[02:06] <RAOF> ddstreet: Perhaps I should rephrase: is there a particular reason why you didn't you fold in the superceded SRU's changes? As far as I can tell they'd all been verified and were just waiting to be aged enough for acceptance into -updates.
[02:09] <RAOF> ddstreet: Those bugs are still there, still have patches to fix them, and have the SRU paperwork filled out, so it should be low effort to fold the changes in and upload one systemd SRU. As it is, accepting just your changes into -proposed will mean waiting 7 days for it to get accepted into -updates, and then immediately uploading another systemd SRU to -proposed to fix those other bugs.
[02:10] <RAOF> Unless I'm missing something, which I may be.
[05:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ptunnel-ng [s390x] (disco-proposed/none) [1.32-1] (no packageset)
[05:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libjwt [s390x] (disco-proposed/universe) [1.10.1-1] (no packageset)
[05:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ptunnel-ng [ppc64el] (disco-proposed/none) [1.32-1] (no packageset)
[05:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ptunnel-ng [i386] (disco-proposed/none) [1.32-1] (no packageset)
[05:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libjwt [ppc64el] (disco-proposed/universe) [1.10.1-1] (no packageset)
[05:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libjwt [i386] (disco-proposed/universe) [1.10.1-1] (no packageset)
[05:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libjwt [amd64] (disco-proposed/universe) [1.10.1-1] (no packageset)
[05:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ptunnel-ng [amd64] (disco-proposed/none) [1.32-1] (no packageset)
[05:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libjwt [armhf] (disco-proposed/universe) [1.10.1-1] (no packageset)
[05:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libjwt [arm64] (disco-proposed/universe) [1.10.1-1] (no packageset)
[05:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ptunnel-ng [arm64] (disco-proposed/universe) [1.32-1] (no packageset)
[05:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ptunnel-ng [armhf] (disco-proposed/universe) [1.32-1] (no packageset)
[07:25] <acheronuk> Todays Kubuntu bionic live cd failed
[07:25] <acheronuk> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
[07:25] <acheronuk>  fwupdate-signed : Depends: fwupdate (= 10-3) but 12-3bionic1 is to be installed
[07:25] <acheronuk> *failed to build
[08:07] <acheronuk> main ubuntu bionic iso also failed to build
[08:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libjwt [amd64] (disco-proposed) [1.10.1-1]
[08:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libjwt [armhf] (disco-proposed) [1.10.1-1]
[08:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libjwt [ppc64el] (disco-proposed) [1.10.1-1]
[08:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ptunnel-ng [amd64] (disco-proposed) [1.32-1]
[08:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ptunnel-ng [armhf] (disco-proposed) [1.32-1]
[08:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ptunnel-ng [ppc64el] (disco-proposed) [1.32-1]
[08:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libjwt [arm64] (disco-proposed) [1.10.1-1]
[08:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libjwt [s390x] (disco-proposed) [1.10.1-1]
[08:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ptunnel-ng [i386] (disco-proposed) [1.32-1]
[08:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libjwt [i386] (disco-proposed) [1.10.1-1]
[08:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ptunnel-ng [s390x] (disco-proposed) [1.32-1]
[08:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ptunnel-ng [arm64] (disco-proposed) [1.32-1]
[09:16] <cpaelzer> hiho, I'd need some archive-powers to get DPDK fixed in Disco
[09:17] <cpaelzer> currently update_excuses lists it as "unsatisfiable Depends: libipsec ..."
[09:17] <cpaelzer> which is correct, libipsec isn't in main and some DPDK packages depends on it
[09:17] <cpaelzer> but, we made efforts to be able to drop parts of DPDK to universe
[09:19] <cpaelzer> and DPDK is only seeded in main through openvswitch-switch-dpdk which pulls dpdk and some librte-*
[09:19] <cpaelzer> but none should reach libipsec, so I wanted to ask if one could check for the demotion of the DPDK libraries
[09:19] <cpaelzer> or at least get in touch with me why they are not demotable
[09:20] <cpaelzer> actually let me file a bug for all of that ...
