/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2019/02/26/#ubuntu-release.txt

tumbleweedvorlon: and, should be running again. ubuntuwire was a little short of disk space00:45
vorlontumbleweed: ta01:17
vorlonginggs: I can reproduce the pandas failure, will try to isolate01:18
ginggsvorlon: thanks. i tried reducing the size of the arange, and have just triggered the tests04:59
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Desktop amd64 [Xenial 16.04.6] has been marked as ready05:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Desktop i386 [Xenial 16.04.6] has been marked as ready05:31
ginggsvorlon: that didn't work :( i have a tested patch to disable only the failing test, only on python2 and only on ppc64el, which does the trick (nothing else fails) - shall i upload that so long?05:49
vorlonginggs: well, it is definitely an oom.  I think I should probably dig a little further to see why it ooms, as that might be real bug06:16
ginggsvorlon: ack06:18
vorlonginggs: oh but it's only an oom with python2, isn't it, could we skip the test on python2 but not python3?07:03
vorlonginggs: ah you said that already - yeah, I think you should upload07:04
vorlonwhatever's going on seems to be a memory leak though, because running that test on its own doesn't trigger it07:05
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: libsodium (trusty-proposed/primary) [1.0.8-5~ubuntu14.04.1]07:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: python-libnacl (trusty-proposed/primary) [1.4.5-0ubuntu1~ubuntu14.04.1]07:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: pymacaroons (trusty-proposed/primary) [0.9.2-0ubuntu1~ubuntu14.04.1]07:16
ginggsvorlon: yeah can skip on py2 only. uploading shortly07:55
julianklivecd-rootfs 3.566 just landed in disco. builds using it will see direct dependencies of ubiquity not marked as automatically anymore08:13
juliankin an attempt to fix #180162908:14
vorlonginggs: and if I run the testsuite under valgrind, it uses ridiculous amounts of memory just to collect the tests without ever running them, so I think ignoring is the right answer09:08
ginggsvorlon: ack09:11
vorlonI do wonder if this is a memory leak in pandas however, since memory usage creeps up over time while running the other tests (when not under valgrind)09:12
* vorlon checks memory usage under python309:13
vorlonsimilar behavior under python3, it just manages not to hit the ceiling09:15
vorlonginggs: do you want to check if memory grows over time on other archS?09:15
ginggsvorlon: sure, i can check amd64 now09:18
LocutusOfBorgsorry for the nodejs rebuild, but I discovered an unicode bug, I'm doing some rebuilds to be sure rollup is now correctly bootstrapped09:38
LocutusOfBorgwe were not correctly building node-unicode, that has been an hack to bootstrap acorn/rollup, and now we should remove that hack...09:39
ginggsvorlon: memory usage grows over time on amd64, but only by about 1.1GB - how much are you seeing?09:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gettext (bionic-proposed/main) [0.19.8.1-6ubuntu0.1 => 0.19.8.1-6ubuntu0.2] (core) (sync)10:45
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: insubstantial (bionic-proposed/universe) [7.3+dfsg3-3 => 7.3+dfsg3-4~18.04.1] (no packageset) (sync)10:45
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: java-common (bionic-proposed/main) [0.63ubuntu1~02 => 0.68ubuntu1~18.04.1] (core) (sync)10:45
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: javatools (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.63ubuntu1 => 0.72.1~18.04.1] (no packageset) (sync)10:46
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: jnr-posix (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.0.42-1 => 3.0.45-2~18.04] (no packageset) (sync)10:46
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: jruby (bionic-proposed/universe) [9.1.13.0-1 => 9.1.17.0-1~18.04] (no packageset) (sync)10:46
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: jython (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.7.1+repack-3 => 2.7.1+repack-5~18.04] (no packageset) (sync)10:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libgpars-groovy-java (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.2.1-7 => 1.2.1-10~18.04.1] (no packageset) (sync)10:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: logback (bionic-proposed/universe) [1:1.2.3-2 => 1:1.2.3-2ubuntu1~18.04.1] (no packageset) (sync)10:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: maven-javadoc-plugin (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.0.0-4 => 3.0.1-3~18.04.1] (no packageset) (sync)10:51
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: openjdk-11-jre-dcevm (bionic-proposed/primary) [11.0.1+8-1~18.04]10:51
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openjdk-lts (bionic-proposed/main) [10.0.2+13-1ubuntu0.18.04.4 => 11.0.2+9-3ubuntu1~18.04.1] (ubuntu-desktop) (sync)10:52
