[01:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pam (bionic-proposed/main) [1.1.8-3.6ubuntu2 => 1.1.8-3.6ubuntu2.18.04.1] (core) [01:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pam (cosmic-proposed/main) [1.1.8-3.6ubuntu2 => 1.1.8-3.6ubuntu3] (core) [04:34] Hi, can an archive admin please poke fwupd in disco? It's awaiting publication due to UEFI binaries [05:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot amd64 [Xenial 16.04.6] has been marked as ready [05:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot i386 [Xenial 16.04.6] has been marked as ready [05:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop amd64 [Xenial 16.04.6] has been marked as ready [05:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop i386 [Xenial 16.04.6] has been marked as ready [05:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base amd64 [Xenial 16.04.6] has been marked as ready [05:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base arm64 [Xenial 16.04.6] has been marked as ready [05:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base armhf [Xenial 16.04.6] has been marked as ready [05:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base i386 [Xenial 16.04.6] has been marked as ready [05:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base powerpc [Xenial 16.04.6] has been marked as ready [05:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base ppc64el [Xenial 16.04.6] has been marked as ready [05:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base s390x [Xenial 16.04.6] has been marked as ready [07:41] why are fastqc and picard-tools autopkg tests triggered by openjdk-lts? [08:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: sway (disco-release/primary) [1.0~rc3-1] [08:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted sway [sync] (disco-release) [1.0~rc3-1] [09:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libsdl2 (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.0.8+dfsg1-1ubuntu1.18.04.1 => 2.0.8+dfsg1-1ubuntu1.18.04.3] (kubuntu) [10:03] bdmurray, it should be ok now [10:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure [amd64] (trusty-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1040.44~14.04.1] (kernel) [10:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure [amd64] (trusty-proposed) [4.15.0-1040.44~14.04.1] [11:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libreoffice (cosmic-proposed/main) [1:6.1.4-0ubuntu0.18.10.1 => 1:6.1.5-0ubuntu0.18.10.1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop) [11:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libreoffice-l10n (cosmic-proposed/main) [1:6.1.4-0ubuntu0.18.10.1 => 1:6.1.5-0ubuntu0.18.10.1] (ubuntu-desktop) [12:35] sil2100, if you have sru cycles please promote unattended-upgrades for cosmic and bionic, also please accept it to xenial-proposed [12:38] rbalint: on it [12:47] o/ sil2100 could you please approve upload in B & C for pam ? [12:51] slashd: will try! I'll be doing the .6 publishing dance soon though [12:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: qtbase-opensource-src (cosmic-proposed/main) [5.11.1+dfsg-7ubuntu2 => 5.11.1+dfsg-7ubuntu3] (kubuntu, qt5, ubuntu-desktop) [12:56] sil2100, ok no worries [12:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted unattended-upgrades [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.1ubuntu1.18.04.7~16.04.2] [13:21] juliank / sil2100: If you have a few minutes, do you feel like implementing a bit of wait/retry around uploading files to swift from the worker? I don't know if you're getting the spam I am, but swift is flaky as hell when it's replicating to new volumes and results are failing to upload properly. https://pastebin.canonical.com/p/wt9tgBtrMN/ [13:29] Laney: not sure if I'll have any cycles today, sadly [13:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pam [source] (cosmic-proposed) [1.1.8-3.6ubuntu3] [13:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pam [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.8-3.6ubuntu2.18.04.1] [13:36] bloop [13:37] * sil2100 is prepping the .6 release to go out [13:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Mythbuntu Desktop amd64 [Xenial 16.04.6] has been marked as ready [13:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Mythbuntu Desktop i386 [Xenial 16.04.6] has been marked as ready [13:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot arm64 [Xenial 16.04.6] has been marked as ready [13:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot armhf [Xenial 16.04.6] has been marked as ready [13:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot ppc64el [Xenial 16.04.6] has been marked as ready [13:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot s390x [Xenial 16.04.6] has been marked as ready [13:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu MATE Desktop amd64 [Xenial 16.04.6] has been marked as ready [13:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu MATE Desktop i386 [Xenial 16.04.6] has been marked as ready [13:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server amd64 [Xenial 16.04.6] has been marked as ready [13:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server arm64 [Xenial 16.04.6] has been marked as ready [13:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server armhf+raspi2 [Xenial 16.04.6] has been marked as ready [13:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server i386 [Xenial 16.04.6] has been marked as ready [13:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server powerpc [Xenial 16.04.6] has been marked as ready [13:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server ppc64el [Xenial 16.04.6] has been marked as ready [13:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server s390x [Xenial 16.04.6] has been marked as ready [13:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Xubuntu Desktop amd64 [Xenial 16.04.6] has been marked as ready [13:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Xubuntu Desktop i386 [Xenial 16.04.6] has been marked as ready [13:39] ^ I marked those images that were tested as ready [13:40] * willcooke checks desktop [13:40] yeah, marked already [13:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: haskell-secret-sharing (disco-proposed/primary) [1.0.0.3-6] [13:49] * Laney does it then [13:57] Laney: sorry, had a lunch break [13:57] np, feel free to review / fix the commit in master [14:00] now it's my turn to eat [14:13] Ok, publishing the images [14:22] sil2100, when you have a moment, would you mind accepting libreoffice{,-l10n} 1:6.1.5-0ubuntu0.18.10.1 into cosmic-proposed? [14:27] oSoMoN: will try o/ [14:36] thanks! [14:40] xnox hi, checking on systemd