[05:04] <Skuggen> vorlon: my_bool has been removed from 8.0. It should simply be replaced with bool (int should also work)
[05:06] <Skuggen> vorlon: I reported a bunch of bugs for this against affected packages, and will help with submitting patches for them
[09:09] <LocutusOfBorg> Skuggen, also boinc seems affected...
[09:19] <Skuggen> Maybe the simplest solution is to patch the type back into MySQL for disco, to get some extra time to patch all the other packages
[09:19] <Skuggen> (it's essentially just a typedef my_bool bool)
[12:38] <Woodpecker> Hey where would you store a file in ubuntu, that one application writes, only for another application to read it, and then discard it?
[12:38] <Woodpecker>  /var/spool right?
[12:55] <ejat> if core18 installed .. can remove core ?
[12:55] <ejat> or need to have both ?
[12:56] <ejat> core               16-2.37.1               6350  stable    canonical✓        core
[12:56] <ejat> core18             18                      594   stable    canonical✓        base
[14:09] <Skuggen> LocutusOfBorg: Did a quick test at https://launchpad.net/~lars-tangvald/+archive/ubuntu/mysql-8.0/+packages with boinc
[14:10] <Skuggen> Oh wait, forgot about default-mysql. nm :|
[18:14] <xnox> rbasak, jelmer is interested in submitting UDD merge proposals using git-ubuntu UDD. Can you sync up? alternatively https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-distributed-devel is the right place to ask questions / ping about merge proposals?
[18:15] <xnox> rbasak, potentially spamming automated merge proposals with broad changes
[18:24] <rbasak> xnox: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2018-May/040362.html and eg. https://code.launchpad.net/~jelmer/ubuntu/+source/geonames/+git/geonames/+merge/361994
[18:25] <rbasak> I have no issue with people filing MPs against git-ubuntu branches. However, I currently discourage it as we don't have a process for those to show up in the sponsorship queue.
[18:25] <rbasak> First step: someone needs to adjust the sponsoring report to find the MPs where ~ubuntu-sponsors is a requested reviewer.
[18:25] <rbasak> Second: perhaps some tooling change against "git ubuntu submit" if people are using that.
[18:26] <rbasak> Then we'll be ready, and I'd encourage interested developers to file those MPs.
[18:26] <rbasak> (and meanwhile please don't spam other teams with MP review requests)
[18:26] <rbasak> Except where they're actually relevant to the team (eg. ubuntu-server for an MP against an ubuntu-server team subscribed package
[18:27] <rbasak> But even then, be wary that those teams may not have processes to ensure those MPs get reviewed, so don't expect anything to happen on those MPs without having spoken to those teams in some other way, not just by filing the MP.
[18:29] <rbasak> xnox: does that sound reasonable?