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openjfx (bionic-proposed/universe) [8u161-b12-1ubuntu2 => 11.0.2+1-1~18.04.1] (no packageset) (sync)10:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: saaj (bionic-proposed/primary) [1.4.0-3~18.04.1]10:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: scala (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.11.12-2 => 2.11.12-4~18.04] (no packageset) (sync)10:55
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gettext [sync] (bionic-proposed) [0.19.8.1-6ubuntu0.2]10:57
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted insubstantial [sync] (bionic-proposed) [7.3+dfsg3-4~18.04.1]10:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted java-common [sync] (bionic-proposed) [0.68ubuntu1~18.04.1]11:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted javatools [sync] (bionic-proposed) [0.72.1~18.04.1]11:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted jnr-posix [sync] (bionic-proposed) [3.0.45-2~18.04]11:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted jruby [sync] (bionic-proposed) [9.1.17.0-1~18.04]11:05
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted jython [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2.7.1+repack-5~18.04]11:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libgpars-groovy-java [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.2.1-10~18.04.1]11:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted logback [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1:1.2.3-2ubuntu1~18.04.1]11:08
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted maven-javadoc-plugin [sync] (bionic-proposed) [3.0.1-3~18.04.1]11:09
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openjdk-lts [sync] (bionic-proposed) [11.0.2+9-3ubuntu1~18.04.1]11:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openjfx [sync] (bionic-proposed) [11.0.2+1-1~18.04.1]11:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted scala [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2.11.12-4~18.04]11:13
jibelwillcooke, sil2100 bug 181768911:14
ubot5bug 1817689 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "[16.04.6 Desktop] Cannot log in after installation with encrypted home enabled" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/181768911:14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted openjdk-11-jre-dcevm [sync] (bionic-proposed) [11.0.1+8-1~18.04]11:14
jibelreproduced on both archs11:14
willcookejibel, my install just finished, and I *can* log in11:16
willcookelemme read the bug, make sure I did it right11:16
willcookeyeah, that's what I did11:16
willcookejibel, did you install in French?11:16
willcookeI will try a different language11:17
sil2100ugh11:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted saaj [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.4.0-3~18.04.1]11:17
jibelwillcooke, 16.04.6 ?11:18
jibelhttp://cdimage.ubuntu.com/xenial/daily-live/20190222/11:18
willcookejibel, yeah, md5 matches11:19
jibelI did an installation in english11:20
willcookejibel, uefi?11:21
jibelno, bios in a vm11:21
jibeli'll try on bare metal11:21
sil2100jibel: can you also try .5 later?11:22
sil2100I'll try to reproduce here11:22
jibelsure11:22
willcookejibel, 2nd install on metal - worked11:39
jibelwell, 2 install and both failed11:41
willcookeAs you might expect, I'm doing my testing on the haunted laptop11:41
sil2100I seem to be able to reproduce it here11:45
sil2100The system boots but on the login screen I can't log into my user11:47
jibelsil2100, switch to a tty, log in and check if there are permission denied in the journal11:47
willcookesil2100, on a vm?11:48
sil2100willcooke: yeah, kvm11:50
* willcooke tries on vbox11:50
sil2100jibel: yes, the same error as you have11:52
willcookemeh, I can't recreate on vbox either11:54
willcookewhat password are you using for encrypting the disk?11:55
sil2100willcooke: so you have ecryptfs home working?11:55
sil2100willcooke: it's not about disk encryption, but home encryption if anything11:55
willcookeohhhhhh11:55
willcookeman11:55
willcookeI cant read11:55
jibelat least now we know that disk encryption is working ;)11:56
willcookeLet's try that again11:56
willcookejibel, ha11:56
sil2100hm, changing file owner didn't help either11:56
sil2100After changing the owner of .ecryptfs, I'm getting "No such file or directory" errors while detecting wrapped passphrase version11:58
* jibel syncs 16.04.511:58
sil2100I do see pam_kwallet*.so load errors earlier11:58
sil2100Maybe those are somehow needed for that?11:58
sil2100Anyway, I need to go prep lunch now, will dig in further when back11:58
willcookejibel, so are you doing a "something else" install, creating a /home and then encrypting that (and using lvm)?11:59
jibelwillcooke, no, you select 'install ubuntu on entire disk' then in the 'Who are you' page, you check 'encrypt home'12:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: glib2.0 (bionic-proposed/main) [2.56.3-0ubuntu0.18.04.1 => 2.56.4-0ubuntu0.18.04.1] (core)12:01
