  reject the queued cloud-init 18.5-17 upload requests, in favor of 18.5-21 I that would be great.16:43
apwseb128, i assume you know that those signing templates won't do anything16:46
sil2100blackboxsw: hey! Thanks, I'll reject the old ones but not sure if I'll have the cycles to do the review today (I'll try) - if not, I'll do them first thing tomorrow morning as I have my SRU shift then16:47
blackboxswsil2100: excellent. thanks much!16:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected cloud-init [source] (cosmic-proposed) [18.5-17-gd1a2fe73-0ubuntu1~18.10.1]16:49
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected cloud-init [source] (bionic-proposed) [18.5-17-gd1a2fe73-0ubuntu1~18.04.1]16:49
cpaelzerHi, it would be great if a release team member could consider https://code.launchpad.net/~paelzer/britney/hints-ubuntu-mask-livecd-rootfs-disco/+merge/362475 to unblock a few things blocked by livecd-rootfs16:57
vorlondoko: python-numpy showing some autopkgtest regressions from the usual suspects, any thoughts?16:58
dokovorlon: not my biggest priority for now, however I was trying to give back all the astro stuff for now17:00
vorlonthere was some entanglement with scikit and a ftbfs matplotlib2 which is now resolved in -proposed, so the remaining astro stuff should now build17:00
LocutusOfBorgvorlon, thanks for kicking it out17:17
LocutusOfBorgI spent two full days trying to fix it17:17
LocutusOfBorgand *nothing* :/ even with upstream patches17:17
LocutusOfBorgI hope they will have a new release out soon, and I pinged today to backport the patch to 2.3.x branch17:18
vorlonLocutusOfBorg: for kicking which out?17:20
vorloncpaelzer: done17:41
LocutusOfBorgvorlon, for kicking matplotlib2 :)18:00
LocutusOfBorgI would have kicked sphinx too, to let matplotlib2 migrate :p18:00
seb128apw, the fwupdate bionic SRU? I don't know much about that SRU, just that Mario pinged to get it unblocked18:03
vorlonLocutusOfBorg: ah, sure thing18:15
sil2100LocutusOfBorg: (I added that vbox hint if anything)18:25
LocutusOfBorgsil2100, ❤18:28
LocutusOfBorgapw, sorry, I forgot we have a boinc-virtualbox on i386... I uploaded boinc to stop providing it... can you please do the magic? (remove boinc-virtualbox on i386)18:41
LocutusOfBorgI also opened a debian bug18:41
LocutusOfBorg https://bugs.debian.org/92094418:42
ubot5Error: debian bug 920944 not found18:42
vorlonLaney, juliank: were either of you involved in the rollout of the new ssl certificate on autopkgtest.ubuntu.com?19:40
juliankvorlon: not me20:22
vorlonk20:22
vorlontimestamps on the files coincide with a login from Laney on wendigo20:23
vorlonand the new ssl certificate was missing its certificate chain so I had to do surgery20:23
vorlonLaney: I think 'juju set autopkgtest-web ssl-cert="$(cat autopkgtest.ubuntu.com.crt autopkgtest.ubuntu.com_chain.crt)" ssl-key="$(cat *.key)"' is the right modification and matches the impementation in autopkgtest-cloud/deployment/deploy.sh (namely, cat *.crt).  Should this be documented on https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ProposedMigration/AutopkgtestInfrastructure#Production_deployment_from_wendigo ?20:28
dokopython-defaults (2.7.15-3 to 2.7.15-4) in proposed for 11 days21:43
dokoWaiting21:43
dokodds/2.9.0-6: arm64, armhf21:43
dokodjango-maintenancemode/0.11.2-3: amd64, arm64, i38621:43
dokoopenslide-python/1.1.1-4: amd64, arm64, s390x21:43
dokopython-lzma/0.5.3-4: amd64, arm64, armhf, i386, s390x21:44
dokosphinxcontrib-restbuilder/0.2-2: amd64, arm64, i386, s390x21:44
dokosvgwrite/1.2.1-1.1: arm6421:44
dokovorlon, Laney: are you giving all these tests back which are marked as running, but are not?21:44
vorlondoko: no (it doesn't require admin privs to do so; if someone had done it you would see them in the queue again)21:45
vorlonalthough21:45
vorlonI did give ack openslide-python21:45
vorlonback21:45
vorlonbut only with a python3-defaults trigger, not python-defaults21:45
dokowell, just trying to address the ones I didn't mention above21:45
dokoanyway, EOD21:47
cpaelzerthanks vorlon21:51
cpaelzeractually, I thought you merged https://code.launchpad.net/~paelzer/britney/hints-ubuntu-mask-livecd-rootfs-disco/+merge/362475 but it is still waiting21:56
cpaelzervorlon: might I ask what is "done" ?21:57
vorloncpaelzer: hmm oops, there was a push conflict; fixing21:57
vorloncpaelzer: now done21:58
cpaelzerthanks again21:59
cpaelzerI'm going to be dreaming of migrating packages ...21:59
cpaelzercu21:59
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libidn [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.33-2.1ubuntu1.1]23:04
Laneyvorlon: ah, thx23:05
LaneyI tested with openssl s_cert and firefox, both worked for me, sorry for missing that (please document)23:06
Laneydoko: all of which ones? it's not expected to happen, so it's not a case of randomly retrying them imho, but something to be investigated23:06
Laneys/s_cert/s_client/23:07
Laneydoko: unless you mean those ones that I think were missed when the surgery was done. if so, feel free to retry those yourself, yes.23:18

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!