[01:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: golang-1.11-race-detector-runtime (disco-proposed/primary) [0.0+svn332029-0ubuntu1]
[05:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pkpgcounter [amd64] (disco-proposed) [3.50-8]
[05:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: prometheus-nginx-vts-exporter [ppc64el] (disco-proposed/universe) [0.10.3+git20180501.43b4556+ds-2] (no packageset)
[05:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: prometheus-nginx-vts-exporter [s390x] (disco-proposed/universe) [0.10.3+git20180501.43b4556+ds-2] (no packageset)
[05:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: prometheus-nginx-vts-exporter [amd64] (disco-proposed/universe) [0.10.3+git20180501.43b4556+ds-2] (no packageset)
[05:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: prometheus-nginx-vts-exporter [i386] (disco-proposed/universe) [0.10.3+git20180501.43b4556+ds-2] (no packageset)
[05:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: prometheus-nginx-vts-exporter [arm64] (disco-proposed/universe) [0.10.3+git20180501.43b4556+ds-2] (no packageset)
[05:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: prometheus-nginx-vts-exporter [armhf] (disco-proposed/universe) [0.10.3+git20180501.43b4556+ds-2] (no packageset)
[05:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted prometheus-nginx-vts-exporter [amd64] (disco-proposed) [0.10.3+git20180501.43b4556+ds-2]
[05:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted prometheus-nginx-vts-exporter [armhf] (disco-proposed) [0.10.3+git20180501.43b4556+ds-2]
[05:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted prometheus-nginx-vts-exporter [ppc64el] (disco-proposed) [0.10.3+git20180501.43b4556+ds-2]
[05:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted prometheus-nginx-vts-exporter [arm64] (disco-proposed) [0.10.3+git20180501.43b4556+ds-2]
[05:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted prometheus-nginx-vts-exporter [s390x] (disco-proposed) [0.10.3+git20180501.43b4556+ds-2]
[05:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted prometheus-nginx-vts-exporter [i386] (disco-proposed) [0.10.3+git20180501.43b4556+ds-2]
[06:22] <cpaelzer> vorlon: the autopkgtests in -devel are on the way through Debian MP is up
[06:23] <cpaelzer> I considered that right away, I just wanted to avoid adding delta to sync it one week later
[06:23] <cpaelzer> only if there is no response by Debian I'll upload the autopkgtest as delta to libpam-mount
[07:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-1.11-race-detector-runtime [source] (disco-proposed) [0.0+svn332029-0ubuntu1]
[07:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-1.11-race-detector-runtime [amd64] (disco-proposed/universe) [0.0+svn332029-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[08:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-1.11-race-detector-runtime [amd64] (disco-proposed) [0.0+svn332029-0ubuntu1]
[09:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/main) [4.18.0-16.17] (core, kernel)
[09:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [ppc64el] (cosmic-proposed/main) [4.18.0-16.17] (core, kernel)
[09:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [4.18.0-16.17]
[09:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [ppc64el] (cosmic-proposed) [4.18.0-16.17]
[10:01] <joalif> hi sil2100, could you please approve the upload of libguestfs for Xenial LP: #1632405 and #1814939
[10:18] <sil2100> joalif: sure! Let me review it in a few
[10:18] <joalif> sil2100, thank you so much!!
[10:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: isync (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.3.0-1build1 => 1.3.0-1ubuntu0.18.04.0] (no packageset)
[10:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: isync (cosmic-proposed/universe) [1.3.0-1build1 => 1.3.0-1ubuntu0.18.10.0] (no packageset)
[10:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-boto (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.44.0-1ubuntu2 => 2.44.0-1ubuntu2.18.04.0] (ubuntugnome)
[10:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-boto (cosmic-proposed/main) [2.44.0-1ubuntu2 => 2.44.0-1ubuntu2.18.10.0] (ubuntugnome)
[11:28] <ginggs> hi archive admins, is it possible to remove patchelf 0.9-51-g1fa4d36-0ubuntu18.04.1 from -proposed so that 0.9+52.20180509-1 can be sync'd?
[11:29] <ginggs> unfortunately 0.9-51... seems to be a higher version than 0.9+52...
[11:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libguestfs [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.32.2-4ubuntu2.1]
[11:32] <apw> ginggs, doesn't that same problem apply to the version in -release as well ?
[11:33] <apw> ginggs, seemingly not, though i a struggling to understand that
[11:34] <ginggs> apw: dpkg --compare-versions 0.9+52.20180509-1 gt 0.9-1 && echo true
[11:34] <apw> huh
[11:35] <apw> ginggs, right, so if that is true, why is the other not true
[11:36] <apw> it cirtainly is not intuitive
[11:36] <ginggs> apw: yeah, i'm trying to remember the rule for multiple -
[11:39] <apw> ginggs, does anything other than snapcraft use that ?