willcookejibel, gotit12:01
willcookethx12:01
jibelthen it uses ecryptfs to encrypt $HOME12:01
jibeland this is a reproducible on hw so not a problem of vm vs hw12:05
willcookejibel, ok, yeah, confirmed on vbox and real hardware. Sorry for the confusion12:08
jibelThanks for the confirmation, I should have make the test case more clear12:09
jibelsil2100, it's a regression in 16.04.6.12:42
didrocks(confirmed as well)13:08
jibelwhat would be a release without a respin13:10
didrocksthat's where the fun is, obviously :)13:10
jibelI actually feel frustrated when I don't find a bug that requires a respin ;)13:11
didrocksmaybe it's all done on purpose then! :)13:12
didrockspeople care of you being happy :p13:12
sil2100:|13:16
=== jbicha_ is now known as jbicha
LaneyI can help on that bug if people want (will be back in 1 hour ish)13:40
sil2100I'm back now so I'll try looking into this a bit more13:55
=== alan_g_ is now known as alan_g
jibelsil2100, there is this in the logs13:57
jibelFeb 26 10:58:21 ubuntu user-setup: Error: Your kernel does not support filename encryption13:57
jibelFeb 26 10:58:21 ubuntu user-setup: ERROR:  Could not add passphrase to the current keyring13:57
jibelFeb 26 10:58:21 ubuntu user-setup: adduser: `/usr/bin/ecryptfs-setup-private -b -u u' returned error code 1. Exiting.13:57
jibelinstallation logs13:57
jibellooks like a kernel issue13:58
jibelapw, ^ any idea? it's bug 181768913:59
ubot5bug 1817689 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "[16.04.6 Desktop] Cannot log in after installation with encrypted home enabled" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/181768913:59
apwjibel, which kernel is that13:59
jibel4.15.0-45-generic13:59
apwand this was not in .5; do we know ?14:01
jibelit works fine on .514:01
sil2100jibel: and there was no message like that in the logs, right?14:02
jibelit worked so I did 't check the logs14:02
jibelno such message in .5 which has kernel 4.15.0-29-generic14:05
apwjibel, i assume you are able to install kernels and test ?14:08
jibelapw, yes, I should be able to do that. which kernel do you want to test?14:08
apwjibel, i am suspicious this of -37 as being when it changed, are you able to check -36 and -3714:08
jibelsure14:09
apwjibel, you are a star14:09
sil2100Interesting fact is that if I boot a xenial .6 system, switch to a tty, create a new user, run ecryptfs-setup-private -b -u user - all is good14:13
sil2100So I would personally doubt it's kernel?14:13
sil2100Since if I do it like this and manually encrypt home for a new user, I can log in normally and from what I see the home dir of that user is encrypted14:14
sil2100jibel, apw: ^14:16
apwsil2100, hmmmm14:17
apwsil2100, and filename encryption appears to be on as far as i can tell14:26
apwsil2100, i wonder how that thing decides it is not14:27
sil2100ah, hmmm14:27
sil2100Ok, so apparently after reboot I can't log in into the new user as well14:28
sil2100So yeah, something's busted, but not sure how14:33
jibelsil2100, if it helps here is the diff of the manifests with .5 http://paste.ubuntu.com/p/pfBQ6Wk924/14:34
sil2100apw: so maybe there's indeed something kernel-related, since as mentioned after reboot it doesn't work again14:47
sil2100I also test installed .5 and I didn't see any messages like this, everything just works14:47
apwsil2100, so i think we wait on the jibel testing, if that shows a boundary there, we may have a likely culprit ... though that change sounds sane, so it might be userspace related14:48
apwsil2100, still userspace related, as in the test might be invalid14:48
apwanyhow, lets see14:48
jibelis the archive not frozen for xenial? I've updates of ghostscript and gnome-keyring after a fresh installation14:49
sil2100That's security14:50
sil2100Not much I can do about that14:51
sil2100jdstrand: hey! Could you maybe take a look at our xenial issues as well? ^15:19
sil2100Strange that in the installer logs one can see the 'Your kernel does not support filename encryption', but then on the running system when you check /sys/fs/ecryptfs/version, it seems to have the flag for kernel encryption set15:37
sil2100Both seem to be running the same kernel?15:37
sil2100Oh, wait15:38
sil2100Yeah, that's correct15:39
sil2100So hmmm, I wonder what's going on during the install15:40
jibelI cannot reproduce with -45 on an installed system15:40
Laneyjibel: can you share the /var/log/installer/syslog from the .5 install?15:49
vorlonginggs: well, the autopkgtest runners only have 1.5GiB of RAM altogether, so any little bit above that is enough to top out on the runners.  But also, my expectation is that memory usage doesn't grow over time at all, that certainly sounds like a leak to me.  I'll rerun under valgrind in an env with more memory.15:52
=== ErichEickmeyer is now known as Eickmeyer
jibelLaney, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1817689/+attachment/5241810/+files/syslog.16.04.515:53