[09:25] <cpaelzer> hmm, I guess we need the rebuild of OVS by jamespage anyway
[09:26] <jamespage> cpaelzer: new DPDK in disco now? I'll get on the upload asap
[09:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ec2-hibinit-agent (trusty-proposed/universe) [1.0.0-0ubuntu1~14.04.0 => 1.0.0-0ubuntu1~14.04.1] (no packageset)
[09:31] <cpaelzer> jamespage: yes it is there, you should have a ping of yesterday around 10 o'clock pm
[09:32] <cpaelzer> but I know ping floods are lost
[09:32] <cpaelzer> also I'll need to no change-rebuild collectd and virtio-forwarder which I'll start as well
[09:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (cosmic-proposed) [18.5-21-g8ee294d5-0ubuntu1~18.10.1]
[09:42] <cpaelzer> jamespage: I subscribed your to bug 1814060 as FYI which is about the demotion I asked above
[09:42] <cpaelzer> taking a look at the no change rebuilds now
[09:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ec2-hibinit-agent [source] (trusty-proposed) [1.0.0-0ubuntu1~14.04.1]
[09:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: hddemux (cosmic-proposed/universe) [0.4-7 => 0.4-7ubuntu0.1] (no packageset)
[09:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (bionic-proposed) [18.5-21-g8ee294d5-0ubuntu1~18.04.1]
[10:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted upower [source] (cosmic-proposed) [0.99.8-2ubuntu0.2]
[10:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-shell [source] (cosmic-proposed) [3.30.2-0ubuntu1.18.10.1]
[10:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-control-center [source] (cosmic-proposed) [1:3.30.2-1ubuntu0.18.10.2]
[11:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ceph [source] (bionic-proposed) [12.2.8-0ubuntu0.18.04.2]
[11:16] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, node-source-map will be fixed today or tomorrow, but I'm scared about node-yarnpkg "regression" on i386... I can't reproduce the segfault locally, maybe some network issue on the VM?
[11:16] <LocutusOfBorg> its a new package, maybe we can hint?
[11:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: haproxy (cosmic-proposed/main) [1.8.13-2ubuntu0.1 => 1.8.13-2ubuntu0.2] (ubuntu-server)
[11:17] <LocutusOfBorg> I tried an autopkgtest against itself, lets see if it is broken in release
[11:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: haproxy (bionic-proposed/main) [1.8.8-1ubuntu0.3 => 1.8.8-1ubuntu0.4] (ubuntu-server)
[11:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: network-manager-fortisslvpn (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.2.8-1build1 => 1.2.8-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[11:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ceph [source] (cosmic-proposed) [13.2.4+dfsg1-0ubuntu0.18.10.1]
[12:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-influxdata-tail [amd64] (disco-proposed/universe) [1.0.0+git20180327.c434825-1] (no packageset)
[12:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-nitrokey [i386] (disco-proposed/universe) [0.3.4-1] (no packageset)
[12:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-nitrokey [amd64] (disco-proposed/universe) [0.3.4-1] (no packageset)
[12:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-factory-bot-rails [amd64] (disco-proposed/universe) [4.11.1-1] (no packageset)
[12:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-nitrokey-test [s390x] (disco-proposed/universe) [0.2.0-1] (no packageset)
[12:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-nitrokey-test [i386] (disco-proposed/universe) [0.2.0-1] (no packageset)
[12:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-nitrokey [s390x] (disco-proposed/universe) [0.3.4-1] (no packageset)
[12:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-bzip2 [amd64] (disco-proposed/universe) [0.3.3-1] (no packageset)
[12:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-nitrokey [ppc64el] (disco-proposed/universe) [0.3.4-1] (no packageset)
[12:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-nitrokey-test [amd64] (disco-proposed/universe) [0.2.0-1] (no packageset)
[12:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-bzip2 [i386] (disco-proposed/universe) [0.3.3-1] (no packageset)
[12:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-coresimd [i386] (disco-proposed/universe) [0.1.2-1] (no packageset)
[12:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-nitrokey-test [ppc64el] (disco-proposed/universe) [0.2.0-1] (no packageset)
[12:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-coresimd [amd64] (disco-proposed/universe) [0.1.2-1] (no packageset)
