/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2019/02/26/#ubuntu-server.txt

cpaelzergood morning ubuntu server05:39
technoobGuys06:56
lordievaderGood morning06:56
technoobIf say i had numerous failed login attempt caused by none other than me does ubuntu ban my pcs ip?06:57
technoobI tried to ssh using my mobile and it works06:57
technoobBut if i ssh using my pc it times out06:57
technoobHelp pls06:57
lordievaderDo you have fail2ban running or something?06:59
technoobDunno06:59
technoobHow do i check06:59
lotuspsychjetechnoob: you are the owner of your system, you cant recall?07:00
technoobIm new. I just install new server a few days ago07:00
technoobI havent been installing much07:00
lordievaderIf you didn't install it it ain't there.07:00
lordievaderPer default there is no mechanism which blocks a client after X login attempts.07:01
technoobOk ill shutdown and reconnect07:01
technoobHope for the best07:01
technoobOk it wotked07:04
CarlFKanyone know why disco is smaller?07:18
CarlFKhttp://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/releases/18.04/release/ubuntu-18.04.2-server-amd64.iso 883M07:18
CarlFKhttp://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-server/daily/pending/disco-server-amd64.iso  752M07:18
=== bhuddah_ is now known as bhuddah
rbasakcpaelzer: no git ubuntu repo for python-libnacl? Do we need to add that?09:36
cpaelzerrbasak: we can add that, we know that sooner or later it will be in main anyway09:37
cpaelzerat least in X/T09:37
cpaelzerrbasak: I have added it to the whitelist already, just not done the (re)imports of all those09:38
cpaelzerrbasak: a8340557e shows the interesting list of packages - you wanted to run thos eon the bastion you said09:38
rbasakcpaelzer: ah. Shall I manually run the imports?09:38
rbasakOK09:39
cpaelzerbut all but +python-libnacl are already imported as they are in main in latter Ubuntu releases09:39
cpaelzerso it comes down to just the import of that09:39
rbasakJust running that one now then. Thanks!09:40
cpaelzeror accepting thins in proposed which will trigger a publishing event which since it is in the whitelist get it imported :-)09:40
rbasak:)09:40
rbasakI haven't published a new snap with latest whitelist entries included though09:40
cpaelzerI see09:40
rbasakIt can be specified manually on CLI invocation FWIW09:41
rbasakI've just never done that for fear of it getting confusing and out of sync etc09:41
rbasakWe could figure out a better way but probably not worth it09:41
rbasakAh09:41
rbasakImport fails - DPMT.09:41
cpaelzerah right there was a blocker with those09:42
rbasakWorked around for now09:44
rbasakcpaelzer: there's an outstanding pymacaroons SRU in xenial-proposed and I see the backport is against the version in xenial-updates. Is this relevant, or if not, do we need to explain?09:47
cpaelzerrbasak: last two updates in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/httmock/+bug/173516009:51
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1735160 in py-macaroon-bakery (Ubuntu Artful) "[SRU] Please backport python3-macaroonbakery 0.0.6-1 [universe] from bionic" [Undecided,In progress]09:51
cpaelzerthis will soon be cleared from proposed09:51
rbasakcpaelzer: ah, sorry. I didn't read far enough down the bug. Thanks!09:52
rbasakcpaelzer: any action needed on bug 1811554? It came up on my weekend triage. It's not in the backlog or anything, but I'm the third triager to touch it now.10:34
ubottubug 1811554 in bind9 (Ubuntu) "bind9 slow response after netplan apply" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/181155410:34
rbasakcpaelzer: noticed you're subscribed to bug 1814124. Was my triaging accurate?10:58
ubottubug 1814124 in openssh (Ubuntu) "sshd does not start after update on non-Ubuntu kernels where fchownat() is broken" [Undecided,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/181412410:58
pagios question, if i have an nfs mount on my server, and i am writing directly to this network location, am i using the disk io of my server? or directly writing to the network?10:58
rbasakpagios: yes to both11:17