ubot5Launchpad bug 1817689 in ubiquity (Ubuntu Xenial) "[16.04.6 Desktop] Cannot log in after installation with encrypted home enabled" [Critical,Confirmed]15:53
Laneythx15:54
Laneyso you can see a difference there when it does the thing in user-setup15:54
jibelyes, when it's successful is says "Done configuring" and when it fails it says15:55
jibelFeb 26 10:58:21 ubuntu user-setup: Error: Your kernel does not support filename encryption15:55
jibelFeb 26 10:58:21 ubuntu user-setup: ERROR:  Could not add passphrase to the current keyring15:55
sil2100Looks like this is an issue only during install15:55
jibelFeb 26 10:58:21 ubuntu user-setup: adduser: `/usr/bin/ecryptfs-setup-private -b -u u' returned error code 1. Exiting.15:55
jibelyup15:55
jibeland I cannot boot with another kernel, I've boot loop for some reason15:56
jibelboot the live session15:56
sil2100Oh, right, I can experiment in the live session15:57
sil2100On the live session on .6 /sys/fs/ecryptfs/version seems to support encrypted filenames, and doing adduser --encrypt-home seems to succeed16:06
sil2100I'll try to see what happens if I try installing from the live session16:09
Laneycan't make this error happen myself, weird one16:17
sil2100Ok, strange, when running ubiquity installer from the live session, I still see it failing in user-setup, wtf16:19
sil2100Laney: like, you can't get ecryptfs to fail during install for you?16:21
Laneynah16:21
LaneyI can't do it outside of ubiquity16:21
sil2100Yeah, same here16:21
sil2100My earlier case was invalid16:21
sil2100So the only place where it fails is during ubiquity install16:22
sil2100bdmurray: remember not to release any xenial packages into -updates o/16:23
sil2100RAOF: ^16:24
sil2100Laney: maybe ubiquity needs a rebuild? I didn't think that was necessary16:25
Laneywhat for?16:28
sil2100I don't know, if I knew I'd rebuild it ;)16:29
sil2100It's really intriguing, user-setup fails during install with the unsupported filename encryption thing, but even when I check /target/sys/fs/ecryptfs/version etc. it all looks like this error shouldn't have been printed16:30
sil2100The right flags are in the version number16:30
Laneyyeah I wrote a program to call that same function and it works :<16:31
jibelmaybe the error message is misleading did you check in which case it's displayed?16:31
sil2100jibel: it's displayed by the ecryptfs tools only in this particular case, I checked the code16:32
sil2100The string is in ECRYPTFS_ERROR_FNEK_SUPPORT and it's only printed in ecryptfs_add_passphrase.c, which checks for the existance of the flag in version16:33
sil2100Oh, wait16:33
sil2100It can also print it out with ecryptfs_get_version() returns non-zero, so maybe somehow sysfs is not mounted on /target yet? Doesn't make sense though16:34
sil2100Or maybe some permission problems accessing sysfs, but that also doesn't make sense16:35
apwsystemd?16:37
vorlonseb128: do you know why the disco desktop image is now 300MB bigger than it was at the beginning of the month? (and > 2GB)16:44
seb128no idea, but that's interesting16:44
seb128thanks for pointing it out, I'm going to poke16:44
seb128last cycle we had the issue and it was some toolchain thing having debug by default during the unstable cycle iirc16:45
seb128but I don't remember the specifics now16:45
seb128I have a look a bit later and let you know16:45
vorlonseb128: the count of packages has also increased sustantially, 1657 -> 180516:45
jibelsil2100, /target/sys is populated and ecryptfs/version exists16:46
sil2100Yeah, I know, I saw that during the install16:47
sil2100But maybe not before user-setup was called?16:47
sil2100Like, it's mounted later or something?16:47
vorlonseb128: mostly a lot of locale stuff that previously wasn't on the CD, so maybe someone fixed something that was previously broken?  Also curl is being pulled in which sounds like a bug (we have wget)16:48
sil2100jibel: ok, I think that's the case16:48
sil2100jibel, Laney: if you check  the logs, first user-setup runs and only later in the logs I see `chroot /target mount -t sysfs sysfs /sys16:49
sil2100`16:49
vorlonseb128: list of newly added packages in the manifest: https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/9gv6knNrZ6/16:49
* sil2100 checks the .5 sysfs logs16:49
sil2100huh16:50
sil2100Laney, jibel: that's it16:50
sil2100Laney, jibel: if you check the .5 logs, there sysfs is first mounted in /target and only then user-setup runs16:50
sil2100Laney, jibel: but now it's the other way around!16:50
sil2100Laney: hmm, did your change for the move-the-keyboard-setup-earlier go into xenial-updates?16:50
sil2100Laney: did you SRU those changes?16:51
sil2100Laney: since to me it seems that the order in ubiquity somehow changed and now user-setup runs earlier due to that16:51
sil2100eh, darn ubiquity16:52
sil2100So now someone just needs to figure out why we now have user-setup running earlier and done16:53
sil2100uh, wait16:54