[12:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-goblin [amd64] (disco-proposed/universe) [0.0.19-1] (no packageset)
[12:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-bzip2 [s390x] (disco-proposed/universe) [0.3.3-1] (no packageset)
[12:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-bzip2 [ppc64el] (disco-proposed/universe) [0.3.3-1] (no packageset)
[12:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: vim-youcompleteme [amd64] (disco-proposed/universe) [0+20181101+gitfaa019a-0.1] (no packageset)
[12:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-coresimd [s390x] (disco-proposed/universe) [0.1.2-1] (no packageset)
[12:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-influxdata-tail [amd64] (disco-proposed) [1.0.0+git20180327.c434825-1]
[12:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted vim-youcompleteme [amd64] (disco-proposed) [0+20181101+gitfaa019a-0.1]
[12:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-factory-bot-rails [amd64] (disco-proposed) [4.11.1-1]
[12:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-bzip2 [amd64] (disco-proposed) [0.3.3-1]
[12:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-bzip2 [ppc64el] (disco-proposed) [0.3.3-1]
[12:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-nitrokey [amd64] (disco-proposed) [0.3.4-1]
[12:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-nitrokey [ppc64el] (disco-proposed) [0.3.4-1]
[12:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-coresimd [ppc64el] (disco-proposed/universe) [0.1.2-1] (no packageset)
[12:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-bzip2 [i386] (disco-proposed) [0.3.3-1]
[12:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-nitrokey [i386] (disco-proposed) [0.3.4-1]
[12:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-bzip2 [s390x] (disco-proposed) [0.3.3-1]
[12:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-nitrokey [s390x] (disco-proposed) [0.3.4-1]
[12:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-coresimd [amd64] (disco-proposed) [0.1.2-1]
[12:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-coresimd [ppc64el] (disco-proposed) [0.1.2-1]
[12:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-nitrokey-test [amd64] (disco-proposed) [0.2.0-1]
[12:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-nitrokey-test [ppc64el] (disco-proposed) [0.2.0-1]
[12:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-coresimd [i386] (disco-proposed) [0.1.2-1]
[12:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-nitrokey-test [i386] (disco-proposed) [0.2.0-1]
[12:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-coresimd [s390x] (disco-proposed) [0.1.2-1]
[12:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-nitrokey-test [s390x] (disco-proposed) [0.2.0-1]
[12:31] <doko> vorlon, ginggs: pandas needs fixes for numpy 1.6, probably a new upstream. didn't check for python-scipy yet. pysparse: "new" upstream available from 2013, could be removed with sfepy, satpy could be removed as well.
[12:32] <doko> python-scipy/i386: new upstream available in experimental. the python2 tests are getting killed
[12:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-goblin [amd64] (disco-proposed) [0.0.19-1]
[13:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cp2k [i386] (disco-proposed/universe) [6.1-2] (no packageset)
[13:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cp2k [amd64] (disco-proposed/universe) [6.1-2] (no packageset)
[13:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cp2k [amd64] (disco-proposed) [6.1-2]
[13:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cp2k [s390x] (disco-proposed/universe) [6.1-2] (no packageset)
[13:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cp2k [i386] (disco-proposed) [6.1-2]
[13:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cp2k [s390x] (disco-proposed) [6.1-2]
[13:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cp2k [ppc64el] (disco-proposed/universe) [6.1-2] (no packageset)
[13:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cp2k [ppc64el] (disco-proposed) [6.1-2]
[14:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: s390-tools (xenial-proposed/main) [1.34.0-0ubuntu8.8 => 1.34.0-0ubuntu8.9] (no packageset)
[15:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: mysql-8.0 (disco-proposed/primary) [8.0.14-0ubuntu1]
[15:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted systemd [source] (cosmic-proposed) [239-7ubuntu10.7]
[15:22] <joalif> sil2100, could you please approve the upload of libmemcached for C/B/X/T (LP: #1573594) ?