[11:40] <ginggs> apw: pyside2 build-depends on patchelf
[11:42] <cjwatson> The rule for multiple - is that the split is on the *last* -
[11:42] <cjwatson> So they're usually a mistake because in the first case there the upstream version part is "0.9-51"
[11:42] <cjwatson> Which probably isn't what anyone expected
[11:43] <apw> which i assume is why debian seems to prefer +thingN on its versions
[11:44] <cjwatson> Well, +thingN is for a revision of the upstream tarball, like +dfsg1 meaning "had to strip out some non-free files"
[11:44] <ginggs> is the upstream part of the first 0.9-51-g1fa4d36 ?
[11:44] <cjwatson> Er yes, I missed a bit
[11:44] <apw> yeah that
[11:44] <cjwatson> So I guess 0.9+52.blah is a snapshot?
[11:44] <cjwatson> If so it should indeed not have "-" in the upstream revision part.
[11:45] <cjwatson> I think I agree that removing the current one in -proposed makes sense assuming it maintains coherency
[11:47] <apw> cjwatson, yeah will check that and action
[11:47] <ginggs> thanks apw cjwatson
[11:51] <apw> ginggs, ok both of the disco-release versions of snapcraft and pyside2 built using that broken one
[12:11] <apw> ginggs, so ... i guess we could do with sync'ing the new debian version into a PPA, and building both of those against it, to be sure they arn't going to be a problem
[12:23] <slashd> sil2100, o/ could you please approve the upload of pciutils for X & B (LP: #1815212)
[12:32] <ginggs> apw: ack, i'll try that
[12:34] <apw> ginggs, let me know how it goes, thanks
[12:46] <sil2100> slashd: looking in a minute!
[12:47] <slashd> sil2100, tks
[13:02] <sil2100> slashd: ok, the package seems to look ok, the test case could use some work though - it's not clear how to verify this, but since this is just updating the pci.ids, I guess there's no perfect test case here
[13:02] <sil2100> So I'll accept it
[13:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pciutils [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:3.5.2-1ubuntu1.1]
[13:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pciutils [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:3.3.1-1.1ubuntu1.3]
[13:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure [amd64] (cosmic-proposed/main) [4.18.0-1009.9] (kernel)
[13:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure [amd64] (cosmic-proposed) [4.18.0-1009.9]
[13:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: makedumpfile (bionic-proposed/main) [1:1.6.3-2 => 1:1.6.5-1ubuntu1~18.04.1] (core)
[13:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: makedumpfile (cosmic-proposed/main) [1:1.6.4-2ubuntu1 => 1:1.6.5-1ubuntu1~18.10.1] (core)
[14:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libxcb (bionic-proposed/main) [1.13-1 => 1.13-1.1] (core, xorg)
[14:42] <ginggs> apw:  pyside2 builds ok, snapcraft failed; but that is expected i guess since it failed in the archive rebuild https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/test-rebuild-20181220/+build/15885022
[14:44] <apw> ginggs, bah on snapcraft
[15:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: uvloop (bionic-proposed/main) [0.8.1+ds1-1 => 0.8.1+ds1-1ubuntu0.1] (ubuntu-server)
[15:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: bind9 (bionic-proposed/main) [1:9.11.3+dfsg-1ubuntu1.3 => 1:9.11.3+dfsg-1ubuntu1.4] (core)
[15:40] <ginggs> apw: the snapcraft build failure is two test failures due to two utilities subtly changing subtly their output
[15:40] <ginggs> testtools.matchers._impl.MismatchError: 'Path "nonexisting.snap" does not exist' not in 'Usage: run sign-build [OPTIONS] <snap-file>\nTry "run sign-build --help" for help.\n\nError: Invalid value for "<snap-file>": File "nonexisting.snap" does not exist.\n'
[15:40] <ginggs> testtools.matchers._impl.MismatchError: 'Missing argument "ci-system".  Choose from travis.' not in 'Usage: run enable-ci [OPTIONS] <ci-system>\nTry "run enable-ci --help" for help.\n\nError: Missing argument "<ci-system>".  Choose from:\n\ttravis.\n'
[15:41] <ginggs> is it worth proving that in a PPA build?
[15:42] <apw> ginggs, i guess the problem is ideally we would get this rebuilt to eliminate the going version ...
[16:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libevent-rpc-perl (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.08-2 => 1.08-2ubuntu0.1] (no packageset)
[16:01] <ginggs> apw: isn't patchelf just a utility that is used during the build? i miss what needs to be eliminated
[16:03] <apw> ginggs, that that binary was built using it, so if we delete it it isn't reproducible any more, gpl etc
[16:03] <apw> ginggs, anyhow i think we can dlete it and let the sync occur so we can throw rebuilds on top
[16:04] <ginggs> apw: ok, thanks
[16:06] <apw> ginggs, ok gone ...
[16:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-httplib2 (bionic-proposed/main) [0.9.2+dfsg-1 => 0.9.2+dfsg-1ubuntu0.1] (core)
[16:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-imaplib2 (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.57-1 => 2.57-1ubuntu0.1] (no packageset)
[16:36] <xnox> Laney, do we need to adjust our web ui? for "code 14" results? sed/universe) [2.57-1 => 2.57-1ubuntu0.1] (no packageset)
[16:36] <xnox> * jhodapp (~jhodapp@108-90-17-180.lightspeed.cicril
[16:36] <xnox> bah
[16:36] <xnox> http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/resource-agents/bionic/armhf
[16:38] <Laney> looks like it
[16:39] <Laney> should be treated like an error result?