Laneydon't think so, user-setup mounts /sys itself16:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: waylandpp (disco-proposed/primary) [0.2.5-0ubuntu1]16:54
sil2100Yeah...16:56
sil2100Guess you're right16:56
sil2100But at least I have a few other ideas to debug this16:58
sil2100Laney: so strange, I didn't get much more info, but when user-setup runs ecryptfs/version seems readable and has correct contents, I was checking it right before adduser runs, no idea why it fails there17:32
sil2100Even from inside the chroot17:32
Laneysil2100: you hacked the script or?17:33
sil2100Laney: yeah, I hacked user-setup-apply in ubiquity/user-setup17:33
sil2100Right before adduser is called that does all the setup I added some catting and statting of the ecryptfs version path, from outside and inside the chroot - all looked correct17:34
Laneysil2100: HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM ok17:46
LaneyI put a "sleep infinit_y" right after the call and now I can poke in there17:46
jibeland I checked that sysfs is mounted right before calling adduser17:46
Laneythe version is coming out weird17:47
sil2100Laney: what version number do you see?17:48
Laney61134640017:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: gmbal-commons (bionic-proposed/primary) [3.2.1-b003-1~18.04]17:48
Laneybut the call errors17:48
sil2100Since in cat from before adduser in the chroot I'm getting 375, which is correct17:48
Laneyrc != 017:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: gmbal (bionic-proposed/primary) [4.0.0-b002-1~18.04]17:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: gmbal-pfl (bionic-proposed/primary) [4.0.1-b003-2~18.04]17:48
sil2100uh17:48
sil2100wow17:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: istack-commons (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.0.6-1 => 3.0.6-3~18.04] (no packageset) (sync)17:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: jaxb (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.3.0-3 => 2.3.0.1-7~18.04] (no packageset) (sync)17:48
Laneyso that's just whatever the memory had before17:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: jaxb-api (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.2.9-1 => 2.3.1-1~18.04] (no packageset) (sync)17:48
sil2100Laney: right after the call - you mean, right after adduser?17:49
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: jaxe (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.5-9 => 3.5-11~18.04] (no packageset) (sync)17:49
Laneyyeah17:49
sil2100(sorry for the noise guys ^)17:49
Laneythe one that dies17:49
Laneyadd a sleep there, then you can get in the chroot and mess around17:49
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: jaxrs-api (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.1-1 => 2.1.2-2~18.04] (no packageset) (sync)17:49
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libwoodstox-java (bionic-proposed/universe) [1:4.1.3-1 => 1:5.1.0-2~18.04] (no packageset) (sync)17:49
sil2100Laney: wow, so it's like something in adduser (the ecryptfs tools) breaks ecryptfs?17:49
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libstax2-api-java (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.1.1-1 => 4.1-1~18.04] (no packageset) (sync)17:49
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: maven-bundle-plugin (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.5.0-1 => 3.5.1-2~18.04.1] (no packageset) (sync)17:49
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: jaxrpc-api (bionic-proposed/primary) [1.1.2-2~18.04]17:49
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: jaxws (bionic-proposed/primary) [2.3.0.2-1~18.04.1]17:49
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: jaxws-api (bionic-proposed/primary) [2.3.0-1~18.04]17:49
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: jws-api (bionic-proposed/primary) [1.1-1~18.04]17:49
Laneydunno, I'm seeing what get_version does17:49
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: maven-jaxb2-plugin (bionic-proposed/primary) [0.14.0-1~18.04.1]17:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: mimepull (bionic-proposed/primary) [1.9.7-1~18.04]17:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: metro-policy (bionic-proposed/primary) [2.7.2-3~18.04]17:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: maven-enforcer (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.4.2-1 => 3.0.0~M2-1~18.04.1] (no packageset) (sync)17:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: maven-dependency-plugin (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.0.1-3 => 3.1.1-1~18.04] (no packageset) (sync)17:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: maven-plugin-tools (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.5-6 => 3.5-6ubuntu1~18.04.1] (no packageset) (sync)17:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: saaj-ri (bionic-proposed/primary) [1.4.1-1~18.04]17:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-desktop3 [source] (cosmic-proposed) [3.30.2.1-0ubuntu1]17:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: stax-ex (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.7.8-1 => 1.7.8-3~18.04.1] (no packageset) (sync)17:50