[15:24] <sil2100> joalif: hey! Let me try getting to that after I'm done with systemd
[15:25] <joalif> sure sil2100 thanks!
[15:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mysql-8.0 [source] (disco-proposed) [8.0.14-0ubuntu1]
[15:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted systemd [source] (bionic-proposed) [237-3ubuntu10.12]
[15:29] <rbasak> mysql-8.0> that was quick. Thanks!
[15:29] <teward> heh
[15:35] <ahasenack> something going on with the arm builders? The queue is huge
[15:38] <cjwatson> A good chunk of it is https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/test-rebuild-20181222-test/+builds?build_state=pending
[15:38] <cjwatson> So they should mostly be scored down low
[15:39] <cjwatson> New builds should jump the queue
[15:42] <ahasenack> cjwatson: but not new ppa builds, right?
[15:42] <ahasenack> https://launchpad.net/~ahasenack/+archive/ubuntu/apache2-merge-2.4.38/+packages is stuck it seems
[15:42] <cjwatson> ahasenack: Yes new PPA builds
[15:42] <ahasenack> ok, I'll wait
[15:43] <cjwatson> ahasenack: That's probably mostly large builds in progress then, rather than the length of the queue as such
[15:43] <ahasenack> ok, because that ppa was published 2h ago
[15:44] <cjwatson> Sure, but there's a lot in progress :)
[15:45] <cjwatson> Most of the builders are building stuff and nothing seems stuck
[15:46] <cjwatson> And there are a bunch of builds in the Ubuntu primary archive which will normally win
[15:46] <cjwatson> I can rescore builds if they're urgent for a specific reason
[15:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mysql-8.0 [s390x] (disco-proposed/universe) [8.0.14-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[15:52] <sil2100> joalif: looking at the change - it looks good and I'm ready to approve it, just was wondering if anyone managed to reach out to the security team about this?
[15:52] <sil2100> joalif: this looks like something that could potentially go to -security as well
[15:53] <joalif> thanks sil2100, I haven't talked with security team about this, should I?
[15:59] <sil2100> Let's poke them about it
[16:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mysql-8.0 [ppc64el] (disco-proposed/universe) [8.0.14-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[16:27] <sil2100> joalif: ok, I'm not getting any response from the security team so far
[16:28] <joalif> sil2100, yup I can see
[16:28] <teward> sil2100: they could be busy :P
[16:28] <joalif> sil2100, so what happens now?
[16:29] <sil2100> joalif: since I'll be finishing my shift soon, I guess let me just accept those and leave a query for the security team - we can always re-build the package in the security PPA and/or override the -proposed upload with a security upload
[16:30] <joalif> ack sil2100, thanks!
[16:30] <sil2100> yw!
[16:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libmemcached [source] (cosmic-proposed) [1.0.18-4.2ubuntu0.18.10.1]
[16:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libmemcached [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.0.18-4.2ubuntu0.18.04.1]
[16:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mysql-8.0 [amd64] (disco-proposed/universe) [8.0.14-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[16:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libmemcached [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.0.18-4.1ubuntu2]
[16:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libmemcached [source] (trusty-proposed) [1.0.8-1ubuntu2.1]
[16:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mysql-8.0 [i386] (disco-proposed/universe) [8.0.14-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[17:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lizzie [amd64] (disco-proposed/universe) [0.6+dfsg1-4] (no packageset)
[17:20] <vorlon> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fwupdate-signed/1.19bionic1/+build/16282395/+files/buildlog_ubuntu-bionic-amd64.fwupdate-signed_1.19bionic1_BUILDING.txt.gz shows fwupdate-signed 1.19bionic1 built with the right version of fwupdate, and ending up with the wrong Built-Using and version field.
