[08:25] <mantas-baltix> Hi
[08:26] <mantas-baltix> could someone tell why libreoffice 6.1.4 packages are only in ppa:libreoffice/ppa, but not in ppa:libreoffice/libreoffice-6-1 ?
[08:29] <mantas-baltix> ricotz: it seems you built libreoffice 6.1.4 packages in ppa:libreoffice/ppa 4 weeks ago, are there any reasons why 6.1.4 isn't in ppa:libreoffice/libreoffice-6-1 ?
[08:30] <ricotz> mantas-baltix, I meant to copy them a week later, but forgot
[08:30]  * ricotz copied them now
[08:31] <mantas-baltix> ricotz: :)
[08:31] <mantas-baltix> thanks
[08:32] <cpaelzer> does anyone know what the data source and/or update cycle of http://qa.ubuntuwire.org/rdepends is - it seems out of date ~6 hours after publish of a new binary to disco so I was wondering what the process behind updating it looks like?
[09:37] <cpaelzer> dannf: would you mind looking to check the ppa for 1771662 or does that need Jason?
[13:22] <xnox> coreycb, should horizon package drop python2 dependencies? specifically the openstack-dashboard appears to list "python2-thing | python3-thing" hence many of the python2-things are still pulled into main.
[13:23] <xnox> hm
[13:23] <xnox> or am i confused.
[13:23] <xnox> ah, it's all done in proposed, and i am looking at the release pocket!
[13:23] <xnox> nevermind, everything looks great.
[13:44] <coreycb> xnox: ah great :)
[13:45] <xnox> coreycb, retriggered adt tests with more &trigger= to get them green. Hopefully will pass, and migrate in a few hours ;-)
[13:46] <coreycb> xnox: awesome, thanks!
[14:53] <dannf> cpaelzer: i can do it
[14:54] <cpaelzer> thanks
[15:44] <rbasak> waveform: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ToolChain/CompilerFlags#A-Wl.2C--as-needed
[18:23] <bdmurray> simpoir: Could you provide some verification details in those landscape-client SRU bugs in addition to flipping the tags?
[18:28] <simpoir> bdmurray: sure. I can add comments about the verifications. I simply went through all of those, one by one. For one of those I had to ad details to the reproducing instructions.
[18:30] <bdmurray> simpoir: ideally we want something detailed like https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1795024/comments/13
[18:32] <simpoir> bdmurray: ok, so ideally pasting of the results?
[18:32] <bdmurray> simpoir: yep
[18:33] <simpoir> bdmurray: sounds good
[18:38] <rbasak> Skuggen: been talking to vorlon about the MySQL transition. We don't know how to proceed with it right now, and leaving it as it would entangle everything else into the transition. So given that we've barely started it, we'd like to delete src:mysql-8.0 and rebuild the rdeps that have already built against it, thus reverting back to where we were before I uploaded src:mysql-8.0. That's not to say
[18:39] <rbasak> that we're not doing the transition this cycle, but just freeing up other work in the archive from getting entangled while we figure out what we're doing.
[18:39] <rbasak> Skuggen: does that sound OK to you?
[18:40] <Skuggen> Yeah. There are a lot of things blocked by it right now
[18:40] <rbasak> OK, thanks.
[18:40] <rbasak> vorlon: please go ahead and delete src:mysql-8.0 from disco-proposed.
[18:42] <vorlon> ack
[18:44] <ahasenack> what happens with the packages in proposed that already built against libmysqlclient21, aka, mysql8?
[18:44] <vorlon> ahasenack: those which were no-change rebuilds only, I will delete.  Those which have sourceful changes, I will reupload.
[18:51] <ahasenack> Skuggen: hi, need a bug about apparmor violations with mysql8?
[18:51] <ahasenack> or are you aware of these: https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/cWq7ymJKBR/
[18:55] <Skuggen> Hm, I've seen the sys/devices one before, but not the others
[18:56] <ahasenack> yeah, the sys one I thought was sorted already
[18:57] <Skuggen> Ah, our upstream profile is a bit different
[18:58] <ahasenack> Skuggen: the mysqlx one matches an error in mysql's error log
[18:58] <ahasenack> Skuggen:
[18:58] <ahasenack> 2019-02-05T18:40:40.574659Z 0 [ERROR] [MY-011300] [Server] Plugin mysqlx reported: 'Setup of socket: '/var/run/mysqld/mysqlx.sock' failed, can't create lock file /var/run/mysqld/mysqlx.sock.lock'
[18:58] <ahasenack> and ssl is probably because now it's being linked with openssl, whereas it wasn't before, or so I understood
[18:58] <ahasenack> never really paid much attention to which ssl library it was linked
[19:00] <Skuggen> Yeah, the mysqlx and sys/devices ones are fixed upstream, but don't see an entry for the openssl config
[19:00] <Skuggen> Will need to fix that (and port over our updates). Thanks :)
[19:00] <ahasenack> upstream ships with an apparmor profile? I thought it was our/debian's addition
[19:01] <Skuggen> Our debian/ubuntu packaging is in packaging/deb-in (the files are generated by cmake)
[19:02] <xnox> jamespage, coreycb - i think you did it =) this is so nice! http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches.html has a long list of "Binary only movements to universe (ubuntu-openstack)"
[19:03] <LocutusOfBorg> tjaalton, doko can we please remove freeipa from here? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dogtag-pki/+bug/1813155
[19:04] <Skuggen> ahasenack: But I think our original Debian packaging (before my time) was made to mirror that of Debian's
[19:05] <coreycb> xnox: ahh how nice is that :)
[19:09] <vorlon> rbasak, ahasenack, Skuggen: deletions from -proposed done, I've only identified 6 that had sourceful changes in -proposed and need reuploading which I'll do once I confirm mysql-8.0 is unpublished from the archive
[19:10] <xnox> freeradius is in NEW waiting for python2/3 split out.
[19:10] <xnox> and then it will be just samba then
[19:13] <ahasenack> vorlon: ok. I added patches to net-snmp so it builds with mysql-8, but they have a lot of #ifdefs so should continue building with 5.7
[19:13] <ahasenack> haven't uploaded that yet
[19:13] <ahasenack> so we will see soon
[19:13] <ahasenack> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/net-snmp/+bug/1814270 was about that
[19:33] <tjaalton>  LocutusOfBorg: done
[20:55] <vorlon> rbasak, ahasenack, Skuggen: -proposed looks clean to me now wrt mysql-8.0 removal; let me know if you spot anything amiss
[20:57] <ahasenack> confirmed
[21:25] <LocutusOfBorg> tjaalton, unfortunately the testsuite still requires the server...
[21:26] <tjaalton> ah damn
[21:27] <LocutusOfBorg> :)
[21:59] <GunnarHj> vorlon: Hi Steve, a few months ago you started a discussion about the bionic SRU at bug #1762889, but never followed up, so the thing is still in the queue. Can we please continue the talk, hopefully resulting in accepting the old style code for the SRU.
[23:29] <rbasak> vorlon: thank you for your help!