cpaelzer | good morning ubuntu server | 05:39 |
---|---|---|
technoob | Guys | 06:56 |
lordievader | Good morning | 06:56 |
technoob | If say i had numerous failed login attempt caused by none other than me does ubuntu ban my pcs ip? | 06:57 |
technoob | I tried to ssh using my mobile and it works | 06:57 |
technoob | But if i ssh using my pc it times out | 06:57 |
technoob | Help pls | 06:57 |
lordievader | Do you have fail2ban running or something? | 06:59 |
technoob | Dunno | 06:59 |
technoob | How do i check | 06:59 |
lotuspsychje | technoob: you are the owner of your system, you cant recall? | 07:00 |
technoob | Im new. I just install new server a few days ago | 07:00 |
technoob | I havent been installing much | 07:00 |
lordievader | If you didn't install it it ain't there. | 07:00 |
lordievader | Per default there is no mechanism which blocks a client after X login attempts. | 07:01 |
technoob | Ok ill shutdown and reconnect | 07:01 |
technoob | Hope for the best | 07:01 |
technoob | Ok it wotked | 07:04 |
CarlFK | anyone know why disco is smaller? | 07:18 |
CarlFK | http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/releases/18.04/release/ubuntu-18.04.2-server-amd64.iso 883M | 07:18 |
CarlFK | http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-server/daily/pending/disco-server-amd64.iso 752M | 07:18 |
=== bhuddah_ is now known as bhuddah | ||
rbasak | cpaelzer: no git ubuntu repo for python-libnacl? Do we need to add that? | 09:36 |
cpaelzer | rbasak: we can add that, we know that sooner or later it will be in main anyway | 09:37 |
cpaelzer | at least in X/T | 09:37 |
cpaelzer | rbasak: I have added it to the whitelist already, just not done the (re)imports of all those | 09:38 |
cpaelzer | rbasak: a8340557e shows the interesting list of packages - you wanted to run thos eon the bastion you said | 09:38 |
rbasak | cpaelzer: ah. Shall I manually run the imports? | 09:38 |
rbasak | OK | 09:39 |
cpaelzer | but all but +python-libnacl are already imported as they are in main in latter Ubuntu releases | 09:39 |
cpaelzer | so it comes down to just the import of that | 09:39 |
rbasak | Just running that one now then. Thanks! | 09:40 |
cpaelzer | or accepting thins in proposed which will trigger a publishing event which since it is in the whitelist get it imported :-) | 09:40 |
rbasak | :) | 09:40 |
rbasak | I haven't published a new snap with latest whitelist entries included though | 09:40 |
cpaelzer | I see | 09:40 |
rbasak | It can be specified manually on CLI invocation FWIW | 09:41 |
rbasak | I've just never done that for fear of it getting confusing and out of sync etc | 09:41 |
rbasak | We could figure out a better way but probably not worth it | 09:41 |
rbasak | Ah | 09:41 |
rbasak | Import fails - DPMT. | 09:41 |
cpaelzer | ah right there was a blocker with those | 09:42 |
rbasak | Worked around for now | 09:44 |
rbasak | cpaelzer: there's an outstanding pymacaroons SRU in xenial-proposed and I see the backport is against the version in xenial-updates. Is this relevant, or if not, do we need to explain? | 09:47 |
cpaelzer | rbasak: last two updates in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/httmock/+bug/1735160 | 09:51 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 1735160 in py-macaroon-bakery (Ubuntu Artful) "[SRU] Please backport python3-macaroonbakery 0.0.6-1 [universe] from bionic" [Undecided,In progress] | 09:51 |
cpaelzer | this will soon be cleared from proposed | 09:51 |
rbasak | cpaelzer: ah, sorry. I didn't read far enough down the bug. Thanks! | 09:52 |
rbasak | cpaelzer: any action needed on bug 1811554? It came up on my weekend triage. It's not in the backlog or anything, but I'm the third triager to touch it now. | 10:34 |
ubottu | bug 1811554 in bind9 (Ubuntu) "bind9 slow response after netplan apply" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1811554 | 10:34 |
rbasak | cpaelzer: noticed you're subscribed to bug 1814124. Was my triaging accurate? | 10:58 |
ubottu | bug 1814124 in openssh (Ubuntu) "sshd does not start after update on non-Ubuntu kernels where fchownat() is broken" [Undecided,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1814124 | 10:58 |
pagios | question, if i have an nfs mount on my server, and i am writing directly to this network location, am i using the disk io of my server? or directly writing to the network? | 10:58 |
