| guiverc | debian soft-waves :) | 00:29 |
|---|---|---|
| lubot | <HMollerCl> @wxl[m] [<wxl[m]> @tsimonq2 I just thought maybe you might have some insight. Adding an a …], I'm more convinced that we should drop nm-tray in favor of nm-applet | 00:44 |
| wxl[m] | I know why you feel that way and I'm sure you know why we'd like to not! | 01:12 |
| lubot | <HMollerCl> Jajajja | 01:38 |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [rLXQTMETAPACKAGESARCHIVE8d03dc04a1f4: DSC file for 29] Diffusion committed: https://phab.lubuntu.me/rLXQTMETAPACKAGESARCHIVE8d03dc04a1f4 | 04:54 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [rLXQTMETAPACKAGESARCHIVE5f85568b3047: Import patches-unapplied version 29 to debian/sid] agaida (Alf Gaida) committed: https://phab.lubuntu.me/rLXQTMETAPACKAGESARCHIVE5f85568b3047 | 04:54 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [rLXQTMETAPACKAGESARCHIVEa007f7ad9426: Import patches-applied version 29 to applied/debian/sid] agaida (Alf Gaida) committed: https://phab.lubuntu.me/rLXQTMETAPACKAGESARCHIVEa007f7ad9426 | 04:54 | |
| -lugito:#lubuntu-devel- [rLXQTMETAPACKAGESARCHIVE2e166303c165: DSC file for 29] Diffusion committed: https://phab.lubuntu.me/rLXQTMETAPACKAGESARCHIVE2e166303c165 | 05:41 | |
| lubot | <The_LoudSpeaker> @HMollerCl [I'm more convinced that we should drop nm-tray in favor of nm-applet], Why? | 08:35 |
| lubot | <HMollerCl> @The_LoudSpeaker [Why?], Mainly because nm-tray has to basic configuration options. But is full Qt and consumes less resources than cmst | 11:22 |
| lubot | <tsimonq2> Fwd from Lubuntu Announcements: We have reached 5,000 followers on Twitter! Thank you! ... You can follow us here: https://twitter.com/LubuntuOfficial ... https://twitter.com/LubuntuOfficial/status/1097612456522891264 | 21:45 |
| lubot | <HMollerCl> It seems to me that bash is less resource intensive than python. Giving that, it's better to develop in bash that python? Any contrary argument? | 22:53 |
| lubot | <HMollerCl> (Obviously I'm talking about basic scripts) | 22:53 |
| wxl | i think it's a question of what you want to do | 22:53 |
| wxl | there certainly are limitations to what you can do with python | 22:54 |
| wxl | s/python/bash/ | 22:54 |
| wxl | and python is waaaaay more readable | 22:54 |
| wxl | that said, i have found bash to be generally the better solution | 22:54 |
| wxl | btw if you're putting something in the repos, it's really best to make sure you're portable | 22:55 |
| lubot | <HMollerCl> That I'm portable? | 22:56 |
| wxl | in other words, don't use bash, but /bin/sh | 22:56 |
| wxl | make it POSIX-compliant | 22:56 |
| wxl | unfortunately that will mean more limitations | 22:56 |
| wxl | a lot of "bashisms" will be missing | 22:56 |
| lubot | <HMollerCl> Ok | 22:57 |
| lubot | <HMollerCl> But is really simple what I want to do | 22:57 |
| wxl | ooh this is nice http://sites.harvard.edu/%7Elib113/reference/unix/portable_scripting.html | 22:57 |
| lubot | <HMollerCl> The interpreter of python consumes more than 5meg | 22:58 |
| wxl | bashisms include: [[, ((, { (including ${ and string handling), function (!), let, local, select, source, <<< (here strings), &>, string comparison with == in test | 23:01 |
| lubot | <HMollerCl> what I want to do is to run this script and parse teh output ... /usr/lib/update-notifier/apt-check | 23:02 |
| lubot | <HMollerCl> which are two number separated by ; | 23:02 |
| lubot | <HMollerCl> should be prety easy with bash. | 23:03 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!