cpaelzerrbasak: yes to ..12411:19
cpaelzerrbasak: it is unfortunate that they are hit by it, but vor these BZ hosting we can't really do anything about the host kernel11:19
cpaelzerand that seems to be the root cause there :-/11:19
cpaelzerrbasak: for ...554 I didn't see anything we can action, that is why I added a netplan task to get it to the eyes of cyphermox11:20
cpaelzeras I hope he knows all the steps that happen at "apply" to maybe identify what is going on11:21
rbasakSo cpaelzer so backlog for 554?11:42
rbasakcpaelzer: I'm not sure how to re-triage bug 1817027 - he's come back with more information, but not steps to reproduce.11:46
ubottubug 1817027 in samba (Ubuntu) "samba crashes when uploading files" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/181702711:46
rbasakSo IMHO it's still a support request but I don't know how to tell him that and stop answering politely.11:47
rbasakcpaelzer: and thank you for reviewing 124. I'll consider that one done then.11:47
fricklerjamespage: freyes: pinging once more regarding this bug in case you missed it yesterday https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rabbitmq-server/+bug/178320311:51
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1783203 in rabbitmq-server (Ubuntu) "Upgrade to RabbitMQ 3.6.10 causes beam lockup in clustered deployment" [Undecided,Confirmed]11:51
fricklercoreycb: any specific reason why you did 17.0.7-2 for nova in queens instead of bumping to latest upstream at 17.0.9? I'm still waiting for the fix for https://launchpad.net/bugs/1801702 to get in12:01
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1801702 in OpenStack Compute (nova) ocata "Spawn may fail when cache=none on block device with logical block size > 512" [Medium,In progress]12:01
coreycbfrickler: 17.0.9 must not have been available the last time we did point releases12:21
coreycbfrickler: we're due so i'll get point releases out soon12:21
fricklercoreycb: o.k., great, thx12:22
=== logan_ is now known as Guest11647
=== not_phunyguy is now known as phunyguy
=== Guest11647 is now known as logan-
ahasenackrbasak: hi, should I remove the "removal-candidate" tag when I complete the sru verification? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/backuppc/+bug/1576187/comments/2412:36
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1576187 in backuppc (Ubuntu Xenial) "backuppc/smb: BackupPC failes to backup SMB shares after smbclient update" [Undecided,Fix committed]12:36
Odd_Blokerbasak: What does DPMT mean in the context of that git-ubuntu failure?12:43
rbasakOdd_Bloke: I mean it's an instance of bug 176481414:06
ubottubug 1764814 in usd-importer "awscli import fails: package_creator.display_name results in HTTP error 410: Gone" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/176481414:06
rbasakThe catch is that I want to properly specify what string *should* be used, given that we can't rely on the real name14:07
rbasakAnd a workaround for now will cause a second "hash-abi-break" (though we are still experimental)14:07
rbasakahasenack: removal-candidate> sure. I don't see why anyone would object to that. AIUI the bug would still be checked manually before actual removal but removing the tag would make it clearer.14:08
kstenerudAre special build commands necessary to build php 7.2.11 in cosmic? I've tried dpkg-buildpackage, but it fails partway through due to a permission error14:10
Odd_Blokerbasak: Thanks for the info. :)14:10
kstenerudI basically did git ubuntu clone php7.2, copied it to a builder, and dpkg-buildpackage14:11
cpaelzerkstenerud: importer/import/7.2.15-0ubuntu0.18.10.1 built for me - let me try the 7.2.11 as well14:38
cpaelzerkstenerud: works just fine on 7.2.11-3build2 as well14:39
cpaelzeras it comes out of git ubutnu clone14:39
cpaelzerI run git ubuntu export-orig to get the tarball14:39
cpaelzerand then dpkg-buildpkg works14:39
kstenerudhmm can't figure out what I'm doing wrong...14:40
cpaelzerkstenerud: are you breaking on dpkg-buildpackage or later on once you build the .dsc/.changes that got generated?14:40