[16:50] <xnox> Laney, yeah, but i guess that's new
[16:50] <Laney> dunno
[16:50] <Laney> anyway, if you wanted to propose that, would be nice :-)
[16:50] <Laney> does britney handle it well?
[16:51] <xnox> didn't look yet
[17:32] <bdmurray> cpaelzer: bug 1657409 was resolved but no team ended up being subscribed to the package
[17:32] <bdmurray> doko: ^^
[17:38] <slashd> sil2100, still around have time for another release ? apt on trusty (LP: 1815129)
[17:39] <sil2100> slashd: sure
[17:40] <slashd> sil2100, thanks owe you a beer now
[17:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted isync [source] (cosmic-proposed) [1.3.0-1ubuntu0.18.10.0]
[17:55] <sil2100> slashd: no worries! Although hm, this apt upload is a bit strange
[17:56] <sil2100> slashd: like, first of all, is that intentional that so many files in doc/en/* got dropped?
[17:56] <sil2100> slashd: the changelog mentions 'Clean up some build artifacts' but this seems a bit much for a 'built artifact'
[17:57] <sil2100> slashd: another thing, I'd say LP: #1815187 needs a better clean up and would be nice if Julian could mention if this affects only trusty
[17:57] <sil2100> Like, a test case that doesn't have TODO in it ;)
[17:59] <slashd> sil2100, I didn't read the sru tmpl as it's not my upload, will let julian answer theses question ;)
[17:59] <slashd> sil2100, thanks anyway ;)
[18:07] <sil2100> juliank: ^ regarding your apt changes, why are so many documentation files dropped?
[18:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (trusty-proposed/main) [3.13.0-166.216] (core, kernel)
[18:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-boto [source] (cosmic-proposed) [2.44.0-1ubuntu2.18.10.0]
[18:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted isync [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.3.0-1ubuntu0.18.04.0]
[18:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-boto [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.44.0-1ubuntu2.18.04.0]
[18:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (trusty-proposed) [3.13.0-166.216]
[18:40] <LocutusOfBorg> apw, http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/v/virtualbox/disco/i386
[18:40] <LocutusOfBorg> this needs an hint, because of the uninstallability there... :(
[18:40] <LocutusOfBorg> making src:linux autopkgtestsuite sad
[18:44] <jbicha> LocutusOfBorg: how about removing virtualbox-qt (and whatever other NBS i386 stuff)?
[18:46] <LocutusOfBorg> feel free to open a bug, I requested the same in debian and worked, not sure what went wrong in Ubuntu
[19:23] <juliank> sil2100: They are not dropped
[19:23] <juliank> sil2100: They are generated at build time, but somehow ended up in a previous tarball
[19:24] <juliank> sil2100: I think somebody built from an unclean tree once
[19:27] <cpaelzer> bdmurray: I'll ping powersj again to subscribe us but he is on travels atm so it might take afew days
[19:27] <cpaelzer> thanks for the hint
[19:28] <cpaelzer> bdmurray: mail sent, will be done once he has network again
[19:32] <bdmurray> cpaelzer: I can do it if that's the right team.
[19:38] <cpaelzer> bdmurray: it will be ~ubuntu-server
[19:43] <bdmurray> cpaelzer: cool, its done
[19:43] <vorlon> coreycb: should python-formencode get merged this cycle?  listed as ubuntu-openstack owned package, last upload was by lamont in 2016
[19:47] <coreycb> vorlon: yes looks like we still need it so i'll take a look
[20:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pyparted [amd64] (disco-proposed/main) [3.11.2-2ubuntu2] (desktop-core)
[20:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pyparted [amd64] (disco-proposed) [3.11.2-2ubuntu2]
[21:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwupd [amd64] (disco-proposed) [1.2.4-1]
[21:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwupd [armhf] (disco-proposed) [1.2.4-1]
[21:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwupd [arm64] (disco-proposed) [1.2.4-1]
[21:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwupd [i386] (disco-proposed) [1.2.4-1]
[22:05] <sil2100> juliank: ACK!
[22:05] <sil2100> Thanks
[22:07] <juliank> sil2100: I rebuilt from git to get rid of this cruft that accumulated there
[22:07] <juliank> :)
[22:07] <juliank> and because I have patches in queues on git
[22:19] <sil2100> juliank: hah, I saw the changelog entry about removing cruft but this seemed a bit much for cruft ;p
[22:19] <sil2100> Now I know this is what you actually meant
[22:20] <sil2100> Will pick it up tomorrow o/
[23:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-rusty-tags [amd64] (disco-proposed/universe) [3.4.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-rusty-tags [ppc64el] (disco-proposed/universe) [3.4.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-rusty-tags [s390x] (disco-proposed/universe) [3.4.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-rusty-tags [i386] (disco-proposed/universe) [3.4.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-rusty-tags [arm64] (disco-proposed/universe) [3.4.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-rusty-tags [armhf] (disco-proposed/universe) [3.4.0-1] (no packageset)