[05:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-opcua [amd64] (disco-proposed/none) [0.98.6-1] (no packageset) === doko_ is now known as doko [07:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libseccomp (bionic-proposed/main) [2.3.1-2.1ubuntu4 => 2.3.1-2.1ubuntu4.1] (core) [08:52] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/virtualbox/+bug/1815567 [08:52] Ubuntu bug 1815567 in virtualbox (Ubuntu) "remove virtualbox-qt on disco/i386" [Undecided,New] [08:52] :) [08:52] jbicha, ^^ [09:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-opcua [amd64] (disco-proposed) [0.98.6-1] [09:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-rusty-tags [arm64] (disco-proposed) [3.4.0-1] [09:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-rusty-tags [i386] (disco-proposed) [3.4.0-1] [09:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-rusty-tags [s390x] (disco-proposed) [3.4.0-1] [09:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-rusty-tags [amd64] (disco-proposed) [3.4.0-1] [09:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-rusty-tags [ppc64el] (disco-proposed) [3.4.0-1] [09:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-rusty-tags [armhf] (disco-proposed) [3.4.0-1] [09:13] seriously AA, what the hell is going on? [09:13] virtualbox-dkms | 5.2.24-dfsg-4build1 | disco/multiverse | all [09:13] virtualbox-dkms | 6.0.4-dfsg-5 | disco/multiverse | all [09:14] virtualbox-source | 5.2.24-dfsg-4build1 | disco/multiverse | all [09:14] virtualbox-source | 6.0.4-dfsg-5 | disco/multiverse | all [09:14] all the vbox binaries seems to be having some sadness :( [09:14] vorlon, ^^ [09:51] LocutusOfBorg: I think that's just because virtualbox-qt is NBS on i386 [09:52] so there are different versions of arch-dep binaries in the suite and so all the arch-indep ones get held [09:55] LocutusOfBorg,vorlon: I've removed that, so the rest should clear out shortly [10:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted apt [source] (trusty-proposed) [1.0.1ubuntu2.20] [10:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.4.0-143.169] (core, kernel) [11:00] yeah, vbox seems sorted out, lets see what happens now with autopkgtests [11:01] ./sil2100:force-badtest virtualbox-ext-pack/all/i386 [11:02] can we please add virtualbox/all/i386? same reason for it... [11:02] sil2100, ^^ [11:02] it is blocking lots of stuff, e.g. libnotify, kernel xinerama qtbase... [11:04] linux-signed and libnotify actually, maybe a versioned hint is enough, because a no-change rebuild of linux and libnotify might actually be enough to not trigger the new test at all [11:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.4.0-143.169] === sgclark is now known as sgmoore === Saviq is now known as ricab|test === ricab|test is now known as Saviq [13:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: adobe-flashplugin (cosmic-proposed/partner) [1:20190108.1-0ubuntu0.18.10.1 => 1:20190212.1-0ubuntu0.18.10.1] (no packageset) [13:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: adobe-flashplugin (xenial-proposed/partner) [1:20190108.1-0ubuntu0.16.04.1 => 1:20190212.1-0ubuntu0.16.04.1] (no packageset) [13:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: adobe-flashplugin (bionic-proposed/partner) [1:20190108.1-0ubuntu0.18.04.1 => 1:20190212.1-0ubuntu0.18.04.1] (no packageset) [13:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: adobe-flashplugin (trusty-proposed/partner) [1:20190108.1-0ubuntu0.14.04.1 => 1:20190212.1-0ubuntu0.14.04.1] (no packageset) === mitya57_ is now known as mitya57 [13:59] cyphermox: around? so, basically, I've got to your http://people.canonical.com/~mtrudel/preseed/full-bionic.cfg preseed. Were you able to have it working with live medias? What's the kernel command line you've used for that? I'm struggling really hard to have live medias (both server and desktop) to work with preseed as it doesn't pass the "Please choose your preferred language." screen [14:05] LocutusOfBorg: I rebuilt libnotify but we still got the virtualbox/i386 trigger [14:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openssl-ibmca (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.4.1-0ubuntu1 => 1.4.1-0ubuntu1.1] (no packageset) [14:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openssl-ibmca (cosmic-proposed/universe) [2.0.0-0ubuntu2 => 2.0.0-0ubuntu2.1] (no packageset) [14:10] fidencio: for preseeded live images (desktop, not server); you need a few different keys in [14:11] a bit like what's in the utah-bionic.cfg file [14:11] if you're talking about server-live, then I don't know how to preseed it [14:13] cyphermox: do you have the kernel command line somewhere that could be used for that? seems that the kernel command line is quite different for live and non-live medias [14:17] sure. it's mostly the same actually [14:17] you need to set url and 'automatic-ubiquity' IIRC [14:17] cyphermox: seems that if I don't pass boot=casper the boot up bails [14:17] fidencio: right [14:17] and I'm stuck in initramfs screen [14:18] I mean, everything that is normally on the kernel command-line [14:18] you change url= from the standard desktop one, and add 'automatic-ubiquity' [14:18] and that will only work for desktop images [14:19] everything else stays the same; especially boot=casper. You can't get around that [14:20] cyphermox: okay, seems that I was using a server live media [14:21] cyphermox: just using automatic-ubiquity boot=casper + the very same preseed I had for the server image works as expected [14:21] with server media? [14:21] cyphermox: no, with desktop media [14:21] ok, got it [14:21] cyphermox: that was my mistake :-( [14:21] now, time to try to figure out what I do need to make a server live media to work [14:22] well, not a mistake if you want to test the server media [14:22] cyphermox: I want both and, for some reason, I thought that starting with the server live would be easier [14:22] okay, okay [14:22] cyphermox: thanks *a* *lot* for the help [14:48] didrocks: out of curiosity, is ubuntu-18.10 live server already using the yaml files? [14:49] didrocks: *already using the yaml files for unattended installation [14:49] fidencio: yes, even 18.04 are using curtin, but it seems that subiquity needs its own preseeding still [14:49] so, it's not pure yaml only [14:49] didrocks: aha! 18.04 live