upload - unless you have one planned for today with the list of patches slashd emailed you, we're planning to upload systemd srus today - let us know asap please if you are planning to instead [14:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cinder (cosmic-proposed/main) [2:13.0.2-0ubuntu1 => 2:13.0.3-0ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server) === msalvatore_ is now known as msalvatore [15:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: curtin (cosmic-proposed/main) [18.1-59-g0f993084-0ubuntu1 => 18.2-10-g7afd77fa-0ubuntu1~18.10.1] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server) [15:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: resolvconf (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.79ubuntu10 => 1.79ubuntu10.18.04.1] (no packageset) [15:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: resolvconf (cosmic-proposed/universe) [1.79ubuntu10 => 1.79ubuntu10.18.10.1] (no packageset) [15:43] sil2100 i know you're super busy with the point release, but this resolvconf sru is for a regression fix; do you know if anyone else on the sru team is available to review/approve it? bdmurray or rbasak maybe? lp #1817903 [15:43] Launchpad bug 1817903 in resolvconf (Ubuntu Cosmic) "systemd-resolve appends "options edns0" to resolv.conf" [Critical,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1817903 [15:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: horizon (cosmic-proposed/main) [3:14.0.1-0ubuntu2 => 3:14.0.2-0ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server) [15:52] ddstreet: not sure, but hopefully I should be done with the image publishing in an hour or so [15:52] Might want to do a quick SRU shift then, since I basically skipped mine today (mostly) [15:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: curtin (bionic-proposed/main) [18.1-59-g0f993084-0ubuntu1~18.04.1 => 18.2-10-g7afd77fa-0ubuntu1~18.04.1] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server) [15:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: swift (cosmic-proposed/main) [2.19.0-0ubuntu1 => 2.19.1-0ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server) [15:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nova (cosmic-proposed/main) [2:18.0.3-0ubuntu2 => 2:18.1.0-0ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server) [15:54] ddstreet, sil2100: if it helps, the SRU makes sense to me, but I don't have time to do a full review right now :-/ [15:54] (and IMHO a detailed looks is necessary only because of the severity of the consequences of getting it wrong) [15:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: curtin (xenial-proposed/main) [18.1-59-g0f993084-0ubuntu1~16.04.1 => 18.2-10-g7afd77fa-0ubuntu1~16.04.1] (ubuntu-server) [15:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lmdb (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.9.21-1 => 0.9.21-1ubuntu2~bionic18.04] (kubuntu) [15:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lmdb (cosmic-proposed/universe) [0.9.22-1 => 0.9.22-1ubuntu1~bionic18.10] (kubuntu) [16:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lmdb (cosmic-proposed/universe) [0.9.22-1 => 0.9.22-1ubuntu1~cosmic18.10] (kubuntu) [16:04] bdmurray: uploads in response to your lmdb rejection message I think ^^ [16:54] retry thing seems to be working more or less [16:55] seems swift is saaaaaaaaaaaddddddddddd at the minute [16:56] doko: libcolt-free-java, reproducible for me in a disco env w/ LANG=C.UTF-8 [16:57] Laney: yeah I was noticing this, have you asked IS? [16:58] lol [17:00] think they know ;-) [17:00] * Laney snuggles wgrant [17:06] ...ok, 16.04.6 should be out [17:06] long live xenial [17:07] doko: so, run that sed command with LANG=C, so that sed doesn't refuse to process a line with invalid input [17:07] * sil2100 celebrates the release all by himself, dancing in the corner [17:07] (it's a very unimpressive release) [17:07] ;) [17:07] sil2100: :) well done, regardless [17:08] sil2100: every release is impressive in it's own way :) [17:08] Thanks ;p Let me send out the announcement then [17:09] Guess I'll wait for stuff to propagate first [17:09] well, we had a couple of incidents [17:09] so it certainly is a proper release :D [17:11] 'tis releasemanagering - it's all tested and ready to go, then respin :P [17:11] Congrats though :) [17:18] * doko hands sil2100 a kinnie [17:28] doko: better not! [17:28] ;) [17:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected lmdb [source] (cosmic-proposed) [0.9.22-1ubuntu1~bionic18.10] [17:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mutter (cosmic-proposed/main) [3.30.2-1~ubuntu18.10.3 => 3.30.2-1~ubuntu18.10.4] (desktop-extra, ubuntu-desktop) [18:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected fwupd [amd64] (disco-proposed) [1.2.4-3] [18:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected fwupd [i386] (disco-proposed) [1.2.4-3] [18:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected fwupd [arm64] (disco-proposed) [1.2.4-3] [18:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected fwupd [armhf] (disco-proposed) [1.2.4-3] [18:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwupd [amd64] (disco-proposed) [1.2.5-1] [18:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwupd [armhf] (disco-proposed) [1.2.5-1] [18:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwupd [arm64] (disco-proposed) [1.2.5-1] [18:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwupd [i386] (disco-proposed) [1.2.5-1] [19:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virt-manager (bionic-proposed/universe) [1:1.5.1-0ubuntu1.1 => 1:1.5.1-0ubuntu1.2] (no packageset) [23:13] ddstreet: hey! I had a quick look at the resolvconf change, but I think I'll have to defer the final review to someone else or actually pull in some expertise [23:13] I don't feel knowledgable enough to know the full consequences here [23:14] rbasak, vorlon: ^ can one of you guys take a look at it instead? [23:14] wince [23:14] It's resolvconf in cosmic and bionic [23:14] sil2100 thnx :) [23:14] I am not impartial; I tried to get the package removed for bionic [23:15] The change seems *sane*, but is that change desirable in bionic? [23:17] * sil2100 checks something [23:17] * ddstreet stepping away for dinner soon but will check back later in case there's any questions for me about resolvconf sru [23:22] ddstreet: I think the information you've included under regression-potential should actually be listed as test cases [23:24] So looking at it some more and getting some context, I personally feel this is the right thing to SRU [23:59] vorlon: are you reviewing this SRU? Or only took a look? [23:59] sil2100: I'm not holding any lock on it, anyway