[07:41] <lordievader> Good morning
[11:42] <dpawlik> coreycb: Hi, Im wondering why sometimes I have a failures on my dev zone with e.g. multiattach and I see that package for Queens cloud archive and Bionic as well are old. Last available packages there is 9.1.1 but as I see https://releases.openstack.org/queens/ it should be 10.1.0. Could you build new package or it will be a problem :> ?
[11:42] <dpawlik> please :D
[13:43] <dpawlik> apt coreycb ^^
[16:34] <Marz> does live patch work with the server?
[16:34] <sarnold> what do you mean?
[16:35] <tomreyn> good chat there.
[16:37] <Marz> i get a message about signing up for livepatch when i access the server
[16:37] <tomreyn> sarnold: i'm really not into apparmor, yet, do you happen to know whether the firefox profile is active by default? i tried to understand this the other day, but (without reading up on things online, just by reviwing my configuration) i wasn't able to.
[16:37] <tomreyn> Marz: is this a bug report?
[16:38] <Marz> no
[16:38] <Marz> not clear to me how livepatch works on a server
[16:38] <tomreyn> Marz: so, since it doesn't end with a question mark, i assum eit is not a question, either? sounds more like a statement.
[16:39] <tomreyn> Marz: if you register for livepatch, the snap will be installed and you'll be able to manage it.
[16:41] <Marz> i see it now
[16:41] <Marz> is this recommended?
[16:42] <sarnold> tomreyn: I think the firefox profile is disabled by default -- I just installed firefox into a bionic schroot, and there's a symlink in /etc/apparmor.d/disable/
[16:42] <sarnold> tomreyn: so yes, there's a profile, but it appears to be disabled by default
[16:43] <sarnold> Marz: the kernel livepatching is particularly nice if you have machines you can't reboot on the three week update cadence
[16:44] <tomreyn> sarnold: a pity. i know firefox comes with its own sandbox (nowadays) but double layer would be great. anyways, thanks for testing!
[16:45] <sarnold> tomreyn: yeah.. but it does put restrictions on how firefox is used..
[16:45] <sarnold> rm /etc/apparmor.d/disable/usr.bin.firefox ; systemctl reload apparmor   ought to be enough to make it work
[16:46] <tomreyn> probably that's the same with any software restricted by apparmor. that's its purpose. are you aware of required functionality it'd break?
[16:46] <tomreyn> also, is the "three week update cadence" described anywhere? this is news to me.
[16:47] <tomreyn> i will try what breaks with the profile enabled, ty.
[16:48] <sarnold> tomreyn: stuff lkke you won't be able to download straight to just any place you want..
[16:48] <sarnold> helper apps may or may not be alloewd
[16:50] <sarnold> tomreyn: this is pretty old at this point, but probably not too wrong :) https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/StableReleaseCadence
[16:50] <tomreyn> hmm pdf viewer still works, looks good so far
[16:51] <sarnold> /etc/apparmor.d/abstractions/ubuntu-browsers shows some of the allowed applications
[16:52] <tomreyn> and .d/ , interesting
[16:52] <tomreyn> thanks for the wiki link, too
[16:53] <sarnold> time to bail, have fun :)
[16:53] <tomreyn> see you!
[17:34] <blackflow> tomreyn: iirc default profile does not allow DRM/widevine. meanwhile I've built my own profile. the FF one is rather too open for my taste.
[17:34] <tomreyn> not allowing DRM / widevine is a plus to me.
[17:35] <tomreyn> would you share yours?
[17:35] <blackflow> sure, sec...
[17:37] <blackflow> tomreyn: https://dpaste.de/RNs9   though even this could use a bit more trimming, esp. in the #includes department
[17:39] <tomreyn> blackflow: thank you. i'll see how it compares to the default one and then how it works for me.
[18:40] <johnnyfive> Hopefully this is the correct channel for this
[18:41] <johnnyfive> I'm trying to recreate a flat-file repository using an absolute Suite Component entry in my sources.list, however in Bionic i've started to receive the "W: Conflicting distribution:" error due to bionic now trying to match the release to the codename in the Release file
[18:41] <johnnyfive> is there a way around this? Or what's the canonical way to create a flat file repository for Bionic? I've determined I can get around the error by changing the "Codename" to "main/" in my Release file, but i'm not 100% sure of the affects of that
[18:46] <johnnyfive> more detail about this and the configs/Release/sources.list to illustrate what i'm talking about: https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/scQZtNb7Cz/
[18:47] <johnnyfive> this exact same config worked before in xenial
[21:45] <Blueking> hmm where I check if mine ubuntu version support NIC hardware ? intel converged  X550T2 ?
[21:48] <blackflow> Blueking: on the internet
[21:48] <blackflow> https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/support/articles/000025890/network-and-i-o/ethernet-products.html
[21:50] <tomreyn> Blueking: or you just try it
[21:51] <OerHeks> it wasn't in 2015 .. http://ask.xmodulo.com/download-install-ixgbe-driver-ubuntu-debian.html
[22:15] <Blueking> I have ubuntu version 16.04.5 LTS installed   looks like driver are there ?
[22:25] <tomreyn> Blueking: got any other questions then?
[22:26] <Blueking> tomreyn need to remove intel pro nic card first to install new one :)
[22:27] <tomreyn> physically then?
[22:28] <Blueking> tomreyn bonded 2 network ports and added some vlans
[22:28] <tomreyn> johnnyfive: since no one else responded: have you tried this sources.list entry on clients instead? "deb [trusted=yes] file:///tmp/instances/ubuntu/bionic main/"
[22:28] <tomreyn> Blueking: i see, have fun.
[22:29] <Blueking> thx
[22:47] <johnnyfive> tomreyn, thanks for responding, but i'm specifying a flat-folder repo utilizing absolute pathing so i'm pretty sure that won't work. I'll try just to confirm.
[22:48] <tomreyn> johnnyfive: i have no experience with this, am just guessing based on what i'm used to in terms of paths, so i may very well be wrong there.
[22:48] <johnnyfive> tomreyn, understood, I appreciate it :)
[23:27] <Blueking> tomreyn: 06:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation Ethernet Controller 10G X550T (rev 01)  seems all ok
[23:31] <tomreyn> Blueking: so?
[23:31] <OerHeks> nice
[23:32] <tomreyn> oh you're just reporting back, right
[23:33] <Blueking> tomreyn: yes