server, right? not live desktop [14:49] but only people who worked on subiquity would really know at this stage (cyphermox, xnox, mwhudson…) [14:50] fidencio: yes, live server [14:50] didrocks: now it makes a lot of sense why I'm failing miserably to make the installation work with a live server [14:50] fidencio: normally, I think that preseeding should create the yaml file, but again, not a subiquity expert :p [14:51] the finale goal though (but will take some times) is to only have yaml for those anyway [14:55] fidencio, hi, if you are preseeding, just use MAAS. server live is meant to be used interractively only, and unlike the d-i based server install, it only has a handful of screens to answer anyway. [14:55] didrocks, there is no unattended install support in server live [14:56] xnox: perfect! [14:56] xnox: thanks a lot for the answer! [14:56] xnox: wondering why there are some debconf hooks (but I may be wrong, maybe there isn't) [14:57] didrocks, that's in curtin.... [14:57] didrocks, and cloud-init can do that too [14:57] didrocks, but that's not for installer. [15:05] vorlon: juliank: sil2100: would any of you like to look into what is going on with armhf? [15:06] e.g. https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-disco/disco/armhf/r/r-bioc-delayedarray/20190212_142628_57297@/log.gz [15:14] ack [15:18] Laney: works for me [15:19] Laney: were there a lot of failures like this? [15:19] sounds like the server went out between update and install [15:19] yes [15:19] lots and lots [15:19] this is odd [15:20] look for /unknown on excuses [15:20] but I've been retrying them so it doesn't look as bad as it really is [15:29] Laney: I did 3 runs and could not reproduce the issue, so it's unclear to me what's going on. It looks like a networking issue, but who knows [15:30] well yes, that's the problem [15:32] Sometimes it happens in the middle of a run too, so some of the armhf regressions will be due to this [16:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server arm64+raspi3 [Bionic 18.04.2] (20190210) has been added [16:33] cyphermox: last question, what's the way to avoid the "Please remove the installation medium, then press ENTER:" message that I get when using a live desktop media? [16:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted adobe-flashplugin [source] (cosmic-proposed) [1:20190212.1-0ubuntu0.18.10.1] [16:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted adobe-flashplugin [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:20190212.1-0ubuntu0.18.04.1] [16:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted adobe-flashplugin [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:20190212.1-0ubuntu0.16.04.1] [16:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted adobe-flashplugin [source] (trusty-proposed) [1:20190212.1-0ubuntu0.14.04.1] [16:37] fidencio: IIRC it's ubiquity ubiquity/reboot boolean true [16:37] "ubiquity ubiquity/reboot boolean true" but it may or may not only deal with ubiquity's prompting.. it's been a while since I looked in that [16:39] ffe [16:49] sil2100: I've queued an FFE bug that probably needs some attention at some point and I'm not certain of the next steps. UA Client is in progress and will be waiting on availability of an active backend service before I can attach package diffs for this FFE. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/1814157 [16:49] Ubuntu bug 1814157 in ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu) "[FFe] ubuntu-advantage-tools v.19" [Undecided,New] [16:52] sil2100: do you, or others have suggestions on next steps to ensure this FFe gets a review before freeze? Would I need wait until I can attach the intended package patch/diff and manual test runs against the backend services before trying to get a review on this FFe, per the docs https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FreezeExceptionProcess? [16:52] I thought it best to queue the FFe bug as early as possible for review, but maybe it just needs to wait until we have final package diff stable/complete. [16:58] blackboxsw: hey! There's still like 1.5 weeks until Feature Freeze for disco, do you mean the new ubuntu-advantage-tools version won't be available for upload before the deadline? [17:05] sil2100: my expectation is that the backend service code and published routes should be stabilizing this week and that we can shake out bugs over the next week and a half. Having an upload available in 1.5 weeks is a tight timeline. but I think we'll have something verified by then. [17:06] sil2100: I didn't know if it was best to get review on the FFe prior to having that upload available in this case given that the timeline is tight for having an upload [17:08] doko, may I upload the fixed ncurses? sed vwprintw -> vw_printw on debian/tests/build [17:20] blackboxsw: hmmm, I guess we could review this beforehand, just in case things slip - but anyway, let's try to get everything landed before FF, I'll take a look at the FFe in the meantime [17:20] But if the feature will land a week later, I still think it won't be a problem [17:20] But yeah, let me read the FFe bug you have provided, thanks for that! [17:21] sil2100: thanks for the looksie. I just didn't want to suprise folks if we end up missing by a few days due to not actually being able to validate against a live backend service yet [17:22] when I have something that is functional/tested against a running backend I'll update the bug accordingly and ping [17:30] mitya57: qtbase-opensource-src-gles seems to be stalled in -proposed because binaries end up uninstallable on arm64; I haven't had a chance to dig into it === blackboxsw_ is now known as blackboxsw === bashfulrobot_ is now known as bashfulrobot [19:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: budgie-extras [amd64] (disco-proposed/universe) [0.8.0-0ubuntu1] (personal-fossfreedom, ubuntu-budgie) [22:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.525.17] [22:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: matplotlib2 (disco-proposed/primary) [2.2.3-5ubuntu1] [22:27] please accept matplotlib2 [2.2.3-5ubuntu1] [22:27] the sphinx build failure is fixed now [22:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: matplotlib2 (disco-proposed/primary) [2.2.3-5] [23:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.408.43]