| cpaelzer | versioning question - current version in Debian is 1.1.99.51-1~unstable and I need a no change rebuild - dch -R will make 1.1.99.51-1~unstablebuild1 out of that - is that a pattern that will work in all tools? | 10:21 |
|---|---|---|
| cpaelzer | the fused "unstablebuild1" suffix makes me suspicious that might e.g. no more be auto-synced | 10:21 |
| cpaelzer | does anyone know for sure what the proper no change rebuild version for this would be? | 10:22 |
| cjwatson | Only an "ubuntu" substring inhibits auto-sync | 10:22 |
| cpaelzer | thanks cjwatson I was afraid it might have more complex rules | 10:22 |
| cjwatson | 1.1.99.51-1~unstablebuild1 seems fine. I might possibly make it be 1.1.99.51-1~unstable+build1 for clarity for humans, but it's also OK to stick with the autogenerated version IMO | 10:23 |
| cjwatson | There are a few other non-version-related things that can cause auto-sync to refuse to touch a package, but the "ubuntu" substring has always been the only version-related rule | 10:25 |
| ahasenack | hi, any idea what this autopkgtest failure means? https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/mZyyPzZxSF/ "badpkg: rules extract failed with exit code 1" | 11:32 |
| ahasenack | on apt-source | 11:32 |
| === ricab is now known as ricab|lunch | ||
| ejat | hi .. how to troubleshoot if i cant login ubuntu using xorg but if i using wayland can login ? | 13:39 |
| ejat | its happened when im using kernel 4.19.x | 13:39 |
| ejat | but its working fine if im using kernel 4.18.x | 13:40 |
| ejat | can someone advise ? thanks | 13:40 |
| ejat | sorry ... my bad .. suddenly its working :( | 13:50 |
| === ricab|lunch is now known as ricab | ||
| teward | anyone know if there's a way I can tell the system what key to use to sign a package when I do debuild -S ? | 15:56 |
| teward | asking because I recently set my "old" keys to expire because I am doing key rotations every so often, and am providing a new key this time. | 15:57 |
| xnox | teward, ~/.devscripts ? | 15:57 |
| teward | xnox: right, but i meant the specific argument to provide in it | 15:57 |
| teward | i know ~/.devscripts but I made a fubar and lost my .devscripts oops. | 15:58 |
| teward | so I need to rebuild that. Don't remember the key/value pair to enter in there | 15:58 |
| xnox | teward, man debsign -> configuration variable -> DEBSIGN_MAINT DEBSIGN_KEYID etc | 15:58 |
| teward | ah, thanks xnox :) | 15:58 |
| teward | xnox: always forget where in the manpages this stuff sits. heh. :P | 16:01 |
| cjwatson | This also suggests that you don't have backups, and you should fix that. | 16:04 |
| teward | cjwatson: well, actually the problem was drive death | 16:12 |
| teward | and then LVM2 corruption | 16:12 |
| teward | so that's the core problem there | 16:13 |
| teward | everything's backed up now | 16:13 |
| teward | and copied in at least 5 places :P | 16:13 |
| bdmurray | coreycb: Does bug 1811098 need to be private? that's frowned upon for SRU bugs | 22:44 |
| ubottu | Error: Launchpad bug 1811098 could not be found | 22:44 |
| coreycb | bdmurray: i dont think it does based on the feedback in the bug but being a security issue inwas hesitant to switch back to public | 22:46 |
| coreycb | I was | 22:46 |
| bdmurray | I think its fine but maybe we should ask a security guru like sarnold | 22:47 |
| sarnold | bdmurray,coreycb, yes, I believe this bug ought to be public -- the fix is public, and it's not something that is itself exploitable | 22:54 |
| bdmurray | sarnold: evenly for an "immensely powerful advesary"? | 22:55 |
| bdmurray | The other day I saw you use those words and I busted up | 22:56 |
| sarnold | I'm always happy to entertain :) | 22:56 |
| * jbicha busts up thinking of bdmurray busting up | 22:56 | |
| bdmurray | coreycb: So do you want to make it public? | 22:57 |
| coreycb | bdmurray: sure and thanks | 23:12 |
| coreycb | sarnold: thanks for the input | 23:12 |
| sarnold | you're welcome :) | 23:12 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!