| === cpaelzer__ is now known as cpaelzer | ||
| LocutusOfBorg | infinity, since you asked me about the testsuite on marc-perl* sadness, I want to give you what I found | 10:12 |
|---|---|---|
| LocutusOfBorg | https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libmarc-charset-perl/1.35-2build1 | 10:12 |
| LocutusOfBorg | for some reasons, gdbm transition, broke the 32bit testsuite, and a no-change rebuild of marc-charset works, even if I don't really know why | 10:13 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I'm not sure how worth investigating this is... | 10:13 |
| LocutusOfBorg | ./usr-old/lib/libmarc-charset-perl/Table is just a different file in lots of places | 10:17 |
| LocutusOfBorg | not even sure why britney let it migrate, probably some timing issue | 10:19 |
| LocutusOfBorg | anyway, rebuilding should be ok now | 10:19 |
| LocutusOfBorg | diffing a 5.4MB binary file is not that easy | 10:19 |
| * LocutusOfBorg opens an RC bug in Debian | 10:24 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | https://bugs.debian.org/923238 | 11:02 |
| ubottu | Debian bug 923238 in libmarc-charset-perl "libmarc-charset-perl: needs a rebuild on 32bit architectures?" [Serious,Open] | 11:02 |
| === cpaelzer__ is now known as cpaelzer | ||
| === velix_inuse is now known as velix | ||
| === ldelgado__ is now known as yikoru | ||
| slashd | !dmb-ping | 19:01 |
| ubottu | cyphermox, jbicha, micahg, rbasak, sil2100, slashd, tsimonq2: DMB ping. | 19:01 |
| bgmccollum | greetings...there seems to be a problem with the xenial netboot mini.iso. there is a segfault during detest disks, as libc6-udev failed for unknown reasons. this has been observed consistently in two different environments. my understanding is that the mini.iso may beed to be rebuilt to accommodate an updated libc6-udeb that is being fetched... | 20:21 |
| CarlFK | bgmccollum: note: im not a dev - just a user. do you have the URL to the mini iso handy? | 20:24 |
| bgmccollum | CarlFK -- http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/xenial/main/installer-amd64/current/images/netboot/mini.iso | 20:25 |
| bgmccollum | Just found this -- https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glibc/+bug/1816846 | 20:26 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1816846 in glibc (Ubuntu) "segfault in libc-2.23.so netinstall installation pxe" [Undecided,Confirmed] | 20:26 |
| CarlFK | bgmccollum: you have a pxe server right? | 20:26 |
| bgmccollum | yes | 20:26 |
| CarlFK | do you boot this file: http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/xenial/main/installer-amd64/current/images/netboot/ubuntu-installer/amd64/linux | 20:26 |
| bgmccollum | well, packer driven preseed, not PXE | 20:26 |
| bgmccollum | sorry...i just boot the ISO | 20:27 |
| bgmccollum | then packer edits the boot args and specifies a preseed | 20:27 |
| bgmccollum | but if you just boot the ISO and step through the installer, it segfaults | 20:27 |
| CarlFK | actually.. looking at that bug report: ... 3 hours ago | 20:28 |
| CarlFK | It seems it is being actively worked on, and is some dependency or publishing problems that will be worked out in at most a day or two | 20:29 |
| CarlFK | what's packer ? | 20:29 |
| bgmccollum | skimming the bug report | 20:29 |
| bgmccollum | http://packer.io | 20:29 |
| CarlFK | I skimmed too, then jumped to the bottom | 20:29 |
| bgmccollum | i have a series of jenkins pipelines to build base images for use in openstack environments | 20:29 |
| bgmccollum | the first pipeline uses back to do a base OS install | 20:30 |
| bgmccollum | *user packer* | 20:30 |
| CarlFK | from a quick skim, sounds like what I built: https://salsa.debian.org/carlfk-guest/ansible/blob/usb-reorg1/usbinst/mk_usb_installer.sh | 20:31 |
| CarlFK | which uses hd-image instead of netboot: http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/xenial/main/installer-amd64/current/images/ hd-image or netboot | 20:32 |
| bgmccollum | whats the difference between the two? | 20:33 |
| CarlFK | https://salsa.debian.org/carlfk-guest/ansible/blob/usb-reorg1/docs/usb.rst#step-by-step-details | 20:34 |
| CarlFK | hd-media fs can be mounted read/write | 20:34 |
| bgmccollum | hence the name...hd-media...makes sense | 20:35 |
| CarlFK | well, it had an iso9660? fs once. and the fs isn't big enough to put the files it needs to work. | 20:36 |
| CarlFK | which is being debated in my own bug report :p | 20:37 |
| CarlFK | im going to run it for xenial and see what happenes | 20:37 |
| tsimonq2 | cyphermox, rbasak, et. al: earlier DMB meeting> bug 1817621 filed. I'm not sure what an edit-acl command would be, as I can't seem to find a case where permissions are set for an existing packageset and an existing team; teams like ~kubuntu-dev seem to have had their ACLs set prior to the usage of the ubuntu-community project for bugs. | 20:38 |
| ubottu | bug 1817621 in ubuntu-community "[TB/DMB] Grant ~lubuntu-dev upload permissions to the lubuntu packageset" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1817621 | 20:38 |
| tsimonq2 | The closest I can get is an edit-acl command done per-series, which I don't know is right for seed-based packageset upload permissions. I don't recall seeing edit-acl commands anywhere in the new release process. | 20:40 |
| tsimonq2 | My current theory after looking over docs is that when seed creation is done for a new release and packagesets are created from those, it's a copy-over process with ACLs. I also believe I'm going down a rabbit hole. :P | 20:43 |
| bgmccollum | CarlFK i switched to using the mini.iso published to xenial-updates, and that seems to have done the trick. | 20:47 |
| CarlFK | oh right.. -updates.. my favorite thing to rant about :p | 20:47 |
| mwhudson | i don't at all understand why anna is trying to update libc | 20:47 |
| bgmccollum | when "current" isn't current, cause you're in xenial, not xenial-updates :P | 20:48 |
| CarlFK | yeah | 20:48 |
| CarlFK | http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/16.04.5/release/ Where is x86 or amd64 ? | 21:02 |
| CarlFK | or where is ubuntu-16.04.4-server-amd64.iso | 21:03 |
| CarlFK | http://old-releases.ubuntu.com/releases/16.04.4/ says "16.04.1" >: | 21:05 |
| cyphermox | tsimonq2: the person who will make the changes should be able to figure it out :) | 21:10 |
| tsimonq2 | cyphermox: I guess so :) | 21:11 |
| infinity | CarlFK: releases.ubuntu.com | 21:45 |
| rbasak | tsimonq2: I believe you're right. | 23:10 |
| rbasak | tsimonq2: but doesn't the ownership/adminship of ~lubuntu-dev need sorting first? | 23:11 |
| rbasak | Sorry I didn't make the DMB meeting earlier. I was driving (a long way), and failed to send apologies in advance :-/ | 23:11 |
| CarlFK | infinity: I'm trying to find a pattern for -server.iso - like ubuntu-16.04.5-server-amd64.iso and ubuntu-18.04.2-server-arm64.iso | 23:21 |
| CarlFK | http://releases.ubuntu.com/16.04.5 has it, but http://releases.ubuntu.com/18.10/ has ubuntu-18.10-live-server-amd64.iso | 23:24 |
| CarlFK | not -live is under http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/18.04.2/release/ | 23:24 |
| tsimonq2 | rbasak: The RT is filed, I'm waiting on a Launchpad admin. | 23:31 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!