Laneythe file in /sys *is* right17:50
Laneyforgot to say that, that's important ;-)17:51
sil2100Ah, so in the chroot, /sys/fs/ecryptfs/version has a sane version when you cat it directly?17:52
Laneyye17:52
sil2100wow17:52
Laneyecryptfs-utils does some weird stuff to get it17:53
* sil2100 needs to take care of the openjdk packages17:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted istack-commons [sync] (bionic-proposed) [3.0.6-3~18.04]17:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted jaxb [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2.3.0.1-7~18.04]18:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted jaxb-api [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2.3.1-1~18.04]18:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted jaxe [sync] (bionic-proposed) [3.5-11~18.04]18:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted jaxrs-api [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2.1.2-2~18.04]18:06
Laneysil2100: there's no mtab, so the function bails out18:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libstax2-api-java [sync] (bionic-proposed) [4.1-1~18.04]18:08
Laneybecause /proc isn't mounted18:09
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libwoodstox-java [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1:5.1.0-2~18.04]18:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted maven-bundle-plugin [sync] (bionic-proposed) [3.5.1-2~18.04.1]18:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted maven-dependency-plugin [sync] (bionic-proposed) [3.1.1-1~18.04]18:13
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted maven-enforcer [sync] (bionic-proposed) [3.0.0~M2-1~18.04.1]18:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted maven-plugin-tools [sync] (bionic-proposed) [3.5-6ubuntu1~18.04.1]18:16
* Laney tries ...18:16
sil2100uh oh18:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted stax-ex [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.7.8-3~18.04.1]18:19
sil2100Laney: wonder what happened that /proc is not available now18:22
sil2100Laney: did you manage to get it working after mounting /proc ?18:22
Laneydunno18:22
Laneynot got that far yet18:22
LaneyI should disconnect the network, it spends ages downloading stuff each time18:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gmbal [sync] (bionic-proposed) [4.0.0-b002-1~18.04]18:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gmbal-commons [sync] (bionic-proposed) [3.2.1-b003-1~18.04]18:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gmbal-pfl [sync] (bionic-proposed) [4.0.1-b003-2~18.04]18:28
LaneyAHHHHHHHH YEAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH18:31
tewardo.O18:31
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted jaxrpc-api [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.2-2~18.04]18:32
vorlonsil2100, doko: do you need anything from me wrt the openjdk-11 SRUs?  I could spend a little time on it this afternoon if needed, but I don't know what's next18:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted jaxws [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2.3.0.2-1~18.04.1]18:33
sil2100vorlon: I'm currently finishing copying the stage4 packages, rest has not yet been reviewed by security18:34
dokovorlon, sil2100: tiago wanted to identify the leaf apps, but didn't send me an update as promised18:35
sil2100Laney: works?!18:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted jaxws-api [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2.3.0-1~18.04]18:35
dokosbeattie will review the apps, tomcat and stage5 PPAs18:35
sil2100Laney: did you figure out why /proc was not mounted, or not yet?18:35
vorloncpaelzer: I don't understand https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu/+bug/1812384/comments/20 I see no autopkgtest failures related to this SRU18:36
ubot5Launchpad bug 1812384 in Ubuntu on IBM z Systems "[Ubuntu] qemu - backport diag308 stable exception fix" [Medium,Fix committed]18:36
Laneysil2100: I dunno what changed, but I know that user-setup doesn't mount it18:36
vorloncpaelzer: (http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/bionic/update_excuses.html#qemu is clean)18:36
Laneyso I'll upload a fix to do that directly, but if someone wants to find out why the order changed they can18:36
LaneyI just upload user-setup and then we rebuild ubiquity to get it, right?18:37
sil2100Laney: excellent! +1 on that18:37
dokovorlon: and we have some autopkg test failures, but EOD for me now18:37
sil2100Laney: yeah18:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted jws-api [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.1-1~18.04]18:37
sil2100Laney: upload it then I can review/accept it, at least the user-setup one18:37
Laneyokey18:38