[17:26] <vorlon> http://ftpmaster.internal/ubuntu/dists/bionic-proposed/main/uefi/fwupdate-amd64 has none of the its.
[17:26] <vorlon> bits
[17:27] <infinity> http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/bionic-proposed/main/uefi/fwupdate-amd64/current/ is 10-3
[17:29] <infinity> ...
[17:29] <infinity> If this is a straight backport of 12-3 (which it seems to be), that would be why it doesn't work.
[17:29] <infinity> We have an Ubuntu delta for a reason.
[17:30] <vorlon> infinity: ok. I'm going to v-failed and throw both of these out of -proposed to unblock image builds
[17:31] <vorlon> (though, today is PROPOSED=0 day according to the schedule, are we on track for that?)
[17:31] <infinity> We're going to be ready for that by late tonight, I think.
[17:31] <infinity> I mean, modulo people trying to jam things like this in last minute. ;)
[17:31] <vorlon> seb128: ^^ and this is why I was in no particular hurry to do new processing of fwupdate in -proposed, fwiw
[17:31] <infinity> I see no reason this update needs to be on or near media, though.
[17:32] <infinity> If your firmware works well enough to boot Ubuntu and run fwupdate, it works well enough to update fwupdate.
[17:32] <vorlon> because I knew things had changed radically post-bionic, and was wary of what might be in the queue being correct for bionic
[18:24] <joelkraehemann> hi all
[18:24] <joelkraehemann> https://tracker.debian.org/news/1026125/accepted-gsequencer-2141-1-source-into-unstable/
[18:24] <joelkraehemann> ^^ do I need to create a sync-request?
[18:25] <joelkraehemann>  https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1813456
[18:27] <joelkraehemann> ^^ regarding this issue the functional tests have now restrictions: flaky
[18:27] <joelkraehemann> https://salsa.debian.org/multimedia-team/gsequencer/blob/master/debian/tests/control
[18:37] <vorlon> joelkraehemann: autosyncs are enabled (and /topic now fixed to match), so there should be no need to request a sync
[18:37] <joelkraehemann> thank vorlon
[18:38] <joelkraehemann> do you recognize the flaky restrictions?
[18:38] <vorlon> I believe so
[18:39] <vorlon> I'm certainly unclear why the test in question needs to allocate && !free so much memory
[18:39] <vorlon> or why its memory usage is somehow consistently different on amd64 vs not
[18:41] <joelkraehemann> I think amd64 is faster by freeing memory
[18:41] <joelkraehemann> ^^ may be it is accelerated
[18:41] <joelkraehemann> the other architectures delayed free memory
[18:41] <joelkraehemann> but yes the test wastes 1.2 GB of RAM
[18:42] <joelkraehemann> I didn't take care of it because the test should exit and the system releases the resources
[18:44] <joelkraehemann> there many threads involved some allocate, some free and the test runner wastes
[18:50] <joelkraehemann> I think it is a race for available resources
[19:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted lizzie [amd64] (disco-proposed) [0.6+dfsg1-4]
[19:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mysql-8.0 [amd64] (disco-proposed) [8.0.14-0ubuntu1]
[19:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mysql-8.0 [ppc64el] (disco-proposed) [8.0.14-0ubuntu1]
[19:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mysql-8.0 [i386] (disco-proposed) [8.0.14-0ubuntu1]
[19:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mysql-8.0 [s390x] (disco-proposed) [8.0.14-0ubuntu1]
[19:26] <vorlon> doko: ah, enigmail/ppc64el was also a progression rather than a regression, I've retried those tests also with all-proposed
[19:35] <seb128> vorlon, I forced no-one to NEW those, it would have been fine to comment on the bug saying why they were stucked in the queue, it just felt wrong to not let Mario know what was going on nor reply to his ping on the SRU bug
[19:40] <vorlon> seb128: a ping on the SRU bug is not guaranteed to get to the right people, if he were here on IRC I would've poked him about it before now
[19:42] <seb128> vorlon, well, it feels wrong the source accept a SRU and then block the binaries, especially that the process doesn't handle that and that whoever accepted the source added the comments on the bugs saying that the update was accepted in proposed and needed to be tested now
[19:42] <seb128> to source*
[19:43] <vorlon> yes, I didn't accept the source either
[19:44] <seb128> anyway, sorry if it caused trouble, I just tried to get the situation clarified because it confused some people