rbasak | pagios: yes to both | 11:17 |
cpaelzer | rbasak: yes to ..124 | 11:19 |
cpaelzer | rbasak: it is unfortunate that they are hit by it, but vor these BZ hosting we can't really do anything about the host kernel | 11:19 |
cpaelzer | and that seems to be the root cause there :-/ | 11:19 |
cpaelzer | rbasak: for ...554 I didn't see anything we can action, that is why I added a netplan task to get it to the eyes of cyphermox | 11:20 |
cpaelzer | as I hope he knows all the steps that happen at "apply" to maybe identify what is going on | 11:21 |
rbasak | So cpaelzer so backlog for 554? | 11:42 |
rbasak | cpaelzer: I'm not sure how to re-triage bug 1817027 - he's come back with more information, but not steps to reproduce. | 11:46 |
ubottu | bug 1817027 in samba (Ubuntu) "samba crashes when uploading files" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1817027 | 11:46 |
rbasak | So IMHO it's still a support request but I don't know how to tell him that and stop answering politely. | 11:47 |
rbasak | cpaelzer: and thank you for reviewing 124. I'll consider that one done then. | 11:47 |
frickler | jamespage: freyes: pinging once more regarding this bug in case you missed it yesterday https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rabbitmq-server/+bug/1783203 | 11:51 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 1783203 in rabbitmq-server (Ubuntu) "Upgrade to RabbitMQ 3.6.10 causes beam lockup in clustered deployment" [Undecided,Confirmed] | 11:51 |
frickler | coreycb: any specific reason why you did 17.0.7-2 for nova in queens instead of bumping to latest upstream at 17.0.9? I'm still waiting for the fix for https://launchpad.net/bugs/1801702 to get in | 12:01 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 1801702 in OpenStack Compute (nova) ocata "Spawn may fail when cache=none on block device with logical block size > 512" [Medium,In progress] | 12:01 |
coreycb | frickler: 17.0.9 must not have been available the last time we did point releases | 12:21 |
coreycb | frickler: we're due so i'll get point releases out soon | 12:21 |
frickler | coreycb: o.k., great, thx | 12:22 |
=== logan_ is now known as Guest11647 | ||
=== not_phunyguy is now known as phunyguy | ||
=== Guest11647 is now known as logan- | ||
ahasenack | rbasak: hi, should I remove the "removal-candidate" tag when I complete the sru verification? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/backuppc/+bug/1576187/comments/24 | 12:36 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 1576187 in backuppc (Ubuntu Xenial) "backuppc/smb: BackupPC failes to backup SMB shares after smbclient update" [Undecided,Fix committed] | 12:36 |
Odd_Bloke | rbasak: What does DPMT mean in the context of that git-ubuntu failure? | 12:43 |
rbasak | Odd_Bloke: I mean it's an instance of bug 1764814 | 14:06 |
ubottu | bug 1764814 in usd-importer "awscli import fails: package_creator.display_name results in HTTP error 410: Gone" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1764814 | 14:06 |
rbasak | The catch is that I want to properly specify what string *should* be used, given that we can't rely on the real name | 14:07 |
rbasak | And a workaround for now will cause a second "hash-abi-break" (though we are still experimental) | 14:07 |
rbasak | ahasenack: removal-candidate> sure. I don't see why anyone would object to that. AIUI the bug would still be checked manually before actual removal but removing the tag would make it clearer. | 14:08 |
kstenerud | Are special build commands necessary to build php 7.2.11 in cosmic? I've tried dpkg-buildpackage, but it fails partway through due to a permission error | 14:10 |
Odd_Bloke | rbasak: Thanks for the info. :) | 14:10 |
kstenerud | I basically did git ubuntu clone php7.2, copied it to a builder, and dpkg-buildpackage | 14:11 |
cpaelzer | kstenerud: importer/import/7.2.15-0ubuntu0.18.10.1 built for me - let me try the 7.2.11 as well | 14:38 |
cpaelzer | kstenerud: works just fine on 7.2.11-3build2 as well | 14:39 |
cpaelzer | as it comes out of git ubutnu clone | 14:39 |
cpaelzer | I run git ubuntu export-orig to get the tarball | 14:39 |
cpaelzer | and then dpkg-buildpkg works | 14:39 |
kstenerud | hmm can't figure out what I'm doing wrong... | 14:40 |
cpaelzer | kstenerud: are you breaking on dpkg-buildpackage or later on once you build the .dsc/.changes that got generated? | 14:40 |