Laneytest/review/accept? ;-)18:38
sil2100HOTFIX FOR THE WIN18:38
LaneyI'll have to go straight after (pub quiz) so won't be around to fix stuff up unfortunately18:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted maven-jaxb2-plugin [sync] (bionic-proposed) [0.14.0-1~18.04.1]18:39
sil2100Laney: no worries, thanks for the help with the investigation and the 'fixation' (wanted it to rhyme)!18:39
willcookenice one Laney, thank you!18:39
vorloncpaelzer: oh, I guess bdmurray already merged, n/m18:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted metro-policy [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2.7.2-3~18.04]18:42
sil2100Laney: in case you won't manage to do the ubiquity rebuild, I can do that as well18:43
sil2100Laney: don't want you to miss the pub action18:43
willcooke:)18:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mimepull [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.9.7-1~18.04]18:44
sil2100doko, vorlon: all stage4 packages should be copied and accepted now, phew18:45
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted saaj-ri [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.4.1-1~18.04]18:45
dokosil2100: stage5 has 60 ...18:45
Laneysil2100: definitely won't18:46
Laneyespecially if you want to test before :>18:46
sil2100Indeed18:46
sil2100That's cool18:46
sil2100Laney: just give me a poke once you upload user-setup18:47
sil2100doko: ...lovely18:47
Laneywill be in one minute18:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: user-setup (xenial-proposed/main) [1.63ubuntu4 => 1.63ubuntu4.1] (core)18:49
Laneydamn it, make that two18:50
LaneyI haven't done anything else, like fix devel (although this option is hidden in all other supported releases AFAIK) or SRUify the bug I'm afraid18:50
Laneyo/18:50
sil2100o/18:51
sil2100That's ok18:51
sil2100It's a release critical bug, it'll be fast-tracked anyway18:51
sil2100Laney: thanks and have fun!18:51
Laneythx18:51
Laneywill follow up tomorrow if anything needs doing18:51
Laneygoodnight18:51
willcookesee you Laney18:51
* sil2100 prepares his kvm for testing18:53
jibelsil2100, let me know when you have a package to verify18:53
sil2100jibel: will do18:53
sil2100I'll test the code changes before accepting18:53
sil2100Code-wise looks good, testing looks promising as well19:03
sil2100\o/19:04
sil2100Accepting19:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted user-setup [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.63ubuntu4.1]19:06
sil2100jibel: user-setup is building in xenial-proposed now, once that's built you can give it a spin - I'll also prepare ubiquity then19:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lldpd [source] (cosmic-proposed) [1.0.1-1ubuntu0.1]19:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lldpd [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.9.9-1ubuntu0.1]19:12
jibelsil2100, k19:24
seb128vorlon, the current disco iso is about the same size as the bionic/cosmic ones and your list of new packages look like thing that are usually on the iso, so I guess it's the earlier one you had which was buggy19:45
vorlonok19:45
sil2100jibel: ...still waiting for the mirrors to catch up19:46
jibelsil2100, I downloaded the version from lp19:52
* sil2100 is still waiting for it to pop up in the the main archive mirror to pull it into ubiquity19:57
jibelsil2100, user-setup 1.63ubuntu4.1 fixes the problem now i'd like to know why it is not happening previously. This package didn't change since the initial release of xenial19:57
sil2100jibel: yeah, we will investigate that for sure, but we should prioritize landing this anyway19:58
jibelindeed19:59
sil2100vorlon: is there a way to sync archive mirrors somehow?20:00
vorlonmm?20:00
sil2100vorlon: like, I'm waiting and waiting for user-setup to appear in archive.ubuntu.com but it's not happening!20:00
vorlonyou should check with IS20:00
vorlonthere is no manual process for triggering a sync because it's supposed to always sync asap20:01
cjwatsonI think there've just been a couple of big publisher runs20:04
sil2100vorlon, cjwatson: thanks20:04
sil2100Sorry for being impatient20:04
cjwatsonNot seeing anything actually wrong20:05
Odd_Blokevorlon: Do you think you might be able to merge https://code.launchpad.net/~paelzer/britney/hints-ubuntu-disco-vagrant-mutate/+merge/363463 ?20:28
vorlonOdd_Bloke: I don't understand the rationale here; the only current failure I see of vagrant-mutate is one that blocks an update of vagrant, but I see two recent successes of the autopkgtest with other triggers since the last time it was retried with -proposed vagrant20:34
vorlonso can you ++verbose on what 'network issues' means?  is this actually a flaky test?20:35
Odd_Blokevorlon: Yeah, we're seeing flakiness (which appears to be network related); I hadn't seen that Christian had managed to get a qemu pass, so I'm retrying now to see if it works for vagrant too.20:37
vorlonOdd_Bloke: already retried it fwiw20:37
