[07:02] <didrocks> good morning
[07:11] <duflu> Morning didrocks
[07:15] <didrocks> hey duflu! Connecting from breakfast place? :)
[07:18] <duflu> didrocks, technically yes. I am at home
[07:19] <didrocks> duflu: oh, I thought you were flying to the sprint
[07:19] <duflu> didrocks, yes I was, but not any more. How is the weather?
[07:19] <didrocks> duflu: well, in Lyon,  blue sky
[07:20] <duflu> didrocks, you're not in Malta either?
[07:20] <didrocks> duflu: I'm not either, started to get sick this week-end and couldn't travel thus
[07:21] <duflu> :(
[07:21] <duflu> Well, Perth also blue sky.
[07:22] <didrocks> still warm or is it starting already getting colder?
[07:22] <duflu> I also went for lunch on Sunday up the coast which at least /looks like/ Malta
[07:22] <duflu> didrocks, still over 30 degrees every day
[07:22] <didrocks> ok, not the start of automn at all thus :)
[07:23] <didrocks> here, we had 18°C yesterday, which is insane for February
[07:23] <didrocks> last week was ~7°C
[07:23] <duflu> Yeah that would be
[07:24] <didrocks> quite pleasant, when you can walk outside :p
[08:01] <Laney> good morning desktop!!!!
[08:01] <didrocks> hey Laney!
[08:02] <didrocks> how was your flight?
[08:02] <Laney> yeah good
[08:02] <didrocks> sunny Malta? (but windy from what I read)
[08:02] <Laney> picked one which stopped in sardinia though, probably could have made it more efficient
[08:02] <Laney> yep, and not that bad imho
[08:03] <didrocks> seems like there is almost no direct flight to Malta
[08:03] <didrocks> from anywhere :p
[08:03] <Laney> there would have been, but I didn't pay enough attention :P
[08:03] <duflu> Good morning Laney
[08:04] <Laney> hey duflu, how's it going?
[08:04] <seb128> good morning desktopers
[08:04] <duflu> Laney, ah ok. You?
[08:04] <didrocks> hey seb128
[08:04] <duflu> Hi seb128
[08:04] <Laney> yep, I'm good
[08:05] <seb128> duflu, didrocks, we are missing you!
[08:05] <didrocks> missing being with you guys :(
[08:05] <duflu> seb128, thanks, it's nice to be needed
[08:05] <duflu> Although sometimes in life needed too much
[08:08] <oSoMoN> good morning desktoppers
[08:08] <didrocks> hey oSoMoN
[08:08] <oSoMoN> salut didrocks
[08:09] <seb128> oSoMoN, I noticed https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ibus/+bug/1814551 in my recent-bugs-triaging daily batch, might be worth keeping an eye on/checking
[08:09] <duflu> Hi oSoMoN
[08:10] <oSoMoN> hey duflu
[08:10] <oSoMoN> seb128, ack
[08:10] <seb128> it claims that newer firefox versions have an issue with password entries again
[08:14] <ricotz> good morning all
[08:17] <seb128> hey ricotz
[08:22] <Trevinho> mitya57: done, also please can you do your pushes under ~mitya57 instead of under ~compiz-team? So we can keep the branches list cleaner :)
[08:23] <ricotz> seb128, hey
[10:49] <seb128> audit: type=1400 audit(1550486647.552:90): apparmor="DENIED" operation="open" profile="snap.lightsoff.lightsoff" name="/etc/glvnd/egl_vendor.d/" pid=2421 comm="lightsoff" requested_mask="r" denied_mask="r" fsuid=1000 ouid=0
[11:08] <seb128> kenvandine, ^ but libglvnd didn't change since cosmic and I don't see changes around that in the mesa update either
[11:11] <kenvandine> seb128: thx
[11:19] <kenvandine> jbicha: I fixed eog plugins in the snap
[11:19] <seb128> jbicha, can you push your update-notifier s390x changes to the vcs?
[11:20] <kenvandine> jbicha: i'm going to attempt to build eog-plugins in now
[11:31] <seb128> kenvandine, robert_ancell, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1816396
[12:41] <ricotz> seb128, hi, do you know if apparmor 2.13 is going to land in disco?
[12:42] <seb128> ricotz, that's a question for security team, maybe chrisccoulson or mdeslaur know?