kstenerudLiterally all I do is git ubuntu clone, put orig in the parent dir, run dpkg-buildpackage14:40
cpaelzerkstenerud: if you want join the standup call14:40
cpaelzerkstenerud: you can share your console and we can check step by step if you want14:40
kstenerudsure sec14:41
kstenerudcpaelzer: After sbuild fails, can I restart the build using dpkg-buildpackage, or is it a different command?16:24
=== lotuspsychje__ is now known as lotuspsychje
nacc_kstenerud: what's the exact error?19:01
johnfghi guys20:06
johnfgyesterday, I was going to install ubuntu-server-18.04.  I wanted to use an existing vg and lv's.20:06
johnfgHowever, the installer didn't recognize or show them.20:06
johnfgfrom ubuntuforums, they suggest to boot from the livecd to try without installing; install lvm2, then start the installation.20:07
johnfgIs there any other way to get the installer to recognize existing vgs and lvs?20:07
lordcirth_johnfg, I thought lvm2 was already on the installer? But if it isn't, yeah, you'd need to install it.20:07
lordcirth_But probably you just need to scan as mentioned in #ubuntu20:08
johnfgAll I know, is that unlike other distros, which see the volume groups and logical volumes, going right to install from the livecd, they aren't present.20:09
tomreynjohnfg: you need to use the alternative installer20:09
tomreynthe default installer doesn't allow you to work with existing structures.20:09
johnfgtomreyn: I'll have to boot it to choose it.  Can't try while in here.  This is my dual-booting machine (actually 3, fwiw).20:09
tomreynjohnfg: you can also do a chroot / debootstrap installation from the live / desktop installer20:11
tomreynubuntu-server-18.04 actually sounds like you were using the ("debian-installer" based) alternative/classic installer. the current default one contains "live" in the ISO file name.20:13
tomreynoh gone20:13
johnfgBack after a try...lvm2 is installed on the installer; lvscan --all recognized the volumes.20:28
compdoc\o/20:29
johnfgHowever, I couldn't install, as this is *not* the live iso, but just the server, so there wasn't any alternative installer.  and the volumes weren't shown and available.20:29
johnfgI just downloaded, and will burn the live server iso.  Think that's the problem?20:30
tomreynjohnfg: can you tell s which iso you're working with?20:30
tomreynlike, so far? getting the live server iso won't improve detection of existing storage structures.20:31
johnfgUbuntu-Server 18.04.2 LTS amd64 is what I have now.20:31
tomreynthat's not an iso name.20:31
tomreyni mean a file name20:31
johnfgubuntu-18.04.2-live-server-amd64.iso is what I was going to burn.20:32
johnfgtomreyn: Ok, I'll get you the other.20:32
tomreynso live-server is not what you want for this use case20:32
tomreynalternative server may work, not sure whether it detects existing lvms fine, you may need to help it a little there.20:33
tomreynor you go with the live/desktop installer and a manual installation via debootstrap.20:34
johnfgtomreyn: what alternative server are you talking about?20:34
tomreynthe installer that is also known as debian-installer, and that used to be the default server installer until and including ubuntu 16.04 LTS20:35
johnfgDo you think that this will work: ubuntu-18.04.2-server-amd64.iso?  That's from the alternatives (which I didn't notice before), if needing, e.g., lvm, on the server web page.20:37
johnfgtomreyn: What do you think of that last image I wrote?20:39
Odd_Blokejohnfg: That's the one Tom was directing you towards, so I think it's worth a try.20:39
johnfgOdd_Bloke: I agree.  Will burn and proceed and report back.  Thanks all!20:40
tomreynright. you may need to lvmscan from tty2 to convince the installer' partitioner to use the existing ones. not sure. try normally first.20:42
johnfgyeah, if it sees them then no problem.20:43
cpaelzerkstenerud: you just issue the sbuild again22:29
cpaelzerkstenerud: no need to re-build the .dsc/.changes22:30
runelind_qis Landscape On Prem 19.01 not available via dist-upgrade yet?23:58

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!