[19:56] <vorlon> seb128: sure, and it's clarified now; if you talk to superm1 and can persuade him to be here on IRC again, it can be clarified more quickly in the future :)
[19:57] <seb128> thx :)
[20:00] <vorlon> Laney: hey, so regarding the certificate rotation, what do you think about us having a standing procedure to ping others here when one of us meddles directly on the servers?  I might have spent less time debugging the certificates issue if I had known it was changing
[22:14] <vorlon> doko: where did you identify a new upstream version for pysparse?  the debian/watch is dead and https://sourceforge.net/projects/pysparse/files/ doesn't show anything newer
[22:21] <vorlon> doko: I see https://pypi.org/project/pysparse/1.3-dev/#files ; that looks like a whole lot of not-fun, support for non-bundled superlu seems dropped upstream
[22:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted hddemux [source] (cosmic-proposed) [0.4-7ubuntu0.1]
[22:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted haproxy [source] (cosmic-proposed) [1.8.13-2ubuntu0.2]
[22:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted haproxy [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.8.8-1ubuntu0.4]
[23:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-settings-daemon [source] (cosmic-proposed) [3.30.1.2-1ubuntu3.1]
[23:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xdg-desktop-portal [source] (cosmic-proposed) [1.0.3-0ubuntu1]
[23:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwts [source] (cosmic-proposed) [18.09.00-0ubuntu2]
[23:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nautilus-image-manipulator [amd64] (disco-proposed/none) [1.3-2.1] (no packageset)
[23:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fasttracker2 [ppc64el] (disco-proposed/none) [0.1+b132-1] (no packageset)
[23:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pymssql [s390x] (disco-proposed/none) [2.1.4+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[23:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pymssql [amd64] (disco-proposed/none) [2.1.4+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[23:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwts [source] (bionic-proposed) [18.03.00-0ubuntu4]
[23:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pymssql [i386] (disco-proposed/none) [2.1.4+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[23:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pymssql [ppc64el] (disco-proposed/none) [2.1.4+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[23:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fasttracker2 [s390x] (disco-proposed/multiverse) [0.1+b132-1] (no packageset)
[23:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwts [source] (xenial-proposed) [16.03.00-0ubuntu1.3]
[23:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fasttracker2 [amd64] (disco-proposed/multiverse) [0.1+b132-1] (no packageset)
[23:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ceilometer [source] (cosmic-proposed) [1:11.0.1-0ubuntu2]
[23:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ceilometer [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:10.0.1-0ubuntu0.18.04.2]
[23:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted s390-tools [source] (cosmic-proposed) [2.6.0-0ubuntu7.1]
[23:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mutter [source] (cosmic-proposed) [3.30.2-1~ubuntu18.10.3]
[23:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pymssql [arm64] (disco-proposed/universe) [2.1.4+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[23:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pymssql [armhf] (disco-proposed/universe) [2.1.4+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[23:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-settings-daemon [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.1-0ubuntu1.2]
[23:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted duplicity [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.7.17-0ubuntu1.1]
[23:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cogl [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.22.2-3ubuntu1]
[23:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libdbusmenu [source] (bionic-proposed) [16.04.1+18.04.20171206-0ubuntu2]
[23:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pygobject [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.26.1-2ubuntu1]
[23:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gnome-control-center [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:3.28.2-0ubuntu0.18.04.3]