Odd_BlokeCool, I'll keep an eye out; thanks!20:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubiquity (xenial-proposed/main) [2.21.63.9 => 2.21.63.10] (core)20:59
sil2100jibel: accepted ubiquity21:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubiquity [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.21.63.10]21:03
sil2100jibel: once that builds would be nice to sanity-test it, release and re-spin the world!21:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-rusty-fork [s390x] (disco-proposed/universe) [0.2.1-1] (no packageset)21:18
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-rusty-fork [amd64] (disco-proposed/universe) [0.2.1-1] (no packageset)21:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-rusty-fork [ppc64el] (disco-proposed/universe) [0.2.1-1] (no packageset)21:19
vorlonOdd_Bloke: both of our retries failed21:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: rust-ascii (disco-proposed/primary) [0.9.1-1]21:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-rusty-fork [i386] (disco-proposed/universe) [0.2.1-1] (no packageset)21:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-rusty-fork [arm64] (disco-proposed/universe) [0.2.1-1] (no packageset)21:20
Odd_Blokevorlon: ;.;21:20
vorlonmerging hint21:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-rusty-fork [armhf] (disco-proposed/universe) [0.2.1-1] (no packageset)21:21
Odd_BlokeThanks!21:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected skiboot [source] (cosmic-proposed) [6.1-2ubuntu0.1]21:29
vorlonginggs: well, running to completion under valgrind, valgrind only finds 332k of memory leaking21:45
vorlonginggs: so it's possibly deferred gc but not leaks per se :/21:45
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-rusty-fork [armhf] (disco-proposed) [0.2.1-1]21:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-rusty-fork [i386] (disco-proposed) [0.2.1-1]21:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected rust-ascii [sync] (disco-proposed) [0.9.1-1]21:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-rusty-fork [arm64] (disco-proposed) [0.2.1-1]21:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-rusty-fork [s390x] (disco-proposed) [0.2.1-1]21:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-rusty-fork [amd64] (disco-proposed) [0.2.1-1]21:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-rusty-fork [ppc64el] (disco-proposed) [0.2.1-1]21:47
vorlon==124425==    still reachable: 413,357,685 bytes in 789,082 blocks21:49
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-proptest [amd64] (disco-proposed/universe) [0.8.7-1] (no packageset)22:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-proptest [s390x] (disco-proposed/universe) [0.8.7-1] (no packageset)22:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-proptest [i386] (disco-proposed/universe) [0.8.7-1] (no packageset)22:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-proptest [ppc64el] (disco-proposed/universe) [0.8.7-1] (no packageset)22:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-proptest [i386] (disco-proposed) [0.8.7-1]22:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-proptest [amd64] (disco-proposed) [0.8.7-1]22:08
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-proptest [s390x] (disco-proposed) [0.8.7-1]22:08
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-proptest [ppc64el] (disco-proposed) [0.8.7-1]22:08
* sil2100 tests the new ubiquity22:11
sil2100eh, ok, still not there22:20
sil2100Usually when rmadison was giving me a +1 that a package is published, this meant it was available22:39
sil2100But today there seems to be some lag22:39
sil2100Looks good, releasing23:10
sil2100vorlon, infinity: I guess I need to go to sleep now23:18
sil2100vorlon, infinity: can one of you re-spin all the 16.04.6 images once ubiquity and user-setup get fully published in xenial-updates?23:19
sil2100You can use the isotracker for that23:19
sil2100Just remember, today it seems to take a bit for the package to publish and actually appear on the archive mirrors23:20
vorlonsil2100: and I think we need to resnapshot the point release?23:26
sil2100vorlon: yes, that too23:27
sil2100+ source iso's as well23:27
sil2100(once it's all published)23:28
sil2100vorlon: would be grateful o/23:28
vorlonok, I'll take it23:28
sil2100Thank you!23:29
* sil2100 off to sleep23:29
sil2100Goodnight23:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted docker.io [source] (cosmic-proposed) [18.09.2-0ubuntu1~18.10.1]23:44
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted docker.io [source] (bionic-proposed) [18.09.2-0ubuntu1~18.04.1]23:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted docker.io [source] (xenial-proposed) [18.09.2-0ubuntu1~16.04.1]23:53
vorloninfinity: both python-biopython and postgresql-hll regressions w/ glibc 2.29 look to me like fp behavior changes that need someone to understand23:54

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!