[12:43] <ricotz> or jdstrand?
[12:45] <sarnold> probably jdstrand
[12:49] <mdeslaur> I vote for jdstrand
[14:01] <jbicha> seb128: pushed
[14:06] <seb128> jbicha, thx
[14:13] <oSoMoN> ricotz,  work on merging 2.13 from debian is in progress
[14:16] <ricotz> oSoMoN, thanks
[14:24] <seb128> kenvandine,
[14:24] <seb128> sudo dbus-send --system --print-reply --dest=org.freedesktop.NetworkManager /org/freedesktop/NetworkManager org.freedesktop.NetworkManager.SetLogging string:"debug" string:""
[14:29] <jamesh> didrocks: I ran into a weird bug with gnome-terminal resizing when I change tabs.  It seems like it might be related to Yaru, since it doesn't occur with Adwaita: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/yaru-theme/+bug/1816436
[14:30] <didrocks> jamesh: do you mind report it to the Yaru upstream github repo? clobrano ^
[14:31] <didrocks> jamesh: more than possible with recent gnome-terminal versions
[14:31] <jamesh> didrocks: sure.
[14:31] <didrocks> thx!
[14:36] <k_alam> didrocks: Hi, good afternoon
[14:38] <didrocks> hey k_alam
[14:38] <didrocks> k_alam: sorry, didn't get to review your fixes (but I saw them)
[14:38] <didrocks> k_alam: planning to do them (and sponsoring) tomorrow
[14:39] <k_alam> ok no prob...that's what I am about to ask...
[14:39] <didrocks> :)
[14:40] <didrocks> yeah I saw you did the fix I discussed, just need a deeper look
[14:41] <k_alam> I moved those files to unity session
[14:41] <jbicha> jamesh: for a similar testcase, see the last few comments at (closed) https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-terminal/issues/44
[14:41] <gitbot> GNOME issue 44 in gnome-terminal "Implement header bar" [Opened]
[14:41] <jbicha> jamesh:   gsettings set org.gnome.Terminal.Legacy.Settings headerbar false   (and then close all your terminals and reopen and see if you still have the bug)
[14:42] <jbicha> upstream does not enable the headerbar by default for 3.31/3.32
[14:45] <jamesh> jbicha: turning off the headerbar makes no difference
[14:46] <jamesh> I strongly suspect it is the notebook tabs (specifically how they're drawn with Yaru), which is there with or without the headerbar
[14:47] <jbicha> ok, thanks
[14:47] <jbicha> I guess it's worth trying to reproduce with Adwaita then?
[14:48] <jbicha> oh you already said that
[14:50] <clobrano> didrocks, jamesh: weird bug :O
[14:59] <Laney> there's been similar things before
[15:00] <Laney> it was something to do with the cell based stuff in vte IIRC
[15:18] <clobrano> Laney: I see, it  doensn't happen with factor 1
[15:23] <Laney> clobrano: it was something to do with vte calculating $size_thing internally based on sizes from the theme
[15:23] <Laney> and that was going wrong with Ambiance
[15:32] <mitya57> Trevinho: thanks! I will use ~mitya57 next time.
[15:34] <mitya57> (and I will delete my existing branch in lp:compiz now)
[16:17] <clobrano> jamesh: the culprit was the orange border in checked tabs
[16:18] <clobrano> probably at higher scales, computing the size of the border creates some issue
[16:18] <clobrano> pushing a change now
[16:23] <jamesh> clobrano: so keep the underline for inactive tabs, just using the background colour?
[16:40] <clobrano> No underline at all actually. In fact, for checked tabs, we have underline + font change + background highlight. It's a bit too much
[16:46] <k_alam> clobrano: We have no-shadow for rightmost button, so it looks different than headerbar button:checked even though path-bar buttons are just headerbar buttons . no?
[17:12] <clobrano> k_alam: pathbar buttons have a special class, so they might be styled differently. However I expect no shadow in any hb button. Isn't that so?
[17:18] <k_alam> clobrano: they are inheriting from headerbar-buttons the same as in 3.26, but even if has special styles it should still respect the generic button state....I guess regression in upstream
[17:22] <clobrano> k_alam: I see, definitely not expected. Unfortunately I need a VM that I can only use tomorrow