kstenerud | Literally all I do is git ubuntu clone, put orig in the parent dir, run dpkg-buildpackage | 14:40 |
cpaelzer | kstenerud: if you want join the standup call | 14:40 |
cpaelzer | kstenerud: you can share your console and we can check step by step if you want | 14:40 |
kstenerud | sure sec | 14:41 |
kstenerud | cpaelzer: After sbuild fails, can I restart the build using dpkg-buildpackage, or is it a different command? | 16:24 |
=== lotuspsychje__ is now known as lotuspsychje | ||
nacc_ | kstenerud: what's the exact error? | 19:01 |
johnfg | hi guys | 20:06 |
johnfg | yesterday, I was going to install ubuntu-server-18.04. I wanted to use an existing vg and lv's. | 20:06 |
johnfg | However, the installer didn't recognize or show them. | 20:06 |
johnfg | from ubuntuforums, they suggest to boot from the livecd to try without installing; install lvm2, then start the installation. | 20:07 |
johnfg | Is there any other way to get the installer to recognize existing vgs and lvs? | 20:07 |
lordcirth_ | johnfg, I thought lvm2 was already on the installer? But if it isn't, yeah, you'd need to install it. | 20:07 |
lordcirth_ | But probably you just need to scan as mentioned in #ubuntu | 20:08 |
johnfg | All I know, is that unlike other distros, which see the volume groups and logical volumes, going right to install from the livecd, they aren't present. | 20:09 |
tomreyn | johnfg: you need to use the alternative installer | 20:09 |
tomreyn | the default installer doesn't allow you to work with existing structures. | 20:09 |
johnfg | tomreyn: I'll have to boot it to choose it. Can't try while in here. This is my dual-booting machine (actually 3, fwiw). | 20:09 |
tomreyn | johnfg: you can also do a chroot / debootstrap installation from the live / desktop installer | 20:11 |
tomreyn | ubuntu-server-18.04 actually sounds like you were using the ("debian-installer" based) alternative/classic installer. the current default one contains "live" in the ISO file name. | 20:13 |
tomreyn | oh gone | 20:13 |
johnfg | Back after a try...lvm2 is installed on the installer; lvscan --all recognized the volumes. | 20:28 |
compdoc | \o/ | 20:29 |
johnfg | However, I couldn't install, as this is *not* the live iso, but just the server, so there wasn't any alternative installer. and the volumes weren't shown and available. | 20:29 |
johnfg | I just downloaded, and will burn the live server iso. Think that's the problem? | 20:30 |
tomreyn | johnfg: can you tell s which iso you're working with? | 20:30 |
tomreyn | like, so far? getting the live server iso won't improve detection of existing storage structures. | 20:31 |
johnfg | Ubuntu-Server 18.04.2 LTS amd64 is what I have now. | 20:31 |
tomreyn | that's not an iso name. | 20:31 |
tomreyn | i mean a file name | 20:31 |
johnfg | ubuntu-18.04.2-live-server-amd64.iso is what I was going to burn. | 20:32 |
johnfg | tomreyn: Ok, I'll get you the other. | 20:32 |
tomreyn | so live-server is not what you want for this use case | 20:32 |
tomreyn | alternative server may work, not sure whether it detects existing lvms fine, you may need to help it a little there. | 20:33 |
tomreyn | or you go with the live/desktop installer and a manual installation via debootstrap. | 20:34 |
johnfg | tomreyn: what alternative server are you talking about? | 20:34 |
tomreyn | the installer that is also known as debian-installer, and that used to be the default server installer until and including ubuntu 16.04 LTS | 20:35 |
johnfg | Do you think that this will work: ubuntu-18.04.2-server-amd64.iso? That's from the alternatives (which I didn't notice before), if needing, e.g., lvm, on the server web page. | 20:37 |
johnfg | tomreyn: What do you think of that last image I wrote? | 20:39 |
Odd_Bloke | johnfg: That's the one Tom was directing you towards, so I think it's worth a try. | 20:39 |
johnfg | Odd_Bloke: I agree. Will burn and proceed and report back. Thanks all! | 20:40 |
tomreyn | right. you may need to lvmscan from tty2 to convince the installer' partitioner to use the existing ones. not sure. try normally first. | 20:42 |
johnfg | yeah, if it sees them then no problem. | 20:43 |
cpaelzer | kstenerud: you just issue the sbuild again | 22:29 |
cpaelzer | kstenerud: no need to re-build the .dsc/.changes | 22:30 |
runelind_q | is Landscape On Prem 19.01 not available via dist-upgrade yet? | 23:58 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!