[12:06] <jbicha> juliank: what about pushing your packagekit patch to Debian? If not, could you at least merge packagekit for a crash fix?
[12:10] <juliank> jbicha: merged
[12:10] <juliank> But yes, should send patch upstream
[12:12] <seb128> juliank, thx
[12:16] <acheronuk> O_o packagekit FTBFS
[12:17] <juliank> acheronuk: seems build deps cannot be resolved
[12:17] <juliank> gotta wait a bit I guess
[12:17] <juliank>  sbuild-build-depends-packagekit-dummy : Depends: docbook-utils but it is not going to be installed
[12:22] <juliank> I'll be trying something new and keep status logs for march in https://wiki.ubuntu.com/JulianAndresKlode/Status/1903, so you can get a sneak peak of what there will be from me in #ubuntu-meeting on the foundations meeting
[12:25] <seb128> juliank, did you want to maybe SRU https://github.com/hughsie/PackageKit/pull/306 ?
[12:25] <seb128> that segfault would be nice to see fixed in the lts
[12:25] <juliank> seb128: oh I guess that's the 3 bugs I was looking at this morning
[12:26] <seb128> right
[12:26] <seb128> which is the fix you just merged :p
[12:26] <juliank> seb128: I'd like to see this fixed, but I'm unsure how to test it
[12:27] <seb128> juliank, my usual testcase for those are "check that e.u.c get no reports of the issue for that version & make sure things keep working" which is often good enough for the SRU team
[12:27] <seb128> especially in case like tis where the the fix is an obvious one liner
[12:33] <juliank> seb128: ack
[12:34] <seb128> juliank, thx
[13:46] <LocutusOfBorg> klebers, LP: 1818049 do you need help, sponsors?
[19:50] <seb128> vorlon, hey, I'm not sure how often foundations look at rls-dd-incoming bugs so I'm mentioned that here in case it's more appropriate, bug #1818285 is blocking desktop isos to be moved from pending to current (we forced one this week though because the current was quite outdated)
[19:52] <vorlon> seb128: ack, I imagine bdmurray might have triaged it at some point soon, but let's do so directly now, thanks
[19:52] <seb128> vorlon, thx
[20:27] <vorlon> seb128: LP: #1814341> ouch, so fwupd included handling of a device from a 3rd-party vendor that lied and used Microsoft USB IDs? D:
[20:28] <vorlon> seb128: btw you'll also need an upload of fwupd-signed to go with this, I don't currently see one in the queue
[20:29] <seb128> vorlon, looks like so. Ah, thanks for pointing that out, I'm not familiar with fwupd ... is there anything special to do for -signed?
[20:29] <vorlon> seb128: the -signed packages are roughly no-change rebuilds, but you may have to manually twiddle versioned build-deps in debian/control and such
[20:30] <seb128> k, I see, taking http://launchpadlibrarian.net/387738423/fwupd-signed_1.1_1.2.diff.gz as an exampke
[20:30] <seb128> vorlon, I do that now
[20:35] <seb128> vorlon, uploaded